FBI Believes Cheney Lied About Outing Valerie Plame

Murray Waas has the scoop on an FBI report that suggests the FBI believes Cheney lied to them:

Vice President Dick Cheney, according to a still-highly confidential FBI report, admitted to federal investigators that he rewrote talking points for the press in July 2003 that made it much more likely that the role of then-covert CIA-officer Valerie Plame in sending her husband on a CIA-sponsored mission to Africa would come to light.

Cheney conceded during his interview with federal investigators that in drawing attention to Plame’s role in arranging her husband’s Africa trip reporters might also unmask her role as CIA officer.

Cheney denied to the investigators, however, that he had done anything on purpose that would lead to the outing of Plame as a covert CIA operative. But the investigators came away from their interview with Cheney believing that he had not given them a plausible explanation as to how he could focus attention on Plame’s role in arranging her husband’s trip without her CIA status also possibly publicly exposed. At the time, Plame was a covert CIA officer involved in preventing Iran from obtaining weapons of mass destruction, and Cheney’s office played a central role in exposing her and nullifying much of her work.

As always, Marcy Wheeler brilliantly analyzes the significance of Waas' scoop.

Cheney's new talking points raised a question the answer to which was--Cheney believed--"Valerie Plame, Joe Wilson's CIA spook wife." Which, as Cheney apparently admitted to the FBI, might raise the chances that Plame would be outed--as happened like a charm with Matt Cooper and John Dickerson. Dickerson, recall, was instructed to look into who sent Wilson, and Cooper answered that question for Dickerson with help from Rove: Wilson's wife.

Now, Murray points out that Cheney's admission--certainly from the perspective of June 2004, when Cheney was interviewed--would make it more likely that Cheney had a role in outing Plame. Frankly, when you put Judy's testimony together with Libby's notes and Addington's testimony, that case has already been proved, and for much earlier in the week than Murray's discussing (since it proves that, on Cheney's order, Libby was asking Addington about both Plame and Wilson in the preparation to talk to Judy). But, people are thick, so hopefully Murray's reporting--apparently direct from Cheney's FBI interview--will convince some people to actually look at the available evidence.

Marcy promises more tomorrow - a Fitzmas present for all Plamophiles!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Congressional Challange

Here's an idea for those officials that have been elected by "We the People", and are supposed to representing the same said people. The records show that these elected officals have not been doing their jobs as they took an oath to do, and with an approval rating in the single digets, [less than 10% folks], Why can't the Atty Gen re-assign these Congressional officals to investigating all those alleged criminal actions involving anyone and everyone who has commited or had knowledge of, or supported, or acted on, including present or past officals against the Constitution, and specifically "We the People."
If it takes 1 year or 10 years, until these issues are taken seriously, and acted upon, there will NEVER be any closure for the crimes against "We the People".
Our government has allowed several individuals to rise above the law in this country. Talk has not, will not, ever address the real problems. These people have been active against the people of the United States, ' FOR A CHANGE" "We the People" have the right to have each and every issue in question investigated to a satisfactory end, and have no mercy for those criminal acts against us.
With our present leadership in Congress, this cannot ever be accomplished, we need to address this situation YESTERDAY. When someone in a leaders role puts their personal agenda ahead of "We the People", and the U.S. Constitution, " We the People " don't want or need any such person in a leadership role.

'

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.