The Blue and Red State Minimum Wage Divide

  • davidswanson's picture
    davidswanson
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By Bob Geiger

With Senate Republicans once again rejecting a modest increase in the federal minimum wage this week, it seemed like a good time to take a look at how the different states behave in providing workers with a better standard of living then mandated by the federal government.

A quick trip to the U.S. Department of Labor web site got me to the data I sought: An exact look at what the minimum wage is in all states and, to really satisfy a hunch, a look at which states have enacted more family-friendly wage laws.

Sixteen states and the District of Columbia have minimum wages higher than the national level, with Washington and Oregon topping the scale at $7.35 and $7.25 per hour, respectively. Californians earn a minimum of $6.75 per hour while San Francisco – that proud bastion of liberalism – requires that employers pay at least $8.50 per hour.

Twenty-six states are the same as the federal level and two are below. Fortunately, Ohio with a lowly $4.25 per hour minimum and Kansas, with a scrooge-like $2.65 per hour rate, are superceded by the federal law. Six states have no minimum wage law, which make the federal $5.15 per hour the de facto standard.

Here are the states (and D.C.) that have set a minimum wage standard above $5.15 per hour:

Alaska $7.15
California $6.75 ($8.50 in San Francisco)
Connecticut $7.10
Delaware $6.15
District of Columbia $6.60 ($7.00 on January 1)
Florida $6.15
Hawaii $6.25
Illinois $6.50
Maine $6.35
Massachusetts $6.75
Minnesota $6.15
New York $6.00 ($6.75 on January 1)
Oregon $7.25
Rhode Island $6.75
Vermont $7.00
Washington $7.35
Wisconsin $5.70
Does that list of states look familiar to you? It should:

[Image/map of U.S. minimum wage status]

Of the parts of the United States making some effort to provide a working wage for our families, all but two of those states voted for John Kerry in 2004 and tend to vote Democratic in most national elections.

So what does this mean?

It means that these are primarily liberal-leaning states and an excellent example of why we should wear that label proudly going into the 2006 and 2008 election cycles. In doing better at defining ourselves – rather than letting Republicans misrepresent who we are – drawing these kinds of distinctions is central to our definition of what being liberal and Democratic means.

Votes like the one made by Senate Republicans on Wednesday (to kill a higher minimum wage) need to be hammered home as constant reminders of what their version of America looks like. States that care about the lot of working families need to be held up as examples of how Democrats envision our society.

We saw the true impact of poverty in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Let's continue to drive home the reality of cruel conservative policies and the undeniable role that agenda plays in the world of working families.

Comments

While I agree in theory

  • pholkhero's picture
    pholkhero
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

that the bluer the state, the better the min. wage ~ with a few exceptions, those states with higher minimums also have higher standards of living

Probably correct

  • vince's picture
    vince
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

But you also ask why they are higher. Do we fund our schools better, pay our teachers better, and have higher expectations for students? Probably yes.

School funding, with the exception of Illinois, is generally much better in the blue states. We probably have a higher level of what I call "intellectual capital" up north and fund universities comparatively better, along with better and more expensive private schools.

Here in the rust belt, we have less rural and agriculture areas than the Red states do. Living in large cities is comparatively more expensive
than living rural (though I am sure there is some quality of life trade offs, there always is).

Even the wealthy in Blues states have to compete for better and more expensive servants that down south.

Saving the world from stupidity
One Republican at a time
Since November, 2004

How did those minimums

  • CitizenJane's picture
    CitizenJane
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

come to be, I wonder. Florida's higher minimum is due to a voter initiative the last election.

Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie, but rather mourn the apathetic throng, the coward, and the meek, who see the world's great anguish and its wrong, and dare not speak.
Ralph Chaplin

Raised minimums here in Orygun...

were by voter initiative.

San Francisco's highest minimum is due to the high cost of housing, particularly rents. A studio apt in the city is likely to run more than $1000/mo.