As The Anti-War Protestors March On Washington, All Hell Breaks Loose In Iraq
-
Chris ElliottWant to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!
In scenes reminiscent of the 6th Armies assault on Stalingrad, president Bush’s “surge” appears to be a last ditch, all or nothing attempt to bring a military victory in Baghdad that it cannot realistically achieve.
Battle for Baghdad: City braces itself for US surge
Urban fighting amid the ruins
By Patrick Cockburn in Baghdad
Published: 28 January 2007Lina Massufi, a 32-year-old Iraqi laboratory assistant with two children, is a widow - her husband was killed by US troops when he accidentally drove down a closed road in 2003. In the past three months she has seen her house raided and her furniture smashed 12 times.
"Every time they raid my house, they break down the door," she told a UN official. When she asked them why they did not ring the bell "they laughed at me and called me an idiot". Her brother Fae'ek, a pharmacy student, was arrested and held in prison for a week. "He returned with signs of torture on his body, and was crying like a baby because of the pain."
Her story shows why the odds are against what may be President George Bush's final gamble in Iraq: the attempt by US troops, now receiving 17,500 reinforcements, to regain control of Baghdad. The plan is for US forces, along with Iraqi army and police, to enter Sunni and Shia districts in the capital, cleanse them of insurgents and militia and then stay put, preventing their return. In his State of the Union speech last week Mr Bush told Congress: "With Iraqis in the lead, our forces will help secure the city by chasing down the terrorists, insurgents, and the roaming death squads."
But the failings of this strategy become more obvious the further one gets from Washington and the closer to Baghdad. The insurgents and militiamen, both Sunni and Shia, usually have more credibility in their districts than Iraqi government forces. As for the heavily Shia police commandos, they are seen by Sunni in Baghdad as licensed death squads.
In recent days 3 helicopters have been shot down by anti-aircraft missiles proving that superiority in the air is now not so certain. Crew from one of the helicopters were all found dead, some reports claim they had been ‘executed’ with bullet holes in the back of their heads.
Carnage on Sunday in Iraq
Sunday: 373 Iraqis, 5 GIs Killed; 166 Iraqis Injured; US Helicopter Shot Down
US Embassy in Baghdad Green Zone hit by mortar/rocket fire
Hundreds killed in Iraq battle
US and Iraqi forces claim to have killed more than 250 armed men in a battle involving tanks and helicopters on the outskirts of the Shia holy city of Najaf.
The US military said a helicopter has been shot down in the fighting, resulting in the death of two troops on board. An Iraqi military commander said the day-long battle was continuing.
Assad Abu Gilel, the governor of Najaf province, said US and Iraqi troops fought a day-long battle with up to 1000 fighters, including foreign fighters, holed up in orchards on the northern outskirts of the city.
According to one Iraqi political source, hundreds of fighters drawn from both Sunni and Shia communities were still fighting.A Reuters reporter at the scene, 160km south of Baghdad, saw US tanks and heard blasts after dark and an Iraqi officer said F-16 jets were bombing the area.
Details of the day's fighting were sketchy. An Iraqi army source said some of the dead wore headbands declaring themselves a "Soldier of Heaven".
Continues
In another videotape, the Jaish al-Mujahideen group said that it has destroyed a US military vehicle in the northern Iraqi city of Samarra.
With sanctions now imposed against Iran and open talk of war coming from Washington and Tel Aviv there is a distinct risk that the ground war could spill over the borders and the US forces in the Baghdad “green zone” find themselves besieged by the Iranian\Syrian army as well as the Iraqi resistance.
Turkey could complicate the situation further by seizing territory in the northern region of Iraq.
Turkey mulls 'invading' Iraq
By Jonathan Gorvett in IstanbulTurkey's parliament went into secret session this week to debate sending troops to invade and occupy northern Iraq for security purposes.
More than 30,000 people have been killed in the confrontation between the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) and the Turkish army – about 400 last year alone, according to Turkey's Human Rights Association.
Onur Oymen, the deputy chairman of the Opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), said: "Northern Iraq is the only place in the world where a terrorist group can operate without being pursued."
"If the Iraqis and the US are not prepared to take action over this, then we must."
In Britain, Tony Blair is fighting for his political life as arrests of his aides in bribery, corruption and tampering with evidence charges, set against the backdrop of two failing wars and an army under manned and under equipped is putting huge pressure on the government to withdraw the armed forces.
US plea to Britain: 'Don't abandon main Iraq base'
By Raymond Whitaker
Published: 28 January 2007
The US is urging Britain to reconsider plans to close its main base in southern Iraq.Since the 2003 invasion, the largest part of Britain's 7,100-strong force has been stationed at the Shaibah logistics base, in the desert south of Basra. The base is due to be closed within weeks as Britain prepares to slim down its Iraq commitment, with the main centre of operations bring transferred to Basra air station, on the outskirts of the city.
The Foreign Secretary, Margaret Beckett, said last week that Britain would be in a position to hand over security in Basra, the last province where it retains formal control, to the Iraqis "at some point this spring". This heightened expectations that Britain would cut its forces by up to 3,000 before the summer.
To make matters even worse, Israeli war rhetoric has reached fever pitch and Lebanon is once again being subjected to airstrikes by Israeli warplanes.
Israel planes dump "suspicious green balloons" on southern Lebanon
- Chris Elliott's blog
- |
- Login or register to post comments
- |
-

