Bush Cut Hurricane, Flood Protection Funding to New Orleans - June 2005

  • CactusPat's picture
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Ah yes, the politics of weather(?). Didn't know their was such a thing, eh? Its not exactly a Bush scandal (yet), but certain to be scandalous. Thanks to Lori at CLG, we now know Bush and Congress cut funding for hurricane and flood protection in New Orleans. This news comes after the cable mediawhores flashed Smirk's face every ten minutes all day long in attempt to make him look (P)residential (ostensibly, to provide reasuring words of comfort to the po' folks staring down the gullet of a Cat 5 monster bearing down on them)...

New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers faces $71.2 million reduction in federal funding In fiscal year 2006, the New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is bracing for a record $71.2 million reduction in federal funding. It would be the largest single-year funding loss ever for the New Orleans district, Corps officials said. "I've been here over 30 years and I've never seen this level of reduction", said Al Naomi, project manager for the New Orleans district... The cuts mean major hurricane and flood protection projects will not be awarded... Also, a study to determine ways to protect the region from a Category 5 hurricane has been shelved for now...

Money is so tight the New Orleans district, which employs 1,300 people, instituted a hiring freeze last month on all positions. The freeze is the first of its kind in about 10 years, said Marcia Demma, chief of the Corps' Programs Management Branch.

Stephen Jeselink, interim commander of the New Orleans Corps district, told employees in an internal e-mail dated May 25 that the district is experiencing financial challenges. Execution of our available funds must be dealt with through prudent districtwide management decisions. In addition to a hiring freeze, Jeselink canceled the annual Corps picnic held every June.

Congress is setting the Corps budget.

The House of Representatives wants to cut the New Orleans district budget 21 percent to $272.4 million in 2006, down from $343.5 million in 2005. The House figure is about $20 million lower than the president's suggested $290.7 million budget.

It's now up to the Senate. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-New Orleans, is making no promises.

It's going to be very tough, Landrieu said. The House was not able to add back this money ... but hopefully we can rally in the Senate and get some of this money back.

Landrieu said the Bush administration is not making Corps of Engineers funding a priority.

I think it's extremely shortsighted, Landrieu said. When the Corps of Engineers' budget is cut, Louisiana bleeds. These projects are literally life-and-death projects to the people of south Louisiana and they are (of) vital economic interest to the entire nation.

The Corps' budget could still be beefed up, as it is every year, through congressional additions. Last year, Congress added $20 million to the overall budget of the New Orleans district but a similar increase this year would still leave a $50 million shortfall.

One of the hardest-hit areas of the New Orleans district's budget is the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, which was created after the May 1995 flood to improve drainage in Jefferson, Orleans and St. Tammany parishes. SELA's budget is being drained from $36.5 million awarded in 2005 to $10.4 million suggested for 2006 by the House of Representatives and the president.

The project manager said there would be no contracts awarded with this $10.4 million, Demma said.

The construction portion of the Corps' budget would suffer if Congress doesn't add money. In 2005, the district received $94.3 million in federal dollars dedicated to construction. In 2006, the proposal is for $56 million.

It would be critical to this city if we had a $50 million construction budget compared with the past years, Demma said. It would be horrible for the city, it would be horrible for contractors and for flood protection if this were the final number compared to recent years and what the city needs.

Construction generally has been on the decline for several years and focus has been on other projects in the Corps.

The district has identified $35 million in projects to build and improve levees, floodwalls and pumping stations in St. Bernard, Orleans, Jefferson and St. Charles parishes. Those projects are included in a Corps line item called Lake Pontchartrain, where funding is scheduled to be cut from $5.7 million this year to $2.9 million in 2006. Naomi said it's enough to pay salaries but little else.

We'll do some design work. We'll design the contracts and get them ready to go if we get the money. But we don't have the money to put the work in the field, and that's the problem, Naomi said.

The Appropriations Committee in Congress will ultimately decide how much the New Orleans district will receive, he said.

Obviously, the decisions are being made up there that are not beneficial to the state, in my opinion, Naomi said. Let's put it this way: When (former Rep.) Bob Livingston (R-Metairie) was chairman of the Appropriations Committee, we didn't have a monetary problem. Our problem was how do we spend all the money we were getting.


Why do we still elect the

  • maryadavis's picture
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Why do we still elect the same people that don't even give a crap about us? Do they have any idea what (EDIT: COMMERCIAL LINK REMOVED) flood damage repair costs? And when your house is completely blown away by the hurricane and you lose all sense of security one needs a helping hand. He needs a shoulder to rely on and know that things will be better. If the funds were cut down people will get less money, probably not enough and they will end depressed. Do we really want a depressed nation?


  • Jim's picture
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I bet if you were President, you, like Bill Clinton, would have declared an Emergency BEFORE the storm hit! That is, given the certainty of the forecasts and their possible implication.

Further, I bet if you were President you would then have followed through and EASILY saved life and limb down there.

Bush could have done it too. Instead he watched TV.

I have to disagree on the role of our Federal Government. I understand your point but with a third of a BILLION people living in our Nation, sometimes a massive natural disaster REQUIRES the coordination of the Nation at large.

I don't think it is prudent to give this massive disservice a pass, simply because, as you correctly point out, other volunteers are usually available. Volunteers taxed in one area will have less to give forth to this Nation in another area. THAT can be a problem.



All the borrowing Bush did

  • tokmik's picture
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

All the borrowing Bush did to pay for his transfer of wealth to the already-wealthy and his disaster in Iraq propped up the economy. The time to pay the piper is coming, But the economy will not suffer too much if the tax cuts are reversed. We are the wealthiest nation on earth. But if we want the world, we have to pay for it, Moderator's note: advertising link removed