Impeachment Proceedings
-
davidswansonWant to meet our members? Click 'Join' above!
By Cindy Sheehan
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the General Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
--Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America
There are many important issues facing our nation and the 110th Congress. Minimum wage increases and universal health care are long past due.I certainly appreciate the stirrings about bringing our troops home from Iraq within 3 or 4 months, too! After all, six more troops were killed yesterday while our politicos are playing footsies with each other! We thought that Nov. 7th was a day to celebrate! When the last of our brave young people come limping home to their relieved families that will be a joy-filled and historic day.
I believe, though, that those same troops and others who have fought so bravely, died so needlessly, and have been wounded for life deserve justice for what the Bush regime has put them through.
I believe that this country and the world deserve justice for the raping and pillaging by the pirates who have stolen our liberties and inflicted torture and other pains and hardships upon the world.
I believe that impeachment proceedings are the most important issue that the 110th Congress should put on OUR table.
Since I have written open letters to George and Reps. Pelosi and Conyers, I have had almost overwhelming support for the ideas, but there are also some legitimate concerns that need to be addressed.
First of all, many people believe that impeachment proceedings will be seen as "political" revenge for what the Republicans have done to the Democrats for the last 12 years or revenge for the impeachment of Bill Clinton. Impeachment is not a political tool as used by the Republican Congress, but it is a Constitutional remedy for elected or appointed officials who are abusing their powers. If George has not abused his powers as president and commander in chief, then no president in history has. I will not detail his high crimes and misdemeanor and crimes against peace and humanity, because all of his illicit activities have already been well documented. Justice should not be a partisan issue and if Congress took their oath to the Constitution as seriously as they take their allegiance to the special interests and to partisan politicking, George would have already been impeached.
Secondly, many people are fearful that impeachment proceedings will bog down Congress. Elizabeth Holtzman, a former Representative from New York who sat on the investigative committee that recommended impeachment articles be charged against Richard Nixon, said, last weekend at our impeachment forum in Philadelphia's Constitutional Hall, that this kind of reasoning doesn't give Congress enough credit. Ms. Holtzman said that Congress is able to "walk and chew gum" at the same time. I will have to take her word for it, since she is the reasoned voice of experience.
Lastly, people are concerned that holding George accountable will further divide a country already damaged and split by the "Uniter." This is a legitimate concern, but our country healed completely after the Nixon debacle, and we will heal again. I would like to also give us Americans the credit that we deserve. We have proven over and over again that we are very resilient and strong enough to withstand a quest for accountability.
Recent polls have shown that most Americans want proceedings instituted against BushCo. The newly elected Congressional leadership will not institute these proceedings unless the will of the people is shown. Many members of the Congresses, in both parties, that have been seated since BushCo came to power in an illegal electoral coup in 2000, have been willing co-conspirators in the Bush crimes against everything and it is up to the will of the American people to correct the course that is robbing the Blessings of Liberty from all of us and from our posterity. As the preamble states, it is our Constitution, as well as it is theirs, and we need to reclaim our country and our humanity before it is lost to us forever.
Bringing Articles of Impeachment against BushCo will not only bring resolution and justice to our nation and the world, but if this regime is made to be held accountable for their crimes and abuses of power, then future administrations may be slower to commit such blatant and belligerent crimes and the world will be a safer and more peaceful place. But there is an overriding reason for these proceedings to be instituted as soon as possible: A president is neither above the law, nor is he the law. A president is an elected official who has a duty to obey, carry out and protect the laws of our land, not break them as if he were a dictator of a banana republic, not the leader of a once great nation. We need to restore our greatness and our credibility to a world that despises us for allowing BushCo free rein to commit their aggressions against the world.
By attaining this justice that our world so desperately needs, we people of compassion and courage cannot bring back the hundreds of thousands of people who have been killed already. We cannot put the buildings back together that the war machine's bombs have destroyed. We cannot make whole the people who have been emotionally and physically wounded by these high crimes and misdemeanors. We cannot put back together the families who have been torn apart by illegal wars. No matter how hard we try, we cannot prevent the pain that has already been caused by BushCo, but by bringing them to justice, we can, and will prevent more needless suffering here at home and abroad for the present and for our posterity.