- |
Top Actions
-
23,210 of 30,000

-
42,758 of 60,000

-
94,686 of 100,000

Comments
Contact your Representatives
We here may be satisfied with ourselves that we have written our comments on the web. That's effortless. We need to do more, and here is the suggestion:
1. Write a hardcopy letter to your congressional representatives EVERY WEEK, requesting that he or she take action against our runaway president. SEND THE LETTER TO THE REPS LOCAL ADDRESS, NOT THE D.C. ADDRESS. IT STANDS A BETTER CHANCE OF BEING READ LOCALLY.
2. Write a letter to the editor to every local paper at least every other week. Express your views. Rove showed the Republicans well that media exposure creates "urban truth." All we have to do is remember the Swiftboat fiasco.
3. If you have the skill, write a "citizen's article" and submit it to as many magazines as possible. Expose the inaction of your representative, the voting records if they support the president, anything that will expose our spineless party's inability to deal with the president's gross crimes and misdemeanors against our Constitution. When your message begins to get out, your reps may begin paying attention to what you have to say.
4. Go to your local Democratic Party meetings and insist that the local party organization contact your representatives to insist on congressional action to impeach, withhold funds, restore Constitutional rights taken away, cease illegal activities, etc.
To sit comfortably in our homes and click out a message or two on the computer is just not enough to win the war against this president-turned-tyrant. We all who are concerned about the future of this nation must become very active and visible in our protest.
Thanks for the advice, but
Thanks for the advice, but the "netroots" members of Democrats.com are among the most aggressive, proactive, political activists in the USA. We are very much in tune with Howard Dean's 50-State initiative, and we do much more than just post on the web.
Take a look around the site and learn how you can help us, and take a look at this page:
http://www.democrats.com/organize
Thank you
Thanks. I am new to this site and have not seen all that there is. It gives me much hope. And I will be involved in many of the suggestions found here on the site to which you referred me.
Send Out Postcards demanding Impeachment
With a Postcard, everyone sees it.
Thanks for posting
Unfortunately as a non-US citizen, writing letters to congress representatives isn't really an option for me. In fact a newspaper campaign in the UK which proposed that the British public should write to Americans and urge them to vote against Bush in the last general election was received very poorly in the US, by Republicans and Democrats alike. I guess with our chequered past, Americans are tired of British interference in politics.
I agree with your ideas though, a mountain of angry letters every morning is very difficult to ignore!
In Britain I was fortunate to be part of the huge Anti-War rally that brought London to a standstill back in 2003 - 2 million people! It's an experience I'll never forget, even the police looked awed. I attended several other marches and wrote some angry letters to my MP - which by law they were obliged to respond to (they must hate that) even if it is just a "thanks for your letter" response.
The Bush regime has done everything it can to eliminate large demonstrations so perhaps they dont have the same impact now. Either way, no matter how big the march was in London, it didn't stop Britain participating in (even enabling) the criminal war of aggression.
I am of the opinion that a general strike is the only way to force a government out of power without a coup. It will put your job at risk but at least you wont have to be beaten or tazared by riot police, jailed under some made up terror law or shot. It needs certain sectors of the population to cooperate but it doesn't require the entire population, the remainder will actually participate without realizing - even Republicans. You target certain key public services like transport, airports, schools, etc and get as many of the workers to cooperate by "phoning in sick". You wont get everyones cooperation but you should be able to seriously disrupt services. This in turn means that hardly anyone can get to work even if they want too. So Banks end up closing, shops close, schools and colleges close resulting in more parents having to stay at home with the kids. Businesses lose money, nothing gets done. The Police cant do anything because the only people they can arrest are the ones stuck at the railway/bus stations trying to get to work (those reluctant strikers I mentioned).
The French have this down to an artform. They block the main roads with their 18-wheeler lorries and simply walk home leaving absolute chaos in their wake. Imagine the chaos of a main road blocked for 36 hours or more. Then imagine the whole rail network closed as well.
The point is you can bring the country to a standstill without violence. It just takes a few smart people to gain the support of those key service employees and enough internet presence / poster campaigns to let the whole country know why and when its happening. It does put your job on the line, but then a company cant sack it's whole workforce, so a little solidarity can go a long way.
Anyway, that's just some ideas! Putting them into practice is difficult because on the whole the left is so divided.
"Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." Albert Einstein