IMPEACHMENT IS IN THE AIR
Impeachment is in the Air
Rep. John Conyers to Hold June 16 Hearing
on the Downing Street Memo
Join the tens of thousands on September 24
Who Will Call for Impeachment
Gather at the White House at 12 noon
Dear sharon, Bob, Joe & Matt,
Everyone in the ImpeachBush.org movement should feel very heartened that the grassroots effort of the past two years has laid the foundation for what will be the next big move.
The movement to impeach George W. Bush is about to reach its highest level yet. The catastrophic invasion and occupation of Iraq is now exposed. The people of the country, and more and more members of Congress, are turning against the war and demanding that President Bush be held accountable. We will insist that accountability means impeachment.
We are writing to announce two very important and exciting events:
1) Congressman John Conyers is holding a hearing tomorrow (June 16) into the Downing Street Memo which reveals that the Bush administration was lying to the people of the U.S. as they forged forward on their planned path of war against, and conquest of, Iraq.
2) September 24 National March in Washington, D.C. - Members of the impeachment movement from all over the country will be marching together as a massive contingent in the huge September 24 antiwar demonstration in Washington, D.C., with coordinated actions in San Francisco and Los Angeles.
You can help build this movement
We are able to do all of this work only because of the generous donations of people who believe in impeachment. The expenses will be great in the coming period. With your donation, will be able to print hundreds of thousands of flyers and posters, make banners, send out large-scale mailings, and begin renting buses to make sure that the message of impeachment is seen throughout Washington, D.C. that day and rings through the hallways of the White House where we will assemble at 12 noon. Your help is needed now. Please make a contribution now by clicking here for access to the online donation form and the secure server, where you can also get information to write a check.
ImpeachBush/VoteToImpeach.org members have worked tirelessly over the past two-and-half-years to raise the political consciousness in the U.S. and the halls of Congress demanding that Bush and other high officials of his administration be impeached for their criminal conduct. This work is now reaching a new level - discussion of Impeachment is being picked up by many across the progressive spectrum and it is increasingly being mentioned in commentary and news analysis as a proper course of action. In recent weeks the Green Party, Veterans for Peace, Ralph Nader and many others have issued statements calling for the impeachment of George W. Bush. This list is sure to grow in the coming months.
The Downing Street Memo and the Case for Impeachment
Tomorrow, June 16, Congressman John Conyers will hold a hearing into the Downing Street Memo, the leaked British briefing notes that document the Bush Administration's intention to attack Iraq and its efforts to create public rationale for their pre-planned illegal war.
The Downing Street Memo is the "smoking gun" for those still searching for one indicting President Bush and his administration for high crimes and misdemeanors of the most serious and deadly kind. Its authenticity has not been disputed by either the British or U.S. governments since it was made public by the Times of London on May 1, 2005. While largely ignored for nearly a month by most of the corporate media here, it has now made its way into some news outlets. Rep. John Conyers and 88 other members of Congress have demanded an explanation from the White House.
The memo is a document containing minutes transcribed during a meeting between British Prime Minister Tony Blair, members of his cabinet and other top military and security officials, on July 23, 2002. The head of British foreign intelligence (MI 6), Richard Dearlove, identified in the memo as "C," had just returned from a meeting with the U.S. National Security Council in Washington.
"C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action."
The key phrase here is, "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." It makes clear beyond question that the Bush administration had set the course for war on Iraq at least eight months before the U.S./British invasion.
In recent days, additional leaked British memos have confirmed the underlying information in the Downing Street Memo and further revealed that the Bush administration was making its plans to launch a war against Iraq and to find a basis to justify the illegal attack as early as March 2002. For instance a memo dated March 22, 2002, revealed that officials in the Blair government recognized that additional efforts would need to be made to justify the war since there was a lack of proof of connections between the Iraqi government and Al Qaida, and that the Iraqi government was not arming itself with weapons of mass destruction as the Bush Administration had claimed.