Our dead, our soldiers, and the people of Iraq are voiceless in the debate on accountability and we must be their voices. The Constitution cannot break out of its glass at the National Archives and sit-in in front of the White House or walk the Halls of Congress to demand that BushCo quit desecrating it and what the US used to stand for. It is up to us, the citizens, to protect humanity and the law of our land. As historian Howard Zinn states in the introduction to Impeach the President, the Case against Bush and Cheney, edited by Dennis Loo and Peter Phillips:
We cannot expect either Republicans or Democrats in Congress to initiate any challenge to the existing order of things. In the history of the nation, serious injustices---slavery, racial segregation, the rights of working people, the condition of women, the war in Vietnam---have only been remedied by powerful social movements that have forced the government to change its policies.
Now we have another such time.
Our very existence as a nation of laws and justice depends on it.
Please visit Impeach for Change to learn about the new and powerful people's movement for accountability. Sign up for an impeachment forum in your area on Human Rights day, December 10th, or organize one locally if there is not one near you. I will be speaking with, among other notable Americans, Elizabeth Holtzman, at the forum in NYC that day.
Please visit Gold Star Families for Peace to learn about our Walk for Change campaign in the Halls of Congress on January 3rd and 4th, 2007. You can join Gold Star Family members in our demand for peace and accountability.
2006 was the year of the Awakening and 2007 will be the year of the Change!
Cindy Sheehan is the mother of Spec. Casey Sheehan who was KIA in the Bush regime's war of terror on 04/04/04. She is the co-founder and president of Gold Star Families for Peace and founder and director of the Camp Casey Peace Institute. Cindy has published three books and the latest is Peace Mom: A Mother's Journey Through Heartache to Activism.
- davidswanson's blog
- |
- Login or register to post comments
- |
-

- |
Top Actions
-
23,210 of 30,000

-
42,758 of 60,000

-
94,686 of 100,000

Comments
A Case Has to be Made BEFORE Impeachment.
I'm not against the impeachment movement putting pressure on Pelosi and Conyers. They've both said impeachment is "off the table." I think they're wrong, but there are critical issues, as well as the Democrats' image, at stake.
What I argue for is an investigation, which was the oversight missing for the last 6 years. I believe that terrible crimes were committed, but the case has to be made carefully that they were made, and, at the same time, the popular demand for impeachment would be necessary for impeachment to actually take place.
I agree the Democrats should not be motivated by vengeance, and should not be seen as acting that way, but real abuses of power have been made by Bush and Cheney, and, if the Constitution is to recover, if checks and balances are ever to work again, some of these abuses will have to be prosecuted.
That's the point I wish to make: the case for impeachment can't be just that the Democrats won the election. But I disagree with Pelosi's position: if crimes were committed, if the President has acted at variance with the Constitution, (I believe both to be true and easily proven), then those crimes--high crimes and misdemeanors--ought to be prosecuted.
Not to impeach in those circumstances endangers the continuation of constitutional government. It would leave in place the presumption that Bush's successors could act just as arbitrarily, could also lie us into war for their own political advantage, could torture, wiretap without warrant, disregard laws passed by Congress by stating so in their signing statements, etc.
We are governed by a Constitution but also by precedent. Bush has set precedents that have to be unset if we are going to have a true balance of powers once again.
If that dismantling of Bush's precedents could be done without impeachment, then impeachment wouldn't be necessary, but at least some of his grab for power has actually involved disregarding Congress (vetoing, by not vetoing by using signing statements, which are not subject to an override vote in Congress) and wiretapping in stated contravention of a law Congress passed (FISA).
That said, yes, the Democrats have a lot of other important, high priority policy changes they will have to carry forward: getting out of Iraq, first of all, but also cleaning up Congress: barring lobbyists from legislative processes, getting rid of earmarks/special bills and clauses, and definitely in passing a new, higher minimum wage indexed to inflation.
