"Daybreak urgently reminds us that good political intentions are not sufficient to ensure the continuation of our democracy; informed vigilance is vital to that task."
-Mark Karlin, editor of Buzzflash.com
Submitted by golfmonkey on January 15, 2005 - 11:45am.
Just to clarify the source, the Cleveland Plain Dealer (our only newspaper in Cleveland...sigh) first reported it. Here's the article in it's entirety.
Blackwell's phony seal raises funds, legal issue
Wednesday, January 12, 2005
Stephen Koff
Plain Dealer Bureau Chief
Washington
--At first glance they're similar. Both have an American eagle with a banner in its mouth, and arrows and an olive branch in its talons.
One is the Great Seal of the United States -- and it is illegal to misuse it. The other is a seal on a fund-raising letter and envelope mailed recently by Ken Blackwell, the Ohio secretary of state who wants to be governor.
Blackwell's seal is a fake. But it raises questions about a letter that has already run afoul of the law.
Federal law says that using the official seal -- or its likeness -- for commercial purposes is punishable by up to six months in prison, a $250 fine or both.
But Blackwell's representatives say that while their fake seal is official-enough looking to grab the letter recipient's attention, it's different enough to be legal.
Counters Alex Formuzis, spokesman for U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg: "Our staff attorneys looked at this and believe it clearly violates the law." Lautenberg, a New Jersey Democrat, has examined the misuse of federal seals before.
The official seal is framed by solid rings. Blackwell's seal is framed by stars.
Blackwell's seal has one star above the eagle's head. The Great Seal has 13 stars. And in Blackwell's seal, the banner in the eagle's beak has no inscription -- whereas it is inscribed with "E Pluribus Unum," meaning "Out of many, one," in the Great Seal.
Confusing or deceptive?
Blackwell's direct-mail consultant, Patrick Mooney, notes that the fake seal has been used by politicians across the country.
"Twenty-five years ago, all the direct-mail agencies got together and came up with that seal," Mooney said.
But Mom, all the other kids are doing it!
But 21 years ago, the Justice Department issued a warning, writing to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to say that the party might be violating "the Great Seal statute." The Democrats stopped -- and two years later, they complained to Attorney General Edwin Meese that Republicans were at it, too.
"Obviously the Great Seal of the United States is protected by law," Fred Alverson, law enforcement coordinator for the U.S. attorney's office in Columbus, said this week. "And if anyone has evidence that it has been used improperly, we would refer it to the proper investigative agency, probably the FBI."
Federal charges in a matter like this would be rare. Blackwell, however, already has had to explain his letter's violation of state law.
This next charge is only anecdotally mentioned. What do you bet he's done this before successfully?
In the letter, Blackwell asks for corporate checks for his gubernatorial campaign.
Corporate donations are illegal in Ohio, and Blackwell -- after blaming the printer for inserting the language -- has pledged to return any such donations.
Submitted by blue planet on January 15, 2005 - 2:08pm.
Sorry, but BradBlog broke the Great Seal story 1:00 a.m. Wenesday morning on 1/12/05, citing sources from a Senator's Office (We now know it to be Sen. Lautenberg). Also, Raw Story was the first to actually obtain and expose the Blackwell letter which the AP later reported.
Actually, I posted the story on this site the same day the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported it.
Below is my blog of that day with link to the Original Brad Blog story regarding illegal use of the Great Seal by Blackwell.
Submitted by blue planet on January 15, 2005 - 2:38pm.
There is the possibility that The PD shared the same source (a Senate Staffer). With blogging you can distribute info right away, a newspaper has to actually wait and deliver the paper. Or, maybe The PD took it from the website, who knows?
I'm just grateful that we now have alternative internet news sources, from which we can distribute and cross-reference the news.
Does anyone here actually think that Blackwell will return the donations he got? Even if they are illegal, I have a hard time believing that he would be so willing to just give the money back to the people who gave it to him in the first place. After everything else he's done, I don't expect him to care whether or not something's legal. I hope that they are finally able to nail him on this, though.
Submitted by Msfitts on January 15, 2005 - 1:51pm.
Blackwell is probably as likely to return any monies as Armstrong
Williams is to return that $240,000! Still, it's good that the story is out there. Anything that might help open up more people's eyes...
Update your address so we can find your Senators and Representative. If your current address is correct but your Representatives are missing, please contact us so we can fix your data.
I didn't know that Blackwell
I didn't know that Blackwell misused a Great Seal. That is definitely kinky.
LOL, he had a thing for 80lb
LOL, he had a thing for 80lb paper too.
Here's the original story
Just to clarify the source, the Cleveland Plain Dealer (our only newspaper in Cleveland...sigh) first reported it. Here's the article in it's entirety.
But Mom, all the other kids are doing it!
This next charge is only anecdotally mentioned. What do you bet he's done this before successfully?
Original Report Came From Brad Blog (Just to Clarify Source).
Sorry, but BradBlog broke the Great Seal story 1:00 a.m. Wenesday morning on 1/12/05, citing sources from a Senator's Office (We now know it to be Sen. Lautenberg). Also, Raw Story was the first to actually obtain and expose the Blackwell letter which the AP later reported.
Actually, I posted the story on this site the same day the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported it.
Below is my blog of that day with link to the Original Brad Blog story regarding illegal use of the Great Seal by Blackwell.
http://blog.democrats.com/node/2528/trackback
My bad
What is journalism coming to? The PD writer gave no references to it. They suck on so many levels...
There is the possibility that
There is the possibility that The PD shared the same source (a Senate Staffer). With blogging you can distribute info right away, a newspaper has to actually wait and deliver the paper. Or, maybe The PD took it from the website, who knows?
I'm just grateful that we now have alternative internet news sources, from which we can distribute and cross-reference the news.
Do you believe him?
Does anyone here actually think that Blackwell will return the donations he got? Even if they are illegal, I have a hard time believing that he would be so willing to just give the money back to the people who gave it to him in the first place. After everything else he's done, I don't expect him to care whether or not something's legal. I hope that they are finally able to nail him on this, though.
Blackwell is probably as like
Blackwell is probably as likely to return any monies as Armstrong
Williams is to return that $240,000! Still, it's good that the story is out there. Anything that might help open up more people's eyes...