Democratic Presidential Plans for Iraq
Joe Biden: No deadlines, no link to funding
A federal, decentralized Iraq is our last, best hope for a stable Iraq. More and more people, inside Iraq and out, are coming to that realization.
We should refocus our efforts on making federalism work for all Iraqis. I would initiate a diplomatic surge to do just that, bringing in the U.N., major countries and Iraq's neighbors to help implement and oversee the political settlement I'm proposing.
It is time to turn the corner.
Stop the surge and start bringing our troops home.
End a political strategy that cannot succeed and begin one that can.
And always, always protect our troops.
This is President Bush's war. But it is America's future. We have to get this right, together.
Hillary Clinton: Faster withdrawal but no deadline and no restriction on funding
"What the President told the American people tonight is that one year from now, there will be the same number of troops in Iraq as there were one year ago. That is simply too little too late, and unacceptable to this Congress and the American people who have made clear their strong desire to bring our brave troops home.
"The Commander-in-Chief has the authority to issue the order to greatly accelerate the redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq, and to bring so many more of our troops home so much faster. They have done everything we have asked of them and more, but are now stuck in the middle of a civil war. I continue to implore the President to change course, bring our troops home faster, and end this war responsibly as soon as possible."
Chris Dodd: deadline tied to funding
"Moving us in 10 months to where we were 10 months ago is not progress. It is the very definition of status quo.
"Not only is the President not offering us anything new; he's insulting our intelligence.
"Despite the fact that his top General is unable to say that the war is making us safer, all the President offers today is quite literally more of the same. More loss of life, more strain on our military readiness, and more degradation of our national security and our standing in the world. It is time for Congress to say 'no more.'
"What was clear to me before, and what should be abundantly clear to my colleagues after today, is that this President is not going to change course unless we force him to. There is only one way to do that - we must set a clear, hard and fast deadline for redeployment and, in order to enforce it, that deadline must be tied to funding."
John Edwards: "No timetable, no funding, no excuses"
Barack Obama: remove 1-2 combat brigades each month to conclude by the end of next year
Update 1: Obama insists on link to funding:"It is long past time to end a war that never should have started. President Bush was wrong when he took us to war, he was wrong when he escalated this war in January, and he is wrong to stay the course now. I opposed this war from the beginning, I introduced legislation in January that would have already started to bring our troops home, and I will continue to lead the fight in the Senate for a fixed timeline with a deadline for the removal of all of our combat troops. The American people are not going to be fooled by the same false promises of success that got us into Iraq. Iraq's leaders are not making the political progress that was the stated purpose of the surge, but the President wants us to keep giving him a blank check. We must not continue the enormous sacrifice of our troops, our military readiness, our treasury, and our standing in the world just to keep the violence at the same unacceptable levels it was at in 2005 and 2006. That is why I have proposed an immediate and sustained removal of 1 to 2 combat brigades each month to conclude by the end of next year. We have to come together -- not as Republicans and Democrats -- but as Americans to turn the page in Iraq so that we can recapture our unity of purpose at home and our leadership around the world."
Obama, who had resisted measures to tie money for the war to a deadline for withdrawal, said Sunday he would no longer support funding measures in the Senate that do not include deadlines.“We are going to bring an end to this war and I will fight hard in the United States Senate to make sure we don’t pass any funding bill that does not have a deadline,” Obama told the crowd.
Bill Richardson: All troops out in 6-8 months, no residual forces
."Enough is enough. This President lacks credibility. President Bush needs to stop putting his historical legacy ahead of the safety of our troops and the security of our nation.
"As of next summer, the President plans to have 130,000 troops in the midst of a civil war in Iraq. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards would leave between 60,000 and 90,000 troops in Iraq with no timetable for a full withdrawal. All of these plans are unacceptable. We must get all of our troops out of Iraq in six to eight months.
"After years of President Bush's reckless mismanagement of the war in Iraq, there is only one responsible course of action left to us. We need to get all of our troops out of Iraq, not just the combat troops as others have suggested, and leave no residual forces behind.
- Bob Fertik's blog
- Login or register to post comments
-


How Did democrats.com determine to support Chris Dodd?
I just received an email from www.democrats.com asking me to support Chris Dodd for President. Apparently democrats.com has determined, I know not how, to support Dodd.
The only response that democrats.com will accept is, yes, I support Dodd & will work on his campaign. Given the email's setup, no other response is possible. In addition, the 'contact us' button or link on the homepage is really well hidden. I'd have responded privately had I found it.
Chris Dodd presumably knew from his father, post-World War II Nuremburg war crimes prosecutor and U.S. Senator Thomas Dodd, that launching an unprovoked war of aggression was a war crime. At bottom, that's what the Nuremburg war crimes trials of Nazi leaders was about.
Yet Senator Chris Dodd voted to authorize the U.S. to commit the war crime of invading, without U.N. authorization, a country that had not attacked us. Sorry, democrats.com, you have earned a lot of credibility, but that one sticks in my craw.
If, as this campaign shakes out, Dodd is the sole halfway credible Democratic candidate still standing, obviously I will support him. But not now.
Thanks, Sarah McKee
we aren't supporting Dodd
here's what it says at the top of the email:
we sent a similar email for Edwards a few weeks ago and are in discussion with the other campaigns.
we want all the candidates to compete for our support by being as progressive as possible!