How to Impeach a President

Beginning today, you can go to http://www.articlesofimpeachment.net to learn about a "National Teach-In" on impeachment organized by the Center for Constitutional Rights and Melville House, launching nationwide on July 19 in cities and towns across the country.

Please join the effort:­ visit www.articlesofimpeachment.net and organize a Teach-In in your home or community center. An "action kit" ­-- including a DVD documentary short, HOW TO IMPEACH A PRESIDENT, the handbook ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST GEORGE W. BUSH, and other resources ­--is available at the website.

Join the CCR, the nation's leading institute of constitutional scholarship and activism, in making the impeachment of George W. Bush a reality.

www.articlesofimpeachment.net

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What happened to the states legislatures that initiated

proceedings?

I recall Illinois, and California had undertaken procedures to begin impeachment. What happened to those proceedings?

I would suggest impeachment of Bush and Cheney together.

Hi Dennis

Hi Dennis,

Please see the rules of Democrats.com here: http://www.democrats.com/rules

Just as you demand adherence to your rules for entry into your New Party so do we.

I have edited out you tag line links to your New Party since it would be on our dime and our time. We are Democrats here, building the Democratic Party.

Those interested in yours may simply go to your profile as the link to your New Party is there.

Thanks for your understanding.

Jim

I Agree we should not only

I Agree we should not only impeach bush & cheney, but impeach virtally the whole adminstration.

HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN???

HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN???
http://files.meetup.com/222807/WANTED%20POSTER.pdf

Be on the look out!

He is heavily armed (with nuclear weapons even!) and considered extremely dangerous (to America and the World)!

He is WANTED for Fraud, Treason, and Crimes Against Humanity!

Download this WANTED POSTER and post it at your LOCAL POST OFFICE (or other suitable location) today!
http://files.meetup.com/222807/WANTED%20POSTER.pdf

(And, when you do, please send us feedback (and photos) on any Post Offices (or other creative locations) where you were able to post your WANTED posters.)

DO IT TODAY!

Citizens remain vigilent!

Only with everyone's help will we eventually be able to stop this dangerous felon!

Thanks,

BOSTONIANS FOR THE OVERTHROW OF KING GEORGE
http://www.impeachbush.meetup.com/335/

Bush's "Bounce" in Polls pure media fantasy

One thing the Democrats MUST learn when attempting to mobilize toward impeachment is that what the media reports about Bush and the public's attitude toward him cannot be trusted. For example, right now, the "White House- media coalition" is trying to psych the Dems out by convincing them that Bush is gaining ground again in public opinion along with support for the war. But it is total utter fabrication:

Here's a dose of reality:

Rasmussen: Bush's overall approval rating remained at 40% before and after Zarqawi's death and even after the "surprise trip" by Dubya to Iraq. Public approval of Bush's handling of Iraq dropped 1% from 32% the week before Zarqawi's death to 31% right after.
http://rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm

NBC/Wall Street Journal: Showed Bush's approval rating up just 1% (from 36% in April to 37% the week after Zarqawi's death) - which is not statistically significant (the error margin was plus or minus 3%).
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=a828I6Upxd60&refer=t...

CBS/AP Poll: This usually very conservative poll showed, right after Zarqawi's death, that Bush lost 2% in approval ratings following Zarqawi's death (down to 35%) while approval for his handling of Iraq hit a record low of 33%. Yep, real bouncy.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/19/AR200606...

FOX: Poll shows Bush overall approval up to 40% from 35% due entirely to Republicans "repledging their allegiance" to their Fuhrer. However, the poll also showed a drop of 3% (from 40% in Jan. down to 37%) in the public's approval of how Bush is handling Iraq.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199668,00.html

CNN: Poll taken after Zarqawi death and Bush trip to Baghdad shows a 1% drop in Bush’s job approval since May (from 37% to 36%).
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/16/bush.poll/

from "Need to Know News" at http://needtoknownews.cherylsealreports.com

Excellent, thanks!

Nice work, Cheryl. Thanks!

Freedom Under God, not under bush

Those who profess to favor "freedom", and yet deprecate agitation, are men who want rain without thunder and lightening. They want the ocean without the roar of its many water.

Frederick Douglass

I received this from People for the American Way and it was too powerful not to pass along.

This president and vice president, deserve to be impeached, of course we all know that is impossible, look at who would be in line.

But I do wish that we could control the house and the senate and drag their butts through the mud, they deserve worse for taking our young men and women to war out of stubborness and greed.

Their blood is on his hands, but George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have no hearts, they don't care who lives or dies. They are war criminals.

What happened to resolutions?

start the fight

"Not a part of your progressive political ideals to start the fight? If you can’t stomach being the aggressor, please just step aside and let us do the dirty work. Really now, mouths shut and eyes open, please. We’ve lost enough ground because of you wimps who wish we’d all just play drums and eat vegan food. You’re not going to end torture that way."

Does everyone know you are

Does everyone know you are being censored here at democrats.com? They edit comments.

Melinda82: Who is the comment about being censored...

aimed at? Either you don't have a target...or you just like waving that smelly old fish around for the fun of it.

Did someone lose a link to a site that does not conform with the rules of this site? 'They' must be a reference to moderation. This site does have mods, several of them, and they tend to remind folks to read the rules of posting as well of really reading through the site before doing things that break the rules.

Calling the members of this site Wimps really doesn't help you make any sort of point.

A mind once expanded can never return to its original dimensions.