Now, more than 26 months after the invasion, 100,000 Iraqis have been killed (according to the British medical journal The Lancet) and Iraq is in chaos. Over 1,700 U.S. troops have been killed and tens of thousands have been maimed, suffering from serious wounds, injuries and illnesses, including enormous psychological trauma.
All this killing, dying and suffering is the result of a war justified by a deliberate campaign of unmitigated lies and deception knowingly carried out by Bush and his top associates - Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Wolfowitz, et. al. All who remain in office should be removed and face trial for their war crimes. It is worth noting that the most serious category of war crimes is the Crime Against Peace; that is, planning and carrying out a war of aggression against another state which poses no threat to the aggressor state.
Please make a contribution now by clicking here for access to the online donation form and the secure server, where you can also get information to write a check.
Click here to read the full text of the Downing Street Memo.
Help spread the word about impeachment everyday. Visit the ImpeachBush Resource Center.
--All of us at ImpeachBush/VoteToImpeach.org
T-Shirts
Lawn Signs
Bumper Stickers
Thanks to the generosity of donors, we are able to offer a “pay what you can” price for the lawn signs for a limited time as part of the new Neighborhood Visibility Campaign. Click here for the ImpeachBush Resource Center to order your lawn sign today!
Click here to unsubscribe.
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version- Send to friend










I cannot get excited about impeachment
To me, it is a monumental waste of time and resources. Suppose by some chance we impeach and remove Bush from office, and in steps Dick Cheney. If anyone can convince me that I should be excited about that possibility, please do so. I think we all need to focus more on winning back key House and Senate races in '06 and stop worrying about this impeachment business. Don't get me wrong, the grounds are certainly there, but our resources would do a lot more good if allocated elsewhere. We need a house and senate that will stand up to the Bush administration for the final 2 years.
Impeachment talk IS important.
I can't blame anyone if they don't get overly excited about impeachment. It won't happen with a Republican Congress.
But the negative publicity that this will generate will show the Repugs for what they are, ignorant stooges of the Bush Administration. Those voters that look at the evidence with an open mind will have to question their Representative's low morals and ethics if they continue to support Bush.
The more negative publicity thrown at The Repugs, the better for us in 2006. We need the poll numbers to drop even farther if we are going to garner enough votes to overrun the vote theft that WILL happen in 2006.
And I wouldn't worry too much about Cheney taking over. He would be a bigger lame duck than Bush is right now, and he would be carrying the same rotting baggage. Look what happened to Jerry Ford. And he was a nice guy.
Saving the world from stupidity
One Republican at a time
Since November, 2004
If impeachment were to
If impeachment were to happen, I would think you'd really have to impeach Bush and Cheney together. They really are guilty of the same crimes. Although the chances of a successful impeachment are nil, just the proceeding would bloody up the Administration significantly, rendering him impotent. I think that alone is reason enough to try for it. We really have to set our sights on winning the house back on '06, if we dont impeachment doesnt even come up for a vote.
BIRDS OF A FEATHER
I AM ASSUMING CHENEY WILL GO RIGHT ALONG WITH HIS BUDDY GEORGIE. HE TOLD JUST AS MANY LIES AND TRICKERY AS BUSHY. I'M ASSUMING BOTH WILL GO. THEY'RE BOTH PARTNERS IN CRIME AND WAR- PROFITEERING, ETC. HOPEFULLY, THEY'LL ALL GO. I AM HYSTERICAL ABOUT IT.
Cheney's actions
Cheney's actions are more "illegal" than Bush's. Bush is like Charles Manson - getting other people to do his dirty work for him. Cheney WAS at CIA headquarters "meeting" about intelligence. Yeah, I think that is called MANIPULATING the intelligence! Cheney has got to go with Georgie and Rove! They need a GOOD public humiliation and then Democrats should EASILY win Congress and White House back.
"They want the federal government controlling Social Security
like it's some kind of federal program."
