The Ugly Truth: America's Economy is Not Coming Back

  • dlindorff's picture
    dlindorff
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By Dave Lindorff

President Barack Obama and his economic team are being careful to
couch all their talk about economic stimulus programs and bank bailout
programs in warnings that the economic downturn is serious and that it
will take considerable time to bounce back.

I’m reminded of an experience I had with Chinese medicine when I
was living in Shanghai back in 1992. I had come down with a nasty case
of the flu while teaching journalism at Fudan University on a Fulbright
Scholar program. <!--break>A Chinese colleague suggested I go to the university
clinic. When I told him there wasn’t much point since doctors couldn’t
do much for the flu besides recommend fluids and bed rest, he said,
“That’s Western doctors. You could go to the Chinese medicine doctors
at the clinic. They can help you.” I figured, what the hell, and we
went. The doctor inquired into the lurid details of my illness—how my
bowel movements looked, the color of the mucus in my nose, etc. He
didn’t really examine me physically. Then he prescribed an incredible
number of pills and teas and sent me home with a huge bag of stuff, and
instructions on the regimen for taking them through the course of each
day. I followed the directions dutifully, and my colleague came by each
day to check on my progress. By the fifth day, when I was still running
a fever and feeling terrible, I told him I didn’t think the Chinese
medicine was working. He replied confidently, “Chinese medicine takes a
long time to work.”

I laughed at this. “Sure,” I said. “But the flu only lasts a week
or so, and now, when I get better, you’ll say it was the Chinese
medicine, right?”

He smiled and agreed. “Yes. You are right.”

Obviously the Obama administration recognizes that it needs to keep
the finger of blame for the current economic collapse squarely pointed
at the Bush administration, which is certainly fair in large part
(though the Clinton deregulation of the banking industry played a major
part in the financial crisis and its enthusiastic promotion of
globalization began the massive shift of jobs overseas that has left
the nation’s productive capacity hollowed out). But it also seems to
recognize that it cannot tell the bitter truth, which is that our
national economy will never “bounce back” to where it was in 2007.

America, and individual Americans, have been living profligately
for years in an unreal economy, propped up by easy credit which
inflated the value of real estate to incredible levels, and which led
people to spend way beyond their means. Ordinary middle-class working
people have been encouraged to buy obscenely oversized homes at 5%
down, or even no down payment. They have been lured into buying cars
the size of trucks, one for each driving-aged member of the family (in
our town, so many high school kids drive to school that the school ran
out of parking spaces and the yellow school buses, largely empty on
their runs, are referred to by the students as the “shame train,” an
embarrassment to be seen riding). They’ve installed individual
back-yard swimming pools, unwilling to share the water with their
neighbors in community pools. Boring faux ethnic restaurant franchises
of all kinds have befouled the landscape, filling up with families too
stressed out to cook, and willing to endure over-salted, over-priced
and tasteless cuisine and tacky plastic décor night after night.

Now this is all crashing down. Property values are in free-fall.
Car sales have fallen off a cliff. Joblessness is soaring (At present,
it’s approaching an official rate of 8%, but if the methodology used in
1980, before the Reagan administration changed it to hide the depth of
that era’s deep recession, were applied, it would be 17% today, or one
in seven workers).

Eventually, the economic slide will hit bottom and begin its slow
climb back, as all recessions do, but there will be no return to the
days of $500,000 McMansion developments, three-car garages and a new
car every two or three years for both parents plus a car for each
highschooler. Not only will banks no longer be able to offer such
credit to clients. People, having been burned, will not be willing to
borrow so much. Company health care benefits, pension programs or
401(k) matching programs that were slashed during this downturn will
not be restored when the economy picks up again.

Over the last 20 years, America has degenerated into a nation of
consumers, with 72 percent of Gross Domestic Product (sic) now being
accounted for by consumer spending—most of it going for things that are
produced overseas and shipped here.

That is not an economic model that is sustainable, and it is a model that has just suffered what is certainly a mortal blow.