Anne Hathaway: 1556-1623

The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.

Louis Pasteur

There is a big difference

There is a big difference between "censorship" and editorial license. This is a private site, and membership is subject to cancellation at any time.

If you do not abide by the Rules of Democrats.com, your comments may be edited, or deleted, at the discretion of the moderators. If you continue to ignore the Rules, you will be banned. See how that works...?

Your comment was edited because it contained a link to a commercial website which offered merchandise for sale. The link was removed.

As a general rule-of-thumb, you can post links only to news/reference sources, and those approved websites that are listed under "Blogroll" on the lower left-hand side of the page. You can not pimp your own, or someone else's, website if they are not pre-approved.

Publication on another man's dime is by privilege, not right.

As to specifics: You've commented a total of 4 times on Democrats.com.

1- A link to your commercial website was edited out of your 1st post as well as an attended whine about censorship.

2- The Link was allowed in your 2nd post.

3- It was edited out in your 3rd post.

4- The attended whine about censorship now came as a 4th post.

The Link to your commercial website has also been in your democrats.com profile, all this time, for anyone who wanted to see it.

By the way: The goal for

By the way: The goal for Independents is to agree.

 

 

 

 

Welcome back, Jim!

;-)

Thanks Karin, I went right

Thanks Karin,

I went right back into radio silence as the storms here knocked out power. It is still out but I rigged the generator to give me some computer time.

Jim

P.S. Hopefully everything will be back to normal by early next week.

Good luck, Jim.

Hope that power comes back on very soon.

I just knew you would have a back up
generator! ;-)

A Mental Exercise (Off-Topic)

Imagine that you were a progressive American, and hated the Bush/Cheney administration for all the usual reasons: their cronyism with Big Oil, their tax cuts for the rich, the continuous erosion of civil liberties, and their lies, lies, lies....

But what if, in spite of this, it was common belief, for liberals and conservatives alike, that Sadaam Hussein actually HAD developed Weapons of Mass Destruction, was connected to Al Qaeda, and was an imminent threat to us; therefore, our invasion/occupation of Iraq was completely justified?

Imagine that it was such a "given" that the administration and the media were telling us all we needed to know that we steadfastly went along with their masquerade? And if we ran across bits of information that contradicted the official story, we would ignore it, much as a conservative will ignore the facts that a liberal gives them because they conflict with their established world view.

In such a scenario, the pressure to believe the conventional wisdom would be so intense that few would have the courage to express their doubts publicly ... to their friends, family, and fellow liberals. And those occasional musings from people who've stumbled on news stories or websites or books that doubted the official Bush story would be denounced as lies and crackpot theories.

Thankfully, we know that the war was unjustified and was based on lies. But think for a minute.... are there any other assumptions that we as Americans from all over the political spectrum hold? Beliefs about the world that we live in that might actually have been manipulated by the Bush/Cheney administration and the media? Are there any tidbits of information that we have run across in the last few years that just don't quite stack up, but we ignore because they contradict our established beliefs? Is there anything that a few daring souls are starting to espouse, only to be shot down, by the likes of both Kos AND Hannity?

Perhaps it's time to start questioning some of the beliefs that we hold about our world since Bush entered office and the reason he has been able to remain President in spite of our efforts. If enough of us start to question our assumptions, as I recently did, we might start noticing, and even welcoming, new perspectives about the current administration. Maybe we can start talking to our friends and fellow progressives about it rather than worrying about what they will think of us if we discuss such matters.

Our leaders are far worse than most of us can admit to ourselves, and everything we need to know is out there, just slightly hidden, if we look hard enough. That's all I'm saying for now.

Enigmatic, slowboilingfrog

Enigmatic, slowboilingfrog. Do you have something to say, something that might enlighten or make fruitful conversation or is this your way of testing the waters for some conspiracy theory?

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross." ~ Sinclair Lewis

In a time of deception telling the truth is a revolutionary act. ~ George Orwell

slowboilingfrog...None of your conjecture is worth a flying ...

lizards great leap into the void.

Ya see, Bush and Co. is actually worse than he seems...worse even than he was when Molly Ivins tried to warn all of us back in 2000 in her book: Shrub.

Since that time, there is no doubt that 99% of the material we have dug up on the Bush family and fellow travelers is absolutely true. This is common knowledge on this site which has been around for 6 very active years now.

With Bush, the deeper you dig, the worse he actually is. There is no need to presuppose that we have wronged the guy. He simply is what he is--an individual groomed for failure since the day he was conceived.

We don't buy into the common ordinary CT that always rears its ugly heads...we never have on this site. If you make an honest effort to find some good about this pretzeldent, you will find none out there...except that he apparently goes to bed early.

Will be interesting to see your response.

A mind once expanded can never return to its original dimensions.

Anne Hathaway: 1556-1623

The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.

Louis Pasteur

Grinch, as you may remember,

Grinch, as you may remember, we have had either this Greenie on here before, or one of his BF friends. Boilingfrog is a Canadian-born movement, and they are closely associated with the Greens.

Wannabe Democrats with a single-issue agenda.

LOL Bill...thanks for the heads up...

here I took the barbs off the hooks 'cause I was bored...and now I'm gonna hafta just turn up the simmer setting on the stove.

A mind once expanded can never return to its original dimensions.

Anne Hathaway: 1556-1623

The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.

Louis Pasteur

But saddam had no WMD's and

But saddam had no WMD's and there was no connection to 9/11, that was just a lie from the start.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.