This might be the smoking gun that we need to force congress and Obama to investigate the bush administration. Professor Jonathan Turley thinks we need to draw the line here, now.

BAGHDAD - By Peter Graff and Ahmed Rasheed

Some prisoners held indefinitely without charge by U.S. forces in Iraq may not be freed or given trials, even though U.S. forces lost the authority to hold them at the beginning of this year, a U.S. military spokesman said.

Iraqi legal experts said the plans -- which would apply to prisoners U.S. forces believe are dangerous or of intelligence value but have not been charged with a crime -- might violate Iraqi law by placing detainees beyond the reach of the courts.

U.S. forces are holding 15,000 prisoners, most of whom have been detained without charge under the authority of a U.N. Security Council resolution which expired on December 31.

Under the terms of a bilateral pact which took effect on January 1, Washington agreed that all its prisoners would either be transferred to Iraqi custody under arrest warrants from Iraqi judges, or freed "in a safe and orderly manner."

The agreement does not mention any mechanism for continuing to hold prisoners without charge, and Iraqi legal experts say there is no such provision under Iraqi law.

But U.S. military spokesman Major Neal Fisher said Washington will ask Iraq not to free some prisoners, even if they cannot be charged with crimes.

"There will be cases in which a detainee falls into the category of high intelligence value or is a high threat but has not violated an Iraqi law, and thus should be released based on the security agreement," he said in an e-mail.

"We would like for the government of Iraq to continue to hold these 'radical extremists' and 'enduring threats,'" he said. "We seriously desire that they will choose to keep these particular detainees off the streets."

More here