Organize!

We gladly
accept
PayPal!
Or contribute with a credit card

Or mail a check to Democrats.com
PO Box 721066
Jackson Hts, NY 11372
(Please put your e-mail on the check)

Thank you for participating in Democrats.com, the largest independent community of Democratic Party activists, with over 600,000 members.

Democrats.com is the home of the Aggressive Progressives and we led the fight against George W. Bush after he stole the White House in 2000. We now support President Obama's agenda of change.

We rely on the generous contributions of members like you to fight for progressive change over the opposition of right-wing Republicans and the Corporate Media. We gratefully accept contributions of any amount!

We invite you to sign our most recent petitions:

We also encourage you to use our simple Web forms to tell your Senators and Representative how you feel on these questions:

Finally, we encourage you to get involved in one of our important organizing efforts below.

Action Links - Make a Difference Today!

You can make a difference right this minute! Here are links to sites that help you take action immediately.

BlogCall

To receive invitations to future BlogCalls, please submit your credentials here.

12/14/07 BlogCall11 with a Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee who wrote an op-ed calling for immediate impeachment hearings for Vice President Dick Cheney - but none of the nation's leading newspapers would publish it. 

10/13/05 BlogCall10 with David Swanson of AfterDowningStreet.org discussing the netroots-funded poll that found a virtual majority of Americans - 50% to 44% - want Congress to consider impeaching President Bush if he lied about the war in Iraq.

8/10/05 BlogCall9 with Cindy Sheehan of Gold Star Families for Peace, who is protesting outside George Bush's "ranch" in Crawford Texas so she can meet with Bush to ask him: "Why did my son die?" and "What was the noble cause that he died for?"

4/19/05 BlogCall8 with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com, exposing the American Center for Voting Rights (ACVR) as a Republican front group with close ties to James Baker, the architect of Stolen Election 2000 and the Republican-controlled Baker-Carter Commission on Election Reform.

4/12/05 Blogcall7 with Andy Stephenson, Education Director of Vote Trust USA.

4/5/05 Blogcall6 with David Swanson of DebtSlavery.org exposing the credit card industry's corrupt campaign to push its atrocious Bankruptcy Bill through the House of Representatives this week - and the grassroots campaign by bloggers and activists to stop it.

3/29/05 BlogCall5 with David Donnelly of The Daily Delay and WithoutDeLay.org exposing the backlash against Tom DeLay arising from his exploitation of Terri Schiavo.

3/22/05 BlogCall4 with Greg Palast of GregPalast.com on the battle within the Bush administration between neoconservatives and the oil giants over who would profit from Iraq's oil. After the deaths of over 1,500 U.S. soldiers and over 100,000 Iraqi civilians, BlogCall4 will ask: "Was it all about oil?"

3/15/05 Blogcall3 with John Byrne and Larisa Alexandrovna of RawStory.com about how Tom Delay's extravagant overseas trips were illegally funded by a "charity" called NCPPR

3/8/05 BlogCall2 with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com and Clint Curtis on the Tom Feeney / Yang Enterprises / Touchscreen Vote-Rigging Scandal.

2/24/05 BlogCall1 with John Aravosis of AmericaBlog.com on the Jeff Gannon/Jim Guckert scandal.

Q. What is BlogCall?

BlogCall is a conference call hosted by progressive and Democratic "bloggers" to discuss exposes of Republican and rightwing crimes and scandals that deserve national media attention. We invite mainstream journalists to participate fully in each BlogCall.

Each BlogCall features a progressive or Democratic "blogger" who has broken a major expose. The format is a virtual press conference, in which the featured "blogger" will present his/her story for 15 minutes, followed by 30 minutes of Q&A about the story.

Q. Why was BlogCall created?

Because progressive "bloggers" (including investigative reporters) cannot get their important exposes covered in the mass media - unlike rightwing bloggers, who get their lies and smears covered immediately on the DrudgeReport, Rush Limbaugh, FOX News, Joe Scarborough, and the rest of the Rightwing Media.

Q. What are the specific objectives of BlogCall?

Q. How do we define "bloggers"?

BlogCall is for progressive "bloggers" who do investigative research and reporting.  We also include traditional investigative reporters, editors, producers, talk show hosts, and media activists who share the ideals of blogging:

Q. How does BlogCall work?

  1. Each call features a hot expose by a progressive blogger chosen by the Program Committee
  2. 3 minute welcome and introduction by BlogCall host Bob Fertik
  3. 15 minutes presentation by the featured blogger (with supporting witnesses or experts invited by the blogger)
  4. 30 minutes Q&A - press 6 to un-mute yourself, wait for a quiet moment, state your name and ask a concise question (30 seconds max), then press 6 to re-mute yourself and wait for the answer
  5. 5 minutes for quick announcements on other important topics - press 6 to un-mute yourself, wait for a quiet moment, state your name and make a concise announcement (30 seconds max), then press 6 to re-mute yourself and let others make their announcements

Q. What happens after a BlogCall?

  1. We invite call participants to share their immediate thoughts in the post-call blog at http://democrats.com/blogcall# (where # changes with each call, starting with 1)
  2. We will post a tape and transcript as quickly as we can
  3. Members of the Publicity Committee will help the featured blogger publicize the expose to the MSM. (For example, Geoff Staples will interview featured bloggers on RadioLeft.com)
  4. Members of the Investigations Committee will help the featured blogger break new ground in the expose
  5. We encourage the featured blogger to use collaborative tools like Yahoogroups and FreeConference.com to allow dedicated bloggers to work together to advance the story

Q. How often will BlogCalls occur?

Q. What exposes will BlogCalls cover?

Here is a list of topics under consideration.

Q. Who can participate in BlogCalls?

BlogCalls are open to Working Members, Honorary Members, and Guests.

Working Members form the core of BlogCall. They are selected by the Administrative Committee from the best progressive bloggers (for example, Koufax Award winners). They are encouraged to join one of the standing committees:

Honorary Members have a standing invitation to participate in every BlogCall:

Guests: mainstream journalists who are actively covering the particular BlogCall topic. Guests must contact us (please specify "BlogCall" as your reason) and provide links to your current work.

Q. Can others join BlogCall?

At the outset we are using FreeConference.com, which has a limit of 100 participants.

If a large number of bloggers and activists would like to participate, we will consider paid conference call systems, but we would have to charge participants roughly $5 per call to cover the costs.

Q. How do BlogCall participants find out about each BlogCall?

When your participation is approved, we will add you to the FreeConference system.

A day or two before each BlogCall, you will receive an e-mail from the FreeConference system with the phone number and PIN. The "From" address will be "Democrats Com" <reservation-#####@conferencemgr.com>, where #### will change each time. If you have a spam filtering program, try to whitelist "@conferencemgr.com". The phone number will be a local phone number somewhere in the U.S., but will not be toll-free - that's how FreeConference.com can offer its service for free.

Due to the limitations of FreeConference.com (100 participants), participation in BlogCalls will be on a first-come-first-served basis. The RSVP system will accept more than 100 participants, but the phone-in system will not - so dial in early to make sure you get a line!

Q. What was the original idea behind BlogCall?

Read Bob Fertik's Blogging Truth to Power: How Progressive Bloggers Can Break through the MSM Blackout to Get Coverage for our Exposes

Q. Who helped turn this idea into reality?

Karyn Altman, Tom BallJim Bryant, Ben Burch, Noah Diamond, Ralph DratmanBrad Friedman, Carolyn KayGeoff Staples

BlogCall Topics

The following topics and bloggers are under consideration:

U.S. military torture Lawrence Velvel
U.S. military attacks on journalists Danny Schechter
Bush doctrine of global domination Tom Engelhardt
White House propaganda Susan G
Rightwing propaganda and tax exemption abuse Nashua Advocate
Social Security bill Josh Marshall
Bankruptcy bill Elizabeth Warren
John Bolton nomination to UN ambassador Dave Meyer
Robert Nelson, the NASA scientist who proved Bush was wired for the 2004 debates Dave Lindorff
2004 Exit Polls / Steve Freeman Kathy Dopp
2004 Ohio Bob Fitrakis
Janet Linke, the widow of the Texas Air National Guard pilot who replaced George W. Bush in 1972 after he was grounded for being "unfit to fly" Russ Baker
CBS 60 Minutes "Rathergate" and Mary Mapes Joe Hagan
9/11 - Sibel Edmonds Kyle Hence / Dave Kubiak
American Center for Voting Rights Brad Friedman
Project 21 Faye Anderson
Closeted Republican Gaybashers Mike Rogers
Media plagiarism at Talon News Ron Brynaert

Blogging Truth to Power

Blogging Truth to Power:
How Progressive Bloggers Can Break through the MSM Blackout to Get Coverage for our Exposes
Bob Fertik
Last Update: 2/15/05

Most of the mainstream media (MSM) is now firmly under the control of the Bush administration and the Republican Party.

The few outlets that are not entirely under GOP control are afraid to challenge the GOP because right-wing media activists are so vicious.

Right-wing bloggers can get instant national attention for their "exposes" - no matter how bogus - through their allies on cable TV, especially Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Joe Scarborough, and Pat Buchanan. Their successes include:

  • The Swift Boat Liars, who played a crucial role in stealing a second term for Bush
  • Dan Rather, whose report on Bush's National Guard failures was fundamentally true
  • Eason Jordan, whose complaint about U.S. troops killing journalists in Iraq was fundamentally true

By contrast, progressive bloggers have no allies on TV, so our exposes - no matter how important - usually get blacked out.

  • Al Gore's victory in 2000 has never been reported in the MSM, despite the MSM's own $1 million recount proving he won. (The story was killed by the NY Times after 9/11.)
  • Bush's 2-year AWOL has never been reported in the MSM, despite overwhelming proof. (The story was first killed by the NY Times just before the 2000 election, and was killed again in 2004 after the Killian memos were attacked.)
  • Bush's use of an earpiece in all 3 debates with Kerry has never been reported, despite substantial evidence confirmed by a top NASA scientist. (The story was killed by the NY Times just before Election Day.)
  • The exit polls proving John Kerry won Ohio, Florida, and other key states has never been reported, despite undisputed statistical evidence.

Despite the general blackout, progressive bloggers have had a few breakthroughs.

  • Trent Lott was dumped as Senate Majority Leader after his praise of Strom Thurmond was exposed by blogger Joshua Micah Marshall
  • The unreliability of touchscreen voting has created a powerful grassroots opposition movement, thanks to blogging led by Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org
  • Sinclair Broadcasting's plan to promote the Swift Boat Lies was stopped by a blogger-led campaign targeting Sinclair's advertisers
  • The suppression of black voters in Ohio led to Congressional hearings and the first voting rights challenge to a state's Electors in American history, thanks to blogging led by Bob Fitrakis, Harvey Wasserman, and Steve Rosenfeld of FreePress.org.
  • White House reporter "Jeff Gannon" was revealed as a fraud, thanks to blogging led by John Aravosis of AmericaBlog.org.

Still, progressive bloggers need a more effective way to get serious coverage for major exposes.

(I am defining "bloggers" broadly as civic-minded investigators who do original research to expose wrongdoing by corrupt government and corporate officials - and share their exposes with the public in order to inspire grassroots activism and change. This broad definition embraces traditional investigative reporters and serious talk show hosts. We invite such reporters and hosts to join this effort as long as they are willing to operate their own blog, so they can benefit from the further discoveries - and occasional corrections - of their audience.)

Since God helps those who help themselves, I propose that progressive bloggers hold regular conference calls to share important exposes.

Our goals would be:

  1. To spread important exposes among progressive blogs, and to enlist more bloggers in getting to the bottom of an expose
  2. To attract journalists and producers from the progressive media
  3. To create firestorms that the MSM has to cover

Of course, large conference calls are a challenge. I propose the following structure:

  1. 2 calls per week (Tuesday and Thursday) starting sharply at 1 pm EST / 10 am PST (arrive early to avoid missing anything)
  2. each call features a hot expose by a progressive blogger chosen by the Program Committee
  3. open to progressive bloggers, journalists, and producers; others by permission of the Credentials Committee
  4. 45 minutes total
  5. 15 minute presentation by the featured blogger (with supporting witnesses or experts invited by the blogger)
  6. 20 minute Q&A with anonymous questions submitted by e-mail to the moderator
  7. 10 minutes for quick announcements on other important topics, with speakers sequentially "activated" by the moderator
  8. tape and transcript (identifying featured blogger and announcements but not questioners)
  9. follow-up publicity by the Publicity Committee to get as much coverage as possible for the day's expose

The content of these calls would be fact-focused, not opinion-focused.  All of us can rant brilliantly (of course!), but we should do that on our blogs, not on these calls.

Criteria for selection would include:

  • Scandalous conduct by a rightwing politician, activist, or government official
  • Dedicated blogger(s) doggedly pursuing the truth
  • Credible witness(es)
  • Credible document(s)

Possible topics would include:

  • John Aravosis of AmericaBlog.org discussing the story of "Jeff Gannon," the possibility of a gay prostitution ring in the White House, and the connection to the Valerie Plame investigation
  • Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com discussing the story of computer programmer Clint Curtis, who was asked in 2000 by powerful Florida Republican Tom Feeney (now a Congressman) to write vote-flipping software for electronic voting machines. Curtis would participate in the call, answering questions from Friedman and the moderator
  • Al Franken of Air America Radio discussing his campaign for Brit Hume's resignation after he knowingly misquoted FDR on Social Security
  • Dave Lindorff discussing the story of Bush's bulge (being fed the answers to the questions during his 3 debates with John Kerry), including the admitted suppression of the story by NY Times ombudsman Dan Okrent
  • Danny Schechter of MediaChannel.org discussing his documentary WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception and his evidence that U.S. troops in Baghdad deliberately fired on journalists at the Baghdad Hotel - the allegation that cost CNN executive Eason Jordan his job.
  • Russ Baker of RussBaker.com discussing Janet Linke, the widow of Texas Air National Guard pilot Jan Linke, who was hired in 1972 to fill Bush's vacant slot after Bush's commanding officer Col. Jerry Killian decided Bush was "unfit to fly."
  • Mary Mapes of CBS 60 Minutes discussing the "Killian Memos" that buttressed the evidence Bush went AWOL

The effort would be sustained by three ongoing committees:

1. Program Committee

  • Monitor breaking exposes by bloggers
  • Contact bloggers about participating in an upcoming call
  • Work with blogger to nail down crucial details about the story, including witnesses and evidence
  • Assign moderator for each call
  • Prepare tape and transcript of each call

2. Credentials Committee

  • Maintain an e-mail list of known progressive bloggers, journalists, and producers who get standing invitations to all calls
  • Approve or reject requests from others (including new bloggers and blog-activists) for standing credentials or one-time guest credentials
  • Distribute conference call details before each call

3. Publicity Committee

  • Work directly with bloggers to get more coverage for their stories and to polish their presentations
  • Arrange appearances on radio & TV talk shows (and help prepare concise answers to likely questions)
  • Arrange articles in large-circulation publications (and help edit)

To cover the costs of this effort, we will set a monthly user subscription fee. We are requesting competitive bids from large conference call services to keep costs as low as possible.

BlueBank

Why should Democrats put their money into big banks that want to kill union jobs at Chrysler and kill union organizing by blocking EFCA?

Why don't we create our own bank - BlueBank?

Services Analysis
Nationwide charter  Our members are scattered across the country.
Competitive deposit rates A well-run bank should offer competitive rates.
Minimal fees and charges Banks should make money by lending to credit-worthy customers, not by ripping off its customers.
Honest credit cards Ditto.
Honest mortgages Ditto.
Low-fee accounts for Democratic candidates There are 10,000 elected offices and at least one Democratic candidate for each. We can help those candidates by making it easy to open an account and keeping fees low.
Loans to socially responsible businesses: unionized, green, minority- and women- owned SRB's are good credit risks because the owners and employees are devoted to their success.

The dream is simple, but turning it into reality is not. Here are some key issues:

1. Credit Union or Bank?

Issue Credit Union Bank
Ownership Would Democrats.com qualify as an "Association"? Here are the rules. It appears that an "Association" must be a non-profit. Democrats.com is an LLC, so we would have to incorporate a new non-profit and establish a formal governance structure. Democrats.com  could raise private capital from progressive investors to buy an existing bank.
Membership

Chapter 2 Part III: To qualify as an "Association"

NCUA will consider the totality of the circumstances, which includes: • Whether members pay dues; • Whether members participate in the furtherance of the goals of the association; • Whether the members have voting rights. To meet this requirement, members need not vote directly for an officer, but may vote for a delegate who in turn represents the members’ interests; • Whether the association maintains a membership list; • Whether the association sponsors other activities; • The association's membership eligibility requirements; and • The frequency of meetings. A support group whose members are continually changing or whose duration is temporary may not meet the single associational common bond criteria. Each class of member will be evaluated based on the totality of the circumstances. Individuals or honorary members who only make donations to the association are not eligible to join the credit union.

Homeowner associations, tenant groups, consumer groups, and other groups of persons having an “interest in” a particular cause and certain consumer cooperatives may also qualify as an association.

No formal membership, just individual customers who are willing to move their deposits from a big bank to BlueBank.

Changing Liberally

Fellow Progressives,

Drinking Liberally started in Manhattan in May 2003 as a support group for down-and-out liberals and spread like wildfire across the country. Chapters meet every week at a local bar to share drinks and make new friends.

But what if we did more than drink and chat? What if we discussed concrete changes that we can bring about in our communities - and beyond?  

That's the idea behind Changing Liberally. And with your help, we hope to turn this idea into reality. 

To start a chapter, pick a convenient bar with a gathering space on a night when it's quiet. Invite local activists and leaders you already know, along with their significant others.

First order drinks. Then introduce yourselves and talk briefly about one issue you're working on and/or care strongly about. After that, talk about what you can do together

There are many ways we can bring about change. We can start listservs or blogs. We can help existing groups or start new ones. We can meet with elected or appointed officials or candidates. If we want to reach out to our friends and neighbors, we can hold larger community events at local schools or churches.

If the group grows, move to a larger space, and perhaps expand from drinks to buffet meals. 

Barack Obama promised change if Americans from all backgrounds came together to work for change. President Obama is fulfilling his promise in Washington DC. What can we do in our communities?

Let's have a drink and find out!

Contact Congress

Instant Congress Phone Number Lookup
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):

House Judiciary Democrats

From: DocGonzo

Here's a list of the exact contact info for each of the House Judiciary Democrats, not just a generic page that leaves you somewhere without being able to just send them a message. Some of them are behind a House Web form (there are different variants) that requires their "ZIP+4" ZIPcode, which I have listed after their DC office phone#. So you should have all you need to contact them RIGHT NOW.

John Conyers (Chair/MI-14) (202) 225-5126 John.Conyers@mail.house.gov
Howard Berman (CA-28) (202)225-4695 91411-4102
Rick Boucher (VA-9) 24210-2839 (202)225-3861
Jerrold Nadler (NY-8) 11224-4561 (202)225-5635
Robert Scott (VA-3) 23607-4333 (202)225-8351
Melvin Watt (NC-12) (202)225-1510 28208-5214
Zoe Lofgren (CA-16) (202)225-3072 95112-5162
Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18) (202)225-3816 77002-8028
William Delahunt (MA-10) (202)225-3111 02601-3128 William.Delahunt@mail.house.gov
Robert Wexler (FL-19) (202)225-3001 33431-6344
Linda Sanchez (CA-39) (202)225-6676 90703-2694
Steve Cohen (TN-9) (202)225-3265 38103-1816
*Hank Johnson (GA-4) (202)225-1605 30058-4104
*Luis Gutierrez (IL-4) (202)225-8203 60647-4841
*Brad Sherman (CA-28) (202)225-5911 91403-1791
**Anthony Weiner (NY-9) (202)225-6616 11415-3605 Weiner@mail.house.gov
Adam Schiff (CA-29) (202)225-4176 91103-3966
Artur Davis (AL-7) (202)225-2665 35203-4014
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20) (202)225-7931 33026-6037
Tammy Baldwin (WI-2) (202)225-2906 53703-5103
Keith Ellison (MN-5) (202)225-4755 55411-3675
Maxine Waters (CA-35) (202) 225-2201 90003-4597
Betty Sutton (OH-13) (202) 225-3401 44313

(The names with an *asterisk are those Reps whose contact page makes it easy to contact them. The rest should be reprimanded into making it easy. Weiner was the most accessible)


Chairman Conyers      Howard Berman            Jerrold Nadler           Rick Boucher

Bobby Scott               Tammy Baldwin      Mel Watt                   Maxine Waters

Sheila Jackson Lee      Robert Wexler     Zoe Lofgren            Adam Schiff

Keith Ellison           Linda Sánchez            Anthony Weiner           Luis Gutierrez

 

Hank Johnson          Brad Sherman            Artur Davis                   William Delahunt

   
Steve Cohen       Betty Sutton       Debbie Wasserman Schultz

House Phones

House phone numbers as of 5/27/08. If you find an error, please contact us.
(Note: the local phone is for the primary district office. A House member can also have several satellite offices.)

