Altruismin Politics
When I was really little my Uncle Leroy was the Alderman for our Ward, that is what the district was called then, in Wilmington De.
Not big politics but we were horribly impressed. Uncle Le always appeared to be doing things for others. He helped my mother get our first apartment; it was the second story of a row house, close to grand mom’s of course. See my father died, I was 2, my sister 4 and my mother pregnant with my baby brother. And well in 1960 a woman couldn't always rent a place on her own. "A man would have to sign, see, you might nit make it alone there missy, with all those kids and all."
So Uncle Le signed, and we got our first place, we shared the bathroom with the people on the third floor, but it was not in Grand mom’s house anymore, and Mother was so proud. And Uncle Le, well he made it all possible.
It seemed Uncle Le was always doing for others, every time I turned around, feeding that family, clothing another, paying the rent, or buying coal (source of heat)
My grandfather called it Altruistic, that Uncle Le had been elected to represent he people of the Ward, and wanting that job, working for the job, meant uncle Le had to be better than most.
Altruism can be distinguished from a feeling of loyalty and duty. Altruism focuses on a motivation to help others or a want to do good without reward, while duty focuses on a moral obligation towards a specific individual (for example, a God, a king), a specific organization (for example, a government), or an abstract concept (for example, patriotism etc). Some individuals may feel both altruism and duty, while others may not.
Pure altruism is giving without regard to reward or the benefits of recognition
There in lies my issue, the regard to reward or the benefits of recognition.
Uncle Le was never honored for what he did as our Alderman, you can't even find his name on the Internet (horrors). Because what he did, he did for altruistic reasons. He went in to politics to make the live of the people living in the 5th Ward in Wilmington, DE better.
Now I don't know how much money it took Uncle Le to get elected, but I cant' not imagine it was much, he worked at the dairy, and had a wife crippled by MS.
And yet he gave to others. THAT is real Politics. THAT is why you run, why you take the job.
Now I am married to a man who could be called Altruistic, he never seeks attention or recognition for what he does. He is a pure soul who treats those he likes and dislikes in the same manner. He has never harmed a soul, except hurt my feelings now and then. If there is a neighbor or friend who needs help, they can and do always count on him. He will help with anything and everything he can. I have seen him rebuild a house for a neighbor; sacrifice a car for weeks for another. Run to his mother’s house, when she saw a snake, and she lived 40 minutes away.
If you gave him a million dollars, he would save it for a rainy day. (no kidding) You never see him in boastful cars, clothes, or attitude.
These are the kinds of people we want in office. Uncle Le was like this, and he was a good politician. If we had my hubby run today though, he would have to compromise himself, compromise his values, and honesty, to get the money needed to run for office. I hear others talking about my new Governor as if he were altruistic, but he is supported by the beltway bandits, defense contractors, and very large insurance lobbyist. Hard to stay honest and true in that shark pool.
So have we set ourselves into a system that causes corruption? If it takes 100 million to get in the game, then who and what are you to take that kind of money? How can you be altruistic, if you are in debt to so many for your election?
I have a real problem with the money everyone is talking about raising for this election. I have a problem with the greed it takes to raise that kind of money. I have a real problem with the kind of person it takes to raise that kind of money.
Why can’t we find an honest Politician? The Money.
Who paid for you to run, who is paying for you to sit there, and what do they want.
Altruism is selfless concern for the welfare of others. It is a traditional virtue in many cultures, and central to many religious traditions. In English, this idea was often described as the Golden rule of ethics. In Buddhism it is considered a fundamental property of human nature.
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version- Send to friend










Great Post
I worked for a campaign that believed that good patriotic Americans ought to serve. Farmers, policemen, firemen, shopkeepers, and grassroots citizens should do their duty and serve their country in public service as a responsibility, not a career.
Not that I think all career politicians are bad or anything, I mean look at Teddy Kennedy. He has money on top of money but still fights for the working poor. However, too many times politicians get caught up in the money and contacts for later in life and forget they are working for the betterment of ALL their constituents. They become institutions instead of public servants, and just cater to those with the huge money to give.
I liked your story about your Uncle Le, and I am sure you are very proud of his life and accomplishments. True altruistic public servants like him are what this country needs so desperately to lead. It is sad to realize that this country has come to the point where a man like him who distinguished himself so eloquently in public service would not have a prayer of being elected today. All because he would rather do his job and make a difference in his constituents lives that fill his campaign coffers with special interest money.
As I said I worked for a campaign that really cared about our neighbors and wanted to work as hard as we could to better the lives of EVERYONE in our region as best we could. You don't become one of the poorest districts in America if your elected leaders have been doing their jobs. It is heart-wrenching to watch as our elected leaders milk our neighbors dry and do nothing for the betterment of them, all the while padding their pockets and rubber-stamping idiocy, and they still get voted for. They still speak for me in OUR Congress and do so by taking huge money from big business and voting against anything that helps people who work.
I know our problem came down to the money. We were immediately forced to frantically try and raise funds in anyway possible. We had the best story, the best ideas, and by far the best passion. We thought that in America that was what it was about, and we could win with that. We were wrong. Forget Whitfield and his 2 million dollar campaign chest, we couldn't even get our message out over a primary opponent who served one term and has lost about six times since then.
Speaking on the U.S. House races, I say we desperately need some kind of public financing at least in the primary. If a candidate could get so many people in the district to sign a petition for them to run, then they should be given a modest amount of public funds in which to begin their campaigns and give the people a chance to hear them. If not I am afraid the spirit of service your Uncle Le left behind might be lost for good.
Public Service
People who did well in our society felt they should give back by doing public service or being a representative (usually an honorable member of the community). I don't care if they are rich as long as they believe in democracy and real Capitalism.
Government control and monitoring by our representatives is needed to prevent criminal activity, etc.
I also believe as Teddy Roosevelt that Civil Service is the only way to prevent cronyism. Lifetime employees have experience and a stake in their country.
To have a healthy country and democracy a large middle class is necessary. Yes...there are still rich but not to the extreme.
I'd like a Social/Democracy. The middle class thrive under such a system.
Today all too many representatives are in it for their own self interest. They dream of the day when they leave public office for that fat job on a corporate board or with their bag of plunder. They don't care or listen to the people. They are a danger to our freedoms and future.
The people are usually right about most issues when open discussion is allowed. Lies by public officials should be punishable by removal from office and jail time. They should not be allowed to run again for public office of any sort.
As Jefferson stated, if the citizens aren't properly informed than they can't make good decisions about government. It will destroy our democracy