The World's First Coup D'Internet

  • Bob Fertik's picture
    Bob Fertik
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I've been following political uses of the Internet since the very beginning, but this one is a shocker. A top GOP lobbying firm in DC is using the Internet to overthrow Prime Minister Maliki. Shall we call it a Coup D'Internet?

Right-Wing Operatives Plot To Overthrow Maliki, Replace Him With Reliable Collaborator Allawi

The powerful Republican lobbying group of Barbour Griffith & Rogers is plotting an effort to displace Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and supplant him with former interim Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi. IraqSlogger reported:

BGR’s work for Allawi includes the August 17 purchase of the Web site domain Allawi-for-Iraq.com.

In recent days, BGR sent hundreds of e-mail messages in Allawi’s name from the e-mail address DrAyadAllawi@Allawi-for-Iraq.com.

I had trouble believing this so I tried to visit Allawi-for-Iraq.com. Sure enough it has been registered, but it is under construction. Then I checked WHOIS and sure enough, the site is owned by BGR.

Until now, American coup d'etats were done by the CIA and in secret. Why?

For starters, the guy you're trying to overthrow usually has a military, and said military usually think it's perfectly ok to use their weapons to kill anyone trying to overthrow their Commander-in-Chief, either at home or abroad. Has BGR built itself a hardened underground bunker capable of withstanding an Iraqi military attack?

Second, the Logan Act passed in 1799 prohibits private U.S. citizens from engaging in foreign policy. The proverbial ham sandwich could convict BGR of breaking this law.

So what on earth is going on here?

Obviously Bush has "decidered" to throw Maliki under the bus:

On Thursday, the administration is planning to make public parts of a sober new report by American intelligence agencies expressing deep doubts that the Maliki government can overcome sectarian differences. Government officials who have seen the report say it gives a bleak outlook on the chances Mr. Maliki can meet milestones intended to promote unity in Iraq.

But Bush doesn't want to dump Maliki publicly because he'd appear to be caving to Hillary Clinton:

On Wednesday, as a second Democratic senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, called for Mr. Maliki to quit, he lashed out at American lawmakers who have questioned his competence.

Also Bush has repeatedly called Maliki the "right man for the job" and staged photo ops with him at the White House. And Bush certainly doesn't want to flip-flop like John Kerry!

Mr. Bush — who on Tuesday confessed to “a certain level of frustration” with the Iraqi government — responded by using Wednesday’s speech to try to shore up Mr. Maliki. “Prime Minister Maliki is a good guy, a good man with a difficult job,” he said, “and I support him.”

So Bush wants Maliki gone, but doesn't want to do the dirty deed himself. Like everything else, Bush has outsourced this Coup D'Etat. 

But if BGR doesn't have its own troops, how exactly will they pull off this coup? Are they just hoping to scare Maliki into retiring? Is unveiling Allawi-for-Iraq.com the Internet version of putting a Godfather-style horse's head in Maliki's bed? When the site is built, will it feature a photoshopped version of Maliki's head in a noose - in case they think Maliki is too stupid to take a hint?

If so, that speaks volumes about how pathetic Bush's Iraq policy has become, and how little influence he has over the Iraqi government. In the good old days, U.S. Ambassadors delivered not-so-subtle messages like this in private. Is Maliki refusing to meet with Ambassador Crocker, thus requiring web sites to get his attention? Will Bush buy the search term "Maliki" in hopes of catching him Googling?

If I were Maliki, I'd reply in kind by registering domains like Allawi-Is-A-U-S-Puppet.com, Over-My-Dead-Body.com, and - going right to the source - Go-Cheney-Yourself.com.

Or if he wants to hit Bush where it really hurts, try Gore-For-America.com.