What we are now seeing is the beginning of an inevitable downward
adjustment in American living standards to conform with our actual
place in the world. As a nation of consumers, and not producers, with
little to offer to the rest of the world except raw materials, food
crops, military hardware and bad films (none of which industries employ
many people), we are headed to a recovery that will not feel like a
recovery at all. Eventually, productive capacity will be restored, as
lowered US wages make it again profitable for some things to be made
here at home again, but like people in the 1930s looking back at the
Roaring 20s of yore, we are going to look back at the last two decades
as some kind of dream.

It would be better if the new administration would be honest about
this, because with honesty, we could have a recovery program that would
actually address the real critical issues facing the country—the
decline of our educational system, the irrationality of official
promotion of home ownership that has led to the proliferation not just
of suburbs but of exurbs, the over-reliance on the automobile for
transportation, the unprecedented waste of resources, the pillaging of
the environment, not to mention the decimation of the retirement system
and the creation of a vast medical-industrial complex that is sucking
the life-blood out of families and businesses alike.

With honesty, we could also confront the other big obstacle to
national recovery—the nation’s obsession with militarism and foreign
wars. The honest truth is that the US is technically bankrupt and in a
state of chronic decline, and yet the nation persists in spending a
trillion dollars a year on war and preparations for war, as though
America were in mortal danger from foreign enemies.

The truth is that we are not threatened by Communism, by drug
lords, or by Muslim Jihadists in any serious way. Rather, we have
become our own worst enemy.

The administration could start by telling us all this straight up,
but the problem is, most of us probably don’t want to hear it, which
explains why we’re not hearing it. It also explains why we’re about to
blow another trillion or so dollars on propping up failing banks,
funding pointless highway and bridge construction, and blowing up
illiterate peasants in remote places like Afghanistan and Pakistan.
_____________________

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist. His latest
book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now
available in paperback edition). Lindorff spent five years reporting on China and Hong Kong for Business Week magazine. His current work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

digg_url = 'http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/39374';
digg_title = "The Ugly Truth: America\'s Economy is Not Coming Back";
digg_bodytext = "By Dave Lindorff\r\n\r\n\r\n President Barack Obama and his economic team are being careful to couch all their talk about economic stimulus programs and bank bailout programs in warnings that the economic downturn is serious and that it will take considerable time to bounce back.\r\n\r";
digg_skin = 'standard';

Comments

Let's see Dave: an

  • Bill Harding's picture
    Bill Harding
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Let's see Dave: an acclaimed journalist, a top-notch diplomacy expert and military strategist, and now an expert in economics.

Wow, I'm impressed!

LINDORFF DOCTRINE: GO AFTER BUSH NOT AL QAEDA?

  • Jim's picture
    Jim
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

We want to go after Bush for starting a war but not the Taliban and Al Qaeda!?!?!

I understand that folks may, at this point in time, come down on different sides of the Afghan question, but a cavalier attitude about ANY military intervention is wrong headed at best.

GO AFTER BUSH NOT AL QAEDA

will not help in our case to the American People about prosecuting Bush.

Jim

"Consumer Economy"

  • Jim's picture
    Jim
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I hear people bitch a lot, but often wonder:

WHAT DO "YOU" PRODUCE?

Seriously. What Dave?

And don't blame a lack of production on the big bad gummermunt or da corporations. Sure they've had a hand in it, but what about "YOU"?

---With just pin money you can presently buy a table top cnc lathe. Make something.

---How about some woodworking tools? We live in PA where every park has free logs just waiting to be chipped. Grab one and make something.

---Etc.

Jim

I note David, that your adjusted figures for unemployment...

show as 17%. The rate of unemployment during the 'Great Depression' was 16%.

Of course, percentages really don't tell the story do they. 17% of today's population is far more unemployment than the 16% that was a sheer disaster for most Americans. Anyone have the true figure of unemployed? Haven't seen any 'real' numbers offered by reputable journalists anyplace.

Maybe the question should be: Are there any 'reputable' journalists left?

We have reached tip-over David. Any suggestions as to how we fix that?

A mind once expanded can never return to its original dimensions.

Anne Hathaway: 1556-1623

 

The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.

I wonder how many folks realize that...

  • Jim's picture
    Jim
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

...any "fix", will only remain fixed, if folks forever more act like DEMOCRATS toward labor?

If not, then there is nothing to fix. Let the majority work for slave wages.

yes I do blame the corporations and the government.