District Last First Phone-DC Phone-local
AK00 Young Don 202-225-5765 907-456-0210
AL01 Bonner Jo 202-225-4931 251-943-2073
AL02 Everett Terry 202-225-2901 334-277-9113
AL03 Rogers Mike 202-225-3261 256-236-5655
AL04 Aderholt Robert 202-225-4876 256-546-0201
AL05 Cramer Bud 202-225-4801 256-381-3450
AL06 Bachus Spencer 202-225-4921 205-280-0704
AL07 Davis Artur 202-225-2665 205-752-5380
AR01 Berry Marion 202-225-4076 501-843-3043
AR02 Snyder Vic 202-225-2506 501-324-5941
AR03 Boozman John 202-225-4301 479-782-7787
AR04 Ross Mike 202-225-3772 870-536-3376
AS00 Faleomavaega Eni 202-225-8577 684-633-1372
AZ01 Renzi Rick 202-225-2315 928-587-3417
AZ02 Franks Trent 202-225-4576 623-776-7911
AZ03 Shadegg John 202-225-3361 602-263-5300
AZ04 Pastor Ed 202-225-4065 602-256-0551
AZ05 Mitchell Harry 202-225-2190 480-946-2411
AZ06 Flake Jeff 202-225-2635 480-833-0092
AZ07 Grijalva Raul 202-225-2435 520-622-6788
AZ08 Giffords Gabrielle 202-225-2542 520-881-3588
CA01 Thompson Mike 202-225-3311 707-269-9595
CA02 Herger Wally 202-225-3076 530-223-5898
CA03 Lungren Daniel 202-225-5716 916-859-9906
CA04 Doolittle John 202-225-2511 800-232-1336
CA05 Matsui Doris 202-225-7163 916-498-5600
CA06 Woolsey Lynn 202-225-5161 415-507-9554
CA07 Miller George 202-225-2095 707-645-1888
CA08 Pelosi Nancy 202-225-4965 415-556-4862
CA09 Lee Barbara 202-225-2661 510-763-0370
CA10 Tauscher Ellen 202-225-1880 707-428-7792
CA11 McNerney Jerry 202-225-1947 925-737-0727
CA12 Speier Jackie 202-225-3531 650-342-0300
CA13 Stark Pete 202-225-5065 510-494-1388
CA14 Eshoo Anna 202-225-8104 650-323-2984
CA15 Honda Michael 202-225-2631 408-558-8085
CA16 Lofgren Zoe 202-225-3072 408-271-8700
CA17 Farr Sam 202-225-2861 831-429-1976
CA18 Cardoza Dennis 202-225-6131 209-527-1914
CA19 Radanovich George 202-225-4540 209-579-5458
CA20 Costa Jim 202-225-3341 559-495-1620
CA21 Nunes Devin 202-225-2523 559-733-3861
CA22 McCarthy Kevin 202-225-2915 661-327-3611
CA23 Capps Lois 202-225-3601 805-546-8348
CA24 Gallegly Elton 202-225-5811 805-686-2525
CA25 McKeon Buck 202-225-1956 661-274-9688
CA26 Dreier David 202-225-2305 909-575-6226
CA27 Sherman Brad 202-225-5911 818-501-9200
CA28 Berman Howard 202-225-4695 818-994-7200
CA29 Schiff Adam 202-225-4176 626-304-2727
CA30 Waxman Henry 202-225-3976 323-651-1040
CA31 Becerra Xavier 202-225-6235 213-483-1425
CA32 Solis Hilda 202-225-5464 323-307-9904
CA33 Watson Diane 202-225-7084 323-965-1422
CA34 Roybal-Allard Lucille 202-225-1766 213-628-9230
CA35 Waters Maxine 202-225-2201 310-642-4610
CA36 Harman Jane 202-225-8220 310-549-8282
CA37 Richardson Laura 202-225-7924 310-538-1190
CA38 Napolitano Grace 202-225-5256 562-801-2134
CA39 Sánchez Linda 202-225-6676 562-860-5050
CA40 Royce Edward 202-225-4111 714-992-8081
CA41 Lewis Jerry 202-225-5861 800-233-1700
CA42 Miller Gary 202-225-3201 714-257-1142
CA43 Baca Joe 202-225-6161 909-885-2222
CA44 Calvert Ken 202-225-1986 951-784-4300
CA45 Bono Mary 202-225-5330 760-320-1076
CA46 Rohrabacher Dana 202-225-2415 714-960-6483
CA47 Sanchez Loretta 202-225-2965 714-621-0102
CA48 Campbell John 202-225-5611 949-756-2244
CA49 Issa Darrell 202-225-3906 760-599-5000
CA50 Bilbray Brian 202-225-0508 760-737-8438
CA51 Filner Bob 202-225-8045 619-422-5963
CA52 Hunter Duncan 202-225-5672 619-448-5201
CA53 Davis Susan 202-225-2040 619-280-5353
CO01 DeGette Diana 202-225-4431 303-844-4988
CO02 Udall Mark 202-225-2161 303-650-7820
CO03 Salazar John 202-225-4761 719-587-5105
CO04 Musgrave Marilyn 202-225-4676 720-494-4336
CO05 Lamborn Doug 202-225-4422 719-520-0055
CO06 Tancredo Thomas 202-225-7882 720-283-9772
CO07 Perlmutter Ed 202-225-2645 303-274-7944
CT01 Larson John 202-225-2265 860-278-8888
CT02 Courtney Joe 202-225-2076 860-886-0139
CT03 DeLauro Rosa 202-225-3661 203-562-3718
CT04 Shays Christopher 202-225-5541 203-357-8277
CT05 Murphy Christopher 202-225-4476 860-223-8412
DC00 Norton Eleanor Holmes 202-225-8050 202-783-5065
DE00 Castle Michael 202-225-4165 302-428-1902
FL01 Miller Jeff 202-225-4136 850-479-1183
FL02 Boyd Allen 202-225-5235 850-561-3979
FL03 Brown Corrine 202-225-0123 407-872-0656
FL04 Crenshaw Ander 202-225-2501 904-598-0481
FL05 Brown-Waite Ginny 202-225-1002 352-567-6707
FL06 Stearns Cliff 202-225-5744 904-269-3203
FL07 Mica John 202-225-4035 386-860-1499
FL08 Keller Ric 202-225-2176 888-642-1211
FL09 Bilirakis Gus 202-225-5755 813-985-8541
FL10 Young Bill 202-225-5961 727-391-6030
FL11 Castor Kathy 202-225-3376 813-871-2817
FL12 Putnam Adam 202-225-1252 863-534-3530
FL13 Buchanan Vern 202-225-5015 941-951-6643
FL14 Mack Connie 202-225-2536 239-252-6225
FL15 Weldon Dave 202-225-3671 800-939-3515
FL16 Mahoney Tim 202-225-5792 772-878-3181
FL17 Meek Kendrick 202-225-4506 954-450-6767
FL18 Ros-Lehtinen Ileana 202-225-3931 305-220-3281
FL19 Wexler Robert 202-225-3001 561-988-6302
FL20 Wasserman Schultz Debbie 202-225-7931 954-437-3936
FL21 Diaz-Balart Lincoln 202-225-4211 305-470-8555
FL22 Klein Ron 202-225-3026 866-713-7303
FL23 Hastings Alcee 202-225-1313 561-684-0565
FL24 Feeney Tom 202-225-2706 321-264-6113
FL25 Diaz-Balart Mario 202-225-2778 305-225-6866
GA01 Kingston Jack 202-225-5831 912-265-9010
GA02 Bishop Sanford 202-225-3631 706-320-9477
GA03 Westmoreland Lynn 202-225-5901 770-683-2033
GA04 Johnson Hank 202-225-1605 770-987-2291
GA05 Lewis John 202-225-3801 404-659-0116
GA06 Price Tom 202-225-4501 770-565-4990
GA07 Linder John 202-225-4272 770-232-3005
GA08 Marshall Jim 202-225-6531 877-464-0255
GA09 Deal Nathan 202-225-5211 706-638-7042
GA10 Broun Paul 202-225-4101 706-886-2776
GA11 Gingrey Phil 202-225-2931 770-836-8130
GA12 Barrow John 202-225-2823 706-613-3232
GA13 Scott David 202-225-2939 770-432-5405
GU00 Bordallo Madeleine 202-225-1188 671-477-4272
HI01 Abercrombie Neil 202-225-2726 808-541-2570
HI02 Hirono Mazie 202-225-4906 808-541-1986
IA01 Braley Bruce 202-225-2911 319-287-3233
IA02 Loebsack David 202-225-6576 319-351-0789
IA03 Boswell Leonard 202-225-3806 888-432-1984
IA04 Latham Tom 202-225-5476 641-357-5225
IA05 King Steve 202-225-4426 712-732-4197
ID01 Sali Bill 202-225-6611 208-454-5602
ID02 Simpson Michael 202-225-5531 208-523-6701
IL01 Rush Bobby 202-225-4372 773-224-6500
IL02 Jackson Jesse 202-225-0773 708-798-6000
IL03 Lipinski Daniel 202-225-5701 312-886-0481
IL04 Gutierrez Luis 202-225-8203 312-666-3882
IL05 Emanuel Rahm 202-225-4061 773-267-5926
IL06 Roskam Peter 202-225-4561 630-893-9670
IL07 Davis Danny 202-225-5006 773-533-7520
IL08 Bean Melissa 202-225-3711 847-358-9160
IL09 Schakowsky Janice 202-225-2111 847-298-2128
IL10 Kirk Mark 202-225-4835 847-940-0202
IL11 Weller Jerry 202-225-3635 815-740-2028
IL12 Costello Jerry 202-225-5661 618-397-8833
IL13 Biggert Judy 202-225-3515 630-655-2052
IL14 Foster Bill 202-225-2976 815-288-0680
IL15 Johnson Timothy 202-225-2371 217-403-4690
IL16 Manzullo Donald 202-225-5676 815-394-1231
IL17 Hare Phil 202-225-5905 217-422-9150
IL18 LaHood Ray 202-225-6201 217-793-0808
IL19 Shimkus John 202-225-5271 618-252-8271
IN01 Visclosky Peter 202-225-2461 219-795-1844
IN02 Donnelly Joe 202-225-3915 574-288-2780
IN03 Souder Mark 202-225-4436 800-959-3041
IN04 Buyer Steve 202-225-5037 317-838-0404
IN05 Burton Dan 202-225-2276 800-382-6020
IN06 Pence Mike 202-225-3021 765-640-2919
IN07 Carson Andre 202-225-4011 317-283-6516
IN08 Ellsworth Brad 202-225-4636 812-465-6484
IN09 Hill Baron 202-225-5315 812-288-3999
KS01 Moran Jerry 202-225-2715 785-309-0572
KS02 Boyda Nancy 202-225-6601 785-234-8111
KS03 Moore Dennis 202-225-2865 913-621-0832
KS04 Tiahrt Todd 202-225-6216 316-262-8992
KY01 Whitfield Ed 202-225-3115 270-826-4180
KY02 Lewis Ron 202-225-3501 270-688-8858
KY03 Yarmuth John 202-225-5401 502-582-5129
KY04 Davis Geoff 202-225-3465 859-824-3320
KY05 Rogers Harold 202-225-4601 606-886-0844
KY06 Chandler Ben 202-225-4706 859-219-1366
LA01 Scalise Steve 202-225-3015 985-340-2185
LA02 Jefferson William 202-225-6636 504-589-2274
LA03 Melancon Charlie 202-225-4031 985-876-3033
LA04 McCrery Jim 202-225-2777 318-798-2254
LA05 Alexander Rodney 202-225-8490 318-322-3500
LA06 Cazayoux Don 202-225-3901 800-892-1253
LA07 Boustany Charles 202-225-2031 337-235-6322
MA01 Olver John 202-225-5335 978-342-8722
MA02 Neal Richard 202-225-5601 508-634-8198
MA03 McGovern James 202-225-6101 508-431-8025
MA04 Frank Barney 202-225-5931 617-332-3920
MA05 Tsongas Nikki 202-225-3411 978-521-1845
MA06 Tierney John 202-225-8020 978-531-1669
MA07 Markey Edward 202-225-2836 508-875-2900
MA08 Capuano Michael 202-225-5111 617-621-6208
MA09 Lynch Stephen 202-225-8273 508-586-5555
MA10 Delahunt William 202-225-3111 800-870-2626
MD01 Gilchrest Wayne 202-225-5311 410-838-2517
MD02 Ruppersberger Dutch 202-225-3061 410-628-2701
MD03 Sarbanes John 202-225-4016 410-832-8890
MD04 Wynn Al 202-225-8699 301-987-2054
MD05 Hoyer Steny 202-225-4131 301-843-1577
MD06 Bartlett Roscoe 202-225-2721 301-724-3105
MD07 Cummings Elijah 202-225-4741 410-685-9199
MD08 Van Hollen Chris 202-225-5341 301-891-6982
ME01 Allen Thomas 202-225-6116 207-283-8054
ME02 Michaud Michael 202-225-6306 207-942-6935
MI01 Stupak Bart 202-225-4735 906-228-3700
MI02 Hoekstra Peter 202-225-4401 616-395-0030
MI03 Ehlers Vernon 202-225-3831 616-451-8383
MI04 Camp Dave 202-225-3561 989-631-2552
MI05 Kildee Dale 202-225-3611 810-239-1437
MI06 Upton Fred 202-225-3761 269-982-1986
MI07 Walberg Timothy 202-225-6276 877-846-6407
MI08 Rogers Mike 202-225-4872 877-333-6453
MI09 Knollenberg Joe 202-225-5802 248-851-1366
MI10 Miller Candice 202-225-2106 586-997-5010
MI11 McCotter Thaddeus 202-225-8171 734-632-0314
MI12 Levin Sander 202-225-4961 586-498-7122
MI13 Kilpatrick Carolyn 202-225-2261 734-246-0780
MI14 Conyers John 202-225-5126 313-961-5670
MI15 Dingell John 202-225-4071 313-278-2936
MN01 Walz Timothy 202-225-2472 507-206-0643
MN02 Kline John 202-225-2271 952-808-1213
MN03 Ramstad Jim 202-225-2871 952-738-8200
MN04 McCollum Betty 202-225-6631 651-224-9191
MN05 Ellison Keith 202-225-4755 612-522-1212
MN06 Bachmann Michele 202-225-2331 651-731-5400
MN07 Peterson Collin 202-225-2165 218-253-4356
MN08 Oberstar James 202-225-6211 218-828-4400
MO01 Clay Lacy 202-225-2406 314-383-5240
MO02 Akin Todd 202-225-2561 314-590-0029
MO03 Carnahan Russ 202-225-2671 314-962-1523
MO04 Skelton Ike 202-225-2876 573-635-3499
MO05 Cleaver Emanuel 202-225-4535 816-842-4545
MO06 Graves Sam 202-225-7041 816-233-9818
MO07 Blunt Roy 202-225-6536 417-781-1041
MO08 Emerson JoAnn 202-225-4404 573-756-9755
MO09 Hulshof Kenny 202-225-2956 573-221-1200
MS01 Childers Travis 202-225-4306 662-342-3942
MS02 Thompson Bennie 202-225-5876 662-326-9003
MS03 Pickering Chip 202-225-5031 601-442-2515
MS04 Taylor Gene 202-225-5772 228-864-7670
MT00 Rehberg Dennis 202-225-3211 406-256-1019
NC01 Butterfield G.K. 202-225-3101 252-789-4939
NC02 Etheridge Bob 202-225-4531 888-262-6202
NC03 Jones Walter 202-225-3415 800-351-1697
NC04 Price David 202-225-1784 919-967-7924
NC05 Foxx Virginia 202-225-2071 336-778-0211
NC06 Coble Howard 202-225-3065 336-886-5106
NC07 McIntyre Mike 202-225-2731 910-735-0610
NC08 Hayes Robin 202-225-3715 910-997-2070
NC09 Myrick Sue 202-225-1976 704-362-1060
NC10 McHenry Patrick 202-225-2576 828-327-6100
NC11 Shuler Heath 202-225-6401 828-252-1651
NC12 Watt Melvin 202-225-1510 336-275-9950
NC13 Miller Brad 202-225-3032 336-574-2909
ND00 Pomeroy Earl 202-225-2611 701-235-9760
NE01 Fortenberry Jeff 202-225-4806 402-379-2064
NE02 Terry Lee 202-225-4155 402-397-9944
NE03 Smith Adrian 202-225-6435 308-384-3900
NH01 Shea-Porter Carol 202-225-5456 603-743-4813
NH02 Hodes Paul 202-225-5206 603-223-9814
NJ01 Andrews Robert 202-225-6501 856-848-3900
NJ02 LoBiondo Frank 202-225-6572 800-471-4450
NJ03 Saxton Jim 202-225-4765 609-261-5800
NJ04 Smith Christopher 202-225-3765 732-350-2300
NJ05 Garrett Scott 202-225-4465 201-712-0330
NJ06 Pallone Frank 202-225-4671 732-249-8892
NJ07 Ferguson Mike 202-225-5361 908-757-7835
NJ08 Pascrell Bill 202-225-5751 973-523-5152
NJ09 Rothman Steven 202-225-5061 201-646-0808
NJ10 Payne Donald 202-225-3436 973-645-3213
NJ11 Frelinghuysen Rodney 202-225-5034 973-984-0711
NJ12 Holt Rush 202-225-5801 609-750-9365
NJ13 Sires Albio 202-225-7919 201-558-0800
NM01 Wilson Heather 202-225-6316 505-346-6781
NM02 Pearce Stevan 202-225-2365 505-622-0055
NM03 Udall Tom 202-225-6190 505-763-7616
NV01 Berkley Shelley 202-225-5965 702-220-9823
NV02 Heller Dean 202-225-6155 775-686-5760
NV03 Porter Jon 202-225-3252 702-387-4941
NY01 Bishop Timothy 202-225-3826 631-259-8450
NY02 Israel Steve 202-225-3335 631-951-2210
NY03 King Peter 202-225-7896 516-541-4225
NY04 McCarthy Carolyn 202-225-5516 516-739-3008
NY05 Ackerman Gary 202-225-2601 718-423-2154
NY06 Meeks Gregory 202-225-3461 718-738-4200
NY07 Crowley Joseph 202-225-3965 718-320-2314
NY08 Nadler Jerrold 202-225-5635 718-373-3198
NY09 Weiner Anthony 202-225-6616 718-520-9001
NY10 Towns Edolphus 202-225-5936 718-855-8018
NY11 Clarke Yvette 202-225-6231 718-287-1142
NY12 Velázquez Nydia 202-225-2361 718-599-3658
NY13 Fossella Vito 202-225-3371 718-356-8400
NY14 Maloney Carolyn 202-225-7944 718-932-1804
NY15 Rangel Charles 202-225-4365 212-663-3900
NY16 Serrano Jose 202-225-4361 718-620-0084
NY17 Engel Eliot 202-225-2464 845-735-1000
NY18 Lowey Nita 202-225-6506 914-428-1707
NY19 Hall John 202-225-5441 845-291-4100
NY20 Gillibrand Kirsten 202-225-5614 518-828-3109
NY21 McNulty Michael 202-225-5076 518-762-3568
NY22 Hinchey Maurice 202-225-6335 845-791-7116
NY23 McHugh John 202-225-4611 518-661-6486
NY24 Arcuri Michael 202-225-3665 315-252-2777
NY25 Walsh James 202-225-3701 315-423-5657
NY26 Reynolds Thomas 202-225-5265 716-634-2324
NY27 Higgins Brian 202-225-3306 716-484-0729
NY28 Slaughter Louise 202-225-3615 716-282-1274
NY29 Kuhl Randy 202-225-3161 607-776-9142
OH01 Chabot Steve 202-225-2216 513-684-2723
OH02 Schmidt Jean 202-225-3164 800-784-6366
OH03 Turner Michael 202-225-6465 937-383-8931
OH04 Jordan Jim 202-225-2676 419-999-6455
OH05 Latta Bob 202-225-6405 419-448-9016
OH06 Wilson Charles 202-225-5705 330-532-3740
OH07 Hobson David 202-225-4324 937-325-0474
OH08 Boehner John 202-225-6205 513-779-5400
OH09 Kaptur Marcy 202-225-4146 419-259-7500
OH10 Kucinich Dennis 202-225-5871 440-845-2707
OH11 Jones Stephanie 202-225-7032 216-522-4900
OH12 Tiberi Patrick 202-225-5355 614-523-2555
OH13 Sutton Betty 202-225-3401 440-245-5350
OH14 LaTourette Steven 202-225-5731 800-447-0529
OH15 Pryce Deborah 202-225-2015 614-469-5614
OH16 Regula Ralph 202-225-3876 330-722-3793
OH17 Ryan Tim 202-225-5261 330-373-0074
OH18 Space Zachary 202-225-6265 740-779-1636
OK01 Sullivan John 202-225-2211 918-749-0014
OK02 Boren Dan 202-225-2701 918-423-5951
OK03 Lucas Frank 202-225-5565 580-256-5752
OK04 Cole Tom 202-225-6165 580-436-5375
OK05 Fallin Mary 202-225-2132 405-234-9900
OR01 Wu David 202-225-0855 800-422-4003
OR02 Walden Greg 202-225-6730 541-389-4408
OR03 Blumenauer Earl 202-225-4811 503-231-2300
OR04 DeFazio Peter 202-225-6416 541-269-2609
OR05 Hooley Darlene 202-225-5711 503-557-1324
PA01 Brady Robert 202-225-4731 215-426-4616
PA02 Fattah Chaka 202-225-4001 215-848-9386
PA03 English Phil 202-225-5406 814-723-7282
PA04 Altmire Jason 202-225-2565 724-378-0928
PA05 Peterson John 202-225-5121 814-238-1776
PA06 Gerlach Jim 202-225-4315 610-594-1415
PA07 Sestak Joe 202-225-2011 610-892-8623
PA08 Murphy Patrick 202-225-4276 215-348-1194
PA09 Shuster Bill 202-225-2431 717-264-8308
PA10 Carney Christopher 202-225-3731 570-327-1902
PA11 Kanjorski Paul 202-225-6511 570-496-1011
PA12 Murtha John 202-225-2065 724-349-3195
PA13 Schwartz Allyson 202-225-6111 215-335-3355
PA14 Doyle Michael 202-225-2135 412-664-4049
PA15 Dent Charles 202-225-6411 215-541-4106
PA16 Pitts Joseph 202-225-2411 610-374-3637
PA17 Holden Tim 202-225-5546 717-234-5904
PA18 Murphy Tim 202-225-2301 724-850-7312
PA19 Platts Todd 202-225-5836 717-600-1919
PR00 Fortuno Luis 202-225-2615 787-723-6333
RI01 Kennedy Patrick 202-225-4911 401-729-5600
RI02 Langevin James 202-225-2735 401-732-9400
SC01 Brown Henry 202-225-3176 843-747-4175
SC02 Wilson Joe 202-225-2452 803-939-0041
SC03 Barrett Gresham 202-225-5301 803-649-5571
SC04 Inglis Bob 202-225-6030 864-582-6422
SC05 Spratt John 202-225-5501 843-393-3998
SC06 Clyburn James 202-225-3315 843-662-1212
SD00 Herseth Sandlin Stephanie 202-225-2801 605-394-5280
TN01 Davis David 202-225-6356 423-247-8161
TN02 Duncan John 202-225-5435 423-745-4671
TN03 Wamp Zach 202-225-3271 423-756-2342
TN04 Davis Lincoln 202-225-6831 865-354-3323
TN05 Cooper Jim 202-225-4311 615-736-5295
TN06 Gordon Bart 202-225-4231 615-896-1986
TN07 Blackburn Marsha 202-225-2811 901-382-5811
TN08 Tanner John 202-225-4714 731-423-4848
TN09 Cohen Steve 202-225-3265 901-544-4131
TX01 Gohmert Louie 202-225-3035 866-535-6302
TX02 Poe Ted 202-225-6565 866-447-0242
TX03 Johnson Sam 202-225-4201 972-470-0892
TX04 Hall Ralph 202-225-6673 214-726-9949
TX05 Hensarling Jeb 202-225-3484 214-349-9996
TX06 Barton Joe 202-225-2002 817-543-1000
TX07 Culberson John 202-225-2571 713-682-8828
TX08 Brady Kevin 202-225-4901 936-439-9542
TX09 Green Al 202-225-7508 713-383-9234
TX10 McCaul Michael 202-225-2401 979-830-8497
TX11 Conaway Michael 202-225-3605 432-331-9667
TX12 Granger Kay 202-225-5071 817-338-0909
TX13 Thornberry Mac 202-225-3706 806-371-8844
TX14 Paul Ron 202-225-2831 361-576-1231
TX15 Hinojosa Rubén 202-225-2531 956-682-5545
TX16 Reyes Silvestre 202-225-4831 915-534-4400
TX17 Edwards Chet 202-225-6105 817-645-4743
TX18 Jackson-Lee Sheila 202-225-3816 713-861-4070
TX19 Neugebauer Randy 202-225-4005 806-763-1611
TX20 Gonzalez Charles 202-225-3236 210-472-6195
TX21 Smith Lamar 202-225-4236 210-821-5024
TX22 Lampson Nick 202-225-5951 281-461-6300
TX23 Rodriguez Ciro 202-225-4511 432-336-3975
TX24 Marchant Kenny 202-225-6605 866-213-3803
TX25 Doggett Lloyd 202-225-4865 512-916-5921
TX26 Burgess Michael 202-225-7772 972-434-9700
TX27 Ortiz Solomon 202-225-7742 361-883-5868
TX28 Cuellar Henry 202-225-1640 956-631-4826
TX29 Green Gene 202-225-1688 281-999-5879
TX30 Johnson Eddie 202-225-8885 214-922-8885
TX31 Carter John 202-225-3864 512-246-1600
TX32 Sessions Pete 202-225-2231 972-392-0505
UT01 Bishop Rob 202-225-0453 801-625-0107
UT02 Matheson Jim 202-225-3011 435-627-0880
UT03 Cannon Chris 202-225-7751 801-569-5125
VA01 Wittman Robert 202-225-4261 804-443-0668
VA02 Drake Thelma 202-225-4215 757-787-7836
VA03 Scott Bobby 202-225-8351 804-644-4845
VA04 Forbes J. 202-225-6365 804-526-4969
VA05 Goode Virgil 202-225-4711 434-392-8331
VA06 Goodlatte Bob 202-225-5431 540-432-2391
VA07 Cantor Eric 202-225-2815 804-747-4073
VA08 Moran James 202-225-4376 703-971-4700
VA09 Boucher Rick 202-225-3861 276-523-5450
VA10 Wolf Frank 202-225-5136 800-850-3463
VA11 Davis Tom 202-225-1492 703-590-4599
VI00 Christensen Donna 202-225-1790 340-778 5900
VT00 Welch Peter 202-225-4115 888-605-7270
WA01 Inslee Jay 202-225-6311 206-361-0233
WA02 Larsen Rick 202-225-2605 360-733-4500
WA03 Baird Brian 202-225-3536 360-695-6292
WA04 Hastings Doc 202-225-5816 509-452-3243
WA05 Rodgers Cathy McMorris 202-225-2006 509-353-2374
WA06 Dicks Norman 202-225-5916 360-479-4011
WA07 McDermott Jim 202-225-3106 206-553-7170
WA08 Reichert David 202-225-7761 206-275-3438
WA09 Smith Adam 202-225-8901 253-896-3775
WI01 Ryan Paul 202-225-3031 608-752-4050
WI02 Baldwin Tammy 202-225-2906 608-258-9800
WI03 Kind Ron 202-225-5506 715-831-9214
WI04 Moore Gwen 202-225-4572 414-297-1140
WI05 Sensenbrenner James 202-225-5101 262-784-1111
WI06 Petri Thomas 202-225-2476 920-231-6333
WI07 Obey David 202-225-3365 715-842-5606
WI08 Kagen Steve 202-225-5665 920-437-1954
WV01 Mollohan Alan 202-225-4172 304-292-3019
WV02 Capito Shelley 202-225-2711 304-925-5964
WV03 Rahall Nick 202-225-3452 304-325-6222
WY00 Cubin Barbara 202-225-2311 307-261-6595

