Big John McCain and the Scary Iran Threat

By Dave Lindorff

Mighty war hero John McCain has a troublesome perceptual problem. He sees things as being bigger than they really are.

When he was flying fighter-bombers over North Vietnam, he, like many in the military, imagined that he was fighting against a mighty foe (world communism, I suppose). What he was really doing was dropping bombs on a peasant country that was essentially still in the 19th or even, in much of the countryside, the 18th Century. It was also only a sixth of the size of the US. But John McCain bravely battled against this pipsqueak enemy, dropping his bombs until some of those peasant soldiers shot him down and captured him.

Now Big John is looking at Iran and seeing a dangerous, implacable enemy of America. In fact, he says this enemy is as big a danger as was the mighty Soviet Union of the 1970s or 1980s! Watch out America! Iran is coming! Like the Soviet Union before it, which had America living in daily terror of nuclear annihilation for decades, and which had our poor country fighting proxy wars around the globe as we tried to contain the spread of a dreaded Communist ideology that threatened to destroy our great capitalist society, McCain says Iran poses a mortal threat to the survival of the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. Look out America! Iran is going to turn us all into Moslems! Ah-h-h-h!

But wait a minute. During the Cold War, before it collapsed in a heap of rubble, the Soviet Union was a country of nearly 250 million people. Its mighty Red Army had defeated the German Wehrmacht in World War II. The USSR had tens of thousands of nuclear bombs and it had missiles bigger than ours, capable of lobbing 20-megaton bombs on American cities. It held half a dozen European nations of ancient lineage captive, and financed dreaded revolutionary forces around the globe. It had a nuclear submarine fleet that was better than ours, and that was equipped with sea-launched missiles that could be fired at US targets from locations only minutes from our coastline.

Iran, in contrast, is a poor country of 70 million. It has no nuclear weapons. It has no missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, much less of carrying them halfway around the world to US targets. It hasn’t conquered or even attacked another country in centuries, and seems to show little interest in doing so (it couldn’t even defeat Iraq, a country less than half its size, which attacked it in the 1980s). Its navy consists of little boats more suitable to towing water skiers than to fighting American carrier battle groups. Its air force wouldn’t last a day in a contest with the planes from just one US carrier. Hell, Iran's leadership is afraid of its own women!

But Big John is afraid, and he says we all should be too.

He says Barack Obama is naïve for proposing that the next president negotiate with the leaders of Iran, saying that Iran is as dangerous as the Soviet Union.

Forget for a moment that America did negotiate with the Soviet Union, not once, but many times—let’s see, by my count every president from Roosevelt to Reagan negotiated with the Soviets. But John McCain, our brave war hero who wants to be president, says Iran is too scary and dangerous. We dare not negotiate with them.

Maybe the guy should be wearing glasses. He’s sure not seeing things accurately.

Big John needs some little warning stickers that he can put on things to remind him of reality. They could say: “Caution! Things you are looking at may be smaller than they appear!”

This disability of McCain’s could at least explain how he has managed to stay so trim at the ripe age of 71 when most of his doddering Senate colleagues are sporting paunches. He probably looks at a plate with a little a tiny burger on it, and thinks he’s been served a Quarterpounder.
__________________
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist. His latest book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now in paperback). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

digg_url = 'http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/33527'; digg_title = "Big John McCain and the Scary Iran Threat"; digg_bodytext = "By Dave Lindorff\r\n\r\n\r\nMighty war hero John McCain has a troublesome perceptual problem. He sees things as being bigger than they really are.\r\n\r\nWhen he was flying fighter-bombers over North Vietnam, he, like many in the military, imagined that he was fighting against a mighty foe (world communism, I suppose). What he was really doing was dropping bombs on a peasant country that was essentially still in the 19th or even, in much of the countryside, the 18th Century. It was also only a sixth of the size of the US. But John McCain bravely battled against this pipsqueak enemy, dropping his bombs until some of those peasant soldiers shot him down and captured him.\r\n\r"; digg_skin = 'standard';

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"...bravely battled against this pipsqueak enemy..."

How about we allow room for our Vietnam Vets?