- George W. Bush in a debate in St. Charles, Mo., Nov. 2, 2000
A Really Deserving Fellow
In any case, it couldn't happen to a more deserving fellow! Superficially or in some ways it wouldn't leave us in much better shape having Dick as President... Perhaps in some ways it would. For one, it would go a ways towards restoring world opinion of the sanity of American voters if we repealed the apparent stamp of approval the last election gave to Bush's first term. For another, even if Cheney was made interim president, the Republicans would likely be suffering politically by association-besides, a temporary president in place for the last segment of a lame-duck, second term president would likely be relatively powerless.
Whatever the real results and implications, it would at least be personally and emotionally gratifying and satisfying to see Bush suffer the indignity he so well deserves. Knowing how much his "legacy" means to him, and knowing that the fact that he's even been allowed to be President, much less have a legacy is an affront to all that is good and right in the world. To deprive him of such additional satisfaction (don't you just delight in Bush's self-satisfied smirk when he's giving a presentation; as though he really thinks he's uniquely persuasive) would indeed be fitting. A fitting end to a sorry episode of American history.
Even so, he deserves so much more! This is a man who, along with must of his cabinet, and vice president, were/are responsible for international war crimes. So, in addition to job loss, he deserves to be tried, by an independent international court, as a war criminal. Of course, there's little hope of any such real justice in the world. The former President Bush was as responsible as Saddam (really, more) for a regime of economic sanctions which resulted in untold numbers of IRAQI deaths--especially women and children; of course, that was pretty much legal so there's no chance for justice there. Bush 43, though, by means of clear and evident deliberate lies and fraud, explicitly broke international law and our own legal responsibilities to the U.N. for being a signatory to it's charter by waging an elective, unwarranted, unnecessary war for other than defensive purposes. It should be impossible for anyone to deny this, of course, just as the man who's wife catches in bed (in the act) with another woman can immediately tell his wife he's innocent (making her question her own eyes or sanity if she listens), Bush can (and will) deny the obvious too. It's a technique that defies rational explanation while being strangely effective (perhaps some people would rather believe lies than the evidence before their eyes).
Deliberately causing harm to the government or people of America should be held as a crime (at least within America). Were such a thing practicable, George Bush along with the entire Republican leadership would be guilty of almost innumerable offenses. Alas, the nature of politics and of governing seems to infer an immunity for responsibility for such inflicted harm. Apparently the worst punishment is the mere loss of political office--and even then, mostly only upon the next election cycle (assuming the people are aware, actually remember and even care). Rather a sad state of affairs it is that our government is effectively beyond our control and we seem unable to hold politicians accountable for their performance...
Impeachment history...
Bush 1 -(1993) --articles of impeachment had been drawn up by (Congressman H. B. Gonzalez--San Antonio, TX) --Mr. Gonzalez was another Rep. Conyers type guy.
This time; I hope the 'articles of impeachment' don't go awry and perhaps this time they will stick. --
Bush 2 is in 'deep crap' up to his ears with crap ; if anything; Rove has to be busy right now --putting up the defense mechanisms and the 'rebuttles and counterclaims'...this isn't going to be pretty.
Nixon - Watergate
Reagan - Iran-Contra
Bush 1 - Desert Storm - Saddam H.
Bush 2 - 9-11, Iraq war - Saddam H. -DSM - WMD's
'articles of impeachment'..
aren't bipartisan --they are a fundamental basis of our constitition.
'High crimes and misdemeanors' are a major part of the basis of this matter.
Given the 'war issues'; the articles may be applicable based on the 'motive and opportunity'..and to conduct a 'resolution of inquiry'. --If anything the BushCo (vs. Clinton) have more fact findings of 'investigative issues'.
Therefore, the British government have to come forward and 'be a witness' to these inquiries. --If the British intelligence was fabricated and/or faulty --the U.S. congress has the right to listen those 'DS minutes'..in order to resolve any inquiries towards 'matters of misconduct.