Democratic and Progressive Wikis

Democratic and Progressive Wikis

Democrats.com Events Archive

Archive of past Democrats.com events.

2005-01-20: January 20 Counter-Inaugural Events

Daytime

Evening

July 23 NYC: Torture and Lies - Who Is Accountable?

Torture and Lies: Who Is Accountable?
From Abu Ghraib to the Downing Street Minutes

New York City Town Hall Meeting
Saturday July 23, 2005 2-4 p.m.
New York Society for Ethical Culture 2 W. 64th St.
Free admission, donations suggested
Seating is limited, no reservations

Sponsored by The Nation and Democrats.com

Speakers:

Moderator: Bob Fertik

Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), who has represented a conservative district in upstate New York since 1993, has spoken passionately about the significance of the Downing Street Minutes and the need to hold the President accountable for taking the nation to war on the basis of lies.
http://www.democrats.com/hinchey-newpaltz

Hon. Liz Holtzman, a former Congresswoman from New York, served on the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment of President Nixon. She later served as District Attorney of Brooklyn and currently serves on the Nazi and Japanese Imperial War Criminal Records Interagency Working Group. She just published "Torture and Accountability," an extraordinary article in The Nation:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050718&s=holtzman

Randi Rhodes hosts The Randi Rhodes Show, the hugely popular afternoon show on Air America Radio.
http://therandirhodesshow.com/live/

Bob Fertik is the President of Democrats.com and a co-founder of AfterDowningStreet.org, a broad national coalition formed on May 26 to end the U.S. media blackout of the Downing Street Minutes, which exposed the Bush administration's pre-war declarations as deliberate lies.

is the President of and a co-founder of , a broad national formed on May 26 to end the U.S. media blackout of the , which exposed the Bush administration's pre-war declarations as deliberate lies.

July 23 is the 3rd anniversary of the Downing Street Minutes. Town Hall Meetings are being held all across the country, organized by Rep. John Conyers and AfterDowningStreet.org.

Co-sponsors:

For updates visit:
http://democrats.com/july23

To volunteer visit:
http://democrats.com/contact

Torture, Lies and Treason: Who Is Accountable?

Torture, Lies and Treason: Who Is Accountable?
From Abu Ghraib to the Downing Street Minutes to Valerie Plame
New York City Town Hall Meeting
Saturday July 23, 2005 2-4 p.m.
New York Society for Ethical Culture 2 W. 64th St.

Sponsored by The Nation and Democrats.com
Speakers:
Rep. Maurice Hinchey
Hon. Liz Holtzman
Randi Rhodes
Moderator: Bob Fertik

On behalf of The Nation magazine and Democrats.com, thank you all for coming to this important Town Hall Meeting on this hot Saturday afternoon.

My name is Bob Fertik and I am the President of Democrats.com and a co-founder of the AfterDowningStreet Coalition.

I'd like to thank the New York Society for Ethical Culture for renting us their wonderful building. I hope each of you will make a donation to help the Society and also get involved in its important community work.

I'd also like to thank our wonderful co-sponsors: Air America Radio, Billionaires for Bush, The Blame Show, Dave Pollak, Democracy for NYC, INN World Report, The Iraq Project, MediaChannel.org, New Democratic Majority, NYC Downing Street Coalition, NYS Senators Liz Krueger and Eric Schneiderman, openDemocracy.net, PoliticalStrategy.us, Progressive Democrats of America, SmirkingChimp.com, United for Peace and Justice, Veterans for Peace, and VoterMarch.org.

I want to thank the contributors to Democrats.com and AfterDowningStreet.org who made today's events possible.

And I'd like to thank the reporters and bloggers who came to hear what we have to say.

Today's forum in New York City is one of over 300 events around the country, organized by Rep. John Conyers and AfterDowningStreet.org. Eight of these events feature Members of Congress, including John Conyers in Detroit, Jim McDermott in Seattle, Barbara Lee in Oakland, Maxine Waters in Los Angeles, and Maurice Hinchey here today. Rep. Charlie Rangel of Harlem held an online town hall yesterday.

Today's events follow a hearing by John Conyers on June 16 that was attended by 36 House Democrats - including Maurice Hinchey - even though Republicans forced the hearings into a small basement room and scheduled 11 roll call votes to keep Members away. Right after the hearing, AfterDowningStreet.org led a spirited protest at the White House to force staff members to accept a letter from John Conyers to George Bush that was signed by over 100 House Members and over 500,000 citizens, including many of you.

This level of mobilization is remarkable, especially since AfterDowningStreet.org was started just two months ago. And this will be just the beginning of our efforts, if you will help us. We'll get to your role after our speakers.

So why are we here today?

First, we are here to mark the 3rd anniversary of the Downing Street Minutes, the smoking gun which proves the Bush administration deliberately lied to Congress, the American people, and the world, to justify their long-planned invasion of Iraq.

Here's what Sir Richard Dearlove, head of British intelligence, told Tony Blair's inner cabinet three years ago today - four months before Congress authorized military action in Iraq, six weeks before Bush's first speech on Iraq here at the United Nations.

"Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

The publication of this document on May 1 caused a firestorm in the British media, but the U.S. media refused to cover it. It was only because of bloggers and activists that most Americans ever learned of this document. And even today, the mainstream media continues its blackout of this historic story.

But more broadly, we are here to discuss the highest crimes imaginable in our democracy: Torture, Lies, and possibly even Treason.

In the past three years, these crimes were committed at the highest levels of our government - and in our names.

These crimes were committed by people who believe they are above the law.

And they will be right - if we, the American people, fail to hold them accountable.

Our speakers are experts on the crimes of the Bush administration.

But they also believe passionately in holding this administration accountable for its crimes.

We all know that Presidents are held accountable through impeachment.

But you probably don't know the word "impeachment" is strictly taboo in Washington today.

The mainstream media - which demanded Bill Clinton's impeachment for lying about sex - refuses to even ask whether George Bush should be impeached for lying about war.

For obvious reasons, conservatives vehemently oppose any discussion of impeachment.

But no progressives have been willing to talk about it either.

Until today.

Today, we are going to break that taboo.

Today, we are going to ask whether George Bush should be impeached for torture, lies, and possibly even treason.

According to a recent Zogby poll, an astonishing 42% of Americans believe George Bush should be impeached if he lied about Iraq.

By comparison, only 26% of Americans thought Bill Clinton should be impeached after the Lewinsky scandal broke.

This 42% figure is astounding. It represents nearly 100 million Americans.

Yet the mainstream media refuse to report it, because - as I said - the word impeachment is strictly taboo.

I know there are a few reporters - and lots of bloggers - here today. So let's give them some news to report.

How many of you believe George Bush should be impeached for lying about Iraq? Please raise your hands, and keep them raised.

Reporters and bloggers, please look around.

The American people are speaking.

They deserve to be heard. And whether or not the media listen today, ultimately we will be heard.

Because Democracy is on the march - right here at home.

Now it's time for our speakers to be heard.

Our first speaker is Liz Holtzman, who knows a thing or two about impeachment. Born in Brooklyn, Holtzman went from Abraham Lincoln High School to Radcliffe College and Harvard Law School. She was elected to Congress in 1972 at the age of 31, and is still the youngest woman ever elected. Holtzman was put on the House Judiciary Committee just in time to investigate the Watergate break-in. That investigation, led by the late Peter Rodino of Newark, uncovered widespread criminality in the Nixon administration, and led to the introduction of Articles of Impeachment, supported by both Democrats and Republicans. On August 8, 1974, Richard Nixon decided to resign rather than be impeached. Liz also knows a lot about prosecuting criminals, through her eight years as District Attorney in Brooklyn. And finally, Liz knows a lot about war crimes, through her current work on the Nazi and Japanese Imperial War Criminal Records Interagency Working Group. Liz recently applied her tremendous knowledge to the question of torture in Iraq, in a brilliant article in The Nation that everyone should read. I'm delighted to welcome a New York treasure, Liz Holtzman.

Maurice Hinchey was born on the Lower West Side and grew up in Saugerties. After serving two years in the Navy, he worked as a laborer in a cement plant and worked his way through college collecting tolls on the Thruway. He rebuilt the local Democratic Party and was elected to the State Assembly in 1974, becoming the first Democrat from Ulster County in 62 years. He served there for 18 years, gaining statewide fame as an environmental champion, preserving Sterling Forest, passing the first acid rain law, and investigating mafia control of the solid waste industry. He was elected to Congress in 1992 in a conservative upstate district running from Poughkeepsie west to the Finger Lakes. Hinchey has been an outspoken critic of the Iraq War - both before and after - and has brought audiences to their feet from New Paltz to St. Louis with his denunciations of the lies that took us to war.

Randi Rhodes was born in Brooklyn. Her father, who served in World War II, was a mechanical engineer; her mom worked in a dress shop. For financial reasons - like most soldiers today - Randi enlisted in the Air Force in 1977 and excelled as a mechanic, reaching the rank of sergeant. Her radio career began in Seminole, Texas where she was a waitress in a Mexican restaurant to support her radio habit. She made it to New York, Dallas, and Milwaukee before settling in South Florida. I first got to know her during the Florida recount in 2000, when Randi was about the only journalist in Florida protesting the theft of the Presidency. She gained national fame with the 2004 launch of Air America Radio, where she hosts the afternoon show from 3 to 7 each day. Randi has a huge and devoted audience here in New York City, where she is heard on 1190AM.

...

Let's give our wonderful speakers a warm round of applause for giving up their Saturday afternoons to discuss these historic topics with us.

Now let's talk about what you can do.

On your way in the door, you should have received a flyer about Representative Barbara Lee's Resolution of Inquiry, H. Res 375.

This resolution was introduced on Thursday and has 26 co-sponsors.

It is a simple request. It asks the White House and State Department for all "communication with officials with officials of the United Kingdom between January 1, 2002 and October 16, 2002, relating to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq."

In other words, we want to know whether the information contained in the Downing Street Minutes is true.

A Resolution of Inquiry is a special kind of bill. Under House rules, the committee to which it is assigned - probably International Relations - must vote yes or no within 14 Congressional working days.

AfterDowningStreet.org is trying to get every Member of Congress to support this Resolution. Our handout lists every Member in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut.

We would like to form committees of activists in as many of these districts as we can. So that's where you can help.

If you have to leave now, please take this flyer home and email your Representative using the link on the flyer - democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/50

If you can stay for another 10 minutes, I have asked a few people to lead brief caucus meetings here in this auditorium.

If you look around, you'll see people holding up signs for various parts of the region. In Manhattan, the West Side is represented by Jerry Nadler. The East Side is Carolyn Maloney. Harlem is Charlie Rangel. The Bronx is Jose Serrano, Eliot Engel and Joe Crowley. Queens is Joe Crowley, Greg Meeks, Gary Ackerman, and Nydia Velazquez. Brooklyn is Velazquez, Major Owens, Ed Towns, Anthony Weiner, Jerry Nadler, and Vito Fossella. Staten Island is Fossella. New Jersey has 13 Representatives, Upstate New York has 12, Nassau/Suffolk has 4, Connecticut has 5.

When you find your area caucus, find the people who have the same Representative. Then exchange e-mail addresses so you can work together after this meeting. And choose one person as the coordinator. Our immediate goal is to schedule a meeting in each district in August, when Congress is in recess and Members are at home. The coordinator should schedule the meeting, with the goal of persuading your Representative to support Barbara Lee's Resolution of Inquiry. The coordinator should e-mail me, bob@democrats.com, so we can work together to make our efforts a success.

That's all we ask for now. It's an easy way to get started and to get to know your Representative. Remember, Congress works for us, and it is their Constitutional duty to hold the White House accountable for its crimes. So let's work together, and make our Democracy work!

Elect More Progressive Democrats

Bush Democrats

While Democrats control the House of Representatives by 231-202, they cannot pass progressive bills on health care, the environment, jobs, justice, and impeachment - or even stop horrendous Republican bills on Iraq, torture, and warrantless wiretapping - because a few dozen "Bush Democrats" usually vote with George Bush.

One solution is to elect more Democrats to increase our majority so "Bush Democrats" matter less, and many netroots groups like Moveon.org, DailyKos.com, and Blue America are doing this brilliantly.

The other solution is to support progressive Democrats in primaries against "Bush Democrats," and that's why we launched this effort, drawing heavily on the excellent advice of Blue America's Howie Klein.

The main reason progressives have avoided primaries against Democratic incumbents is the fear that a divisive primary might help turn a "Bush Democratic" seat into a Republican seat. Realistically, there may be a few "Bush Democrats" who are uniquely able to win in Republican districts and therefore should not be challenged in a Democratic primary. But those are the exceptions, not the rule - especially in an election like 2008 where Democrats have a large lead due to widespread disgust with Bush and the entire Republican Party. We will not target incumbents who are truly exceptional.

While we focus on replacing incumbent Bush Democrats, there are two other situations in which progressive Democrats face Bush Democrats:

You can help all of our progressive Democratic candidates through our Actblue page:
http://www.actblue.com/page/bushdemocrats

1. Incumbent Bush Democrats who deserve primary challenges

Below is a list of Democrats who voted wrong on one or more crucial votes. Some are hard-core "Bush Democrats" while others simply join them from time to time.

       
Steny Hoyer        

By publishing this list, we hope to accomplish several goals:

  1. Persuade these Democrats to stop voting with Bush so we don't have to challenge them in a primary. Democrats who reverse their bad votes and genuinely embrace progressive positions will be crossed off our list
  2. Encourage progressive Democrats to run primaries against those who keep voting with Bush

This list began after 59 Bush Democrats voted against the McGovern Amendment on 5/10/2007 on the first key vote to end the war. Those 59 Bush Democrats voted for an endless occupation of Iraq despite overwhelming opposition from Democrats, Independents, and even many Republicans. The list has been modified since then to take account of other key votes since the original Iraq War vote on 10/10/02.

Key to Column Headings:

"B/R" ranks each district on a "Blue/Red" scale where 1=Strong Blue, 2=Leans Blue, 3=Tossup, 4=Leans Red, 5=Solid Red. In theory there is less "risk" in challenging an incumbent in a Blue district than a Red one, because the seat should stay Democratic regardless of who wins the primary. But each district and each race is unique, so that general theory may or may not apply.

"Incumbent" links to a page for each incumbent where you can discuss progressive Democrats who could challenge them in a primary, and other topics related to local political organizing.

"B/N" identifies Members who join the "Bluedog" (B) or "New Democrat/DLC" (N) caucuses. "Bluedogs" claim to support "fiscal responsibility," but these Bluedogs support a war that has already wasted an incredible $434 billion and driven budget deficits to record levels. "New Democrats/DLC" claim to support "national security" but the Iraq War has severely damaged our armed forces, undermined military recruitment, increased global terrorism, and alienated our allies. Those who play a leadership role with either group earn an asterisk (*).

"BDI" is the "Bush Democrat Index" which ranks all Democrats on their overall voting support for George Bush and the Republicans. It is the reverse of the Progressive Punch Index.

"Votes" identifies key votes where these Members voted wrong:

  • ?: (Not in office when vote occurred)
  • A: Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq on 10/10/02 (bad=support)
  • B: Bankruptcy Bill on 5/14/05 (bad=support)
  • M: Military Commissions Act on 9/27/06 (bad=support)
  • I: Iraq Supplemental McGovern Amendment to end the war by 4/08 on 5/10/07 (bad=oppose)
  • R: Andrews Amendment to block Iraq/Afghan funds for military strike on Iran on 5/16/07 (bad=oppose)
  • X: Iraq Supplemental with unenforceable timetable on 7/12/07 (bad=oppose any timetable)
  • W: Warantless Wiretapping on 8/4/07 (bad=support)
  • C: Bi-Partisan Compact on Iraq to oppose any funding cuts 9/26/07 (bad=support)
  • P: "Protect America Act" letter co-signer 2/08 (P voted against Democratic alternative 3/14/08)
  • Q: Iraq $163B on 6/19/08
  • F: FISA wiretapping immunity on 6/20/08

"Primary Nominees" lists people whose names have been mentioned. If they are running and have a web site we link to their site. If we consider them priority candidates (whether or not they are running) we make them bold.

