Hackett Manhandles GOP Talking-Points Action Figure
As a Veteran myself, it pains me any time I see a fellow Vet humiliated. But tonight it was worth it because a) The Iraq war Vet in question so thoroughly deserved it and b) the smackdown was delivered primarily by another Veteran, Paul Hackett of Ohio.
The venue was MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews tonight and the person getting his comeuppance was Van Taylor, a Republican Iraq war Veteran who is running for the House of Representatives against Democrat Chet Edwards in Texas.
Taylor, who appeared to have carefully studied one 3X5 card from the Republican National Committee in preparation for his appearance tonight, was almost comically unprepared and could only manage to hit the usual GOP talking points no matter what Matthews asked him or how Hackett responded.
It was the usual stuff: "We need to stay in Iraq until we get the job done." "We need to fight them there, because if we don’t fight them there, we're gonna have to fight them here."
You know the drill.
When Matthews hit him on the fact that almost nobody in Iraq is being killed by Al Qaeda -- because Taylor kept bringing Al Qaeda into the picture -- the befuddled Texan could only go back to his prepared script.
"We need to be in Iraq because of Al Qaeda and we cannot leave Iraq until Al Qaeda is eradicated from that country."
There's a long pause before Matthews blurts out "But those are talking points!"
But then Hackett jumps in and really schools Taylor on how, if he's going to appear on television to defend Bush's disastrous policies in Iraq, he better come with more than a handful of GOP talking points.
Here's Hackett:
"What you're watching [in Iraq] is chaos, pandemonium, civil war. This is not something that's going to happen in the future, if we leave because we are going to leave. It's something that is happening every single day in Iraq because this administration has mismanaged this war, has mismanaged the military, has redirected the military, has ignored the advice of the military leaders and has made America the laughing stock of the world.
"They have depleted our prestige, the have depleted our strength as a country and, frankly, Mr. Taylor is an apologist for this failed mission, lack of policy, lack of strategy, lack of goal-oriented mission accomplishment. There is no goal. There is no strategy. There is no plan. This administration is floundering on the world stage and you and I are paying the price for it."
But enough about my take on it… Please go to Crooks and Liars and watch the entire clip.
I guess when 10 of 11* Veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are running for Congress as Democrats, the Republicans had to take whoever they could get.
What they got, was Ken Mehlman Jr.
You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at BobGeiger.com.
* In the sentence referenced above, I had originally said that there were 51 Iraq war Veterans running for Congress this year. This is incorrect. It is, in fact, 11 Vets of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- and in some cases, both -- running and only one of those is a Republican. There are a total of 50 Veterans, from all periods of military service, and not only the Iraq war, running as Democrats. I regret the error.
- Bob Geiger's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version- Send to friend










Watch Hackett! Its worth the eight minutes of your time!
Watch Hackett! Its worth the eight minutes of your time!
Chris Matthews finally does the job of an itellectually and factually curious journalist and pretty much nails repug Tailor to the cross.
Hackett hatches the apologist in grand fashion as well.
"If being liberal means critical thinking and informed dissent, instead of blind obedience and ignorant nationalism, then I am all for it!"
Republican Robots
Submarine USS Wahoo ss238
They seem like robots who speak about the same thing
over and over again, their talking points that havn't
changed for almost 5years now.
You see there were no insurgents, no Al-Kida, and no
so called terrorists in Iraq before Bush illegally invaded
that country, yes Saddam was a bad guy, very bad.
But removing him from power was not worth 2600 brave US Soldiers.
It is disturbingly pathetic.
It is disturbingly pathetic. Taylor looked like a deer caught in the headlights when Matthews, said, "Those are talking points, sir, answer the question."
He must have forgot his Rovian earpiece that night!
It really was a momentous occasion, Hacket really smacked him around and he did not have any answers to Matthews questions...as goes the same for any other Bush supporter.
So the question is still out there: "Why did we go to war then??" No 9/11 ties, no WMD's....
"If being liberal means critical thinking and informed dissent, instead of blind obedience and ignorant nationalism, then I am all for it!"
Carol Francis It was
Carol Francis
It was priceless. Why can't other Democrats show such spunk!
Really, the bushies know they have a civil war on their hands and they have chosen sides - The Sunis (remember those folks they ousted along with Saddam?). It won't be long now before the Iraq Shia government is publically rejected by the bushies - it has been privately but no one will admit it. It would make George look like the dumb-a.... he is. Bush's Arab buddies cannot abide shia rule in Iraq or anywhere else and Iran is also Shia, as is Hezbollah, etc. What a mess this guy has made. I cannot understand why he is given any respect from anyone here or abroad - It is surreal to watch the evening news programs.
Oh, by the way, even the Arabs have begun to take their oil elsewhere. I suspect they, too, are finding George too unstable to deal with.