  • Ole's picture
    Ole
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

One for looking for the very cheapest labor around so they moved there production overseas. Two the governemnet has benn giving tax breaks to coprorations that move there production oversea. I guess a better word instead of consumer economy would be a service economy.

Ole, try this for a another perspective:

  • Jim's picture
    Jim
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

1-Design a part.

2-Go to www.mfgquote.com and get back quotes on that part.

3-Now decide who YOU will use to make your parts, knowing full well you have to face the American Public as consumers.

---

Companies are not always what you think they are. Most companies, from giants to single person ones, design in house, then try to find specialists who make particular kinds of parts: cast, machined, spun, injection molded, short run, long run, etc.

If you take the time to do this exercise you will find that the culprit is BOTH the people who bitch, and the general anti labor attitude fostered by Republicans.

IT IS NOT JUST THE CORPORATIONS FAULT.

---

The solution:

-Consumers must be willing to pay a LOT more for products BUT with increased salaries for the majority (via less for the elite).

-The increased salaries will still NOT compensate for what we could purchase if we make use of slave labor oversees, but it helps.

Jim

P.S. I can get parts for less than a dollar a piece overseas, but have to pay $10 here. For a product that needs a few dozen parts, that is deadly in the USA market. It makes something folks now expect to pay $10 for, over a hundred bucks!

That use to be fine! We never had cheap fair quality Chinese wrench sets in stores a few decades ago. You had to really think if you needed new sets of tools and plunk down some real cash for them. Not anymore, and folks aren't looking back. Sad.

If you'll note, in my original post I DID say that the government and corporations had a hand in this. I only mentioned that that was not the end of the story.

Perhaps

  • Ole's picture
    Ole
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Yeah your right I guess , but many of these corporations don't want to pay a living wage here in the US so they ship the job overseas and then bitch that americans are not buying there goods as much now. If you don't pay the workers a decent wage how can they buy these products. I also blame consumers for making companies like walmart so big because they get most there products from overseas. In other words shopping at places like walmart undercuts american manufacturing. So there is three fingers to point one at ourselves, one at the government, and one at the corporations.

That leaves only one finger...

  • Jim's picture
    Jim
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

...and a thumb!

We had better not find another culprit ;)

a few thoughts

  • shakerdog's picture
    shakerdog
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Firstly, there is merit to each opinion
being expressed. Everyone is unique in the way they perceive the
physical and spiritual world. “There is some truth to be found in
all things, but nothing is absolute truth”. So there you have it,
we all think we know what to do for things to be better.

Well here we are a nation of consumers.
We have even been led to believe that it is patriotic to do so.
Well first of all that tells me the people who told us that had an
idea of what was to come, and also they took advantage of it. And
yet they did not feel that “we the people” should know or needed
to know.

And as a matter of fact there is “some”
truth to that in that there has to be someone to buy the products
that are made. And the fact is that those products (albeit crap) are
being made less costly than we can make them. So we are buying stuff
made from other countries because it is cheaper to buy.

And there is “some” truth to the
selling military and weapons as what we do. There are a select few
companies who create our advanced military technology and while they
do employ many people, it is a quite small number in comparison to
the number of available workers in America.

Yet they have the ears of our
government and usually secure the big contracts from our government
to continue doing so. The truth is that there are many more
companies that would like to share in some of these contracts in
order to employ and even greater number of Americans but that usually
is not allowed to happen. There is an area where we could do better
and share a little more.

Regarding making things, I fully agree
that we should be using any bailout to create new technologies and to
update some existing systems of our infra-structure. The problem
with a lot of this is that money and greed is involved and not
everyone wants to share the benefit or for that matter the labor.

For instance the electric grid is a
joke. The fact that we have things working as much as they do is a
miracle in itself. And as our weather patterns change and become
more serious, this affects everyone. This can be seen in the daily
news as areas more and more lose power for extended periods of time
or the systems become more taxed as we try to keep everything lit up
with extravagant lights and perfect temperatures. And the cost to
keep our cozy abodes whether little of massive continue to increase
though the systems are becoming less and less reliable.

Here is “some” truths About that:

First of all we choose to build cheap
stick housing developments, that use up our forests, and use up our
lands with urban sprawl. This is done to make money. It is not done
for the good of the people. If it were, we would use better
materials.

