Another damaging Bush memo from across the pond.
Ok, guess what, another damaging Bush memo from the Guardion via the buzz.
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,,1700881,00.html
Apparently two months before the invasion, Bush told Blair that the US was very worried about the failure to find any hard evidence against Saddam. Bush? the military? even wanted to paint a U2 reconnaissance plane with UN colors as bait, hoping Saddam would fire upon it. Bush said, if Saddam fired upon the plane it could be considered a breach of UN resolution.
Hey, way to go. If you can’t find evidence, pull a sting operation. Obvious instead of being in the front lines Bush spent his time watching John Wayne and cop shows. Anyway, Blair agreed he would do what ever was necessary. Of course they are not ponying up the $100,000 dollars a minute that this war is costing us.
This memo makes it very clear that Mr Bush intended to invade whether or not there was a second UN resolution and even if UN inspectors found no evidence of a banned Iraqi weapons programme.
Will it make headlines? I doubt it. won't matter, the spin machines are ready to pull the wool over our eyes if it does. Now you know what the spin machine spins.
- Login or register to post comments
- Send to friend










The White House memo
Click on link below to watch video report of UK Channel 4 on White House Memo:
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.j...
'The White House memo
Published: 2 Feb 2006
By: Gary Gibbon
Revealed: Bush and Blair discussed using American Spyplane in UN colours to lure Saddam into war.
Watch the report
Watch Menzies Campbell reaction
White House Meeting Memo Special Report
Channel 4 News tonight reveals extraordinary details of George Bush and Tony Blair's pre-war meeting in January 2003 at which they discussed plans to begin military action on March 10th 2003, irrespective of whether the United Nations had passed a new resolution authorising the use of force.
Channel 4 News has seen minutes from that meeting, which took place in the White House on 31 January 2003. The two leaders discussed the possibility of securing further UN support, but President Bush made it clear that he had already decided to go to war. The details are contained in a new version of the book 'Lawless World' written by a leading British human rights lawyer, Philippe Sands QC.
President Bush said that:
"The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another resolution and would 'twist arms' and 'even threaten'. But he had to say that if ultimately we failed, military action would follow anyway.''
Prime Minister Blair responded that he was: "solidly with the President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam."
But Mr Blair said that: "a second Security Council resolution would provide an insurance policy against the unexpected, and international cover, including with the Arabs."
Mr Sands' book says that the meeting focused on the need to identify evidence that Saddam had committed a material breach of his obligations under the existing UN Resolution 1441. There was concern that insufficient evidence had been unearthed by the UN inspection team, led by Dr Hans Blix. Other options were considered.
President Bush said: "The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach."
He went on: "It was also possible that a defector could be brought out who would give a public presentation about Saddam's WMD, and there was also a small possibility that Saddam would be assassinated."
Speaking to Channel 4 News, Mr Sands said:
"I think no one would be surprised at the idea that the use of spy-planes to review what is going on would be considered. What is surprising is the idea that they would be used painted in the colours of the United Nations in order to provoke an attack which could then be used to justify material breach. Now that plainly looks as if it is deception, and it raises some fundamental questions of legality, both in terms of domestic law and international law."
Also present at the meeting were President Bush's National Security Adviser, Condoleeza Rice and her deputy Dan Fried, and the President's Chief of Staff, Andrew Card. The Prime Minister took with him his then security adviser Sir David Manning, his Foreign Policy aide Matthew Rycroft, and and his chief of staff, Jonathan Powell.
Those present, as documented in Mr Sands' book, also discussed what might happen in Iraq after liberation.
President Bush said that he: "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups."
_______________
Memo extracts
Published: 2 Feb 2006
By: Channel 4 News
Taken from the White House Meeting Memo, 31 January 2003, seen by Channel 4 News - and detailed in 'Lawless World' by Philippe Sands.
President Bush to Tony Blair: "The US was thinking of flying U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach"
Bush: "It was also possible that a defector could be brought out who would give a public presentation about Saddam's WMD, and there was also a small possibility that Saddam would be assassinated."
Blair: "A second Security Council Resolution resolution would provide an insurance policy against the unexpected and international cover, including with the Arabs. "
Bush: "The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another resolution and would 'twist arms' and 'even threaten'. But he had to say that if ultimately we failed, military action would follow anyway.''
Blair responds that he is: "solidly with the President and ready to do whatever it took to disarm Saddam."
Bush told Blair he: "thought it unlikely that there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups." '
Afterdowningstreet.org Media Action Alert re: White House Memo
~Revealed: Bush and Blair discussed using American Spyplane in UN colours to lure Saddam into war.~
Afterdowningstreet.org has a Media Action Alert regarding this newly revealed White House Memo :
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/media
Watch the UK Channel 4 video of the White House Memo report:
real url:
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-repor...age.jsp?id=1661
tiny url:
http://tinyurl.com/9sj87
The "tiny url" can be more easily exchanged by email and even typed on pieces of paper (business card size) and copied about 16 per page. Type "Expose the WHITE HOUSE MEMO http://tinyurl.com/9sj87".
Please contact your local media and all your email lists.
This story needs to get out!
Any news from the US TV networks?
I haven't seen any news from the US TV networks. Hope they wait until after the Superbowl. Everbody will not be able to focus on anything else. Also that should give the spin doctors time to reweave the events to make Bush look good. You don't want Rush's flock to hear anything but spin do you.
International and alternative news are on it, US is less
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/7436
"The White House Memo
Submitted by davidswanson on Fri, 2006-02-03 09:47. Evidence
Sampling of Extensive International and Alternative Coverage:
Channel 4 News Memo Extracts, Article, Video Report and Commentary; Guardian Article; Guardian Commentary; Guardian Timeline; BBC Article; AfterDowningStreet Commentary; David Corn's Commentary; The Australian Article; Telegraph Article; Mail and Guardian Article; Financial Times Article; Independent Article; Times of London Article; Another BBC Article; Scotsman Article; People's Daily Article (China); Journal of Turkish Weekly Article (Turkey); Mirror Article; Mirror Article 2; Herald Article
Complete US Corporate Media Coverage:
Associated Press Article; Associated Press Article 2; USA Today Marginalizes Story on a Blog, What about some coverage in the paper?; Christian Science Monitor Article; Olbermann on MSNBC;"
Fox news
You can bet Fox won't air it.
US TV is spineless
I doubt that you will find it on any of our TV channels, except the daily show. On CNN, Paula Zahn, would do her best to discredit the report.