Elect Barack Obama
Impeach Bush & Cheney!
"Google" your Voter Registration
Register to Vote
Vote Early-Absentee-Nov4
Visit the Democratic Party
User loginNavigation![]() "The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. Bush" is available for $12; a free downloadable PDF is also available. |
Rep. Murtha Puts Bush Impeachment Front and CenterNOTE: This post is also at www.dailykos.com, where it is currently the top "most recommended" story of the day. Consider going there and joining the discussion that follows at the end of the post, which could result in its becoming the site's featured story. ----------------- Impeachment is moving inexorably into the mainstream. On Saturday, April 28, people across the nation rallied to spell out the word “Impeach” with their bodies, from coast to coast. Most of their efforts went unreported in the nation’s complicit, propaganda-organ-like corporate media, but the effects of the effort were still felt. Earlier in the week, the Democratic Party convention in California (the largest state Democratic party organization in the nation) voted overwhelmingly to call for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney. Also that week, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), filed a bill of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney. A day after the national demonstrations, Rep. John Murtha (D-PA), speaking on the CBS News program face the Nation (www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5fui2hgFso&mode=related&search= ) told host Bob Schieffer that impeachment is “one of the ways Congress has to influence the president.” Murtha did not back off, and responded, “I’m just saying that’s one way to influence the president.” For too long, Congressional Democratic leaders have been blocking impeachment, beginning with Pelosi’s pre-election vow that if Democrats took control of Congress impeachment would be “off the table.” The public explanations for this position have never made any sense, and indeed have been specious: the claim that impeaching Bush would mean Cheney would become president is ludicrous (what Republican would want to have the monumentally unpopular Cheney at the head of the GOP heading into the 2008 elections?); the claim that Democrats had an important agenda of bills to pass is preposterous, given their slim margins of control in both houses, the promise of presidential vetoes, and the president’s hyperactive use of “signing statements” to illegally kill laws enacted by Congress; and the claim that impeachment would be “divisive” is bogus, because it is the administration and the Republicans in Congress who have been divisive for the past six years. In fact, the real reason the Democratic leadership has been running from impeachment is that party leaders think they are better off letting this increasingly unpopular administration continue to foul up domestically and especially in Iraq. Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL), actually at one point publicly stated that it would be “good” for Democrats if the Iraq War continued into November 2008. This heartless Machiavellian thinking may or may not be strategically valid (I suspect it’s not correct), but it is certainly a betrayal of the American people who voted Democrats into control last November, and is certainly a betrayal of the troops who are fighting and dying in Iraq every day. It appears, from Murtha’s comment about impeachment, that leading Democrats in Congress are starting to realize that the public is way ahead of them, and is growing frustrated and angry at Democratic pussyfooting. Americans don’t want symbolic action by Democrats on ending the war. They want the troops brought home--now. They don’t want tangential investigations by Congress into the political firing of federal prosecutors, or into the faked documents alleging that Iraq was buying uranium ore from Niger, They want impeachment bills against President Bush, and the convening of impeachment hearings in the House Judiciary Committee to defend a Constitution that has been vitiated by six years of Bush administration crimes, abuses of power and blatant undermining of the Bill of Rights. Rep. Murtha should be swamped with emails and calls congratulating him for recognizing this, and for putting impeachment back on the agenda (call 202-225-2065). The impeachment movement, which is just getting going, needs to keep the pressure on Congress and the media.
|
What's HotStop Bush from Pardoning Himself and Cheney PaulsonWatch: No Bailouts for Bush's Cronies
Replace Bush Democrats
Escrow to Keep Obama Progressive Local: connect with Democrats.com members in your State, County, and Congressional District Are you really registered to vote? "Google" your voter registration to find out Ten Reasons to Impeach Bush & CheneyNo Pardons for Bush-CheneyOut of Iraq PetitionForumsPollShould Congress Give Paulson $700 Billion Blank Check? Yes 1% No 99% Total votes: 260 Protest and Organize! |
Murtha floating the impeachment word
I'm not sure what to think about this. Something smells fishy. And so then does this mean that if Bush agrees to compromise, after being threatened with impeachment, then impeachment proceedings can no longer be filed because the Dems struck a deal with Bush so they could pass their toothless piece of legislation for ending the war???? I don't think I'm in favor of Murtha, or anyone else, playing games with impeachment. Either Bush and Cheney deserve to be impeached, or they don't, but there should be no making deals involving impeachment. I've become so cynical that I just don't trust any of them anymore. We all know that the Dems would go swimming with man-eating sharks before they would impeach (without being forced to, that is). So what are they up to with this Murtha comment. And I've read today that some of them are getting really testy with their anti-war constituents. I wouldn't put it past them to come up with some scheme to really put impeachment "off the table" for good.
Impeachment as a movement...
David Lindorff's logic makes perfectly good sense to me. On Saturday, April 29, 2007 as others were sending their messages by forming the word, "Impeach" on the beach, the Democratic Party of Washington State met for our quarterly meeting. The Women's Federation (which has a seat on the Executive Board of the Washington State Democratic Central Committee) passed a strong resolution FOR impeaching Bush and Cheney. Earlier in the day several other groups (the Progressive Caucus et al.) also passed resolutions for impeachment. At the meeting of the Central Committee in the afternoon the WSDCC passed a resolution for impeachment. Therefore, we can proudly report that the Washington State Democratic Party stands firmly on the side of accountability -- holding Bush, Cheney, and any others who violate our constitution or laws legally liable and fully accountable to the citizens of these United States of America. Bravo, Washington Dems!!!