Now those materials can be better for
us and be just as cost effective, but we call it green and charge
more money for it. However, by building better buildings in the
first place the benefits are many. One is reduce energy cost.

By using the sunlight in an effective
way electricity usage can be cut for lighting and heating. Seems
like such a basic thing to consider yet few do.

By using materials other than sticks,
the building become more efficient at holding coolness or heat thus
cutting energy.

Also a benefit of this type of building
is that it cuts property loss due to weather damages for instance.
This would in fact lower our insurance costs and therefore benefit
everyone. These buildings would also be safer.

Our energy grid to me is like one big
electrical strip that we just keep daisy chaining off of . Every
time a new building or new lights on roads or whatever goes up we
just plug another strip into the strip and it is all plugged into
just a few outlets. One thing to consider would be area or
neighborhood fuel cell grids running off natural gas(which we are
using anyway). Less taxing of the greater system, a more even spread
of the resources are just some of the benefits. Also the building of
such things would lead to employment of Americans. What a novel
idea. Gee in an area or neighborhood grid we could even get rid of
those ridiculous and seriously dangerous wires. Oh my goodness that
might even cut down on loss of power due to weather. Wow maybe we
could even use fiber optics underground to supply it.

There are many more things we need to
consider that benefit “all” Americans as well as our economy.
These are just a few. An underlying issue is the way we view
problems and how we choose to solve them. In the near future with
global changes we need to be looking at these types of things as well
as considering the global changes in how and where we get our water
and food and looking ahead to adjust for the changes so that we can
continue to meet the demands for “all” Americans in cost
effective ways (that f not beneficial right away, are in our future).
These things create jobs, help our environment, make our world safer
and healthier and allow us to be comfortable and happier while
helping the economy, the earth, and everyone.

And finally, these things will take
people of intelligence, discernment, and wisdom as well as courage
and foresight. They cannot be done from a foundation of greed built
on suffering or the me me me attitude. Every day new ideas and ways
of doing things better are created but to everyones loss they are
pushed aside covered up or disregarded because they challenge the
status quo or take wealth from the few and give to the many or even
because it takes a little longer to do. Well we all have a say and
we all have choices but do we have leaders and do we have resolve and
do we havecourage to change for the better.

Where to begin?

  • Jim's picture
    Jim
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Poor people, in the most densely packed areas, are already VERY green!

---Row homes have only 3 sides exposed to the weather instead of 5 for a single. They therefore lose only 3/5 of the heat.

---Modest homes are also small (losing less heat and using fewer resources in general).

---Transportation is minimal due to the dense packing.

---Incomes are limited,and therefore, so too the consumption of resources.

---etc.

When you sit down and try to do better, you discover a few things. One of them is that our civilization already ROCKS! I am proud of her, and the United State in particular. The above characteristics, which came about over time, match green building almost perfectly!

You want to improve on it?

You mention using something better than "stick construction" (i.e. 2x4s). Sometimes that might, but often it is WORSE. Why? Because the rows are already resource efficient, and if you put more cash into the walls then you have to see if the increased mortgage payments are offset by the decreased energy bills. Sometimes they are NOT. In addition, have you just locked lower income folks out of owning that home due to the increased UP FRONT COST?

Now, obviously we can always improve. Often however this requires a coordinated effort. A single builder can't do it alone. Government can help.

If I was to offer recommendations I would say:

-look at adding insulation to the non party walls (via a tax incentive).

-consider facing the rows for near southern exposure when possible. (Up North. Reverse for Deep South).

-A single panel pre heating solar water panel per roof would, in many locals,pay for its up front costs, in about a decade (let's get some tax incentives going to help lower income workers afford this).

-For a fixed window budget, place the more expensive windows on the north side (where they are just a heat loss). And/Or place most of the windows on the South sides (with appropriately sized awnings to passively block the higher summer sun). And/Or place foam insulating shutters over the northern windows whenever not in use. (Up North.)

-Consider compact fluorescent bulbs as you can afford them.

And that is about it! That is, until new discoveries cheapen the price of solar cells, for example. In other words, the working class has done pretty damned well.

I would caution anyone with grand schemes to actually DO IT before being convinced it's a no brainer.

More thinking than you think might have already been done ;)

Jim