Comments

MALICKI

  • AARON SCHWINGER's picture
    AARON SCHWINGER
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

ITS ABOUT TIME WE GOT RID OF THIS PILE
OF DUNG (NICE WORD FOR S--T) CALLED MALICKI!!!!!!!! HOW MANY MORE OF OUR YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN WILL DIE OR BE DISABLED DEFENDING THIS TRASH.
BUSH-ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND DEFENDING
THIS SNAKE?????? THE ANSWER IS A RESOUNDING YES!!!!
A. SCHWINGER
NEW JERSEY

AARON, I doubt that many of our members would disagree...

with your comment. Many of us believe that Bush really has no mind to start with--what he does have is an overworked brainstem.

That said, to use all caps to get your message across equates to screaming on the net. Try hard not to do this in the future.

A mind once expanded can never return to its original dimensions.

Anne Hathaway: 1556-1623

The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.

Gotta get it off my chest..........

  • DIERIGJ's picture
    DIERIGJ
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

 

 

Mr. Maliki you are a mirror image of our own "DO NOTHING" GW Bush!   Get off your camel-riding arse and

bring your people back from their undeserved month long vacation and get on with it.   You govern as well as our

own BOZO does!    People in this country hate you as much as we hate Bush.    I'm tired of my tax dollars lining

your pockets.   I'm tired of seeing your smug face on TV.   At least when Saddam Hussein was on TV, he

had a commanding presence.   You on the other hand are a weak spineless puppet of GW Bush. 

 I'm tired of you living in the Green Zone under our protection, while our boys are in harms way. 

To most Americans, you shite, sunni, and kurds are all the same.   If you can't work out your differences now,

you never will.   Al qaida isn't the problem.......your ineptness is!   Whatever the sunnis hand you when we do

pull out will be well deserved;  hopefully something similar to that of Hussein's end.

 

Why should ONE more American soldier die supporting you and your kind?

Thanks to the NYT article over the weekend, the truth about the loyalty of the Iraqi soldiers doesn't lie with

the American soldiers.

 

The time has come................TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY!!!!!!!!!

 

 

It's Bush Double-Speak, or He's Just Plain Crazy

  • Chip's picture
    Chip
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

And it was only yesterday that Bush said: "Bush's remarks appear to be a new attempt to pile pressure on the Iraqi administration, and came on the same day as US Ambassador in Baghdad Ryan Crocker described its performance as "extremely disappointing."

"If the government doesn't respond to the demands of the people, they will replace the government. That's up to the Iraqis to make that decision, not American politicians," Bush said in Montebello, Canada."

Yeah, right, that's why a high-powered Republican lobbyist firm is in the mix the next day...

[Italics mine].

Refresher on Allawi: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iyad_Allawi

In particular, note:

In preparation for the next parliamentary elections that took place in Iraq in December 2005, Allawi formed an alliance between many groups, including secular Sunni and Shia groups and the Iraqi Communist Party under one electoral list (the Iraqi National List). However, despite a slick advertising campaign, and despite high expectations, this list performed extremely poorly in the polls. It only managed to secure 25 seats in the national assembly, a net loss of 15 seats since the January 2005 elections.

The Iraqi National List was represented in the coalition governmment led by Nouri al-Maliki, but Allawi himself did not take a Cabinet post. The party eventually boycotted the government in 2007.

Is Bush doing a Vietnam Redux? Why would I say that? Well, notice that one group in membership on the Iraqi National List is the Iraqi Communist Party. And there's no doubt that Bush's analogy of Iraq to Vietnam (which Bush formerly vehemently and repeatedly rejected) is striking a nerve in Vietnam.

People in Vietnam, where opposition to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq is strong, said Thursday that Bush drew the wrong conclusions from the long, bloody Southeast Asian conflict.

"Doesn't he realize that if the U.S. had stayed in Vietnam longer, they would have killed more people?" said Vu Huy Trieu of Hanoi, a veteran of the communist forces that fought American troops in Vietnam. "Nobody regrets that the Vietnam War wasn't prolonged except Bush."

He said U.S. troops could never have prevailed here. "Does he think the U.S. could have won if they had stayed longer? No way," Trieu said.