The Democrats: Really, You Just Gotta Laugh

  • dlindorff's picture
    dlindorff
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By Dave Lindorff

The Democrats in Congress, and their main man Barack Obama in the
White House, have taken tens of millions in legal bribes from the
health insurance industry over the past year, and have obligingly been
hammering out in Congress a health “reform” bill that, instead of
helping people, has been designed to help the insurance industry.

They started out by immediately blackballing any discussion of real
health reform in the form of an expansion of Medicare to cover everyone
of every age, which of course would have ended the problem of the
uninsured, while cutting the nation’s overall health bill by at least a
third, but in the process shutting down the private health insurance
business.

Then they chipped away and are at this point on the verge of
eliminating any so-called “public option” or government-run health
insurance plan to even compete with the private insurance sector.

Finally, in a move as breathtakingly accommodating of the insurance
industry as was the multi-trillion-dollar bailout financial bailout of
Wall Street’s biggest banks, they proposed to require (on pain of a
$3800 fine by the IRS) to require everyone in America to buy a health
insurance plan from the private sector—a gift to the industry of some
40-50 million new captive customers.

But a combination of public outrage at this forced program of
compulsory insurance and recognition that the inevitable government
subsidy of low-income insurance buyers would be humongous has led
Congress to backtrack, and start backing away from the mandatory aspect
of this plan.

And now the private insurance industry, not satisfied that it has
managed to practically dictate the terms of the health reform
legislation so far, and angry that it might not get those 40-50 million
new forced customers, is reportedly threatening to turn around and
knife the president and the Democratic Congress in the back,

They’re threatening to (gasp!) start running attack ads on the “reform” legislation.

Remember the old “Harry and Louise” ads the industry ran attacking
Hillary and Bill Clinton’s health reform proposal back in the early
1990s? Well, this time, it’ll be Harry and Louise attacking ObamaCare.

I can see it now. America’s Health Insurance Plans, the lobby for
the insurance industry vultures, will set up some nice-sounding front
group with a name like People for a Healthier America, and they’ll fund
a new ad campaign like this:

Harry will be sitting at the breakfast table, reading the local
paper. He’ll look up from his coffee as Louise is puttering around by
the sink.

“This ObamaCare looks like it’s gonna drive up our insurance premiums, hon.”

“What do you mean Harry?”

“Well it says here that they’re not going to force the poor
folks to buy insurance, so most of ‘em will probably wait until they
get sick and then buy it.”

“Well what’s wrong with that, dear?”

“Nothin’ ‘cept that the law would also prohibit the insurance
companies from charging those sick folks higher premiums when they do
finally come in to buy insurance.”

“Well, wouldn’t it be unfair to charge them more, when they need it?”

“It might seem that way Louise, but if the insurance company
has to take a loss on them, they’re going to make it up by charging us
good folks who have insurance more.”

“Oh my god, Harry! We’re already paying $6,000 a year for our insurance. What will our premiums go up to?

“Says here they could go up by another $1000 a year!”

Announcer: Don’t let Congress make you pay for the uninsured.
Call your Senators and Representatives and the White House, and tell
them to demand that every American be required to buy insurance
immediately! This announcement is brought to you by People for a
Healthier America.

It’s funny really, to see Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana), the biggest
recipient in Congress of insurance industry money, who has spent the
last few months working hand-in-glove with the insurance industry
lobbyists to craft a bill to their liking, suddenly accusing his
erstwhile financiers of doing a “hatchet job” on his bill. Actually,
his bill has been a hatchet job itself on the whole concept of health
care reform.

All of this, of course, was entirely predictable. Like HillaryCare
before it, ObamaCare has been doomed from the start by its
unwillingness to address the basic issue behind America’s twin crisis
of health care: lack of access for those with lower incomes, and
absurdly high cost for everyone.

What makes it all so pathetic is that America already has
an excellent model for delivering quality health care: a single-payer
system called Medicare. Everyone in America gets this program, just
like in Canada, Germany, France, Taiwan, Japan and elsewhere. The only
difference is that in those other countries, people get it from the day
they’re born. In America, you have to wait until you are permanently
disabled, or until you reach the age of 65.

Far from having to “start from scratch,” as Obama duplicitously
claimed in his last address to Congress in explaining why he was not
proposing a single-payer solution despite its obvious success in other
countries, solving America’s health crisis by adopting a single-payer
system would be a simply matter of taking a well proven system that
works and is popular, and expanding it to cover everybody.

But of course that would have made the insurance industry furious.
They’d have to go back to just selling life insurance and homeowners
insurance and car insurance.

