Religious Right Strangely Silent About Foley

If there's one thing you have to concede to America's Religious Right, it's that these folks have an amazing media and public relations network and can issue press releases, get on television and radio and, when they really want to, mobilize their lemming-like flock faster than Jack Abramoff can bribe a Republican Congressman.

And yet here we sit, four days after it was revealed that Republican Congressman Mark Foley was using the Internet to go after teenaged boys, and all you can hear from our own little version of the Taliban is dead quiet and crickets chirping.

Odd, isn’t it? The same people who can move their followers to boycott any company that believes gay people even have the right to exist, can't muster much outrage over one of their own preying on young boys and, more importantly, the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives ignoring it to save their political hides.

With the news out since Friday, James Dobson's Focus on the Family (FOF) still doesn’t say a word about it on their web site. In fact, if you go there right now and do a search on "Mark Foley," the closest thing you'll find citing Foley is a statement from March 2006 entitled More Funding Needed to Combat Child Porn.

They quote Foley in that piece as expressing concern that children will continue to be victimized if Congress does not act more proactively against child predators.

"We are still not funding it enough," they quote Foley as saying. "This is one of the most pervasive, dangerous elements in our society."

You just can't make this stuff up.

Meanwhile, the FOF site found plenty of time in their CitizenLink News Center to do 49 "news" stories in September covering a whole bunch of stuff including the presidential line-item veto, the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act and rapidly urging members to "thank Gov. Schwarzenegger" for vetoing two pieces of California legislation "aimed at advancing the homosexual agenda" but that, to sane people, were really just simple antidiscrimination bills.

They also marshaled their forces to harangue U.S. Senators to confirm George W. Bush's judicial nominees and, as recently as Monday, publicized Pray for Children Weekend to promote "a drug-free and safe" life for children.

I guess to the folks at FOF, that doesn’t include getting indignant about children not being safe when they're preyed upon by a right-wing, church-going Republican.

Meanwhile, the ultraconservative Family Research Council (FRC) isn’t paying a lot more attention to this either. The FRC web site's banner headline on Monday remained Democrats Kill Parental Notification Bill in reference to a vote made by the Senate on Friday to shelve a bill that prohibited minors from going across state lines with a non-parental relative to get an abortion.

The most recent updates from FRC chief Tony Perkins' Washington Update are The ACLU versus America and Protecting Parents Rights to Notification, the latter charmingly promoted by the FRC as an issue so important that followers should "urge Senators to protect minor girls from abortion predators."

But there's just not much there about protecting teens from Republicans on Capitol Hill who admire their "cute butt(s)" and are willing to "…drive a few miles for a hot stud" like one of the young Congressional pages.

In fairness to the FRC, they did finally issue a press release from Tony Perkins late Monday, saying that he is "shocked by this spectacle of aberrant sexual behavior." They then turned right around and subtly placed the blame on the gay community, saying that "this is the end result of a society that rejects sexual restraints in the name of diversity."

The "letters campaign" section of Gary Bauer's amusingly-named American Values web site is still goading supporters to write to Washington about how much gay people are threatening heterosexual marriage -- but not a thing about one of their guys going after young boys on the Internet.

A quick check on the American Family Association finds them whipping their minions into a frenzy over Madonna Set To Mock The Crucifixion of Christ and urging them to collectively send one million e-mails to NBC to protest an upcoming Madonna appearance. They also continue their long history of anti-gay activity by prompting their 3.3 million supporters to keep boycotting Ford Motor Company due to what they allege is Ford's "funding homosexual groups and promoting homosexual marriage."

Finally, Jerry Falwell's National Liberty Journal newspaper is currently going after the interstate abortion bill and urging disciples to push the issue of "religious accommodation in public schools," while saying absolutely nothing about Mark Foley's adventures in pedophilia.

Of course, Falwell's the same pious dude who outed 'Tinky Winky' of the children's television show, Teletubbies, in the February 1999 edition of his newspaper and warned parents to keep their kids away from the show.

