Clinton Blames Large Numbers of People Who Support Peace for Her Defeat
"We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party. MoveOn didn't even want us to go into Afghanistan. I mean, that's what we're dealing with. And you know they turn out in great numbers. And they are very driven by their view of our positions, and it's primarily national security and foreign policy that drives them. I don't agree with them. They know I don't agree with them. So they flood into these caucuses and dominate them and really intimidate people who actually show up to support me."
- davidswanson's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version- Send to friend
Join us & contribute
Proud members of the Democratic Party
Copyright 2006 Democrats.com. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
True colors bleeding through...
I am not that familiar with Move On's position on Afghanistan, (If they are/were against going into Afghanistan, I strongly disagree with them.) but her warmongering is starting to show. I've tried to keep an open mind on the two candidates, but Hillary's desperation tactics are not making her look any better.
EDIT: I should have mentioned that her DLC lineage is also showing. Us vs Them, and the THEM is supposed to be part of US. By her reckoning, most people against the war are THEM!