Fun Thoughts: Messin' With Republicans

  • dlindorff's picture
    dlindorff
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

By Dave Lindorff

A week out from Election Day, with the polls looking pretty good for Barack Obama's election, especially in the Electoral College, focus is shifting to the Senate, where Democrats would need to pick up 10 seats in order to be able to both prevent Republican obstruction via filibuster, and send Connecticut's turncoat Sen. Joe Lieberman into well-deserved oblivion.

Getting to a 10-seat gain may look like long odds, but it occurs to me that this really doesn't matter. In fact, a President Obama could have fun picking off a couple of Republican senators from states that have Democratic governors, by naming them to posts in his administration, thereby simultaneously demonstrating a bi-partisan approach to governance while ensuring solid Democratic control of both houses of Congress. And he could do this without having to name out-of-synch conservatives to any position.

For example, Obama could invite either Sen. Susan Collins or Olympia Snowe, both Republican senators in Maine, to serve in some capacity in the cabinet--perhaps in the role of EPA Administrator or Secretary of the Interior, or as Secretary of Health and Welfare or of Education. Either one would be hard put to turn down that offer, and if accepted, Maine's Democratic governor, John Baldacci, would get to name a replacement, who would be a Democrat.

Oregon Republican Senator Gordon Smith is in a tight race for re-election in that liberal state. If he succeeds in returning to office, Obama could offer him a cabinet post, too--perhaps Secretary of Commerce. Smith has been campaigning almost as an ally of Obama in his effort to defeat Democratic challenger Jeff Merkley, so he'd be an easy fit, and that would give Oregon's Democratic governor, Ted Kulongoski, the chance to name a Democratic replacement--probably Merkley. So everybody (except Senate Republicans) wins!

If still another Democratic Senate seat were needed to hit the magic number of 60 in the next Senate, Obama could find a job for Tennessee's Lamar Alexander, or even Pennsylvania's senior senator Arlen Specter.

Republicans, of course, would be livid if their numbers were pared in this way, but that would be fun to watch. All the named Republican senators above are relatively liberal and have suffered at the hands of their party's conservative majority. Most would probably jump at the chance of a cabinet post.

So if Obama wins next Tuesday, but Democrats fall short in the Senate, look for some entertainment in the coming few months.

________________

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in paperback edition). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

 

Comments

Fantastic idea.

  • Ole's picture
    Ole
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

How devilishly clever of you. I LIKE IT!!!

I like it, too!

  • kwahlf's picture
    kwahlf
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

Don't forget Ted Stevens( R-Alaska) is going to have a very
rough go now with his felony conviction hanging over him.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/10/ted-stevens-con.html

Ted Stevens' conviction the crowning blow in bad year for GOP senators.

More than a year ago, The Ticket noted how everything seemed to be coming up roses for the Democrats as the landscape took shape for 2008 Senate races.

Now, with the election a week away, the party caught still another break with the conviction this afternoon of the longest-serving Republican in the Senate -- Ted Stevens of Alaska -- on all seven counts of failing to report an array of gifts.

Most obviously, the jury's verdict is a huge blow to Stevens' bid for a seventh full Senate term.

Is it a fatal one?

We'd pause before writing off Stevens -- even with a felony conviction weighing him down -- because of the status he long enjoyed among his constituents. And in a statement he issued, Stevens, right, made clear he'll depict himself as the target of unscrupulous and unethical federal prosecutors. "This verdict is the result of the unconscionable manner in which the Justice Department lawyers conducted this trial."

But Anne Hays of the Anchorage-based Hays Research Group showed no hesitation to make a political prediction as word spread in her state of Stevens' conviction.

"I think it sinks him," she told us as word spread of Stevens' conviction. His race against Democrat Mark Begich "had tightened up," she noted. "But I think this will break it out again" in Begich's favor.

More broadly, the verdict is yet another stain on a GOP brand ...

... that hardly needed it . Although it shouldn't directly hurt a specific Republican candidate, it adds to a general malaise that has enveloped the party -- and which many GOP officials fear will only get thicker with next week's election results.

Hold up, wait a minute

  • KimJones's picture
    KimJones
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

What machines do the Rethug states have. Are Alaska's voting machines out of whack too?

Stevens should not win, nobody likes a cheat. Which calls to mind the whole Rethug Party that took over the Republican Party. They are long cheaters and need to be purged from the party, to start their own, if just for Americans to know, who the real "nut cases" are and where they be.

We've got work to do America, one of the jobs is accountability, meaning, "A paper trail"

mommapanther

A paper trail is RIGHT, Kim.

  • kwahlf's picture
    kwahlf
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I don't see Stevens winning.

If he does, I would highly suspect fraudulent voting in Alaska.

Why in the hell doesn't the man have the decency to withdraw
from the race?

I just answered my own question- decency- he doesn't have it.

:-(

YOu should have seen him on C-Span

  • KimJones's picture
    KimJones
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

You should have seen him on C-span, when the Senate wouldn't pass his "bridge to nowhere" You can probably find it in the archives on C-SPAN.ORG

It was comical. He threw a "wang dang doodle" Threatening other members by stating whe wouldn't help them get their bills throught either. "You can count me out of it"

Totally funny, how he threw that tantrum. I guess that's when they took him seriously and ratted him out on the contracting scam.

Poor "Uncle Teddy" got caught with his hand in the Oil company till.

mommapanther

Lamar Alexander

  • pepawjoe0943's picture
    pepawjoe0943
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

I like the probable plan also. I am a blue Democrat, living in a red State. Lamar Alexander simply cannot be trusted in any political scenerio. He beleives that who ever is willing to pay the most for his services, "Done Deal".He is also subject to losing his re-election in Nov. that is if the people of Tenn. are willing to admit his intentions do not include any concerns on his part to represent the people. He is a Senator that is "FOR SALE" to the highest bidder. His intent is to sell himself and his personal gain.

Lamar Alexander, say it ain't so

  • KimJones's picture
    KimJones
    Want to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!

You mean Lamar is a "political whore"

We had a bunch of those since Bush. Get the whores out of the People's house.
We had enough of that with Bill Clinton.

Family values do matter, I'll take a man married 16 years to one woman, to a two bit hussler navy pilot, who devorces his wife for a younger woman, anytime!

Michelle Obama would have never stood silent, if Barack would have been such a dog. His election would have stopped in it's tracks. We black women have a way of keeping ours in check.

Some call it b*tchy, some call it bold, but regardless of the circumstances, We don't play that!

mommapanther