Dist B/R Incumbent B/N BDI Votes Primary Nominees
AL05 4 Bud Cramer B 2 ABMIRWCPQF retiring in 08
AL07   Artur Davis     MWBPKQF  
AR01   Marion Berry B   ABCKQF  
AR02 1 Vic Snyder N 49 IXWQF  
AR04 1 Mike Ross B* 26 ABMIWCPQF  
AZ05 4 Harry Mitchell b 59 ?IRWQF  
AZ08 3 Gabrielle Giffords B 79 ?IQF Jeff Latas
CA18 3 Dennis Cardoza B 46 ?BIF  
CA20 2 Jim Costa B 50 ?BIWCQF  
CA28 1 Howard Berman   117 AIQF Rep. Cindy Montanez
Rep. Lloyd Levine
Mike Stettler
CO02 1

Mark Udall

  109 IQF running for US Senate
CO03 4 John Salazar B 56 ?BMIRWQF  
FL02 4 Allen Boyd B* 6 ABMIRWCPQF Rep. Al Lawson
FL03   Corrine Brown     KQF  
FL16 4 Tim Mahoney B 63 ?IRQF  
GA02 1 Sanford Bishop B 27 ABMIRQF  
GA08 5 Jim Marshall B 9 ?MIRXWQF Robert Nowak
Jack Ellis
George Carswell
GA012 1 John Barrow BN 12 ?MIRXWPQF Regina Thomas 7/15
GA013 1 David Scott BN 52 ?BMIRQF  
IA03 3

Leonard Boswell

B 20 ABMIWPF Ed Fallon
[Likely to retire after
IA loses seat in 2010]
IL03 1 Daniel Lipinski   76 IWQF Mark Pera
IL05   Rahm Emanuel *   KQF  
IL08 4 Melissa Bean BN 37 ?BMIRWPQF Randi Scheuer
IN02 3 Joe Donnelly B 29 ?IRWQF  
IN08 4 Brad Ellsworth B 30 ?IXWPQF  
IN09 4 Baron Hill B 32 A?IWQ Gretchen Clearwater 5/6
KS02 4 Nancy Boyda b 88 ?IQF  
KS03 3 Dennis Moore BN* 47 ABMICPQF  
KY06 3 Ben Chandler BN 55 ?BMIWQF Sen. Ernesto Scorsone
LA03 3 Charlie Melancon BN 15 ?BMIRWPQF  
LA06   Don Cazayoux     ?QF  
MD02 1 Dutch Ruppersberger   68 ?BIQF  
MD04 1 Al Wynn   94 AB Donna Edwards
MD05 1 Steny Hoyer * 83 ABIQF Paul Pinsky
MN07 4 Collin Peterson B 3 ABMIWQF  
MO04 5 Ike Skelton   5 ABIQF  
MS01   Travis Childers     ?QF  
MS04 5 Gene Taylor B 1 ABMIXWCQF  
NC02 2 Bob Etheridge N 48 ABMIWQF  
NC07 3 Mike McIntyre BN 7 ABMIWQF  
NC011 3 Heath Shuler B 23 ?IRWPQF Sen. Martin Luther Nesbitt
Rep. Susan C Fisher
Rep. Ray Rapp
ND00 4 Earl Pomeroy B 33 ABMIWPQF  
NV01 1 Shelley Berkley N 67 AIRQF  
NY20   Kirsten Gillibrand B   ?QF  
OH06 3 Charles Wilson B 140 ?IWQF  
OH18 4 Zack Space B 57 ?IRWPQF  
OK02 4 Dan Boren B 4 ?BMIRXWCPQF  
PA04 3 Jason Altmire   25 ?IRWQF  
PA07   Joe Sestak     ?KQF  
PA10 5 Chris Carney B 43 ?IRXWPQF  
PA11   Paul Kanjorski     AQF  
PA12   John Murtha     AHRBKQF  
PA13 1 Allyson Schwartz N 145 ?BIRQ Chuck Pennacchio
PA17 5 Tim Holden B 11 ABMIRXPQF Sen. Michael O'Pake
SC05   John Spratt     AMBPKQF  
SC06   Jim Clyburn *   KQF  
SD00 4 Stephanie Herseth Sandlin BN* 36 ?BMIRWCQF  
TN04 3 Lincoln Davis B 13 ?BMIWCPQF  
TN05 1 Jim Cooper B 24 ?BIWPQF  
TN06 4 Bart Gordon B 18 ABMIWQF  
TN08 1 John Tanner B 8 ABMIRWCPQF  
TX09 1 Al Green   167 ?BIF Rep. Alma Allen
Rep. Hubert Vo
TX15   Ruben Hinojosa     KQF  
TX16   Silvestre Reyes     KQF  
TX17 5 Chet Edwards   17 ABMIWQF  
TX22 5 Nick Lampson B 34 A?IRWCQF  
TX23 3 Ciro Rodriguez   75 ?IWQF  
TX27 2 Solomon Ortiz   14 BIQF Juan Garcia
TX28 1 Henry Cuellar bN 19 ?BMIRWQF  
TX29 1 Gene Green   43 AIQF Sen. Mario V. Gallegos
UT02 5 Jim Matheson B 10 ABMIXWCPQF Mayor Rocky Anderson
VA09 5 Rick Boucher   38 ABIQF  
WA03   Brian Baird     CKQF Cheryl Crist
WA06   Norm Dicks     AQF Paul Richmond
WI03 2 Ron Kind N* 66 ABIQF  

2. Republican districts and open seats where progressive Democrats are running against Bush Democrats

 

3. Progressive Democratic incumbents who are being challenged by Bush Democrats

Dist B/R Progressive Bush Democrat Notes
TN-09 1 Steve Cohen Nikki Tinker Cohen is an outstanding progressive Freshman who won Harold Ford Jr.'s open seat in 2006 by beating cousin Joe Ford Jr. in the Democratic primary and brother Jake Ford in the general election. Religious right ministers want to defeat Cohen because he supported the Hate Crimes Bill H.R. 1592 and they are likely to support Nikki Tinker, Harold Ford Jr.'s former campaign manager, who came in 2nd to Cohen in the 2006 Democratic primary.

"New Democrats"

In Washington, conservative Democrats call themselves "New Democrats" - which only means they will betray the Democratic base - unions, women, minorities, gays -  whenever Corporate America tells them to.

Here at Democrats.com, we call them Corporate Sellouts.

Groups

Democratic Leadership Council (DLC)

Senate New Democratic Coalition

Max Baucus, U.S. Senator, MT
Evan Bayh, U.S. Senator, IN
Maria Cantwell, U.S. Senator, WA
Tom Carper, U.S. Senator, DE
Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator, NY
Kent Conrad, U.S. Senator, ND
Christopher Dodd, U.S. Senator, CT
Byron Dorgan, U.S. Senator, ND
Dianne Feinstein, U.S. Senator, CA
Tim Johnson, U.S. Senator, SD
John Kerry, U.S. Senator, MA
Herb Kohl, U.S. Senator, WI
Mary Landrieu, U.S. Senator, LA
Joe Lieberman, U.S. Senator, CT
Blanche Lincoln, U.S. Senator, AR
Bill Nelson, U.S. Senator, FL
Ben Nelson, U.S. Senator, NE
Mark Pryor, U.S. Senator, AR
Debbie Stabenow, U.S. Senator, MI

House New Democratic Coalition

Brian Baird, U.S. Representative, WA
Shelley Berkley, U.S. Representative, NV
Lois Capps, U.S. Representative, CA
Russ Carnahan, U.S. Representative, MO
Ed Case, U.S. Representative, HI
Ben Chandler, U.S. Representative, KY
Joseph Crowley, U.S. Representative, NY
Jim Davis, U.S. Representative, FL
Susan Davis, U.S. Representative, CA
Artur Davis, U.S. Representative, AL
Rahm Emanuel, U.S. Representative, IL
Eliot Engel, U.S. Representative, NY
Bob Etheridge, U.S. Representative, NC
Harold Ford, Jr. , U.S. Representative, TN
Jane Harman, U.S. Representative, CA
Stephanie Herseth, U.S. Representative, SD
Brian Higgins, U.S. Representative, NY
Rush Holt, U.S. Representative, NJ
Darlene Hooley, U.S. Representative, OR
Jay Inslee, U.S. Representative, WA
Steve Israel, U.S. Representative, NY
Ron Kind, U.S. Representative, WI
Rick Larsen, U.S. Representative, WA
John Larson, U.S. Representative, CT
Carolyn McCarthy, U.S. Representative, NY
Mike McIntyre, U.S. Representative, NC
Gregory Meeks, U.S. Representative, NY
Juanita Millender-McDonald, U.S. Representative, CA
Dennis Moore, U.S. Representative, KS
Jim Moran, U.S. Representative, VA
David Price, U.S. Representative, NC
Loretta Sanchez, U.S. Representative, CA
Adam B. Schiff, U.S. Representative, CA
Allyson Schwartz, U.S. Representative, PA
David Scott, U.S. Representative, GA
Adam Smith, U.S. Representative, WA
Ellen Tauscher, U.S. Representative, CA
Tom Udall, U.S. Representative, NM
David Wu, U.S. Representative, OR

Steny Hoyer Logos

Steny Hoyer Logos

How to Run for Office - and Win!

Democrats.com encourages every progressive activist to run for political office - at whatever level appeals to you.

As a company, we are prohibited by law from contributing money or services to candidates. However, we can offer free advice - and we are happy to do so!

The Internet is the greatest campaign tool ever invented. If you master the Internet, you can run a kick-ass Democratic campaign. Here are some suggestions on how to use the Internet to win. For best results, complete each step in sequence.

1. Create a web site

a. Think of a domain name that's really easy to spell and remember. Buy it at a low-cost registrar/hosting site like GoDaddy.com or Namesecure.com.

b. Create a free campaign contribution page at ActBlue.com and encourage your friends to make a contribution to show support.  

c. Buy a turn-key Web site from one of these excellent vendors. If you can't afford a turn-key site, you can build a workable site for practically nothing using these do-it-yourself tools (no programming or server management skills necessary). Be sure to include an email signup form.

d. Have a good photographer take a vivid smiling closeup picture of you, as well as candid shots of you talking to voters.

e. Find a videographer with a studio to record you making a 2-minute persuasive statement about your candidacy, looking directly into the camera. Upload that statement to Youtube and embed the Youtube object in your web site.

f. Blog about the issues you care about most, the issues voters are bringing up as you campaign, news and blog coverage, etc. Write in a natural thoughtful voice. Respond to worthwhile comments. Enlist your strongest supporters (and clearest writers) as occasional bloggers. 

g. Create a page with endorsements and enlist respected people from all walks of life, especially politics (including local party officers). Include their titles with their permission.

2. Promote your web site

a. Tell your friends to visit your blog, post comments, and help you spread the word. Respond to thoughtful comments whenever you can - build a friendly and welcoming community!

b. Reach out to Democrats.com members and other progressive activists in your Congressional District:

c. Print business cards. You can buy fancy but inexpensive cards with your color logo from iPrint.com.

d. Hit the campaign trail. Speak to local organizations, especially progressive activist groups like Moveon.org, DemocracyForAmerica.org (Howard Dean's group), Progressive Democrats of America, and Democrats.com. Join their e-mail lists to keep up with their activities and find out when they are meeting locally.

e. Social Networking. Create a campaign page on MySpace.com, Facebook.com, and YouTube.com - the largest social network sites. Recruit one or more volunteers who are regular users of these sites to update your campaign page and make "friends."

f. Make friends with progressive reporters, talk show hosts, and bloggers who cover your district - invite them to lunch or dinner so they get to know you. Encourage them to write/talk about your campaign. Make sure they mention your web site.

g. When your blog starts cooking with genuine local support, introduce your campaign on the national and state blogs. Each blog has its own format and personality, so spend a little time getting familiar with each one before you post. You only get one chance to make a first impression, so don't blow it!

Here is the straight dope from the King of Democratic Blogging, Markos Moulitsas a.k.a. Kos of DailyKos.com.

All of the campaigns that have grabbed notice in the past couple of years were launched by regular people, and I simply lent my support. I think it's important for people to realize that this is a new model of activism. The press and politicians still think it's a traditional model -- from top to bottom. So they come to me and think that by "reaching out" to me they can reach my audience. That's complete crap. It needs to be the exact opposite, they need to reach out to my audience. And if my audience decides its an endeavor worthy of support, then I'll get involved.

Here are some excellent tips for engaging bloggers from Chris Bowers and Matthew Stoller, authors of Emergence of the Progressive Blogosphere: A New Force in American Politics:

• Hire a "Netroots Coordinator" and be prepared to work with him or her on money, messaging and organizing. Most organizations hire one and relegate them to a position where they are asked simply to raise money. If you follow this model it is not worth engaging the blogs. A good Netroots Coordinator can deliver messaging, media, and money.

• Put up a link on your web site that says "Got a blog?" Ask for bloggers to give you their name, email, IM, and blog address. This list is valuable – it is the list of bloggers who are interested in your issue.

• Take your list of bloggers and add them to your press release list. Call through to introduce yourself, and invite them to cover events, and if possible give them press passes and access.

• Read the blogs who sign up. If you use an "aggregator" such as www.bloglines.com, you can read many more blogs much more quickly. Get a sense of who is on your side and who is not. Go into the comment section of various blogs and add comments when relevant.

• Hold conference calls with your strategists/candidate. Treat bloggers like friends and allies, but also realize you are on the record.

• Periodically do a "blog round-up" where you email interesting blog posts on your issue to all the bloggers as well as internally.
Link to interesting blog posts from your web site/blog; make sure you link to a few posts that disagree with you. This will lend your online presence more credibility.

• Listen and respond to criticism. These are your friends and often not that experienced in politics – treat them like they are here to learn, not like they are cynical, hard-boiled reporters.

3. Become a Netroots Hero

Every campaign cycle, a handful of campaigns gain the attention of the largest national blogs. They do so through a combination of timing, creativity, know-how, and luck.

  • In August 2005, Paul Hackett raised $500,000 from the blogosphere, and lost by only 52%-48% in a district that gave Bush 64% in 2004.
  • In 2006, Ned Lamont challenged Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic primary, and beat Lieberman with the enthusiastic support of the blogosphere

The most important factors are:

  • A winnable race: an open seat, or an incumbent who is vulnerable because of a scandal or illness
  • A really strong issue that gets covered by the media - hopefully one that connects directly to your background and experience
  • Support from prominent people
  • Fundraising prowess: either you master the arts of fundraising yourself, or find someone to devote full-time to do it for you

Candidate Guide

Candidate qualifications for "aggressive progressive" candidates

  • A record of leadership on progressive issues
  • A passionate commitment to bringing our troops safely home from Iraq and to providing the support they need upon return
  • A passionate commitment to restoring all constitutional guarantees that were criminally subverted by the Bush-Cheney administration, including Habeus Corpus, wiretapping only with warrants, closing Guantanamo, and ending all torture
  • A passionate commitment to grassroots organizing over the Internet
  • Organizing skills and political campaign experience as a candidate or volunteer
  • A core group of family and friends who will devote time and energy to help you campaign

Researching your opponent: Progressive Punch is an incredible database of Congressional votes that awards every Member of Congress a "progressive score" based on their votes. You can click on the Member's name to learn more about each vote.

Legal requirements

  • You must be registered to vote as a Democrat in the Congressional District by primary day
  • When you spend over $5,000 on a campaign for federal office, you must register your campaign with the Federal Elections Commission and file all periodic reports
  • You must meet each state's rules to get on the ballot as a Democrat (collect petition signatures, pay filing fee, etc.)
  • You will need a bank account and a Treasurer who is responsible for all financial reports

Fundraising

  • ActBlue hosts free fundraising pages for all Democratic candidates and charges the lowest possible credit card processing fee; you can easily link to your Actblue page from your campaign web site
  • All fundraising starts with personal requests to friends and family
  • As you meet people (online and offline), ask them to join your email list and send occasional (but not repetitive) fundraising appeals
  • When you decide to run, seek the endorsement of progressive PACs.

Internet organizing

  • Democrats.com guide to internet strategy: web sites, blogs, social networks, and more
  • Democrats.com guide to campaign software: turn-key web sites, mailing list managers, and more 

Training for candidates, staff, and volunteers (see also PACs)

Email Outreach to Democrats.com Activists in your CD

How to Email Democrats.com Activists in your CD

  • Click "My account" on the upper left
  • Click on "Voting" tab on the upper right
  • Scroll down to "Look up other users in your Congressional District" and click
  • Below your Senators and Representatives, you will see "Users in District"
  • Right below that is "Users Registered to Receive Alerts," which you can click to review
  • You can unclick anyone you do not want to receive your email
  • For "Subject" use "A Message from [your name]"
  • For "Message" write a friendly note to explain who you are and why you're writing. See examples below.
  • Click "Preview" to make sure it looks ok, then click "Test Mail" to send one copy to yourself, and make sure it gets delivered to you and looks good
  • Then click "Send Mail" to send a copy to everyone who is checked above.
  • If you get a good response, you should propose a convenient time and place to meet, such as a convenient coffee shop.
  • We have specific instructions on collecting petitions.
  • In some cases we can help you email petition signers.

Example #1: Impeachment Committees

My name is ? and I am a fellow member of Democrats.com.

I am organizing an Impeachment Committee to persuade Representative ? to support impeachment.

We will collect impeachment petitions in a busy location, write letters to the editor, and meet with Representative ? to persuade him/her to support impeachment.

Can you help us?

If so, please reply and tell me which of the activities above you can help with, and include your phone number if it's ok for me to call.

Thank you!!

[Your name]

Example #2: Iraq Town Hall

My name is ? and I am a fellow member of Democrats.com.  

I am organizing a Town Hall Meeting on Iraq to persuade Representative ? to vote NO on Bush's demand for another $102 billion.

The Town Hall will be on April ? at the ? Church on ? Ave.

Can you come? And can you help me organize this event?

Please reply to this email if you can.

And please forward this email to everyone you know in Representative ?'s district.

Thank you!!

[Your name]

CD Email FAQ

Democrats.com has built a unique email networking tool to help local activists who are authorized senders reach out to fellow Democrats.com members in their:

  • Congressional District
  • Zip Code (in development)

The purpose of this tool is to help activists accomplish political tasks, such as:

  • Organizing local meetings and events
  • Lobbying on issues chosen by Democrats.com members
  • Campaigning for a candidate supported by Democrats.com members

How it works:

  • Click "my settings"
  • Make sure your address and zip code are accurate; if not change them by clicking the "edit" tab
  • Click "Look up other users in your Congressional District"
  • Click "Users Registered to Receive Alerts" to see the registered Democrats.com Members; click on their username to learn more about them
  • Uncheck the box for anyone you do not want to email

Opting out:

Authorized senders:

Authorized senders can be chosen in several ways:

  • By vote of local Members
  • By application to the Moderators

Content restrictions:

Everyone receives too much email, and we do not want this system to become a nuisance or a burden. We strictly prohibit:

  • Personal solicitations
  • Commercial solicitations
  • Fundraising appeals, no matter how worthy

Technical development:

  • Email announcements should be created as a node type with comments enabled
  • These nodes should be moderated
  • Authorized senders can bypass moderation
  • Each announcement should include a link to the node to facilitate discussion

How to Build a Do-It-Yourself Campaign Web Site

a. If you know a good PHP programmer or Linux server administrator, download and install a free copy of CivicSpace. Otherwise, buy a basic hosting package from your domain registrar (like GoDaddy.com or Namesecure.com) that includes a few pages for basic information. Pick one of the pre-packaged designs, or find a talented graphic designer to create a snazzy logo and a simple site design, including a style sheet (body text and headlines).

b. Build your most important pages in this order: Home, Biography, Issues, News, Endorsements, and Photos. Do a first draft, sleep on it, and do a second draft. Show it to your most savvy friends and ask for their feedback. Keep revising it until it is unique, important, and persuasive.

c. Add a blog. You can get a free blog at Blogger.com. Tell your story in your blog - who you are, why you're running, and how you plan to beat your opponent. Update your blog frequently with items about yourself, your opponent, your district, and the issues of the day - local, state, national, and international.

d. Add a contribution form. You can get one from ActBlue.com.

e. Add a mailing list. You can get a free one from Yahoogroups.

Turn-Key Campaign Websites

These are the best turn-key Web sites for progressive candidates.

Cost/US
House
Content
Mgmt
Blog
 
Email
List 
Volun
teer  
Donate
 
FEC
File
Canvass
Mgmt 
Blue State Digital + + +

+

+

Blue Utopia + + +

+

+

+

+

Bryght + +
Campaign Advantage + + +

+

+

Campaign Office + + +

+

+

Campaign Window + + + + +   +
CompleteCampaigns.com + + +

+

+

+

DCS + + +

+

+

ElectionMall + + + + +
Mandate Media + + +

+

+

+

Media Mezcla + + +

+

+

NGP Campaign Office + + +

+

+

+

Orchid for Change + + +

+

+

WebPolitechs + + + + +

Mailing List Managers

If you have a web site but need a service to manage your mailing list, you can choose between free and paid services. Free services (Yahoo Groups (http://groups.google.com/),%20%20and%20Topica’s%20free%20service%20(http://lists.topica.com/).%20have">http://groups.yahoo.com/),%20Google%20Groups%20(http://groups.google.com/),%20%20and%20Topica’s%20free%20service%20(http://lists.topica.com/).%20have these limitations:

  • they only store the email address and name, so you cannot target your mailings based on criteria like geography, volunteers activities, contributions, etc.
  • there are limitations on the number of email addresses you can add per day, which makes it difficult to move an existing list
  • they show ads at the top of each message

Hosted email tools typically allow you to manage your list, create emails, and view reports through a web-based interface.  Most will allow you to send formatted emails; some provide tools to let you easily format them.   You can generally integrate them into your website so that you can take subscriptions online, and the tools will automatically manage unsubscribe requests and delete email addresses that are no longer valid.   Reports allow you to see how many opened a particular eNewsletter and how many clicked on a link.

These tools minimize the possibility of being blacklisted as a spammer. In addition, many of the vendors proactively manage relationships with ISPs to prevent spam filter problems.

