Politician Caught Using Prostitute!

  • Bob Fertik's picture
    Bob Fertik
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Senator David Vitter is a rightwing Republican from Louisiana who consistently voted against abortion and gay rights and campaigned on a strict puritanical religious-right platform. Remember this?

In early July 2007, Vitter's phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, also known as the "D.C. Madam", which is accused by the U.S. government of being a prostitution service. Hustler magazine identified the phone number and contacted Vitter's office to ask about his connection to Palfrey... Phone records show that Vitter's number was called by Palfrey's service five times, the first on October 12, 1999, and the last on February 27, 2001. Two calls were placed while House roll call votes were in progress.

So did the Corporate Media, the political establishment, and the Religious Right demand Vitter's resignation? Of course not.

So why are they all demanding Gov. Spitzer's resignation?

As for the legal implications,

On November 13, 2007, the attorney for Palfrey served Vitter with a subpoena to force him to testify at a November 28, 2007 hearing about whether an act of prostitution occurred with a Palfrey escort and when. The following week, the judge in the case canceled the hearing. Palfrey's attorney indicated he planned to subpoena Vitter to testify at her 2008 criminal trial.

We'll be carefully watching how the Corporate Media covers this case - and how the Justice Department prosecutes it. And if Spitzer gets harsher treatment than Vitter, we'll raise holy hell.

Update 1: Jane Hamsher asks all the right questions:

1. Why would the bank tell the IRS and not Spitzer himself if there was a suspicious transfer? Spitzer is a longtime client, a rich guy and the governor. We're talking thousands of dollars here, not millions. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense that they spotted a "suspicious transfer" made by the governor, and that this is how things began. It's possible it was just ordinary paperwork the bank had to file with the government whenever some particular flag was raised, but if that's the case, why did the DoJ go to DefCon 3?

2. What is a USA doing prosecuting a prostitution case? This isn't normally what the feds spend their time with.

3. Mike Garcia is a Chertoff crony. Sources familiar with the investigation say that he sent a prosecution memo to DC two months ago asking for authority to indict a public figure (Spitzer). Which means they had their case made long before the wire tap of February 13. Why did they then include this line from that conversation in the complaint?

LEWIS continued that from what she had been told "he" (believed to be a reference to Client-9) "would ask you to do things that, like, you might not think were safe -- you know -- I mean that...very basic things...."Kristen" responded: "I have a way of dealing with that...I'd be like listen dude, you really want the sex?...You know what I mean."

This salacious detail does not seem like it's necessary to make their case, and appears to be added for no other purpose than to destroy Spitzer's career.

4. How did Spitzer's name get leaked to the media, and who did it? Didn't happen to Dave Vitter.

5. Why did Mike Bloomberg suddenly start talking about running for governor recently? And why did he give $500,000 to Joe Bruno? He's good buddies with Mike Mukasey. What did he know and how did he know it?

6. The Mann Act? Are you kidding?

7. Spitzer's been in the line of fire of the GOP hit squad for a while. Roger Stone, Roger Stone, Roger Stone.

Comments

"Wag the Dog" two-fer?

  • Thomasina Paine's picture
    Thomasina Paine
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Given that the Senate is having hearings on corruption relating to Iraq which has multiple ties to Cheney's current and past corporate connections, the TIMING (not to mention the spirit) of the Spitzer charges feel like a version of "Wag the Dog:" a "two-fer" to get rid of a dangerous politician, while diverting the press from what Cheney and Friends have been doing in Iraq (as well as from WHY Admiral Fallon is resigning). The Senate hearings look like TRUE grounds for impeachment to me. The timing couldn't have been better for the Cheney-Bush crew.

The Senate Hearings were an updated version of "Iraq 4 Sale." It's only gotten worse since that movie was made.

"Wag the Dog" two-fer?: correction

  • Thomasina Paine's picture
    Thomasina Paine
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I meant to post tp the Spitzer thread. Apologies for what I hope will be a redundant post. However Hamster's post (which I hadn't read before I posted) is great support for my hypothesis.