"He is purple - the gay-pride color; and his antenna is shaped like a triangle, the gay-pride symbol," wrote Falwell of his proof that it was only a matter of time before Tinky Winky moved to Massachusetts. "As a Christian I feel that role modeling the gay lifestyle is damaging to the moral lives of children."

So there you have it -- the true face of the Religious Right measured in deeds and not words.

They'll go out of their way to rally their followers to keep gay people from getting married, boycott corporations acknowledging that right, demonize legislators and judges who dare keep Church away from State and even attack children's-television characters.

But nary a word about a Republican Congressman, who is co-chairman of the Missing and Exploited Children’s Caucus, trolling for teen sex partners among Congressional pages, and being protected via a cover-up by the House Republican leadership.

I'm sure the letter-writing campaign to House Speaker Dennis Hastert will begin the minute they’ve taken care of that Madonna situation.

You can read more from Bob at BobGeiger.com.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Repug "moral values" or the Lack Thereof

I think that the Foley situation and the Repug Leadership cover up will be a boon for the Democrats in Nov. One of my letters to the editors of local newspapers. I think that every concerned Democrat should send this kind of letter to their local newspapers.

The Republican "moral values" = Mark Foley and the cover up by the House Republican Leadership!!!

Vote Democratic for "real" moral values! Vote for Louis Vandenberg in CA-44!!!!

Shayne Munger
Riverside, CA

FoF finally responded.

I don't have all the details, but Dobson's group is reported as saying that now is not the time to engage in politics about it, but to help the victims and that this happened because our society is too sexualized.

Leave it to the rabid religious right to try to spin this into a plus.

- Surviving Bush one day at a time.

Ahhh...with Dobson, you have to consider how thin...

the air is at his altitude.

A mind once expanded can never return to its original dimensions.

Anne Hathaway: 1556-1623

The greatest derangement of the mind is to believe in something because one wishes it to be so.

Louis Pasteur

Foley and the Religious Right

I have a friend who's a "Jew for Jesus." When I sent him the info on Foley he wrote back, "All Man unfortunately has a tendency toward sin. Mike Foley is not [an] exception."

Funny, how he was foaming at the mouth at how Clinton had ruined America, but Mark Foley is just "a Sinner," like the rest of us.

Yes, I do think this could be the October surprise in reverse. If it disourages the rabid bornagains and encourages the "secular humanists" Democrats may have a chance, even if they did cave in outrageously to the waronterra crowd in the detainee dictatorship bill. Maybe, if they gain a majority, they can repeal it?

With the Republicans I always thought

With the Republicans I always thought it was a matter of "Just do what I say, not what I do..." or was it.."Republicans can do no wrong, and Democrats can do no right.." maybe it was a combination of both? I know they said that we were just suppose to "Get over it"..whatever that means.

"Itadakimasu!"

Bright lights...

Ah, hypocrisy! It casts a light so bright that it pierces every veil of subterfuge and obfuscation and insists upon showing itself glaringly!

See http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/10/02/matt-drudge-blames-the-kids-for...
for efforts to make it the youngsters' doing.

I have a rule of thumb developed through years of wading around in the murk of law: Where no one is innocent, he who is least guilty should be protected.

So even if (and I deny it) the kids were sexually precocious and/or receptive, the burden of right behavior rests with the adult (using that term to signify years of life, not maturity).

Get out your sunglasses, folks! The glare could blind you.

That reminds me of the old adage:

Q: HOW DO YOU SEDUCE A MAN?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A: Show up.

Foley

A story just came about about how Foley's lawyer says he was molested as a teen by a clergy member. While it's unfortunate that this happened (if in fact it did, I'm less inclined to believe it now than I would have been two weeks ago), this is by far the worst excuse in the world. If a person was molested as a teenager or a youth, they of all people should be less inclined to do so as an adult just for the sole fact that they know what it is like to be victimized and should be totally against putting someone else in the same situation. As far as excuses go, even "I slipped and my hand landed on his ass" would have been a better excuse than this.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.