if only some people would wake up and realize the type above is really the truth

the cancer will first eat the whole world...
The only valid way in which American democrats can fight against Bush is by boycotting his sponsors, and making it obvious

Read this and weep for your children all of you who were taken in by the utter lack of principles or morality of Dubya The Shrub. This is a far more realistic forecast of things to come than the "oh everything's just fine," rhetoric of the cattle who helped put this idiot in office -- again.

After this election was over my reaction to it was we were "doomed" I am terrified of what this idiot (Dubya) is going to do with this country. Some say he wants to remove every part of the new deal.

"The only thing necessary for the perpetuation of evil is for good people to do nothing."  ~Jane Elliott

I hope he goes down as the most despicable leader this country has ever had. Sadly, with his own party controlling every knook and cranny of D.C., they will make sure, most of them anyways, that he is written down as the greatest of all time. This country needs to revolt against this administration.

Just like Hitler without the smirk. He, too had his followers, they followed him to their graves. This moron is taking us with him!

I found this article interesting as well..not that us Dems didn't already know this:

Analysis: Bush Facing Domestic Challenges

By TOM RAUM
WASHINGTON (AP) - From his domestic policy platter, President Bush chose to serve dessert before the main course. Having now won a second term, he may find it increasingly difficult to deliver on the meatier stuff, even with the political capital he is claiming and larger GOP majorities in the House and Senate.

Bush accomplished the things that were palatable and relatively easy during his first term, and which required little sacrifice for Americans, at least on the home front: hefty tax cuts to spur a stumbling economy, education legislation that promised to leave no child behind, adding a prescription drug benefit to Medicare.

Thornier issues were put off: making those tax cuts permanent and ``fundamental reform'' of the tax laws, overhauling Social Security to allow private investment accounts, easing immigration restrictions, cutting the deficit in half within five years.

Given that the federal budget was $413 billion in the red last year, Bush lacks much of the traditional capital available to spend on his priorities.

``Making the tax cuts permanent would drain about a trillion dollars of revenue, at about the same time you would need an extra trillion or more for the Social Security plan,'' said Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a bipartisan group advocating fiscal responsibility.

``And the plan to cut the deficit in half assumes that we don't spend any more on Iraq or Afghanistan, which is not a reasonable assumption,'' Bixby said.

Bush may discover that it isn't just outnumbered Democrats that will give him a headache.

Unless the economy takes off and conditions improve markedly in Iraq, the president may find increased restiveness among the GOP, and this only will intensify as the 2006 midterm congressional elections approach.

Republicans united to resist the candidacy of Democrat John Kerry for president. Now that the election is over, GOP majority-party strains are beginning to show even before Bush's second term begins.

Conservatives who are deficit hawks are unhappy with Bush's spending plans and his failure thus far to use his veto. Social conservatives want him to do more to advance their agenda and some are peeved about his push to liberalize immigration.

On foreign policy, extricating the United States from Iraq poses a far more daunting challenge than did the march to Baghdad. Some top Republicans, including Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Richard Lugar of Indiana, have expressed frustration at the cost and chaos of postwar Iraq.

Right after his victory, Bush claimed ``the will of the people at my back.'' While there is no doubt that Democrats are in a state of disarray, there are practical limits to what the president can deliver, despite his optimism.

``He probably has a better chance of pushing his Social Security program than he does at tax reform,'' said Henry J. Aaron, an economics analyst at the Brookings Institution. ``I think you can move the pea around under the shell a little more readily on Social Security.''

Aaron said overhauling the tax laws is ``in essence tax redistribution. It involves taking goodies away that people now enjoy.''

Bush wants fundamental changes of ``our complicated and outdated tax code'' and says they should be ``revenue neutral.'' He has proposed a bipartisan commission to come up with recommendations, but that is about as far as he has gone.

Many conservatives would like Bush to move toward a simplified flat tax or a tax on consumption, such as a national sales tax.

There is a widespread clamor for him to ask Congress to modify the alternative minimum tax. Designed to prevent high-income people from taking too many deductions, the tax was never indexed for inflation, so it is starting to hit many middle-class families.

White House officials give little guidance or details.

``It's too premature to speculate, when an advisory panel hasn't even been appointed,'' White House spokesman Scott McClellan said. ``The president said this is going to be a top priority for him.'' On Social Security, Bush also has not said much beyond repeating his 2000 mantra that younger workers should be allowed to invest a small portion of their Social Security funds in personal retirement accounts.

Veterans of the legislative process expect it to take many months, perhaps all of Bush's second term, to get to final votes on his Social Security and tax overhaul plans.

``The schedule gets really short once you start taking out the stuff Congress has to do. A lot is going to be left on the cutting room floor,'' said conservative economist Bruce Bartlett, director of the National Center for Policy Analysis.

EDITOR'S NOTE - Tom Raum has covered Washington for The Associated Press since 1973, including five presidencies.

How he has come to power amazes me, the revamp of the Constitution should be impeachable in itself. Sometimes I wonder if the Democrats are a part of this entire fiasco.

Terry McAucliffe was a loser from day one, I preferred the Atlanta choice that was not made for leadership. The entire black pretense of the Dems pisses me off as well. The libertarians, greens and other independent parties must be given a chance to get elected in positions all over the country.

The government should be made up of the makeup of our country which includes all races most everywhere in America. Muslims have their religion, Christians, Buddists, Catholics, etc.... It should not be a part of government.

Bush must be impreached. I hope everyone is writing their representatives and senators to report you would like investigation into the electoral fraud that just took place to demand recounts.

Boycott Time Warner Cable. Boycott!!! Walmart, they own you, today they are bragging about how they have personal data on most of their customers. Boycott. Close your checkbooks. Boycott. Boycott. Write letters to your representatives. People should be in the streets, and until they hit the streets, Bush will turn America into a pre-civil war state.

It is there. I know I feel as angry as the northerners back in the mid 1860's about much that is happening. The blue states should as much as possible refrain from putting only a fair share of what is coming back to them in the coffers in the federal government in the matter of taxpaying governments.

Succession does not sound bad. Linking with Canada would be cool for blue states. Actually Northern North America does not sound bad either.

I alone cannot do anything. I am so mad about this second stealing. The web is soothing my soul somewhat when I see that people are so upset, but they are not upset enough.

BOYCOTT. BOYCOTT. BOYCOTT. BOYCOTT. BOYCOTT. BOYCOTT. BOYCOTT.