And so we can expect a new round of “Harry and Louise,” and ObamaCare will go down in flames.

You have to laugh at these Democrats. Even when they brazenly try to sell out, they get screwed.

________________

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist. He is author
of “Marketplace Medicine: The Rise of the For-Profit Hospital Chains”
(Bantam Books, 1992) and most recently of “The Case for Impeachment”
(St. Martin’s Press, 2006). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

Comments

The misinformation on this subject is rampant

  • Krag's picture
    Krag
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I feel very betrayed by the democratic party and the President. Back in the year 2000 Ralph Nader said there was little difference between republicans and democrats. Back then i disagreed with him. Now i realize i was wrong.

If you can't see the difference between Russ Feingold

  • kwahlf's picture
    kwahlf
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

and John Boehner,

no amount of persuasive debate will change that.

:-(

You may be right

  • Krag's picture
    Krag
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

They do speak a good speak, but what about substance. Name one bit of good legislation the democrats have proposed and passed since they took over in 2006. They are too worried about playing patti-cake with republicans and being bi-partisan than trying to help the majority of the people. So therefore in substance i see no difference. They do have the votes now to get some real progressive legislation through. So what excuses are there now.

Here is a small sample of

  • kwahlf's picture
    kwahlf
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

his actions in the Senate.

I am discussing Feingold and Boehner here,
good examples of those who get things done
and those who don't.

http://usliberals.about.com/od/liberalpersonalprofiles/p/SenFeingold.htm

Sen. Feingold is an independent progressive thinker who votes the courage of his strong convictions. In 2005, he was the first senator to call for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. On March 13, 2006 and again on July 22, 2007, Sen. Feingold boldly called for Congressional censure of President Bush.

Also see Russ Feingold Gets It Right Again, Votes NO on Bailout.

Sen. Feingold and the USA Patriot Act:

In 2001, Feingold was the lone Senator who voted against the USA Patriot Act, despite pressure for a unanimous vote. He voted against the Iraq War in 2002, and was the first senator to call for a specific timetable for US exit from Iraq. On March 13, 2006, he called for censure of President Bush for illegal wiretapping of Americans.
While he supported 90% of the Patriot Act, he "voted against it because certain provisions...represent a very dangerous infringement on our civil liberties."

Sen. Feingold and the Iraq War:

Sen. Feingold was one of 23 senators to vote against the Iraq War, writing on October 11, 2002, "Both in terms of the justifications for an invasion and in terms of the mission and the plan for the invasion, Mr. President, the Administration's arguments just don't add up... "
On August 21, 2005, Sen. Feingold became the first senator to call for a specific U.S. withdrawal date, December 31, 2006, from Iraq.

What has Boehner done besides trash everything the Democrats do?
Any accomplishments to help our people and our country?-Nah, it's
much easier to trash the Dems.

Here's the link to Feingold's website.

http://www.russfeingold.org/home.html

I was not

  • Krag's picture
    Krag
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I was not just comparing those 2. You are right there is a big difference between those 2, but by and large folks like Russ Feingold are few and far between now in the democratic party. And no i would never vote for a republican unless of course it was Abraham Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt. We need more like Russ or maybe a present day Hubert Humphrey.

Here's a Rush tune Rush

  • KimJones's picture
    KimJones
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

War! Hoo, yeah,

what is it good for?

Absolutely, nothing.  We hear you!

Sensible smart strategy for withdrawal and training the citizens that don't want terrorist and join in a government.  If they election run off turns out honest and no deaths on the way to democracy, maybe just maybe as the people here have called for an end, the citizens of Afghanistan and Pakistan will say:  NOT IN MY BACK YARD YOU DON'T!

God Bless the Peace Makers of Tolerance who Understand Respect for Nations of different nationality.

 

mommapanther

Choosing sides

  • chabuka's picture
    chabuka
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

while you all were choosing sides...Democrats v Republicans...progressives v conservatives...gays v straights.....white v black/hispanic....Hillary v Barack... Obama v McCain, capitalism v socialism..(most people couldn't tell you, how either of them work or the differences) free market v regulated market....torture v prosecution...free trade v jobs in the U.S....etc., the Corporations,  the Wall Street Bankers and "K" street... waltzed right in the back door of the White House and the Congress taking control of both political parties, the legislating and the whole political process, in fact....blackmailing and bribing both political parties (AKA campaign donations) while you all bickered among your selves....John Edwards was right about one thing,  they are not going to give it back..we have to take it back