Bud Paxson remembers meeting with McCain

In a public statement yesterday Paxson contradicted John McCain's assertion that he never met with anyone from Paxson Communications:

"Broadcaster Lowell "Bud" Paxson yesterday contradicted statements from Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign that the senator did not meet with Paxson or his lobbyist before sending two controversial letters to the Federal Communications Commission on Paxson's behalf.
Paxson said he talked with McCain in his Washington office several weeks before the Arizona Republican wrote the letters in 1999 to the FCC urging a rapid decision on Paxson's quest to acquire a Pittsburgh television station.
Paxson also recalled that his lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, likely attended the meeting in McCain's office and that Iseman helped arrange the meeting. "Was Vicki there? Probably," Paxson said in an interview with The Washington Post yesterday. "The woman was a professional. She was good. She could get us meetings."

The Washington Post article this morning goes on to quote Bud Paxson that he personally asked McCain to write the letters in question to the FCC and as a result he got the approval he needed to pursue the purchase of the Pittsburg TV station.

See the full article here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/22/AR200802...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

She's a professional, alright...

McCain apparently works best when he's lying - whether it's on his back or with his gums flapping...he's just lying.

Isn't that a typical politician

Especially the Republicans. Seems like if their mouth is moving they are lying. They lie about sex, they lie about contributions, they lie about sex, they lie about influence pedaling, they lie about sex, they lie about their positions on key issues, they lie about sex, they lie about their relationships and did I mention they lie about sex? I have not doubt that being in a position of prominence and power is an aphrodisiac for a lot of impressionable young people and therefore the availability of willing partners is abundant and who is going to come out and admit they cheated on their spouse. One can almost pardon lying about sex but when it comes to the amount of corruption going on and the amount of deceit involved it is almost beyond comprehension. I am absolutely astounded that one of the Keating Five is actually going to be a nominee for the office of POTUS.

I personally don't care if McCain had sex with Vicki Iseman or Larry Craig or even Bill Richardson's horse Sundance, but the known fact that he was one of the Keating Five and that he lied about why he wrote those letters to the FCC says more about McCain's character and honor than anything else in his background.

He was reprimanded, IIRC

but it was too little, too late and his lobbyists had already raped us while we slept. It pretty much ended the jobs of the other senators involved. I think they got more than a ceremonial slap on the wrist.

SFGate

Usama bin Forgotten

Cloudancer is right on....

He was eager to take Charles Keating's money and do the dirty work. If one learns of More-of-the-same McCain's history as a POW, the fact remains that he would tell the Communist Vietnamese anything to get himself into a hospital while his fellow fliers were in prison. HE TALKED. He violated the Code of Conduct.  Of course, he's been on the government dole all of his life and his father greased the skids for him. He got off.

 

For anyone else, it would have been treason.  

 

BUCK FUSH !!!

"When Fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag carrying a cross." Sinclair Lewis

Old time post

McCain himself has admitted he broke under torture and extreme pain when he was a POW but even those that were imprisoned with him do not fault him for it. He even tried to kill himself before he finally broke and who among us can swear that we would do better? On the other hand, his experiences as a POW are a strong reason why he should never be president. I wrote the following post on the original Democrats.com website several years ago when McCain was being touted as a great presidential candidate:

McCain will survive
By cloudancer
Long ago in a land far away we fought a stupid war and many or our brothers were captured. There were those that had as part of their duties the honor of going after those brothers in unacknowledged rescue excursions across the DMZ. There was one common denominator among the rescued that had been captives for any length of time......they knew how to survive.
John McCain exhibits all the characteristics of those brothers. He knows how to give a lot to get a little. He knows how to push to that point just before he has pushed to far. He knows how to give up what he considers expendable to save himself. He knows when to bow to authority. And he knows how to make people think he is agreeing when he is thinking just the opposite.
John McCain is a survivor and that is a good thing. Good if you are a POW. Good if you are trying to survive or keep your men alive. Not so good if you are representing millions of people that depend on you to stand strong and be resilient. Not so good if you are the president of the United States and have to make hard decisions about the welfare of our nation and the future of our children.
Survival instincts are not the basis for a good leader; they are the instincts of a good soldier (or in Bush’s case, a good evader). Recently I have seen several posts and articles touting John McCain as a bipartisan Republican that could help mend the rift between the parties. I think this is a ruse. I think he is playing the same old game that got him though the horror of being a POW. I think he is not what he appears.
The conditioning that got John though those years of internment is exactly the conditions that should prevent him from ever being President. Just like Pavlov’s Dogs, McCain’s first reaction will always be the reflex action of self preservation and that is not what makes a good President.

As a Viet Nam Veteran myself, I can only praise those that suffered at the hands of the North Vietnamese as Prisoners. But I cannot call them heroes any more than every other veteran that served in that war and other wars before and after. However, being a veteran does not make anyone an honest person nor does it automatically qualify them for public office.

McCain admitted it in deposition

at least I think he did.  This stuff gets so confusing:

But that flat claim seems to be contradicted by an impeccable source: McCain himself. "I was contacted by Mr. [Lowell] Paxson on this issue," McCain said in the Sept. 25, 2002, deposition obtained by NEWSWEEK. "He wanted their approval very bad for purposes of his business. I believe that Mr. Paxson had a legitimate complaint."

While McCain said "I don't recall" if he ever directly spoke to the firm's lobbyist about the issue—an apparent reference to Iseman, though she is not named—"I'm sure I spoke to [Paxson]." McCain agreed that his letters on behalf of Paxson, a campaign contributor, could "possibly be an appearance of corruption"—even though McCain denied doing anything improper.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/114505

 

 

 

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.