  • Groundspring Email Now (http://www.groundspring.org/):  A good basic service, with solid deliverability and reports.  If you want to send formatted newsletters, you must create them in a different tool and paste the HTML in.  At $19.95/ month for 10,000 emails and $1 or less for every 1000 thereafter, Groundspring is affordably priced even for small lists, and becomes a tremendous deal for bigger ones.  Groundspring is a nonprofit itself and is committed to the nonprofit sector.
  • Electric Embers NPOGroups (http://www.electricembers.net/):  NPOGroups has perhaps more in common with tools like Yahoo Groups than the other services in this section – it provides a similar service without the advertising and a bit more control over the list.  It doesn’t easily support HTML formatting.  It is priced on a sliding scale, starting at $10/month for 2500 subscribers, and $5 per extra 5000.
  • GraphicMail (http://www.graphicmail.com/):  GraphicMail offers 10,000 emails (in total) free to nonprofits (notable branding for GraphicMail is included in your emails in this free version; the branding can be removed for $20/year). Additional emails are about half a cent per email.  The tool has solid editing and reporting tools, including a HTML editor that allows you to create your own templates.
  • Emma (http://www.myemma.com/):  Emma is a good solution for those who want to send good looking formatted emails without messing around with HTML.  You can install a custom template (designed by you, a consultant, or by Emma themselves) and then easily change the text and images for each newsletter.  It has solid reporting tools.  It’s $35/month for up to 1000 emails, $45/month for up to 2500, and so on through a number of levels, reaching $600/month for 100,000 emails.
  • CampaignMonitor (http://www.campaignmonitor.com/): Intended for web designers who can build their own HTML emails, CampaignMonitor doesn’t provide any template options, but offers good custom fields and reporting functionality as well as solid deliverability.  At $5 per email campaign, plus $0.01 per email, the service is very affordable for small lists but probably overpriced for large ones.
  • Topica (http://www.topica.com/):  In addition to its well known free service, Topica offers a solid paid option.  The tool offers sophisticated website integration, lots of custom fields, and powerful list segmentation tools as well as the standard newsletter template and report functions. It’s $50/month for up to 5000 subscribers (ask about an additional nonprofit discount), but goes up quickly from there: the next level is $250/month for up to 25,000 subscribers. 
  • ConstantContact (http://www.constantcontact.com/):  A commonly used tool in both the business and nonprofit worlds, ConstantContact provides solid templates, segmenting, and reporting features.  The pricing scheme is friendly to small lists:  $15/month for under 500 subscribers, $30/month for under 2500, and so on up to $150/month for up to 25,000 subscribers.  However, several people mentioned trouble with spam filters when using ConstantContact.
  • DemocracyInAction (http://www.democracyinaction.org/):  DemocracyInAction (DIA) offers a lot of flexibility to set your email template and website forms just the way you want them, and includes an extensive developer’s API.   Unfortunately, getting started is not as easy as with most of these other hosted tools, so you’ll want someone with HTML skills on hand.  DIA is on the expensive side for small lists, charging $50/month for up to 2500 subscribers, but a great deal for large lists at $100/month for up to 50,000 subscribers. 

Canvassing systems:

These systems allow you to upload a voter file and then manage canvass operations like phone banks and door-to-door by printing contact sheets and keypunching canvass results.

Paid Advertising to progressive activists:

Email append: buy email addresses for Democratic voters in your district (typically 15% match rates)

Free Internet outreach tips:

Paul Hackett's Winning Message

On August 2, 2005, Paul Hackett shocked the political world by getting 48% in a special election in Ohio's 2nd Congressional District - a conservative district that previously elected Republicans with over 70% of the vote.

What was the secret of Hackett's success? Hackett didn't let Republicans frame the debate, and he didn't mince words.

Here is Paul Hackett in his own words.

Gay Marriage:

  • Gay marriage—who the hell cares?  If you're gay you're gay—more power to you. What you want is to be treated fairly by the law and any American who doesn't think that should be the case is, frankly, un-American."

Elections

Democrats.com believes in Democracy as expressed in the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...

Unfortunately George Bush and the Republican Party do not believe in winning fair elections - they believe in stealing elections.

Democrats.com led the fight against the Stolen Elections of 2000 and 2004 - and we will continue to fight them through our voter empowerment web site MyDem.com

Here are resources to help us in our fight.

"Google" Your Voter Registration!

Are YOU registered to vote? Are you SURE??

You may THINK you're registered and go to the polls on Election Day - and be shocked to discover your name is not on the eligible voter list.

Why? Because Republicans are trying to disenfranchise Democratic voters through an ever-increasing number of despicable laws, regulations, and practices - even criminal activities.

Make sure they haven't removed YOU - "Google" your voter registration!

Step 1. Create a user account at Democrats.com so we can protect the privacy of your voter registration data. We need lastname, firstname, address, zip, and birthdate for an accurate match. (You can change or delete your data after you finish your search.)

  • If you are already logged in as a Democrats.com user, you will see your username in the upper left menu just below the search box. Review your data to make sure it is accurate and complete. Skip ahead to step 2.
  • If you have a Democrats.com user account but are not logged in, log in here. Review your data to make sure it is accurate and complete. Go to step 2.
  • If you're not sure whether you have a Democrats.com user account, request a password here and we will send you one by email. If we cannot find your login, create one here and we will send you an email confirmation with a link to activate your account. Review your data to make sure it is accurate and complete. Go to step 2.
  • If you do not have a Democrats.com user account, create one here and we will send you an email confirmation with a link to activate your account. Go to step 2.

Step 2. Search the Democrats.com National Voter List.

  • When your data is accurate and complete, search our National Voter File for a valid registration that matches your data: lastname, firstname, address, zip, and birthdate.
  • We will tell you if we find a match for all or some of your data, or if we cannot find any match. (Please note: our state files are updated regularly but there is a processing lag so we may not have very recent data.) (1)
  • You can change your data and search again up to 3 times.

Step 3. Register to vote!

If you find this service useful, we welcome your contributions. We also encourage you to tell your friends to visit http://democrats.com/register 

Count every vote - no more stolen elections!

(1) Because we are using copies of county election files, we cannot guarantee the results of our search - our service is for your convenience only. The only definitive way to find out if you are registered is to receive a mailing addressed to you from your County Election Office. Otherwise you can call your County Election Office (also here) and ask a county employee to look up your current voter record in their file. If you have any questions or comments, please drop us a note.

2008 Campaigns

Here are some of the candidates and races we are following...

2008 Democratic Challengers

There are some of the "aggressive progressive" Democratic challengers we're watching. More at AfterDowningStreet.org. Special props to those who attended Netroots Nation in July 2008.

Progressive Democratic PACs (Other Progressive and Democratic PACs)
- BA: BlueAmerica
- BD: BushDemocrats (Democrats.com)
- DFA: Democracy For America
- DWT: Down With Tyranny
- ESC: Eschaton/Atrios
- JSt: JStreet
- MyD: MyDD
- NOW: NOW
- Olbd: OpenLeft Better Democrats
- OtB: Orange to Blue (DailyKos.com - criteria)
- PDA: Progressive Democrats of America
- PEN: People's Email Network
- SNA: SNAPPac/Students for a New American Politics

Progressive Endorsements
- ADS: AfterDowningStreet
- DWT: DownWithTyranny

    Challenger Incumb Gen
eral
Prim
ary
Pac Out of Iraq  Wiretap Other
S AK Mark Begich Stevens (R)     BA
DWT
"gradual withdrawal" No  
S ID Larry LaRocco open (R)        within 12-14 months No  
S KY Greg Fischer McConnell (R)   5/20
lost
BA Responsible
Plan
   
S KY Bruce Lunsford           No  
S ME Tom Allen Collins (R)     BA
DWT
ESC
SNA
  No  
S MN Al Franken Coleman (R)     OtB
SNA
     
S NC Jim Neal Dole (R)   5/6
lost
BA ASAP   vs. Primary opponent Kay Hagan:
opposed Mukasey
opposes telecom immunity
supports S-CHIP
opposes tax cuts for the rich
S NE Scott Kleeb Johans (R)     ESC      
S NH  Jeanne Shaheen Sununu (R)     NOW
SNA
     
S NM Tom Udall       DWT
ESC
  No  
S OK Andrew Rice Inhofe (R)     BA
DWT
OtB
ASAP but orderly No pro-choice, pro-gun, civil unions, mandatory health insurance 
S OR Jeff Merkley Smith
(R)
  5/20
won!
BA
DWT
Olbd
now No universal health care, stop global warming, restore the Constitution, voter verifiable paper trail
S OR Steve Novick Smith
(R)
  5/20
lost
       
S TX Rick Noriega Cornyn (R)     BA
DFA
DWT
OtB
  No  
H AL02 Bobby Bright Everett (R) won          
H AL03 Josh Segall Rogers (R) lost         ePluribus Radio
H AL05 Parker Griffith (open-D) won          
H AK00 Diane Benson Young (R)   lost DWT
NOW
     
H AK00 Ethan Berkowitz Young (R)             
H AZ01 Howard Shanker (open)   lost BA
DWT
  No primary v. Ann Kirkpatrick, endorsed by DCCC
H AZ01 Ann Kirkpatrick   (open) won          
H AZ03 Bob Lord Shadegg (R) lost   DWT
OtB
     
H CA03 Bill Durston Lungren (R)     PDA      
H CA04 Charlie Brown (open)     BA
DFA
DWT
OtB
  No  
H CA08 Shirley Golub Nancy Pelosi (D)   6/3
lost
PEN     Impeach
H CA16 Cynthia Papermaster Zoe Lofgren (D)   6/3
lost
      Impeach
H CA24 Mary Pallant Gallegly (R)   6/3
lost
ADS
MyD
PDA
     
H CA26 Russ Warner Dreier (R) lost   BA
DWT
  No  
H CA42 Ron Shepston Miller (R)   6/3
lost
BA      
H CA45 Julie Bornstein   lost   BA      
H CA46 Debbie Cook Rohrabacher (R) lost   BA
DWT
Responsible Plan  No  
H CA48 Steve Young Campbell (R)     PDA phased withdrawal    
H CA50 Cheryl Ede Bilbray (R)   6/3
lost
PDA      
H CA50 Nick Leibham Bilbray (R) lost       No  
H CA52 Vickie Butcher (open)   6/3
lost
PDA phased withdrawal    
H CA53 Mike Copass Susan Davis (D)   6/3
lost
PDA Out-of-Iraq Pledge!   Defend the U.S. Constitution
Separation of Corporation and State
Repeal NAFTA
H CO02 Joan Fitz-Gerald (open)   8/12 PDA
NOW
     
H CO02 Jared Polis (open)   8/12   Responsible Plan     
H CO04 Betsy Markey Musgrave (R) won   NOW   No  
H CO05 Hal Bidlack Lamborn (R)       Responsible Plan    25 years as an officer in the United States Air Force, retiring in September, 2006, as a Lt. Colonel.
H CT04 Jim Himes Shays (R) WON   BA
DWT
ESC
SNA
  No  
H FL08 Corbett Kroehler Keller (R)     PDA      
H FL08 Alan Grayson Keller (R) WON   BA
DWT
  No  
H FL10 Samm Simpson Young (R)     PDA      
H FL12 Doug Tudor Putnam (R) lost   DFA
DWT
Responsible Plan  No just retired from the Navy as a chief petty officer and his wife is still on active duty (and deployable)
H FL15 Bob Bowman Weldon (R)            
H FL21 Raul Martinez Diaz- lost           
H FL18 Annette Taddeo Ros-Lehtinen (R) lost   BA
DFA
DWT
Responsible Plan  

FL-18 is the most Democratic leaning (R +4) of the three Miami cuban districts and Annette's campaign is both well-organized and well-funded.

Blog 7/23/08

H FL24 Clint Curtis Feeney (R)   lost PDA   No  
H FL24 Suzanne Kosmas Feeney (R) won          
H FL25 Joe Garcia Diaz-Balart (R) lost   BA
DFA
DWT
OtB
  No  
H GA08 Bob Nowak Jim Marshall (D)         No  
H GA10 Bobby Saxon Broun (R)           veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan
H GA12 Regina Thomas John Barrow (D)   7/15 BA
Olbd
"adamantly opposed to the occupation" No Barrow voted with Bush on HR 976  SCHIP; S 1927 FISA; HR 2956 Redeploy troops in 120 days; HR 2206 Iraq funding without withdrawal deadlines; HR 1591 Iraq benchmarks and withdrawal deadlines; HR 6 Repeal tax cuts for oil companies.
District is 45% African-American and African-Americans are 70% of the voters in Democratic primaries.
H GA13 Donzella James David Scott (D)   7/15 ADS "would vote No on funding occupation"   "supports impeachment"
2006 primary lost 67%-31%
H IA03 Ed Fallon Leonard Boswell (D)   6/3
lost
DFA
PDA
    As in his seven previous campaigns in the Iowa Legislature, all of which he won, Fallon is running a grassroots campaign that focuses on contacting voters through door-to-door canvassing and phone banking, as well as creative use of YouTube. Recent productions include a mockumentary “Campaigns of the Rich and Powerful” and a rap video on fiscal responsibility and tax reform.
H ID01 Walt Minnick Bill Sali (R) won          
H IL03 Mark Pera Dan Lipinski (D)   2/5
lost
BA
BD
     
H IL08 Randi Scheuer Melissa Bean (D)   2/5
lost
BD
PDA
     
H IL10 Dan Seals Kirk (R) lost   OtB
SNA
NOW
  No  
H IL11 Debbie Halvorson (open) won   JSt      
H IL14 John Laesch open (R)   2/5
lost
BA
PDA
     
H IN06 Barry Welsh Pence (R) lost   BA   No  
H IN09 Gretchen Clearwater Baron Hill (D)   5/6
lost
BA Out-of-Iraq Pledge!   Civil liberties, equal rights and justice for all; Single payer universal healthcare; jobs @ living wage
H KY01 Heather Ryan Whitfield (R)         No  
H LA06 Michael Jackson Don Cazayoux (D)   9/6   asap No Cazayoux was elected in a special election in 2008 and immediately became one of the strongest Bush Democrats.
H MD01 Frank Kratovil  open (R)  won          
H MD04 Donna Edwards Al Wynn (D)   2/12
won!
BA
BD
JSt
Olbd
PDA
     
H ME01 Mark Lawrence  open (D)   6/10
lost
      pro-impeachment
H ME01 Chellie Pingree open (D)     NOW   No  
H MI07 Mark Schauer Walberg (R) WON   BA
DWT
  No  
MI09 Gary Peters Knollenberger (R) WON   BA
DWT
NOW
  No "I believe in civil rights and equality for all people and to me gay marriage is a basic human rights issue, one I feel very strongly about. When I take a position based on core principles, I'm not going to waiver from it"
H MN03 Ashwin Madia open (R) lost   DWT   No  
H MO02 Byron DeLear Akin (R)           pro-impeachment
H NC08 Larry Kissell Hayes (R) WON   BA
DWT
  No  
H NC09 Harry Taylor Myrick (R)     PDA
NOW
    known for his courageous—and courteous—confrontation of President Bush in Charlotte in April 2006.
H NJ01 Mahdi Ibn-Ziyad Rob Andrews (D)   6/3
lost
PDA      
H NJ05 Camille Abate  Garrett (R)   6/3
lost
  now   local Moveon leader, pro-impeachment
H NJ05 Dennis Shulman Garrett (R) lost 6/3
won!
BA
DWT
JSt
Responsible Plan No blind rabbi
H NJ07 Linda Stender open (R) lost   NOW   No  
H NM01 Martin Heinrich (open) WON 6/3
won!
BA
DWT
  No  
H NM02 Bill McCamley (open)   6/3
lost
       
H NM02 Harry Teague (open) won         multimillionaire oilman
H NY08 Adam Sullivan Jerrold Nadler (D)   9/9
BD     Impeach
H NY10 Kevin Powell Ed Towns (D)   9/9        
H NY13 Steve Harrison Fossella (R)   lost DWT
NOW
PDA
now    
H NY13 Michael McMahon open (R) won          
H NY21 Darius Shahinfar  open (D)   9/9     No  
H NY21 Tracey Brooks open (D)   9/9 NOW      
H NY25 Dan Maffei (open) WON   BA
DWT
OtB
  No  
H NY26 Jon Powers Jack Davis (D)   lost BA
DWT
OtB
  No  
H NY29 Eric Massa Kuhl (R) WON   DFA
DWT
PDA
Olbd
OtB
  No  
H OH02 Victoria Wulsin Schmidt (R)     BA
DWT
NOW
SNA
  No  
H OH03 Jane Mitakides Turner (R) lost   NOW      
H OH15 Mary Jo Kilroy (open)  lost   JSt
NOW
SNA
     
H OR01 Mark Welyczko David Wu (D)   5/20
lost
PEN     Impeach
H OR03 Joe Walsh Blumenauer (D)   5/20
lost
PEN     Impeach
H OR05 Nancy Moran (open)   5/20
lost
PEN     Impeach
H PA15 Sam Bennett Dent (R) lost   BA
DWT
NOW
Olbd
  No  
H TN09 Steve Cohen     won BA
DWT
JSt
    primary by Harold Ford Jr. supporter
H TX10 Larry Joe Doherty McCaul (R) lost   BA
DWT
  No  
H VA02 Glenn Nye Drake (R) won          
H VA04 Andrea Miller Forbes (R)      DWT   No progressive social activist
pro-impeachment
former MoveOn.org Regional Coordinator and
Dennis Kucinich Regional Coordinator
H VA05 Tom Perriello Goode (R)     ADS
BA
DWT
Olbd
SNA
  No  
H VA06 Sam Rasoul Goodlatte (R)            
H VA10 Judy Feder Wolf (R)     BA
DWT
NOW
  No Dean of Georgetown University's Public Policy Institute (1999-2007)
nationally recognized expert in health care policy
H VA11 Leslie Byrne (open)   6/10
lost
BA
NOW
    She opposed the war in Iraq from the start, will fight to make health care more affordable and more accessible, and has always supported a woman's right to choose.
H VA11 Gerry Connolly open (R) won         developer/contractor
H WA03 Cheryl Crist Brian Baird (D)   8/19
lost
      Impeach
H WA04 George Fearing Hastings (R)            
H WA06 Paul Richmond Norm Dicks (D)   8/19
lost
      Impeach
H WA08 Darcy Burner Reichert (R)     BA
DFA
DWT
ESC
Jst
NOW
Olbd
OtB
SNA
  No  
H WI01 Marge Krupp Ryan (R)     NOW      
H WY00 Gary Trauner (open) lost   OtB   No  

I urge all Democrats to take the unequivocal Out-of-Iraq Pledge:

I solemnly pledge to vote against any additional funds for the occupation of Iraq, except what is absolutely required to bring all our troops home. I recognize that I will be under tremendous pressure from Democratic leaders and the Corporate Media to fund various missions like "fighting terrorism" or "training Iraqi forces" or "protecting Iraqi democracy," but I will not waver. We have already spent far too much of our blood and treasure for a war and occupation based on never-ending lies, and I will not sacrifice one more American soldier's life or one more taxpayer's dollar for those lies.

2008 Primary Survey

From: Democrats.com
Subject: Democratic Presidential Survey

Democrats.com is the oldest and largest online community of Democratic Party activists with over 330,000 subscribers, and we are conducting the first Presidential survey of Democrats via email.

The results will be published on Democrats.com and will get wide coverage in the media, so we hope you will participate!

If the Presidential vote were held today, which Democratic candidate would you vote for? (Vote by clicking one link below).

Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton
Chris Dodd
John Edwards
Mike Gravel
Dennis Kucinich
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson

If you cast a vote we will send you an email when the results are published. We will also forward your email to the candidate of your choice so they can invite you to events with your candidate and help you vote absentee or at the polls on Election Day.

Thank you for your participation and onwards to victory in 2008!

Bob Fertik, President
Democrats.com

2008 Primary Survey Results

These are the results of our survey of Democrats

  IA NH NV SC
Joe Biden        
Hillary Clinton        
Chris Dodd        
John Edwards        
Mike Gravel        
Dennis Kucinich        
Barack Obama        
Bill Richardson        

2008 Spoils

These are the key post-election decisions by Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi:

Week Progressives BlueDogs Republicans
11/3   Rahm Emanuel named Chief of Staff  

2008-change-now

To: Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, and Barack Obama

The Democratic nomination was not decided in Iowa or New Hampshire, so voters in many other states will have a voice in choosing our nominee.

The central theme for all Democratic candidates is change. But there's an enormous difference between talking about change a year from now - and acting for change NOW.

In the coming weeks, Congress has three major opportunities to ACT for change. As Democratic primary voters, we want to know: Will you just talk about change, or will you act for change NOW?

1. Will you actively support Senator Dodd's filibuster of telecom immunity for warrantless wiretapping, including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Senators?  

2. Will you actively oppose and endorse the filibuster of any bills to further fund the occupation of Iraq, including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Senators and Representatives?

3. Will you actively support Rep. Robert Wexler's efforts to persuade House Judiciary Committee Chair John Conyers to hold hearings on Impeachment for Vice President Cheney, including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Representatives?

4. Will you actively support Rep. John Conyers' single-payer non-profit health care plan (H.R. 676), including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Senators and Representatives?

We look forward to your prompt response so we can share your answers with millions of progressive primary voters who want change NOW.

Sincerely,

Change Now Coalition
Democrats.com
Progressive Democrats of America
Etc.

Barack Obama

Display this full page for our collections of important facts about Barack Obama.

For ongoing stories in the news, check our blog:
http://democrats.com/barack-obama  

Obama Smears

Internet rumors & lies:

Lie Truth
Obama is a radical Muslim Obama is now and always has been a Christian
Obama was sworn into office on the Koran (Quran) Obama was sworn into office on the Holy Bible
Obama doesn't put his hand over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance or the National Anthem. "My grandfather taught me when I was 2. During the Pledge of Allegiance, you put your hand over your heart. During the national anthem, you sing." What do you do at a sports event?
Obama belong to a racist black church

Obama's church proudly proclaims its African heritage. As the Chicago Sun-Times wrote, "If a white church plainly and proudly prounounced its whiteness, [Sean] Hannity, [Tucker] Carlson and company would be right. But if it was the Holy Trinity Polish Church on Chicago's North Side proclaiming its Polishness, who'd care? This is how African Americans find ourselves in a trick bag. We're defined racially even when we're acting like any other of this nation's ethnic groups."

Obama's church does not permit white parishoners Univ. of Chicago Divinity School Prof. Martin Marty (who is white) told FactCheck, "That kind of e-mail is vicious and lying, and makes my blood boil. ... Many civic officials, public school teachers, etc. are members at Trinity; [Rev. Jeremiah] Wright has been on TV with his services for years, and no one found them racist – it's smear politics."
Our military "fears" Obama

Ret. Air Force Gen. Merrill A. McPeak, who campaigned for Bob Dole in 1996 and George W. Bush in 2000, recently concluded that Obama is “what the joint chiefs want to see — somebody they can rely and depend on.”

