Impeach Bush & Cheney!
"Google" your Voter Registration
Register to Vote
Visit the Democratic Party
User loginNavigation |
Primary Against Dutch Ruppersberger (MD-2)EVENTS
VENUE:
375 W. Padonia Rd., Ste. 200
Timonium, MD 21093 starts: 09/09/2008 - 10:42pm
Democrats.com is looking for an "aggressive progressive" Democrat who will challenge Ruppersberger in a Democratic primary in 2008. Read our Candidate Guide. If you are interested in running against Ruppersberger, or know a good candidate who could run against Ruppersberger, post a comment below.
|
What's HotReplace Bush Democrats!
Let's Escrow Our Money to Keep Obama Progressive Out of Iraq - Not Another Penny! Honk to Impeach - it's fun Local: connect with Democrats.com members in your State, County, and Congressional District Are you really registered to vote? "Google" your voter registration to find out Ten Reasons to Impeach Bush & CheneyOut of Iraq PetitionForumsPollShould Congress Give Bush Another $102 Billion for Iraq? Yes: give Bush $102 billion more for Iraq 2% No: do not give Bush $102 billion more for Iraq and tell him to use existing funds to bring our troops safely home. 98% Not sure 1% Total votes: 26480 Protest and Organize! |
Christopher C. Boardman to replace Dutch Ruppersberger (MD-2)
I would like to see Christopher C. Boardman replace Dutch Ruppersberger (MD-2). Ruppersberger doesn't speak for progressives.
Below is a portion of his bio and a couple of his reponses to questions re the invasion, etc.
Elected offices/civic activities:
Past president, Joppatowne Civic Association, First Democratic Club; president, Joppatowne Community Center Inc.; past secretary, Joppatowne Recreation Council; past chair, South Hanford Community Coalition.
Why should voters elect you?
"I will vote against Iraq war appropriations, unlike the incumbent. We need to turn around U.S. Mideast policy with negotiations and conflict resolution."
What do you think is the most urgent problem facing your jurisdiction?
"The Mideast war and the need for revitalized energy policies deeply affect the residents of the 2nd District. War expenditures of $311 billion average $715 million per congressional district. This money could have been spent for building light-rail commuter systems to lessen energy dependence and traffic congestion. A proactive, peaceful foreign policy that assists with economic development abroad would better enhance our security. We need to open negotiation with old adversaries including Syria, Iran and Cuba. New talks with Mexico should also be scheduled to address a number of outstanding issues."
RON PAUL endorses Richard Matthews
Congressman Ron Paul endorses Richard Matthews, Congressional candidate for the 2nd Congressional District of Maryland.
Moderator's Note: Republican propaganda removed.
Matthews and Paul are for LOWER incomes for the Majority!
I don't want "spending" cut when it reduces income for the woefully underpaid majority: Soldiers, Cops, Researchers, Laborers, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------
Do you want a simple tax code?
A revenue neutral one?
How about this:
This returns capital to the vast majority who provide the labor and innovation. It does so by withdrawing it from dead wood who maintain their silly incomes via the inertia of wealth NOT via labor or innovation.
---------------------------------------------------------------
But is this ethical?
YES as it is exactly what Aristocrats do to prevent Monarchy/Monopoly at the top. They, via the voting booth, spread the wealth around. The above is nothing different in kind.
Further, folks should pay for services rendered. In part: Wars are fought to defend a Nation's wealth. Folks should pay in PROPORTION to the wealth they need defending. In addition, since they lack the shear number of bodies to defend that wealth, they should pay additional amounts to cover the number of bodies that are torn to shreds defending that wealth.
Jim
Matthews is a Republican.
Matthews is a Republican. Why wouldn't another Libertarian/Republican, Ron Paul, endorse him? I suspect that you are on the wrong website...
Valid Libertarian Arguments:
To all Democrats who shrink from discussing the IRS in this light, I have an observation and a question:
- The essential counter argument from some Democrats is "Sure Democrats should help folks, but let's not be too blatant about it".
- My question is, if all Democrats are doing is "helping" someone via these "programs," then how exactly do you counter what Libertarians bring up? Namely, that "taking the shirt off another man's back, to clothe the shirtless, is wrong".
The Libertarian argument is valid and needs to be addressed.
My claim is simply that Democrats are NOT doing that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------