Obama Wins Debate #1

According to all the overnight polls below, voters chose Obama as the winner. But why?

My theory is that The Real McCain finally came across: angry, cocky, belligerent, and snide. Even though McCain is famous among Senators for his rage, he normally goes to extraordinary lengths to keep his anger out of public view by covering it with his forced and creepy smile. But last night he forgot his smile and let just enough of his anger and contempt loose to turn people off. He certainly lost Chris Matthews:

So why did McCain fail to conceal his anger and contempt? Was it because he's terrified about trailing in the polls and losing ground? Or because he really is contemptuous of Barack Obama? I suspect it's more the latter. And I suspect he simply hates Obama because he (a) is smarter, (b) more charming, (c) didn't spend 6 years suffering in a POW camp, (d) has a truly loving family, and (e) is black.

(Psychiatrists and primate behavior specialists are offering another explanation: that McCain is afraid of Obama, so he refused to look at him to avoid reinforcing his fear. So while McCain's attitude might not be actual contempt, that's the impression he conveyed by refusing to look at him.)

Whatever the reasons, The Real McCain may be an effective debater, but he's not appealing. And he's certainly not the guy you'd rather have a beer with because you'd probably end up with a broken jaw.

CBS: Obama won 39% to John McCain's 25% with 36% saying the debate was a draw.

Nearly half of those uncommitted voters who watched the debate said that their image of Obama changed for the better as a result. Just eight percent say their opinion of Obama got worse, and 46 percent reported no change in their opinions.

McCain saw less improvement in his image. Thirty-two percent have improved their image of McCain as a result of the debate, but 21 percent said their views of him are now worse than before.

Why did voters' image of Obama improve? Many volunteered that they were impressed by his poise and knowledge about the issues, that he was more knowledgeable about the issues than they thought previously. When it came to McCain, those same voters said he "didn’t control himself well under pressure," that he was "angry and bad-tempered," and that he "talked too much about the past."

CNN

Men were nearly evenly split between the two candidates, with 46 percent giving the win to McCain and 43 percent to Obama. But women voters tended to give Obama higher marks, with 59 percent calling him the night's winner, while just 31 percent said McCain won

Nate Silver:

TPM has the internals of the CNN poll of debate-watchers, which had Obama winning overall by a margin of 51-38. The poll suggests that Obama is opening up a gap on connectedness, while closing a gap on readiness.

Specifically, by a 62-32 margin, voters thought that Obama was "more in touch with the needs and problems of people like you". This is a gap that has no doubt grown because of the financial crisis of recent days. But it also grew because Obama was actually speaking to middle class voters. Per the transcript, McCain never once mentioned the phrase "middle class" (Obama did so three times). And Obama’s eye contact was directly with the camera, i.e. the voters at home. McCain seemed to be speaking literally to the people in the room in Mississippi, but figuratively to the punditry. It is no surprise that a small majority of pundits seemed to have thought that McCain won, even when the polls indicated otherwise; the pundits were his target audience.

More Nate Silver:

The CBS poll of undecideds has more confirmatory detail. Obama went from a +18 on "understanding your needs and problems" before the debate to a +56 (!) afterward. And he went from a -9 on "prepared to be president" to a +21.

Stan Greenberg/Democracy Corps:

Of our 45 initial undecided voters, a quarter moved to Obama and a quarter to McCain after the debate with the rest remaining undecided. Moreover, by a 38 to 27 percent margin these voters said that Obama won this debate.

A look at the underlying numbers shows that Obama made important gains that could endure through Election Day. These undecided voters had a strong positive reaction to Obama on a personal level. Before the debate, just 40 percent viewed Obama positively, but this skyrocketed to 69 percent after the debate – a remarkable 29-point gain that left him more personally popular than McCain despite this group’s conservative leanings. He also made large strides on being seen as independent, from 44 percent to 65 percent. And in head-to-head matchups against McCain, Obama made significant gains on who "shares your values" and is "on your side."

McCain did not fair as well. His personal standing also improved, but not to nearly the same degree as Obama’s. And while he made impressive gains on being a "maverick," he actually lost slight ground on "offering a different path than Bush," showing that these gains were more about style than substance.

Insider Advantage reports those polled Obama won 42% to McCain's 41% with Undecided 17%

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Debate

This debate did a couple things to encourage my belief in one candidate's stand on who I'd like to see move into the White House. It also re-enforced my belief that the other candidate will not be straight forward with us on national issues, as well as not being able to get out of his yester-year mind set.
I would have liked to hear Obama put McCain in his place about the surge results in Iraq.I am very thankful that the violence and killing has slowed down because of the troop build-up. But, lets compare apples with apples and oranges with oranges. We, the American People were told by the present Adminstration, that these troops were being sent to Iraq for security reasons that would allow the Iraqi Government, the security to make mark improvements in their Ruling tasks for their country.
I haven't heard anything about any requests to use Geoge W Bush's " MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" banner to proclaim the success of the Iraqi Government's advancing to that end [ OR EVEN CLOSE].
THE WHITE HOUSE has been changing their stories, and the reasons of their failures, to confuse the American People about what the orginial plan and purpose really was at the time. simply look at our invasion of Afganistan due to the 9/11 attacks. Then we invaded Iraq because of [in-part] the Iraqi leadership was a pardaner-ship with Bin Laden and the 9/11 bombings of the USA. When it was proven that Hussien had nothing to do with Bin Laden or the 9/11 bombings, it became a War on terror. The truth of the matter is that the terrorist organizations that are in Iraq today, were not there until George W Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq.And guess what, John McCain still supports staying in Iraq. His statement saying "We are finally winning the war, is no more than a pie in the sky remark that he has stuck in his mind, probably forever. It appears he is unable to face the real truths, and move ahead.
He also appears that he has a difficult time of offering his ideas to improve what this country needs to go forward. Once again he appears to be stuck on blame someone else for everything.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.