McPeak told the Times, “I think Obama is going to be an outstanding commander in chief, not just an ordinary commander in chief. He has the potential to be one of the all-time greats. I think the senior military will learn that about him starting from the first minute he occupies the Oval Office.”

Democratic Presidential Candidates Scorecard on Iraq

The 2008 campaign has begun, and the Democratic presidential candidates are competing for the support of the anti-war majority - that's us, folks!

It's extremely rare for progressives to be courted by Democratic leaders, so let's make them really compete for our votes by making our position clear:

1. Deny all funds for Bush's escalation
2. Use the Supplemental Appropriations to restrict all funds to safe withdrawal of our troops (Lee Amendment) attach a withdrawal timeline, even if Bush vetoes the bill 
3. Support legislation for immediate redeployment of U.S. troops, to be completed by the end of 2007 using the funds already appropriated
4. Oppose continued U.S. occupation of Iraq beyond 2007

We will track the candidates' positions below. Please help us by contacting the campaigns (click on their names for the contact form). Ask them to state their position on the 4 issues above - simply copy/paste into their contact form after this introduction: "As a member of Democrats.com, I support these positions on Iraq. Do you?"

Running 2002 - 2006 1/07 Surge Funds 5/07 $100B Supplemental Veto Response 5/07 Redeployment Completed in 2007 10/07 $200B request 09
Plan
Residual force Iran
Biden Authorized and fully funded Non-binding resolution   Withdraw all but 20,000 troops in 2007 I will vote for the money necessary to protect them, period   .  
Clinton Authorized and fully funded Set troop cap but allow escalation with Congressional approval keep the pressure on him not to veto it Supports non-specific phased withdrawal; Urges Bush to complete by 1/09 but won't support legislation requiring it; has a secret plan to complete withdrawal if elected I have voted against funding this war, and I will vote against funding this war as long as it takes.   vastly reduced residual force to remain for some limited period of time to train Iraqi troops.. to provide logistical support, for counter-terrorism missions, to protect the Kurds... a continuing mission to protect America’s vital interests, and to support an Iraqi government... reassess in 2009 "We cannot, we should not, we must not
permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons"
"no option can be taken off the table."
Dodd Authorized and fully funded Set troop cap but allow escalation with Congressional approval Supports Feingold-Reid Begin immediately, complete by 4/08 terminate the funding of this effort here, give us a new direction.   Supports Feingold-Reid  
Edwards Authorized and funded
until 2005 
Deny funds send another funding bill to him with a binding plan to bring the troops home. And if he vetoes it again, they should do it again. cap troops at 100,000, forcing withdrawal of 40-50,000 immediately, all combat troops by 9/08, meanwhile training Iraqi troops     Embassy guards, humanitarian relief protection, regional force to to prevent the sectarian violence in Iraq from spilling over into other countries, for counter-terrorism, or to prevent a genocide "Under no circumstances can Iran be allowed to
have nuclear weapons."
"We need to keep all options on the
table."
Gravel Opposed .   Immediate and orderly withdrawal     .  
Kucinich Led Dem opposition, including 2004 Presidential campaign; opposed all funding. Deny funds Adopt Kucinich plan below Begin immediately, replace all with UN     None - see Kucinich plan below Pre-emptive U.S. attack is impeachable
Obama Opposed in 02 but fully funded in 05-06 Set troop cap find 67 votes to override the veto and shorten the funding periods to three or four month intervals Begin by 5/1/07, end by 3/31/08 we not vote for funding without some timetable for this war. remove 1-2 combat brigades per month, all by 5/10 limited missions of protecting our diplomats and carrying out targeted strikes on al Qaeda Iran is "a threat to all of
us" and "we should take no option, including military action, off the table."
Richardson ? Deny funds and deauthorize the war based on the War Powers Act   Start now, complete by 12/31/07     None whatsoever (except embassy guards)  

The Kucinich Plan (H.R. 1234): How do the other candidates compare? 

  Biden Clinton Dodd Edwards Gravel Obama Richardson
1. The US announces it will end the occupation, close military bases and withdraw.             Yes
2. US announces that it will use existing funds to bring the troops and necessary equipment home.              
3. Order a simultaneous return of all US contractors to the United States and turn over all contracting work to the Iraqi government.              
4. Convene a regional conference for the purpose of developing a security and stabilization force for Iraq.   Yes         Yes
5. Prepare an international security and peacekeeping force to move in, replacing US troops who then return home.              
6. Develop and fund a process of national reconciliation.             Yes
7. Reconstruction and Jobs.             Yes
8. Reparations.              
9. Political Sovereignty.              
10. Iraq Economy.              
11. Economic Sovereignty.              
12. International Truth and Reconciliation.              
               

.

John McCain

Display this full page for our collections of important facts about John McCain.

For ongoing stories in the news, check our blog:
http://democrats.com/john-mccain

McCain 527

Washington Post 4/21/08:

during a forum shown on MSNBC, host Chris Matthews asked McCain if he would "sit down with the Democratic nominee . . . and agree to them that there will be no outside sleazeball attacks by either side, that you will tell your people you will condemn any attack, like a swift-boating, and you will both agree to do that upfront, right after you get the nomination?"

"I would love to do that," McCain replied. "During the primary, there was a 527 that sprang up. And I asked them to stop."

.

McCain Abortion

John McCain is as much of an anti-abortion zealot as anyone in Congress.

  • During his political career, McCain has participated in 130 reproductive health-related votes on Capitol Hill; of these, he voted with the anti-abortion camp in 125.
  • McCain has consistently backed rights for the unborn, voting to cover fetuses under the State Children's Health Insurance Program and supporting the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which allowed a "child in utero" to be recognized as a legal victim of a crime.
  • He has voted in favor of the global gag rule, which prevents U.S. funds from going to international family-planning clinics that use their own money to perform abortions, offer information about abortion, or take a pro-choice stand.
  • And he has voted to appoint half a dozen anti-abortion judges to the federal bench, as well as Samuel Alito, John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, and Robert Bork to the Supreme Court. During the Bork hearings, McCain attacked the Court's creation of a right to privacy in Roe v. Wade: "Whether one is pro-or anti-abortion," McCain said in an October 1987 hearing, "it is difficult to argue that the Court's opinion is not constitutionally suspect."
  • McCain also joined efforts supported only by the radical wing of his party. He voted, for instance, with only one-fifth of the Senate to remove family-planning grants from a 1988 spending bill and with only 18 senators that same year against allowing Medicaid to pay for abortions in cases of rape or incest.
  • In 1994, the year after abortion provider David Gunn was killed outside a Florida clinic, McCain voted with 29 members of the Senate against establishing penalties for violent or threatening interference outside abortion clinics. Many solidly pro-life Republicans--Mitch McConnell, Kit Bond, John Danforth--voted in favor of the bill, called the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE). "We tried to get as many co-sponsors as we could, and we postured the thing as anti-vigilante violence," recalls Judy Appelbaum, a Washington lawyer who was counsel to Senator Edward Kennedy at the time and the lead Hill staffer on the bill. "We argued that, even if you oppose abortion, you should not condone these actions." According to Appelbaum, law enforcement officials, newspaper editorialists, health care providers, and law-and-order politicians all supported the bill. "There were a number of very anti-choice senators who voted for FACE," she says, "and [McCain] wasn't one of them." Instead, McCain joined senators like Orrin Hatch and Jesse Helms in opposition.

McCain Age

John McCain was born on 8/29/36. If elected, he will be 72 when he is sworn in in 2009 - the oldest start of any Presidency. He would be 76 at the end of his first term, and if re-elected in 2012, would be president until age 80.

McCain's age is already an issue, due to his many jokes and "senior moments."

  • In July, McCain referred repeatedly to Czechoslovakia as though it still existed and to Vladimir Putin as though he were still president of Russia. More significantly, he has claimed that Iraq borders Pakistan, that the Anbar Awakening occurred after the surge, that the Iraq war was America’s first major armed conflict since 9/11, and that, unlike Obama, he would prefer to speak outside the country only after being elected president.
  • In May, McCain incorrectly said the U.S. had drawn down its forces in Iraq to pre-surge levels. In March, he wrongly claimed that Iran was training Al Qaeda operatives. Last April, he mistakenly said General David Petraeus regularly drove around Baghdad in an unarmored Humvee. In each of these “McCain moments,” political life would have been easier for the candidate if his statements were true. But none were.
  • On 5/5/08, McCain said the "League of Nations" needs to deal with Iran. The League of Nations was disbanded in 1946 when John McCain was 10.
  • On 10/21/07, McCain advocated a missile defense system for "Czechoslovakia." Nearly 14 years earlier (1/1/93), when McCain was 57, Czechoslovakia peacefully split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
  • In his autobiography, McCain declared himself a man of the 20th Century, which is natural because he lived his best 64 years in it.
  • In 2000, he told Jim Lehrer, "in 2004, I expect to be campaigning for the reelection of President George W. Bush, and by 2008, I think I might be ready to go down to the old soldiers home and await the cavalry charge there."

McCain is a cancer survivor

  • McCain has had skin cancer (melanoma) four times
  • In 2000, the melanoma was classified as Stage IIa (out of IV) with a 65% survival rate after 10 years

McCain's family history is risky

Is McCain's mind failing?

McCain's many "senior moments" are listed here. Does he have a medical problem?

Gerontologists and retirement planners have learned that aging brains compensate for cognitive decline by relying on templates of familiar knowledge more than problem solving. That’s usually a good thing, but neuroscientists have also found that memory loss can lead people to substitute incorrect information. This phenomenon, called confabulation, rather than being random, often takes the form of untrue “facts” that make them feel better — giving them what scientists have called “the pleasantness of false beliefs.” So are McCain’s stumbles simply misstatements, or evidence of a mind filling in blanks with wish fulfillment? Well, we really have no idea. But neither does McCain: His aides told reporters in May that he has had no mental evaluations in the past eight years

During his first presidential run, eight years ago, McCain disclosed hundreds of pages of records to reporters as he sought then to counter what aides called a "whisper campaign" questioning his mental fitness. In those records, medical personnel concluded that his years in prison, including solitary confinement, left him with no psychological wounds. Aides said McCain has had no mental evaluations in the past eight years and none was included in the documents.

McCain's memory could also be affected by prescription drugs:

Could McCain's mind get worse?

13% of Americans over 65 have Alzheimers. 22% of Americans over 70 are affected by mild cognitive impairment, a decline in brain function that causes memory loss and can lead to dementia. (Each year, 3.5% of healthy 70-79 year olds develop mild cognitive impairment, with men twice as likely as women to get it.) Further, 35-40% of older adults have neural deficits that lead to poor decision making. 

Ronald Reagan turned 70 two weeks after his inauguration in 1981 and many questioned whether he was too old. He was formally diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 1994 at age 83, but early symptoms were apparent during his re-election campaign in 1984, which he dismissed with a famous prepared joke: "I'm not going to hold my opponent's youth and inexperience against him."

McCain's brain has endursed physical, chemical, and physiological abuse:

  • He competed as a lightweight boxer for three years and lacked skills but was fearless and "didn't have a reverse gear," as he later put it. No one knows how many blows he took to his head, but repeated head injuries in boxing (especially in non-proficient boxers) predispose these boxers to brain disease later in life.
  • As a young man and officer, his reputation for hard partying and hard living was prodgious: "being on liberty with John McCain was like being in a train wreck." Binge drinking and chronic heavy alcohol use also decrease brain function in later life.
  • From 1967 to 1973, McCain was a Vietnamese prisoner of war and was tortured. McCain has constant functional limitations from the torture (he cannot lift his arms above his head). According to his publicly released medical records, McCain also has chronic pain resulting from numerous fractures; his captors when he was a POW did not provide adequate care, and the fractures did not heal properly. Torture can produce psychiatric disease (especially PTSD), cognitive impairments, or both. The experience of being a POW has - in WWII POW's - also been shown to be associated with neuropsychiatric impairment.
  • In 1993, McCain was diagnosed with melanoma (skin cancer). After treatment for the intial diagnosis, the melanoma returned two more times (2000 and 2002). Both chemo and radiation used to treat cancer may also lead to permanent cognitive impairment.

Does McCain have PTSD and its consequential psychiatric problems?

  • According to the records, McCain has said that immediately after his release from military prison in Hanoi there were "times when very realistic or frightening memories" came back to him. But McCain "can successfully put these memories out of his mind," the medical records said.

According to Dr. Kirk James Murphy, a V.A. physician who has long experience treating veterans with PTSD:

Sen McCain's life history indicates that his brain is at greater than average risk of dysfunction and impairment in the following areas:

  • capacity to learn, recall, and reason with complex new information
  • judgement and impulse control
  • capacity to devote sustained attention.

Sen McCain - like all victims of trauma and torture - is entitled to absolute privacy regardiing his personal medical history. We as American citizens, however, are entitled to all possible information about the men and women who choose to ask act us to select them as president.

At the very least, Sen McCain's history raises many questions about the presence of objectively determinable disruption in neuropsychiatric function. He and his camapign have been forthcoming with his medical records in the past; his brain history strongly suggests that obtaining and releasing the results of current neuropsychiatric testing, imaging studies (perhaps including functional MRI and or auditory evoked potential findings) and other relevant assessments would be required in order to conclude that Sen McCain would bring to the Oval Office a brain functioning sufficiently well to serve as the second President of the 21st Century.

.

McCain American

Is John McCain eligible to be President?

Under the Constitution, the President must be a "natural born Citizen" of the United States.

But McCain was not born in the United States. He was born in the Panama Canal Zone on Aug 29, 1936 at the Coco Solo Naval Hospital; at the time of McCain's birth was NOT located within the Canal Zone. (It was later added to the Zone by Franklin Roosevelt through EXECUTIVE ORDER 8981 on Dec 17, 1941, when McCain was 5 years old.)

Therefore John McCain is not a citizen "by birth" or a "natural born Citizen."

Instead, McCain is a citizen "by law" because his parents were both American citizens.

The Supreme Court has never decided whether a citizen "by law" is eligible to be President, because no citizen "by law" has ever won a Presidential election.

  • Barry Goldwater, who ran in 1964, was born in Arizona while it was still a U.S. territory. Although Arizona was not a state, it was a fully organized and incorporated territory of the United States, making it debatable whether or not he was born outside the United States.
  • George Romney, who ran in 1968, was born in Mexico to U.S. parents. Romney’s grandfather emigrated to Mexico in 1886 with his three wives and children after Utah outlawed polygamy. Romney's parents retained their U.S. citizenship and returned to the United States in 1912. Romney was 32 years old when he arrived in Michigan.
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr. was once viewed as a potential successor to his father, but was seen by some as ineligible since he had been born on Campobello Island in Canada.

Several federal lawsuits have been filed that challenge McCain's eligibility:

  • Nashua NH
  • Riverside CA 

More info:

McCain Bush

John McCain has kissed George Bush's ass ever since Bush beat him in the vicious 2000 GOP primary in South Carolina, when Bush's dirty tricksters used "push polls" to spread lies about McCain's "black babies."

McCain's devotion to Bush has been especially ardent on Iraq.

But with Bush's approval rating down to 19%, McCain suddenly wants to keep Bush as far away as possible, according to the NY Times.

McCain Cancer

John McCain has a history of melanoma (skin cancer):

  • 93 left shoulder in-situ 
  • 00 left arm in-situ
  • 08/00 invasive melanoma on his left lower temple
    • Michael L. Hinni, M.D. a head-and-neck surgeon at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, said the August 2000 lesion was 2.2 mm thick at its thickest part and was 2 cm in diameter. 
    • "A 2-cm margin of normal skin was removed around the 2-cm melanoma, resulting in a 6-cm-by-6-cm roughly circular wound on the left side of the senator's face," Dr. Hinni said. "The underlying parotid salivary gland was also removed to assure a clear deep margin, to protect facial nerves from injury and to remove the sentinel and other lymph nodes that were inside the parotid gland."
    • Dr. Hinni said none of McCain's nodes showed any evidence of metastasis. He said McCain has been closely followed since 2000 and has remained melanoma-free since 2002.
  • 02 left nasaql sidewall in-situ
  • 7/28/08 removal of a growth from his upper right cheek:
    • "The biopsy that was performed did not show any evidence of skin cancer. No further treatment is necessary."

McCain Cindy

McCain called Cindy a "cunt" in front of 3 reporters in 1992:

Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain's intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain's hair and said, "You're getting a little thin up there." McCain's face reddened, and he responded, "At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt." McCain's excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days.

Cindy's fortune comes from her father's beer distributorship, which had many ties to the mob.

Which may be why McCain refused to release Cindy's 2006 and 2007 tax returns.

Back in 2004, then-Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie excoriated John Kerry in the media as a result of the presumptive Democratic nominee's similar decision not to publicly release information on his wife's substantial assets -- so we can assume that he will hit McCain for doing the same thing this year, right? I'm not holding my breath. In fact, Heinz Kerry did release a portion of her 2003 returns during the 2004 campaign.)

The partial release of Cindy's tax returns could be hiding something very important:

These media reports, therefore, have advanced the McCain campaign's comparison between Cindy McCain's limited release of financial information and Heinz Kerry's, and in doing so, ignored a key distinction in the information they released: Unlike Heinz Kerry, Cindy McCain did not release sufficient information for the public to determine the extent to which she benefited from the tax cuts her husband supports extending.

Slate writes:

Aside from a Wachovia checking account, in which he keeps between $15,000 and $50,000 (wouldn't some of that money earn more interest in a certificate of deposit?), all of the couple's assets are in Cindy's name. John McCain's tax return is so anemic, so marginal to the couple's actual financial situation, that he doesn't even take a deduction for interest on his home mortgage. Presumably Cindy does, since disclosure forms indicate that she has several mortgages.

We don't know for certain whether she does, because the campaign has declined to release Cindy McCain's tax returns. This data gap sets McCain apart from his Democratic opponents, who have released jointly filed tax records going back a minimum of seven years. Thanks to McCain's lack of genuine opposition in recent months, there has been very little clamor to release Cindy McCain's returns, even from those Republicans who loudly insisted that Hillary and Bill Clinton were hiding something in theirs. 

Cindy says she will never release her tax returns, even if she becomes First Lady!

McCain Coward

John McCain claims to be a brave war hero. So why is he afraid to even talk to Iran? As Jonathan Singer writes,

The Obama campaign is completely right to invoke Presidents Kennedy and Reagan in talking about the importance of speaking with both friend and foe. They might have even invoked Teddy Roosevelt, who McCain claims to model his career after but who in fact McCain seems to know and understand little about, a President who won a nobel peace prize while in the White House specifically because of his willingness to engage with the world.

But I'd go even a step further and ask why John McCain is afraid to speak with Iran. What is it about Iran that scares McCain so much? Or is it that McCain believes Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Khamenei are so crafty that they would trick an American President into inadvertently ceding the state of Maine or American Samoa to Iran? Or alternatively, is it that McCain simply does not know how to act in a manner different from his true political role model, George W. Bush?

Here's a simpler possibility: John McCain is simply a coward, just like all the macho war criminals in the Bush Administration.

McCain Critics

Republican critics of John McCain

Ron Paul

  • 5/2/08 Having a Republican win the upcoming presidential election is “secondary” for Paul who is more interested in defending the Constitution, having the country go in what he considers the right direction, having a sound currency, and achieving balanced budgets. Paul parts ways with McCain over McCain’s support for the Iraq war, his approach to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and his willingness to spend federal dollars to support military operations in Iraq. Instead, Paul favors Sen. Barack Obama because of positions on foreign policy. “But that’s doesn’t mean that’s an endorsement,” Paul quickly added.

Frank Schaefer, author of "AWOL-The Unexcused Absence of America's Upper Classes From Military Service, And How It Hurts Our Country."

  • In the 2000 Republican primary season I went on numerous conservative and religious radio talk shows to argue for McCain against the Bush crowd and against the Republican right.
  • McCain has taken his lack of good judgment about Iraq to the next level. He has joined himself at the hip to the Bush disaster by demanding a "win." While we may empathize with our soldiers, who have given so much and who may grimly want to be vindicated when it comes to "sticking it out" and wanting to "win" what we can't do is elect a president whose idea of honor guarantees more wasted sacrifice.

McCain Crooked Talk

John McCain's "talk" is a lot more crooked than straight.

  • 7/08: One thing I, in all my travels here -- Americans want a respectful campaign. They do, they want it. Now, people say, well, negative ads move numbers. They may. But do we have to go to the lowest common denominator? I don't think so. 
  • "Why not 100?" That was McCain's reply to a voter when asked about keeping U.S. troops in Iraq for 50 years. McCain said it more than once, even proposing 1,000, 10,000, and a million years. A straight-talker would admit it - only a crooked talker would deny it.
  • 5/2/08: "I will have an energy policy... which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East that will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East." That means the current war in Iraq is about oil, doesn't it?  A straight-talker would admit it - only a crooked talker would deny it.
  • 5/1/08: McCain said Bush's "Mission Accomplished" banner was "wrong at the time." On 6/11/03, McCain told FOX's Neil Cavuto, " "the major conflict is over, the regime change has been accomplished." On 6/12/03, McCain told Salon's Jake Tapper, "the mission is 'accomplished'."
  • 5/1/08: McCain said only that earmarks divert money from necessary projects toward unneeded pork-barrel ones. The day before, McCain said: "The bridge in Minneapolis didn't collapse because there wasn't enough money. The bridge in Minneapolis collapsed because so much money was spent on wasteful, unnecessary pork-barrel projects."
  • 4/24/08: McCain said he didn’t know what his plans would be. "That’s why we need to go back," he said, "to have a conversation about what to do about it. Rebuild it? Tear it down? Ya know, whatever it is." From North Carolina, Clinton seized the opportunity to attack. "Sen. McCain said he might want to tear down the Ninth Ward instead of rebuilding it," she said. "But I went to the Ninth Ward after Katrina and met with people there and saw the destruction and I saw the resilience in their eyes and they deserve our help to rebuild and regain their lives and their homes." Steve Schmidt, a senior McCain aide, said Clinton’s attack was "inaccurate." "Sen. McCain has said the levees must be strengthened on time so people can make a decision on whether to return based on safety," he said, adding that he would like to see a "safe, vibrant community emerge" after the appropriate flood plan. Even before Clinton made her comments, McCain had been asked to clarify. "I don’t remember ever saying it," he said Thursday afternoon on his way from Xavier University to the New Orleans airport.
  • 3/18/08 "Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are are coming back into Iraq from Iran... I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not Al Qaeda." McCain mistakenly said Iran was training Al Qaeda Sunnis on 3 occasions.
  • 2/3/08: RUSSERT: Senator McCain, you have said repeatedly, "I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated." Is it a problem for your campaign that the economy is now the most important issue, one that, by your own acknowledgement, you're not well-versed on?    McCAIN: Actually, I don't know where you got that quote from. I'm very well-versed in economics.
  • 3/28/07: Yesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) told CNN that that President Bush’s escalation in Iraq is going so well, "General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in an unarmed humvee." On Monday, he told radio host Bill Bennett that there "are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods, today." This morning, during an interview with McCain, CNN’s John Roberts rebutted McCain’s assertions, stating, "I checked with General Petraeus’s people overnight and they said he never goes out in anything less than an up-armored humvee." He added that a new report by retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey "said no Iraqi government official, coalition soldier, diplomat reporter could walk the streets of Baghdad without heavily armed protection." Faced with overwhelming evidence that he was wrong, McCain denied he’d ever said it: "Well, I’m not saying they could go without protection. The President goes around America with protection. So, certainly I didn’t say that."
  • 3/16/07: "Do you think contraceptives help stop the spread of HIV?" McCain: (Long pause) "You've stumped me."
  • 9/17/03: "I believe that Saddam Hussein presents clear and present danger to the United States of America with his continued pursuit of...to acquire weapons of mass destruction." [CNN Late Edition, 3/3/02] "I never said that it was a, quote, clear and present danger because of weapons of mass destruction."

