For reference:
The key questions to ask are:
Do you agree that invading Iraq on the basis of lies is an impeachable offense?
Do you agree that allowing prisoners to be tortured is an impeachable offense?
Do you agree that wiretapping countless innocent Americans without a warrant is an impeachable offense?
Do you agree that nullifying laws with signing statements is an impeachable offense?
If you agree that one or more are impeachable offenses, what will it take for you to publicly support impeachment?

How dangerous is it to ask verb-led questions (as above), when one of the possible answers is "no," an answer we do not want. Other answers we wouldn't want might be "maybe" (the worst possible), "I don't know," "I'd have to think about it," etc.

How much better to ask interrogatively-led questions, such as who, when, where, which, why, &/or how. ex. "What do you think should happen when your president violates the Constitution?"

How much better to help citizen-voters to discover for themselves that impeachment is the answer to some trying questions? When most people know the word, impeachment, how much better to let them say it first, like they were the one who discovered it and told us?