Is George W. Bush a sexual pervert, rapist and pedophile?

Society has a right and obligation to protect children from sex offenders. I recognize that people have a right to privacy and that sex between consenting adults, whether gay or straight, is no one’s business except the participants. But when sex occurs without consent, which is rape, or when sex involves children, society must intervene. The case of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski involved two consenting adults. While their behavior may not have been appropriate by some standards it was no one’s business except their own. Many millions of tax dollars were spent and numerous laws broken nosing into and uncovering their private lives. The mainstream media provided headlines accompanied by excruciating detail, including the shape of Clinton’s penis, etc. This was politically motivated, mean-spirited and totally inappropriate. While any scurrilous rumor about Clinton, substantiated or not, received wide publicity allegations and even known facts about GOP poster boys like Newt Gingrich almost always go unreported. An example is the story that Ronald Reagan raped a young actress named Selene Walters after seeing her in a bar and forcing his way into her apartment. That was before the term “date rape” had been coined and, to be fair to date rapists, Walters described the scene in interviews with People Magazine and Kitty Kelley and said it was not date rape because “I didn't have a chance to have a date with him”. All of Reagan’s dalliances went nowhere in the media because Reagan, who was divorced, got Nancy pregnant before their wedding and slapped around his daughter, was the moral exemplar for conservative republicans who control the portals of power in so much of our national media. Had the story been known perhaps Reagan, who provided lavish funding for Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, and was involved in helping nazi’s and other fascist war criminals immigrate into the U.S. after WW II, might never have been elected. Flash forward to today. The Internet has been filled with numerous stories about George W. Bush’s private life. Most of these, like the story about Bush’s alleged affair with Tammy Phillips, a partner in a workout gym in Carrolltown, TX, fall into the category of private business between consenting adults. Even though Phillips claims she has “evidence” I don’t think the matter should be investigated. However the allegation that Bush had sex with a 15-year-old minor is a different story. Society has an obligation in cases involving child abuse or rape, in this case statutory rape, to investigate. I realize that people who do not support Bush’s political agenda could have made the story up. But that is a good reason to investigate the case and, if it is untrue, then clear Bush’s name and expose whoever started the rumor. Let’s go back for a minute to the many allegations about Bill Clinton, for example that he had an affair with Gennifer Flowers. This allegation was widely disseminated in the national news but on investigation it was found that Flowers had been paid $125,000 for the story by a supermarket tabloid and $50,000 by a group called the “Concerned Republicans”. She had denied the same allegations 2 years before under oath, and she claimed the tryst occurred at a hotel that was not built until 2 years after the alleged rendezvous. In this case efforts by GOP operatives to smear Clinton were exposed and the republicans, who have been so successful in using sexual innuendo to ruin opponents careers and lives, were unsuccessful. In Bush’s case the alleged facts are these: In the winter of 1971 George W. Bush was dating a woman whose maiden name was Robin Lowman, now Robin Garner. Miss Lowman became pregnant by Mr. Bush, who would have been 25 years old at the time and legally an adult. Bush, and or members of his family, helped arrange an abortion which, in those days before Roe v. Wade, was illegal in Texas. The alleged abortion took place at the Twelve Oaks Hospital in Houston (now called the Bayou City Medical Center). As far as I have been able to determine there is no statute of limitations for prosecuting statutory rape in Texas. I do not know if the allegations are true or not. I did not make them. These allegations have been posted on Internet web sites and by some magazine publishers. I feel it is very unfair for the mainstream media to routinely publicize any and all allegations about democratic politicians like Clinton or JFK while ignoring allegations about George W. Bush. While the thought of sex offender signs being posted around Bush’s White House and Texas homes may scare some republicans, the GOP made clear under Clinton that the sexual morality of the President is an issue of grave importance to them. No one, not even the President, is above the law. I say this case should be investigated. If Bush is found to be a perverted rapist, child molester and solicitor of illegal abortion services then I feel he should be impeached. If on the other hand the story is proven false, I feel the stories should be removed from the Internet and an apology offered to Bush.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You Just Never Know about People

And The Saga Continues Unnoticed

Two of the Village People: Th

Two of the Village People: The Cop, and The Idiot.

Most Immoral Fascist

Bush has never had to answer for anything he has ever done, the accusations do not have any claims to disprove them and I argue that they are true. Bush is the biggest lying criminal of all time, the only place he belongs is in jail. He should not be out on the street, he is a dangerous perp.

"The only thing necessary for the perpetuation of evil is for good people to do nothing."  ~Jane Elliott

Won't you learn?

It's just this kind of liberal hate-speech that cost Democrats the White House and more seats in the House and Senate.

Keep it up, and keep wondering why you keep losing elections.

TT

Do I "hate" Rove/Dubya? You b

Do I "hate" Rove/Dubya? You bet! I hate all people and ideologies that would subvert the Constitution and take this country back to the racist, bigoted, homophobic era of the early 1900's.

"Bush won, get over it?" The call by Republicans and Independents to blindly follow a failed, and morally-deprived "elected president" is not only un-American, it is the heighth of arrogance. Respect the "office" if not the man? How is that possible? The "man" currently IS the office.

Rove/Dubya is not a racist because he appoints minorities? Condi, Powell, and the new Hispanic AG do NOT represent their respective racial segments of the USA, anymore than they represent me or the 56,000,000 of us who passionately wanted Rove/Dubya out of office.

Hate? An old addage states that, "it is never wise to make enemies of those who disagree with you." Rove/Dubya does not understand the meaning of compromise, or inclusion, or any of the concepts of diplomacy and healing. To many of us, he is a traitor to this country, and the personification of evil.

Do I "hate" all Republicans? No -- because they are Americans and are among my neighbors, relatives, and friends. Like all true patriots, I embrace the exchange of ideas, and the Constitution. But I will not follow, respect, or hold my anger inside for four more years while a despot attempts to subvert the basic foundations of my country.

What here do you consider hate speech?

What here do you consider hate speech?

The republicans called for an investigation of Bill Clinton's sex life. They publicized all sorts of rumors that were untrue. They publicized all sorts of details that were true, but Clinton's private business. So if I call for a much more focused and fair investigation of Bush this is hate speech?

It seems like the republicans are the ones who are using hate sppech and it seems to be getting them elected while democrats try to respond in a decent and fair way and people call us wimps.

Re:

The Common Six Pack Jesus Lovin Joe doesn't care &
They Think Bush is Jesus

Republicans

One of the most intolerable consequences of Bush's re-election is the gross arrogance on the part of some Republicans. It's as if this is a football game and they're running around screaming "WE WON" even though they're personal gain will be NOTHING and they know nothing about the game itself. Sadly this is no game. Don't they see the likelihood that they're arrogance and bias will eventually bite them in the ass as politics/ life are cyclical and when this extreme tilts too far it'll flip again to a more progressive administration.

To the Republican, if the tables were turned would you not scrutinize ANY information that could bolster your belief that the current President is a reckless, dishonest, fratboy drunk who poses as a Jesus lover because it's the only possible way he could have EVER been anointed such status? Think about it, you all are so gullible. You think this putz is any more religious than Bill Clinton? That was the ONLY way they could scrape him off the floor and make something of him and the only way they could make his disastrous record moot.

I'm just floored that you would doubt the POSSIBILITY that this man who was involved in a hazing scandal and had been in plenty of trouble COULD have been involved in other reckless or illegal activities.

Why do you people protect the immunity of a man who is making you all look like a bunch of oblivious hypocrites?

As far as hate speech. Come on, if the Democrats were any softer on you guys we'd be caressing your hair and rubbing your feet...you guys play about as dirty as it gets. Buck up!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.