-The battles were ferocious not "pipsqueak".
-The motivations of each soldier ---at the moment of horror--- can hardly be picked apart from afar.
-Summing up a defining moment in a Vietnam Vet's life, as BOTH wrong AND minor, just to disparage McCain, is an outrage.
-etc.

I just don't get this approach at all.

Jim

Jim, thanks for speaking up

Jim, thanks for speaking up for those of us who have given up trying to argue with the "morally superior" crowd, and their armchair quarterback spokespeople. Anyone with a loaded weapon, or a homemade bomb, regardless of their age, ethnicity, religion, or educational background, is NOT a "pipsqueak" when they're trying to kill you -- especially when they have the homefield advantage.

The current brave US-citizen military members in Iraq and Afghanistan (you know -- the "other" war), are in the same situation as the Vietnam citizen-soldiers: getting their asses kicked because there is no definable "enemy," or objective, while both the politicians AND the anti-war pundits use them for political and propaganda fodder.

Just like the Vietnam troops, the Gulf War troops are locked in a no-win situation: no respect from the anti-war know-nothing bullshit artists, and no support from the war-profiteering politicians, or those they represent. When you get right down to it, there is little difference in the tactics and faux-arguments employed by the two groups, and both sides can kiss my, and my brother and sister veterans' collective bruised and bloody asses.

I was close to vitriol...

...but this was all so deja vu that I felt I would make no inroads no matter what.

I just don't get it.

I don't see how some disparagingly judge soldiers over points of disagreement:

-One soldier believing the Vietnam War advanced American interests.

-Another soldier believing the Vietnam War was a cluster fuck like Iraq.

-Yet another soldier believing something in between.

ALL THE WHILE, THEY ALL HAD TO F@@@ING SHOW UP REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VIEWED IT!

--------

I've heard all those views from Vets, and I've seen respectful disagreement on policy. To place policy arguments and a soldier's motivation (allowing them to tough out a war) in the same sentence, is horrid.

Is this now to be applied to the troops in Iraq?

This popped up on democrats.com before and we rid ourselves of it. I'll say what I said then: An entire Nation resisted doing this --regardless if they objected to the War in Iraq (on both the Left and the Right)-- and now we are to air it here?

Jim and Bill,

Thank you,

for speaking up and for your service.

The "enemy" could be a pipsqueak, like
a little 10 year old boy who threw a hand grenade
into a cafe full of US soldiers in Na Trang. That resulted in
many casualties, so the messenger( or enemy) can come
in all sizes.

It's just oh so easy to pick apart the who, what and why
of our soldiers actions in combat- especially when the
dissector has NEVER SET FOOT in a battlefield.

Nah- it doesn't fly- ESPECIALLY ON MEMORIAL DAY!

(there is no smilie that adequately conveys my feelings right now)

Memorial Day

Just to be clear to everyone: Bill got shot at, my gen avoided it.

------------

I was driving into the sun today and suddenly remembered a childhood memory: sleeping in tall grass, looking up at the sun, filling my lungs with fresh air, and bathed in the knowledge that mom and dad, brother and sis, AND Saturday cartoons, awaited me at home.

It made me think of whether Vietnam Vets -in particular- can remember back to childhood, before they knew either horror, or just how unappreciative and non-understanding supposed compatriots can be.

I don't mean "remember" in the intellectual sense, but in a visceral way: innocence, love, joy, wide eyes...

My hope this day, is that as the decades pass, some of that CAN be remembered. Even in this complex world there must be some truth to those moments in our youths.

Jim, you've touched on a

Jim, you've touched on a subject that many vets struggle with: American and Vietnamese Vietnam War vets; Russian, Afghan, Iraqi, British, Canadian, and American ME War vets.

WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East wars all have one thing in common: the vets on both sides of the conflicts are the ones who pay the price in blood, psychological trauma, and lives permanently interrupted or altered.

The few "winners" in war, are those who sell the weapons, rebuild the devastation, and heal the wounded. The losers, and personal losses, are legion.

Vietnam: Those that pay and Those with mouths.

I've often marveled at how bullies in the school yard can be physically weaker than their victims. It is truly amazing how the human mouth can can allow some to be manipulators of others ---regardless of physical prowess.

I guess those same bullies grow up.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.