.Barack Obama

We Just Stopped Congress From Giving the Power of War to Presidents

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

"What's the point?"  "We never win!"  "Why bother trying?"
 
This time we won.

This is the point.  Congressman Buck McKeon and Senator John McCain proposed to give Obama and all future presidents dramatically expanded powers to launch wars.  They wanted to do so as part of the same "Defense Authorization Act" in which the House was restricting Obama's warmaking in Libya. 

Activist groups like RootsAction pushed back.  A great deal of support was generated for an amendment to strip the offending language out in the House, but the amendment failed.  RootsAction, and other organizations, demanded that the Senate remove it:

They Question Where He Was Born But Are Trying to Give Him Absolute Power

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Beneath the noisy blather about where the president was born and the whole superficial pretense of disagreement and fundamental opposition between elected Republicans and Democrats, top Republicans in the House and Senate are attempting to give President Obama and his successors from whichever party absolute power to make war and absolute power to imprison.

Tom Andrews has blogged on this here.

There is legislation in both houses that would update the Authorization to Use Military Force passed a decade ago and purporting to legalize wars fought against those behind the 9-11 attacks. This new version would allow any president to start any war against "al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces," as well as "nations, organizations, and persons who are part of or substantially supporting" any of the above.

Obama on Libya: What Would MLK Say?

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

President Obama on Monday said he would "never hesitate" to use the U.S. military "unilaterally" to defend "interests" and "values," including "maintaining the flow of commerce." Fear of exactly that led the founders of this republic to give Congress the exclusive power to declare war. James Madison did not believe any single individual could be trusted with such power:

"The strongest passions and most dangerous weaknesses of the human breast, ambition, avarice, vanity, the honorable or venal love of fame, are all in conspiracy against the desire and duty of peace."

Obama Gets Asked a Good Question - Amazing

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

This is from Dennis Trainor at NoCureForThat



Thursday, during a live video streaming event from the White House, I got to ask President Obama a fair question, but one that is never asked of him in the mainstream media: “How is your PREVENTATIVE war policy different than the Bush doctrine, and can you refute the assessment of MLK that the US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world?” - DT

Obama Was Created by Our Failure to Impeach Bush

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By David Swanson

Remarks at the Rutherford Institute, June 16, 2010
Video of these remarks and the following Q&A posted at
http://afterdowningstreet.org/rutherford

I want to save most of the time we have for your questions, so I'll be brief and I'll start with a couple of questions for you. And then I want you to think of questions for me, because otherwise I'll just go on and on about what I want to talk about.

Who can tell me who said this and where they said it?
"I -- like any head of state -- reserve the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend my nation." -- President Barack Obama, asserting the illegal and unconstitutional power to make war, in a Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech in Oslo, Norway.

What about this one -- who and where?

Obama Scraps Iraq Withdrawal

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By David Swanson

So, we elected a president who promised a withdrawal from Iraq that he, or the generals who tell him what to do, is now further delaying. And, of course, the timetable he's now delaying was already a far cry from what he had promised as a candidate.

What are we to think? That may be sad news, but what could we have done differently? Surely it would have been worse to elect a president who did not promise to withdraw, right?

The Democratic Party's Plan To THROW The Next Couple Elections

  • thepen's picture
    thepen
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Facing reality is a tough job but somebody's got to do it. And we foretell for you the events of the future NOT because we want them to happen, but to get you to act to keep them from happening. But to do that you need an action page, so here it is.

Put The Public Option Up For A Vote: www.peaceteam.net/action/pnum1038.php

And now we will explain why this action page is so critical. To understand the current political dynamic, first you must understand that the Democrats are PLANNING on losing the next couple election cycles. UNTIL you understand that, the events to unfold in the next couple years (unless you act to derail them) will make no sense to you.

Rep Delahunt Backs War to Please Obama

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By David Swanson

Add Congressman Bill Delahunt to the list of misrepresentatives who claim to oppose wars when a Republican is president but agree to support them when a Democrat moves into the White House.

When Bush was president, Delahunt sometimes voted for war funding bills and sometimes voted against them. The inclusion in the bills of lipstick measures, such as relief for hurricane victims, etc., was not a decisive factor. Delahunt appears to have voted No when the Democratic leadership was most accepting of that action. But, with all the Republicans voting Yes, there was never a chance of a No vote actually helping to block funding.

A Fable for Our Time

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By David Swanson

Several years ago we started a community garden where I live.  We worked at it quite energetically.  We got more and more people involved.  Much of the hardest work involved digging irrigation ditches to bring water to the soil.

We made progress slowly.  We brought water to little corners of the garden.  But the work was exhausting, and some people burned out and needed to take a break.  Usually they'd be back within a year and working shoulder-to-shoulder with the rest of us again.

The work was hard but extremely enjoyable.  The camaraderie of it was a benefit whether or not the garden was yet prospering.  It was very properly called a community garden.

Syndicate content