Meanwhile, I want to see Conyers putting his investigation into high gear. He should state at the outset that impeachment is not a desired outcome, but a possible one. It would be a necessary one if the facts demand it.
That's why the popular movement is important; it will provide political cover.
Douglas C. Smyth
http://www.roman-empire-america-now.com
Before Impeachment
I agree with Mr. Smythe, and by pursuing that course we can bring pulic opinion along in support of impeachment.
John Foster
2court@comcast.net
Strategy
That's the strategy I heard, too, this morning discussed on Pacifica Radio. INVESTIGATION.
Personally, I think it was extremely stupid for Pelosi to make the statement "off the table" because now she's got her ego in the way if she goes back on what she said. But, then again, what am I saying? Didn't she earlier say if the Dems took over Congress, an investigation into impeachment was definitely on the agenda?
We need more women like Cynthia McKinney in power and not flakes like Pelosi. But, I digress.
I'm writing letters to Pelosi, Conyers, etc, too. I may change my focus to INVESTIGATION instead of impeachment (for now). A true investigation would lead to impeachment. There's no other place for it go. It could go further to prosecution --- and I think it should.
Impeachment
If the leaders of the Democratic party feel that impeachment is not timely because of the consequences thereoff, I think that "impeachment" does not require the Bush Team to be replaced, just as Bill Clinton was "impeached" but was not forced to resign. Such action would stop George W. of doing additional harm to the nation, including messing around with SS and Medicare. It would only make the lame president "lamer".
Impeachment and removal of Bush/Cheney...
would stop the following:
Office for life at taxpayer expense
SService protection for life
Pension for life
Would keep both out of public service for life since they would have been convicted and removed.
The savings to us, we the people, could be in the millions.
Plus, we have validated the Constitution vis-a-vis impeachment/removal for the future.
A mind once expanded can never return to its original dimensions.
Anne Hathaway: 1556-1623
The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.
Louis Pasteur
Impeachment is not revenge
If the Dems ignore the crimes of the Bush administration they are complicit and are giving the OK for future abuses of power. If the Dems do not proceed to impeach then I will leave the Democaratic party and register as an Independent.
That's exactly what I wrote Pelosi
You are right on about that. They are COMPLICIT if they ignore these crimes. Good point for more letters I need to write. They will doom the office of the presidenty for good if they don't impeach because no future president will feel they have to abide by any laws since this has set the precedent.
(I almost wonder if bush isn't threatening these people's families. As soon as we won the house, bush said he was going to have lunch with Ms. Pelosi. Next thing we know, impeachment is off the table. Does he threaten people's families? He meets with people, and then they shut up. I wouldn't put it past him. I doubt he's that charming to change people's minds.)
Investigation
I have been working in Iraq for most of three years and as each day goes by my heart breaks a little more for all of the people who have been killed or irreparibly damaged by this war OF terror.
It is unmistakenly true that our government has a lot to do these next few years. The working men and women will be years recovering from the Bush era. But the folks who have commented above are absolutely correct, if we don't clip the cancer out of the executive branch we ultimately risk losing everything. In my opinion an honest investigation of the executive will lead to the fall of the neocon war machine and begin to repair America both at home and abroad.
Milt
I've heard the arguments that...
.....impeaching Bush might seem petty, vindictive or vengeful. The MSM will certainly spin it that way, and I agree that impeachment should be reserved for the very worst of the worst and never used for political expedience. And yes, we must make a case for it before impeachment.
However, we already have a case from the Downing Street Memos, from torture in Afghanistan, Iraq and Gitmo, from Bush's own admission that he maintains secret CIA prisons, from Bush's own admissions of wiretaps, and more. We should still investigate to strengthen that case, because what we know so far is just the tip of the iceberg.
To avoid accusations of vengeance, the politically expedient thing to do is not to impeach Bush, but if we do just what is expedient, how are we different from the GOP? Shouldn't we do what is right instead?
Is there a chief executive in our nation's history whose high crimes demanded impeachment more than those of GW Bush?
- Surviving Bush one day at a time. Politics Plus