Watch these Youtubes:

  • 5/13/07 Flip-flops on tax cuts
  • 1/26/07 Flip-flops on Iraq, the Confederate flag, Agents of Intolerance (Falwell), Gay marriage

McCain Democrat

Jon Perr writes,

Four days after Arianna Huffington first reported it, John McCain’s 2000 VoteGate has become the election issue du jour. The New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times have all run stories confirming Huffington’s account that in 2000 a still steaming McCain did not vote for George W. Bush, the man who savaged him and his family during the Republican primaries.

Of course McCain tried to lie about it to Bill O'Reilly - but his tongue slipped and he accidentally told the truth!

O'REILLY: Did you vote for President Bush?

MCCAIN: Of course not.

Beyond McCain's guilty conscience, and all the witnesses at the Hollywood dinner party, there is more evidence McCain voted against Bush in 2000. In the spring of 2001, McCain seriously considered leaving the Republican Party and caucusing with Senate Democrats!

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was close to leaving the Republican Party in 2001, weeks before then-Sen. Jim Jeffords (Vt.) famously announced his decision to become an Independent, according to former Democratic lawmakers who say they were involved in the discussions.

In interviews with The Hill this month, former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and ex-Rep. Tom Downey (D-N.Y.) said there were nearly two months of talks with the maverick lawmaker following an approach by John Weaver, McCain’s chief political strategist... 

Daschle said that throughout April and May of 2001, he and McCain “had meetings and conversations on the floor and in his office, I think in mine as well, about how we would do it, what the conditions would be. We talked about committees and his seniority … [A lot of issues] were on the table.”

Absolutely not so, according to McCain. In a statement released by his campaign, McCain said, “As I said in 2001, I never considered leaving the Republican Party, period.”

So who are you going to believe, McCain or a half-dozen Democrats who participated in these discussions?

Other senators who played major roles in the intense recruiting effort, according to Democrats, were then-Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) as well as Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

All of McCain's semi-Democratic friends know it's true, but now they're either lying or covering it up. The liar is John Weaver, McCain’s chief political strategist, who actually started the conversation with Tom Downey. The coverup is by Marshall Wittman

a McCain loyalist and strategist six years ago, put the odds of McCain leaving the Republican Party at “50-50.” Wittman, who now works for Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), declined to comment for this article.

Two other obvious witnesses were not interviewed: Jim Jeffords, who actually left the Republican Party to caucus with Democrats that spring, and Lincoln Chafee, who got close but chickened out.

McCain Dictators

In May, McCain was forced to fire two key staffers because of their lobbying work for the brutal dictators of Myanmar (Burma).

But that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to McCain's ties to brutal dictators.

Charlie Black, campaign chairman (Hilzoy)

  • Ahmed Chalabi, the smooth talking Iraqi exile who helped manufacture the WMD charges against Saddam Hussien that led the U.S. to invade (more here).
  • Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos, found guilty of torture, executions, disappearances, and human rights violations, who hired Black to "improve" his image in the U.S.
  • Somali dictator Mohamed Siad Barre, who's army massacred between 40,000 and 50,000 civilians in two years.
  • Dictator Mobuto Sese Seko of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), who amassed a vast personal fortune and repressed rival political parties while his country's children starved.
  • Angolan rebel leader Jonas Savimbi of UNITA, an ally of apartheid-era South Africa, who started a civil war which claimed hundreds of thousands of lives and ordered the torture and murder of countless opponents (more here).
  • Nigerian Dictator Ibrahim Babangida ran a one-party regime, who arrested his opponents, and murdered journalists. 
  • Equatorial Guinea's Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo

More at FireTheLobbyists.com.

McCain Economics

Back when John McCain was a "straight talker," he said this about economics:

  • “I’m going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated.” (11/26/05)
  • “The issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should. … I’ve got Greenspan’s book.” (12/18/07)

Here's McCain's economic plan in a nutshell, based on his statements and writing:

  • Cut taxes on corporations from 35% to 25%.
  • Lower taxes on capital gains and dividends from 15%
  • All interest rates at zero.
  • Fix the economy by telling people it's good. Give fireside pep talks.
  • Deregulate and abolish Sarbanes-Oxley
  • Check in Greenspan's book
  • Lower interest rates, and destroy the standing of the dollar
  • Ban Accountants. They are offensive.
  • Blame the last eight years on Democrats
  • Freedom Works

McCain Elitism

It Takes Real Chutzpah for a Guy Who Owns Eight Houses (McCain) to Call Barack Obama an "Elitist"

The McCain campaign is managed by a cadre of Washington-insider special interest lobbyists. He and his current wife are estimated to be worth about $100 million. He reportedly owns eight houses. His let-them-eat-cake economic policies are based on George Bush's failed radical conservative "you're on your own buddy" philosophy. One after another he supported trade agreements that protect the rights of corporations, but ignore the rights of labor, and have devastated one Pennsylvania community after another. He gets most of his campaign cash from the wealthiest corporate interests around. And he has the gall to call Barack Obama an "elitist"?

McCain English

In May, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) launched a Spanish-language campaign website, greeting voters with, “Bienvenido! Estamos Unidos con McCain” (Welcome! We are united with McCain):

This new website comes despite the fact that McCain voted in 2006 for Sen. James Inhofe’s (R-OK) amendment to “declare English as the national language of the United States and to promote the patriotic integration of prospective US citizens.” In March, McCain skipped a vote on an amendment by Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), aimed at “blocking lawsuits by employees challenging English-only workplace rules.” Both Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-IL) voted against the measure, but McCain left Washington to attend a fundraiser.

McCain Extremists

Republicans and the Corporate Media spent months attack Barack Obama over his ties to his crazy pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. But what about John McCain's ties to crazy rightwing pastors and other extremists?

Rev. John Hagee

McCain said he was "very honored by Pastor John Hagee's endorsement." Reverend Parsley calls McCain a "strong, true, consistent conservative."

G. Gordon Libby

  • 5/4/08: Now a conservative radio talk-show host, [G. Gordon] Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him. ... "It's always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great."

Rev. Rod Parsley

McCain calls Parsley "a spiritual adviser."

McCain Fearmonger

Just as George Bush did in 2004, John McCain's 2008 campaign is centered on fearmongering.

  • 3/15/08 McCain: al Qaeda Planning Spectacular Attacks In Iraq To Sway U.S. Election

McCain FlipFlops

Torture: McCain was against it, before he was for it.

  • Glenn Greenwald: "He holds himself out as a principled torture opponent but is, in fact, the single greatest enabler of legalizing torture in this country, from his 2005 bill which exempted the CIA from torture prohibitions to his 2006 leadership in enacting the Military Commissions Act to his opposition this year to the waterboard ban."
  • CBS: After first insisting that federal law clearly and unambiguously outlaw “torture,” McCain suddenly caved to White House pressure on the MCA, allowing the Administration to insert into the law a clause that effectively allows (and, indeed, legally buttresses the efforts of) the executive branch to implement torture as a means of interrogation.

Public Funding of Elections: McCain was for it, before he was against it.

Immigration: McCain was for it, before he was against it. It's impossible to keep track of McCain's immigration flip-flops without a scorecard, but luckily Steve Benen is keeping one. Here are some of the major flips:

  • 5/22/08 Told pro-immigration business leaders "we must enact comprehensive immigration reform," then insisted his policy remained "secure the border first."
  • 1/30/08 McCain said he “would not” vote for his own immigration bill now.
  • 5/05 Introduced the McCain-Kennedy "Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act" which featured legalization ("shamnesty") and guest worker programs. This formed the basis of the  Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 and the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007.

Iraq:

  • 1/3/08 The United States military could stay in Iraq for "maybe a hundred years" and that "would be fine with me" ... U.S. troops could be in Iraq for "a thousand years" or "a million years," as far as he was concerned.
  • 2/25/08 "that reminds me of that “100 year thing”.  My friends, the war will be over soon.  The war, for all intents and purposes, although the insurgency will go on for years and years and years.  But it will be handled by the Iraqis, not by us."

Global Warming: He was against it before he was for it.

  • 08: He brags on his website that he has been “a leader on the issue of global warming with the courage to call the nation to action.”
  • 2/28/08: Governors from coal- and oil-producing states spelled out their problems with McCain’s energy policies, and he was responsive.

McCain Foreign Policy

McCain wants to replace the United Nations with a "League of Democracies."

  • Fareed Zakaria: The approach lacks any strategic framework.... How would the League of Democracies fight terrorism while excluding countries like Jordan, Morocco, Egypt and Singapore? What would be the gain to the average American to lessen our influence with Saudi Arabia, the central banker of oil, in a world in which we are still crucially dependent on that energy source?

McCain also wants to throw Russia out of the G8 and exclude China while adding India and Brazil

  • Fareed Zakaria: The single most important security problem that the United States faces is securing loose nuclear materials. A terrorist group can pose an existential threat to the global order only by getting hold of such material. We also have an interest in stopping proliferation, particularly by rogue regimes like Iran and North Korea. To achieve both of these core objectives—which would make American safe and the world more secure—we need Russian cooperation. How fulsome is that likely to be if we gratuitously initiate hostilities with Moscow? Dissing dictators might make for a stirring speech, but ordinary Americans will have to live with the complications after the applause dies down.
    To reorder the G8 without China would be particularly bizarre. The G8 was created to help coordinate problems of the emerging global economy. Every day these problems multiply—involving trade, pollution, currencies—and are in greater need of coordination. To have a body that attempts to do this but excludes the world's second largest economy is to condemn it to failure and irrelevance. International groups are not cheerleading bodies but exist to help solve pressing global crises. Excluding countries won't make the problems go away.

McCain Gays

Gay Marriage

  • 5/22/08 On the Ellen DeGeneres Show, McCain said people should be encouraged to enter into legal agreements, particularly for insurance and other areas where decisions need to be made.
  • In 2007, McCain said he was opposed to New Hampshire’s bill legalizing civil unions for same-sex couples. “If I were a citizen of New Hampshire, I would oppose it,” he said. “Anything that impinges or impacts the sanctity of the marriage between men and women, I’m opposed to it.”
  • In 2006, he also told the late Rev. Jerry Falwell that would support a federal constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, even though he opposed such a measure in 2004.
  • On Nov. 19, 2006, ABC’s George Stephanopoulous asked McCain, “So you’re for civil unions?” McCain replied, “No.” He instead said they should be able to only “enter into contracts” and “exchange powers of attorney.
  • In 2005, he supported an Arizona amendment that would change the state’s constitution “to ban gay marriages and deny government benefits to unmarried couples.”

McCain Health Care

McCain wants to businesses to stop offering health care to their employees, and to force everyone to buy insurance individually. The Des Moines Register writes,

The proposal [by McCain] should scare the heck out of the millions of Americans who rely on employer-based coverage... Buying individual policies means having your health history reviewed. It means not having the bargaining power and protections that come with being part of a plan offered by an employer. And it's expensive...

The senator is correct that the employer-based system of health insurance in this country isn't working. Businesses are saddled with the high costs of coverage, putting them at a competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace. Insurance shouldn't be tied to jobs.

But the more reasonable solution is to offer everyone what Medicare already offers: health coverage financed by a combination of tax dollars and participant contributions, thus allowing the huge bargaining power of millions of Americans to leverage down costs.

That idea is nowhere near as radical as forcing millions of Americans to shop for their own coverage in a profit-driven, private-insurance sector.

McCain is lying about the Democratic plans to make private insurance affordable to the 47 million uninsured Americans, claiming Democrats want a "massive government takeover"

"There are those that want a massive government takeover of the health care system in America," Mr. McCain warned Thursday in Des Moines, as he made the case for his more market-based approach...

"But before you decide to sign on to that kind of a program, go to Canada, or go to European countries that have government-run health care systems," he continued. "My friends, they don’t work, they’re inefficient, and they end up in a two-tiered system where the wealthiest can afford to pay for their own health care and those with low income sometimes wait six or eight months for a routine kind of treatment. And that’s what I’m not going to let happen to the United States of America."

 

McCain Iraq

From the beginning, John McCain has been the strongest Senate supporter of invading Iraq to replace Saddam Hussein with the famously corrupt and double-crossing Ahmed Chalabi.

  • In November 1997, he announced on Fox News that it had been a mistake not to oust Saddam during the first Gulf War of 1991 under George Bush I, and he called upon the Clinton administration to set up an Iraqi government in exile.
  • In the fall of 1998 - in the face of opposition from both the Pentagon and the State Department - McCain co-sponsored the Iraq Liberation Act, which committed the United States to overthrowing Saddam's regime and to funding opposition groups. McCain welcomed Ahmed Chalabi, leader of the Iraqi National Congress (INC), to Washington and pressured the administration to give him money. When General Anthony Zinni cast doubt upon the effectiveness of the Iraqi opposition, McCain rebuked him at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. 
  • In 2000, McCain was Chalabi’s favored candidate in the 2000 election since Chalabi knew that he would be able to free up the $97 million in military aid plus millions pushed through in Congress and earmarked for Chalabi’s exile group, the Iraqi National Congress, but held up by the Clinton State Department.
  • In the fall and winter of 2002, when the Bush administration was lying about the threat posed by Iraq, McCain put himself squarely on the side of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and the neoconservatives. Like them, McCain evinced a blithe optimism about America's ability to transform Iraq. Asked by Chris Matthews in March 2003 whether the Iraqis would treat Americans as liberators, McCain replied, "Absolutely, absolutely." Echoing The Weekly Standard, he also promoted the most alarmist versions of the threat posed by Saddam, insisting that "Saddam Hussein is on a crash course to construct a nuclear weapon" and that "the interaction we know to have occurred between members of Al Qaeda and Saddam's regime may increasingly take the form of active cooperation to target the United States." And he indulged wildly optimistic scenarios about how the war might liberalize the Middle East, arguing that "regime change in Iraq" could result in "demand for self-determination" throughout the region.
  • In April 2003, with Saddam's military crumbling, McCain signed a letter with four other Republican senators complaining that Chalabi's INC was not being funded. Appearing on "Good Morning America," he argued for "bringing in Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress as soon as possible."

When the invasion of Iraq turned into a disastrous occupation, McCain became its strongest defender. Now McCain claims to be the strongest critic of Bush's mismanagement of the Iraq War.

Timeline:

  • 2/12/08: “The argument is really almost insulting to one’s intelligence to say how long we’re in Iraq,” McCain said, noting that the U.S. has maintained thousands of troops in Germany, South Korea and Japan for decades. But no American soldiers were killed during those occupations, while 50-100 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq every month since the invasion.

McCain Jobs

John McCain admits he knows little about economics. But what little he knows is enough to kill good American jobs. 

3/08: Boeing lost a $35 billion contract for Air Force tankers to the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. (EADS), which cost 44,000 good U.S. jobs.

  • 3 top McCain advisors worked for EADS
  • EADS contributed $14,000 to McCain's presidential campaign, more than they gave to any other Member of Congress
  • McCain helped block an earlier tanker contract with Boeing and prodded the Pentagon in 2006 to develop bidding procedures that did not exclude Airbus.

McCain Jokes

John McCain pretends to be civil and charming, but his ugly sense of humor gives him away as a nasty and vindictive SOB.

  • 9/22/08 In Scranton PA, McCain tells a joke about drunk Irish twins, thereby insulting many Irish voters.
  • 11/13/07 a supporter asks him about Hillary: "How do we beat the bitch?" After trying to bite his tongue, McCain finally bursts out laughing and calls it an "excellent question."
  • 4/24/07 tells Jon Stewart he'd brought him an IED from Iraq as a gift, at a time when thousands of American soldiers had been killed or maimed by IED's. Rep. Jack Murtha challenged McCain on the House Floor: “In the last four months, we’ve lost more troops than any other period during this war. … Imagine a presidential candidate making a joke about IEDs when these kids are blown apart! It’s outrageous!” McCain replied on Good Morning America: "All I’m going to say to Murtha and others. … Lighten up and get a life."
  • 4/19/07 Sings "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran" at a campaign event at a time when the White House is threatening to do exactly that and possibly start World War III. When challenged about it later, he snapped, "My response is, lighten up and get a life."
  • 10/06 "I think I'd just commit suicide." — Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), quoted by Radio Iowa, on what he would do if Democrats take control of the U.S. Senate. We did, but he didn't honor his promise - instead he ran for President.
  • 6/98: "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno."

McCain Katrina

In New Orleans on 4/24/08, McCain said: “I would’ve landed my airplane at the nearest Air Force base and come over personally.” But as Newsweek notes, on Aug. 29, 2005, when Katrina had just hit New Orleans, McCain was posing with President Bush for his 69th birthday.

McCain aggressively sought the endorsement of conservative evaneglical leader John Hagee, who said repeatedly repeated that Hurricane Katrina was punishment to New Orleans.

McCain told reporters he was not sure if he would rebuild the lower 9th ward as president. "That is why we need to go back is to have a conversation about what to do -rebuild it, tear it down, you know, whatever it is," he said. Transplanted Texan writes,

I guess it's no surprise. McCain has opposed the creation of an independent 9/11-style commission to investigate the failure of the levees, voted against a 2006 bill that included $28 billion in hurricane relief, and opposed Medicaid and unemployment benefits for Katrina victims.

McCain Lies

Lies About Obama

Obama wants to teach kindergartners about sex before they can read 

9/9/08 “Education” Ad (TV :30)
ANNCR: Education Week says Obama “hasn’t made a significant mark on education”.
That he’s “elusive” on accountability.
A “staunch defender of the existing public school monopoly”.
Obama’s one accomplishment?
Legislation to teach “comprehensive sex education” to kindergartners.
Learning about sex before learning to read?
Barack Obama.
Wrong on education. Wrong for your family.

Truth:

Campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs told CBS News the legislation Obama supported provided information to children on what to watch for when with an adult they don't know, such as inappropriate advances or touching. 

“It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls – a position that his friend Mitt Romney also holds. Last week, John McCain told Time magazine he couldn’t define what honor was. Now we know why,” says Obama spokesman Bill Burton in an emailed statement.

Obama would increase capital gains taxes on 100 million Americans

  • Lie 4/20/08: "Senator Obama says that he doesn’t want to raise taxes on anybody over — making over $200,000 a year, yet he wants to nearly double the capital gains tax. Nearly double it, which 100 million Americans have investments in — mutual funds, 401(k)s — policemen, firemen, nurses. He wants to increase their taxes."
  • Truth: "Investments contained in 401-K's (Or in the case of 'policemen, firemen' usually a 403-B), pensions, IRAs, tax deferred variable annuities, and similar retirement vehicles aren't subject to capital gains tax -- they're not taxed at all. Changing the capital gains tax rate will have zero effect on them. Withdrawals from tax deferred accounts by retirees are generally taxed at whatever the income tax rate is for that person at the time of withdrawal (Which, incidentally, is usually a hell of a lot more than the current long term capital gains tax rate, yet another way to rip off the middle class)." 

Lies About Himself   

McCain crowd estimates

  • Lie 9/13/08: Virginia rally drew 23,000; independent estimate was 8,000

McCain created the DoNotCall list:

  • Lie 8/17/08: "2003 – McCain led in creating the FTC’s ‘Do-Not-Call’ telemarketing registry"
  • Truth: FTC Chairman Tim Muris announced in October 2001 that the FTC was going to create the Do Not Call list

McCain co-authored the CAN-SPAM Act:

  • Lie 8/17/08: "2003 - McCain co-authored the CAN-SPAM Act to regulate the sending of unsolicited commercial e-mail (”spam”) 
  • Truth: According to the Library of Congress, three Republicans and four Democratic senators introduced the CAN-SPAM bill in 2003. John McCain was not one of them.

Lobbying for Lowell Paxson 

  • Lie 2/21/08: "No representative of Paxson or [Paxson's lobbying firm] Alcalde and Fay discussed with Senator McCain the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proceeding...  No representative of Paxson or Alcalde and Fay personally asked Senator McCain to send a letter to the FCC regarding this proceeding."
  • Truth: [Floyd] Abrams asked [McCain during a deposition for a Mitch McConnell lawsuit fighting McCain's campaign finance reform]: "Did you speak to the company's lobbyist about these matters?"
    McCain: "I don't recall if it was Mr. Paxson or the company's lobbyist or both."
    Abrams: "But you did speak to him?"
    McCain: "I'm sure I spoke with him, yes."
  • Truth 2/22/08: Broadcaster Lowell "Bud" Paxson today contradicted statements from Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign that the senator did not meet with Paxson or his lobbyist before sending two controversial letters to the Federal Communications Commission on Paxson's behalf.
    Paxson said he talked with McCain in his Washington office several weeks before the Arizona Republican wrote the letters to the FCC urging a rapid decision on Paxson's quest to acquire a Pittsburgh television station.
    Paxson also recalled that his lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, attended the meeting in McCain's office and that Iseman helped arrange the meeting. "Was Vicki there? Probably," Paxson said in an interview with The Washington Post today. "The woman was a professional. She was good. She could get us meetings."
    The recollection of the now-retired Paxson conflicted with the account provided by McCain about two letters at the center of a controversy about the senator's ties to Iseman, a partner at the lobbying firm of Alcalde & Fay.

McCain Lobbyists

John McCain brags that he's friends with lots and lots of lobbyists:

I have many friends who represent various interests ranging from the firemen, to the police to senior citizens to various interests particularly before my committee and I had meetings with hundreds of them and that was my job to do to get their input. Obviously, people who represent interests are fine, that's their constitutional right, the question is do they have access or unwarranted influence and certainly no one ever has in the conduct of my public life and my legislative agenda.

At least 59 lobbyists have helped McCain raise nearly $50 million. Below are some of the most powerful corporate lobbyists who have the most influence over McCain - and always put their clients' interests ahead of the interests of the American people. (Also watch "Friends" - a great video by Brave New Films.

People:

Phil Gramm, National Campaign General Co-Chair

Vice Chairman of Swiss bank UBS, and their U.S. lobbyist until April 2008. According to Newsweek, UBS is the focus of congressional and Justice Department investigations into schemes that enabled wealthy Americans to evade income taxes by stashing their money in overseas havens.

Gramm's former congressional aide, John Savercool, is still registered to lobby for UBS on numerous issues, including a bill cosponsored by Sen. Barack Obama that would crack down on foreign tax havens.

Rick Davis
Campaign Manager

Rightsfield.com: Founded Davis, Manafort & Freedman, Inc., through which he served clients ranging from Nigerian dictator Gen. Sani Abacha to “mafia-like” Argentine legislator Alberto Pierri.

Davis has had a long association with McCain — one tangled up in webs of special influence. In 1999, while Davis was working for McCain, two of his firm’s clients, COMSAT and SBC, “had major (and controversial) mergers pending before the Federal Communications Commission in 1999, and both mergers were approved.” The FCC was under the legislative oversight authority of McCain’s Commerce Committee, yet McCain refused to recuse himself from the proceedings.

Davis was also a central figure in McCain’s Reform Institute scandal, an under-reported affair in which the “Maverick” Senator used a nonprofit, tax-exempt “reform” organization to trade political favors for corporate cash."

###

WaPo: In August 2006, Davis was present again at a social gathering that was also attended by McCain and Deripaska, this time in Montenegro, another Eastern European country in which Davis's firm was working. The three were among a few dozen people dining at a restaurant during an official Senate trip.

Davis was a paid consultant to the governing party in Montenegro and had advised it on a just-ratified independence referendum, Salter said. That was why he was at the dinner, he added.

Afterward, a group from the dinner took boats out to a nearby yacht moored in the Adriatic Sea, where champagne and pastries were served, partly in honor of McCain's 70th birthday.

Charlie Black

Charles R. Black Jr. is chair of BKSH, a powerful DC lobbying firm that has earned $57,426,252 in lobbying fees since 1998 from hundreds of corporations, led by Philip Morris, AT&T, JP Morgan, and GE.

a seasoned Republican operative whose client roster dates back to such paragons as the late Filipino President Ferdinand Marcos and several African dictators, and more recently has featured Erik Prince, the mercenary entrepreneur who founded Blackwater.

Vicki Iseman

Vicki Iseman has represented Paxson since 1998, longer than any of her other clients. The Washington Post reports that Iseman’s clients have given nearly $85,000 to McCain campaigns since 2000.

McCain initially supported legislation that would have forced Paxson and handful of broadcasters — but not the great bulk of television stations — off the air by December 31, 2006. Bud Paxson himself personally testified about this bill with “fear and trepidation” at a hearing on September 8, 2004.

Two weeks later, McCain had reversed himself. He now supported legislation that would grant two-year reprieve for Paxson — and instead force all broadcasters to stop transmitting analog television by December 31, 2008. Paxson and his lobbyists, including Iseman, were working at this time for just such a change.

Hector Alcade

Washington Post 2/23/08: The second letter [from McCain to the FCC on behalf of Paxson] came on Dec. 10, a day after the company's jet ferried McCain to a Florida fundraiser aboard a yacht in West Palm Beach. The fundraiser was arranged by Hector Alcalde of Alcalde & Fay and was hosted by a cruise line that Alcalde had represented, Paxson said. Paxson said he attended the fundraiser.

Emptywheel 2/23/08: Paxson flew McCain to a fundraiser in FL, organized by Iseman's boss, and probably hosted at the house of the owner of Carnival Cruise lines. Paxson, Iseman, McCain, Alcalde--they all were there. In other words, this was Alcalde and Fay as a company sponsoring McCain's campaign, not just individual clients of Iseman's who had businses with McCain.

Kirk Blalock Kirk Blalock, of the lobbying firm Fierce, Isakowitz & Blalock, leads Mr. McCain’s young professional group and has raised over $250,000 for him; his clients include Sprint Nextel and Viacom.
Kyle McSlarrow Kyle McSlarrow, chief of the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, the lobbying arm for the cable industry, has raised over $100,000 for Mr. McCain. He and others in the cable industry recently butted heads with Mr. McCain over a proposal that would allow customers to pick and choose which channels they received.
Wayne Berman

Wayne Berman, who is deputy finance chairman of the McCain campaign and a veteran lobbyist whose clients include Verizon and Verizon Wireless, dismissed the notion that some lobbyists might be raising money for Mr. McCain to curry influence

The NYTimes could also say "Wayne Berman, of the McCain campaign and lobbyist for ChevronTexaco, and chairman of Federalist Lobbying as well as an insurance broker." Or "friend of Tom DeLay?" Or how about "AmeriQuest lobbyist Wayne Berman, whose client had interests before the Commerce Committee of which McCain was chairman." Wouldn't that be informative for the public to dig further into at some point before November?

McCain Marriages

Daily Mail 6/8/08

She was the woman McCain dreamed of during his long incarceration and torture in Vietnam’s infamous ‘Hanoi Hilton’ prison and the woman who faithfully stayed at home looking after the children and waiting anxiously for news.

But when McCain returned to America in 1973 to a fanfare of publicity and a handshake from Richard Nixon, he discovered his wife had been disfigured in a terrible car crash three years earlier. Her car had skidded on icy roads into a telegraph pole on Christmas Eve, 1969. Her pelvis and one arm were shattered by the impact and she suffered massive internal injuries...

For nearly 30 years, Carol has maintained a dignified silence about the accident, McCain and their divorce. But last week at the bungalow where she now lives at Virginia Beach, a faded seaside resort 200 miles south of Washington, she told The Mail on Sunday how McCain divorced her in 1980 and married Cindy, 18 years his junior and the heir to an Arizona brewing fortune, just one month later.

Carol insists she remains on good terms with her ex-husband, who agreed as part of their divorce settlement to pay her medical costs for life. ‘I have no bitterness,’ she says. ‘My accident is well recorded. I had 23 operations, I am five inches shorter than I used to be and I was in hospital for six months. It was just awful, but it wasn’t the reason for my divorce.

My marriage ended because John McCain didn’t want to be 40, he wanted to be 25. You know that happens...it just does.’

Some of McCain’s acquaintances are less forgiving, however. They portray the politician as a self-centred womaniser who effectively abandoned his crippled wife to ‘play the field’. They accuse him of finally settling on Cindy, a former rodeo beauty queen, for financial reasons.

McCain was then earning little more than £25,000 a year as a naval officer, while his new father-in-law, Jim Hensley, was a multi-millionaire who had impeccable political connections...

In 1979 – while still married to Carol – he met Cindy at a cocktail party in Hawaii. Over the next six months he pursued her, flying around the country to see her. Then he began to push to end his marriage.

Carol and her children were devastated. ‘It was a complete surprise,’ says Nancy Reynolds, a former Reagan aide.

‘They never displayed any difficulties between themselves. I know the Reagans were quite shocked because they loved and respected both Carol and John.’

Another friend added: ‘Carol didn’t fight him. She felt her infirmity made her an impediment to him. She justified his actions because of all he had gone through. She used to say, “He just wants to make up for lost time.”’

Indeed, to many in their circle the saddest part of the break-up was Carol’s decision to resign herself to losing a man she says she still adores.

Friends confirm she has remained friends with McCain and backed him in all his campaigns. ‘He was very generous to her in the divorce but of course he could afford to be, since he was marrying Cindy,’ one observed...

despite his popularity as a politician, there are those who won’t forget his treatment of his first wife.

Ted Sampley, who fought with US Special Forces in Vietnam and is now a leading campaigner for veterans’ rights, said: ‘I have been following John McCain’s career for nearly 20 years. I know him personally. There is something wrong with this guy and let me tell you what it is – deceit.

‘When he came home and saw that Carol was not the beauty he left behind, he started running around on her almost right away. Everybody around him knew it.

‘Eventually he met Cindy and she was young and beautiful and very wealthy. At that point McCain just dumped Carol for something he thought was better.

‘This is a guy who makes such a big deal about his character. He has no character. He is a fake. If there was any character in that first marriage, it all belonged to Carol.’...

 Ross Perot, who paid her medical bills all those years ago, now believes that both Carol McCain and the American people have been taken in by a man who is unusually slick and cruel – even by the standards of modern politics.

‘McCain is the classic opportunist. He’s always reaching for attention and glory,’ he said.

‘After he came home, Carol walked with a limp. So he threw her over for a poster girl with big money from Arizona. And the rest is history.’

Matthew Yglesias on VickiGate:

Obviously, I don’t know whether or not McCain had sex with Iseman. I suppose by “what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” standards, he didn’t even deny having had sex with Iseman. Certainly it’d be a bit rich of McCain to get outraged that anyone would even suggest that he might engage in sexual improprieties. After all, it’s well known that he repeatedly cheated on his first wife Carol, of a number of years, with a variety of women, before eventually dumping her for a much-younger heiress whose family fortune was able to help finance his political career. That’s well known, I should say, except to the electorate, who would probably find that this sort of behavior detracts from McCain’s “character” appeal.

McCain Media

For the past 20 years, John McCain has received more glowing media coverage than any other politician. There's a whole book about it.

Columnist Joel Connelly writes,

McCain is allowed to dominate any and every issue on which he chooses to cross the aisle in Congress. He is omnipresent on Sunday talk shows.

Between 1997 and 2006, McCain had 135 appearances as a guest on “Meet the Press,” “This Week” and “Face the Nation,” far more than runner-up Joe Biden with 91. McCain was usually able to hold forth alone rather than sharing the stage.

McCain Memory

Like many older Americans, McCain's memory is playing tricks with him. For example, he forgets key facts.

Like how many homes he owns:

"I think — I'll have my staff get to you," McCain told Politico in Las Cruces, N.M. "It's condominiums where — I'll have them get to you."

Like the $1M lawsuit he filed in 1990:

"You can be sure that I talked to and got the permission of any client who is listed as a plaintiff," said attorney Barbara P. Beach.

Like the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003:

In the 21st century, nations don't invade other nations.

Like Election Day is in November:

 “If we do everything right — and we can and we will — I will win in January,”

He also has a tendency to say one thing... and then forget he ever said it. Here are some great examples, courtesy of georgia10. Is McCain simply lying, or suffering from "senior moments"? We report, you decide.

On how safe it is in Iraq:

Yesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) told CNN that that President Bush’s escalation in Iraq is going so well, "General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in an unarmed humvee." On Monday, he told radio host Bill Bennett that there "are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods, today."

This morning, during an interview with McCain, CNN’s John Roberts rebutted McCain’s assertions, stating, "I checked with General Petraeus’s people overnight and they said he never goes out in anything less than an up-armored humvee." He added that a new report by retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey "said no Iraqi government official, coalition soldier, diplomat reporter could walk the streets of Baghdad without heavily armed protection."

Faced with overwhelming evidence that he was wrong, McCain denied he’d ever said it: "Well, I’m not saying they could go without protection. The President goes around America with protection. So, certainly I didn’t say that."

On the possibility of tearing down the Ninth Ward:

McCain said he didn’t know what his plans would be. "That’s why we need to go back," he said, "to have a conversation about what to do about it. Rebuild it? Tear it down? Ya know, whatever it is."

From North Carolina, Clinton seized the opportunity to attack. "Sen. McCain said he might want to tear down the Ninth Ward instead of rebuilding it," she said. "But I went to the Ninth Ward after Katrina and met with people there and saw the destruction and I saw the resilience in their eyes and they deserve our help to rebuild and regain their lives and their homes."

Steve Schmidt, a senior McCain aide, said Clinton’s attack was "inaccurate." "Sen. McCain has said the levees must be strengthened on time so people can make a decision on whether to return based on safety," he said, adding that he would like to see a "safe, vibrant community emerge" after the appropriate flood plan.

Even before Clinton made her comments, McCain had been asked to clarify. "I don’t remember ever saying it," he said Thursday afternoon on his way from Xavier University to the New Orleans airport.

On economics:

   RUSSERT: Senator McCain, you have said repeatedly, "I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated." Is it a problem for your campaign that the economy is now the most important issue, one that, by your own acknowledgement, you're not well-versed on?

   McCAIN: Actually, I don't know where you got that quote from. I'm very well-versed in economics.

On Saddam Hussein:

ROUND 1: Do you think Saddam is a threat?

"I believe that Saddam Hussein presents clear and present danger to the United States of America with his continued pursuit of...to acquire weapons of mass destruction." [CNN Late Edition, 3/3/02]

"I never said that it was a, quote, clear and present danger because of weapons of mass destruction." [Hardball, 9/17/03]

On Samuel Alito:

As John McCain neared his momentous primary election victory in Florida after a ferocious campaign questioning his conservative credentials, right-wingers buzzed over word that he had privately suggested that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was too conservative. In response, McCain said he recalled saying no such thing and added that Alito was a "magnificent" choice. In fact, multiple sources confirm that the senator made negative comments about Alito nine months ago [...]

In a conference call with bloggers that day, McCain said, "I don't recall a conversation where I would have said that." He was "astonished" by the Alito quote, he said, and he repeatedly says at town meetings, "We're going to have justices like Roberts and Alito."

On the Gitmo lawsuit, Boumediene v. Bush:

McCain had previously derided that decision as “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country,” but today stepped back from that comment:

ISAACSON: But you called that the worst decision in history?

MCCAIN: No I didn’t. No, no

.

McCain Money

"Everybody says that they’re against the special interests. I’m the only one the special interests don’t give any money to." - John McCain, New Hampshire Town Hall, November 2007

  • 3/08: McCain's appearance at the Deer Valley event, arranged by J.P. Morgan Vice Chairman James B. Lee Jr., a top McCain fundraiser, put him in a room with the chief executives of companies such as General Electric, Xerox and Sony. It was, Lee said, "a chance for him to let them see him for who he is and possibly decide to support him." The effort paid off: J.P. Morgan executives have donated $56,250 to McCain's campaign, two-thirds of which came after his Utah appearance. And his visit there was quickly followed up by dozens of smaller private meetings with corporate executives in New York City arranged by leading Wall Street figures. "We tried to get him around to a lot of those kinds of things," said McCain campaign manager Rick Davis. "We were very much in the friend-making business." 
  • According to the Center for Responsive Politics, McCain has taken nearly $1.2 million in campaign contributions from the telephone utility and telecom service industries, more than any other Senator. McCain sides with the telecom companies on retroactive immunity.
  • McCain is also the single largest recipient of campaign contribution by Ion Media Networks — formerly Paxson Communication — receiving $36,000 from the company and employees from 1997 to mid-year 2006.

Steven Betts (5/8/08)

  • Sen. John McCain championed legislation that will let an Arizona rancher trade remote grassland and ponderosa pine forest here for acres of valuable federally owned property that is ready for development, a land swap that now stands to directly benefit one of his top presidential campaign fundraisers.
  • Initially reluctant to support the swap, the Arizona Republican became a key figure in pushing the deal through Congress after the rancher and his partners hired lobbyists that included McCain's 1992 Senate campaign manager, two of his former Senate staff members (one of whom has returned as his chief of staff), and an Arizona insider who was a major McCain donor and is now bundling campaign checks.
  • When McCain's legislation passed in November 2005, the ranch owner gave the job of building as many as 12,000 homes to SunCor Development, a firm in Tempe, Ariz., run by Steven A. Betts, a longtime McCain supporter who has raised more than $100,000 for the presumptive Republican nominee. Betts said he and McCain never discussed the deal.
  • Although the bill called for the two parcels to be of equal value, a federal forestry official told a congressional committee that he was concerned that "the public would not receive fair value" for its land. A formal appraisal has not yet begun. A town official opposed to the swap said other Yavapai Ranch land sold nine years ago for about $2,000 per acre, while some of the prime commercial land near a parcel that the developers will get has brought as much as $120,000 per acre.

Donald Diamond (4/22/08)

  • McCain helped a wealthy and generous donor buy land from the Army — complete with special water rights — for a quarter of a million dollars, which McCain’s buddy then sold two years later for $20 million. There’s a term for this — it’s called “influence peddling,” and it’s exactly the kind of thing McCain swears he never gets involved with. 
  • on a number of key occasions, McCain played a key role in helping Diamond, a major campaign contributor, make deals that made him millions of dollars
  • two of those involved bills (in 1991 and 1994) co-sponsored by McCain that swapped public land for Diamond's land, and the other involved McCain doing a couple personal favors in order to help Diamond land an incredibly lucrative piece of land owned by the Army
  • The most delicate of the three transactions for the McCain camp is undoubtedly the Army deal: an old base in Monterey County, California called Fort Ord. Helped along by a meeting with an Army official set up by a McCain aide, Diamond got the inside track on the land, which ultimately made him a $20 million profit. McCain had also written a letter to the city of Seaside, California, enthusiastically recommending Diamond, who was making a bid to buy Fort Ord's two golf courses that had been acquired by the city.
  • Mr. Diamond is close to most of Arizona's Congressional delegation and is candid about his expectations as a fund-raiser. "I want my money back, for Christ's sake. Do you know how many cocktail parties I have to go to?" To raise money for Mr. McCain, Mr. Diamond invites local Republicans to make fund-raising calls from his Tucson office. Ray Carroll, a member of the council that controls zoning in Pima County, Ariz., said Mr. Diamond followed up on one fund-raising session with a thank-you note "on behalf of Mr. McCain," sending a copy to the senator. "To reciprocate, if you need any zoning in the county, let me know," Mr. Diamond wrote. (Mr. Diamond said it was the kind of joke he often made.)
  • Mr. Diamond, for his part, said Mr. McCain had only done his job. "I think that is what Congress people are supposed to do for constituents," he said. "When you have a big, significant businessman like myself, why wouldn't you want to help move things along? What else would they do? They waste so much time with legislation."

Sinclair Broadcasting / Glencairn Broadcasting (2/23/08)

  • In late 1998, Senator John McCain sent an unusually blunt letter to the head of the Federal Communications Commission, warning that he would try to overhaul the agency if it closed a broadcast ownership loophole.
  • The letter, and two later ones signed by Mr. McCain, then chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, urged the commission to abandon plans to close a loophole vitally important to Glencairn Ltd., a client of Vicki Iseman, a lobbyist. The provision enabled one of the nation’s largest broadcasting companies, Sinclair, to use a marketing agreement with Glencairn, a far smaller broadcaster, to get around a restriction barring single ownership of two television stations in the same city.
  • For its part, Glencairn appeared to have been getting little support in Congress until it retained Ms. Iseman in 1998.
  • Edwin Edwards, who was the president of the company at the time, said in a recent interview that after retaining Ms. Iseman, he was able to get heard by Mr. McCain.
  • “We were pounding the pavement in Washington,” Mr. Edwards said. “We recruited help from as many people as we could. We knocked on every door just trying to get support.”

FEC Violations

  • TPM 2/22/08: First, McCain opted in to the public finance system for the primaries last year. It meant that his struggling campaign would get $5.8 million in public matching funds in March. Now that he’s effectively the Republican nominee, he wants out, because the system entails a spending limit of $54 million through the end of August. He’s almost spent that much already, according to the Post.
    It is a serious issue. As the Post reports, “Knowingly violating the spending limit is a criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five years in prison.” 
  • Judicial Watch 4/24/08: Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it filed a formal complaint, dated April 22, 2008, with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) related to a fundraising luncheon held at London’s Spencer House to benefit Senator John McCain’s presidential campaign.  The venue for the event was apparently donated to the campaign by foreign nationals, in violation of federal campaign finance laws.

FEC Violation #2

McCain POW

When called out for a factual error in something so trivial, yet memorable as using dominant pro football teams of an era to patronize he uses the POW card.

He uses the POW Card to push his Cuba policy.

He uses the POW Card to get a forty year old dig in at hippies.

He has used the POW card to say he isn't a racist, evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.

He has used the POW card to excuse years of voting against issues supporting veterans.

He just used the POW experience again to apparently plagiarize Solzhenitsyn (classy, the guy just died). But then again, how dare I accuse John McCain of this, he was a war hero.

And the most shallow of McCain surrogatoes on cable (and is there any other kind?) even excuse cheating on your wife through the POW experience.

McCain Scandals

1. Keating Five: John McCain's most infamous scandal was being one of the "Keating Five" Senators who helped S&L profiteer Charles Keating.

On Oct. 8, 1989, The Arizona Republic revealed that McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators.

The paper also reported that the McCains, sometimes accompanied by their daughter and baby-sitter, had made at least nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard the American Continental jet. Three of the trips were made during vacations to Keating's opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay.

McCain also did not pay Keating for some of the trips until years after they were taken, after he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln. Total cost: $13,433...

McCain also had to explain his trips with Keating and why he didn't pay Keating back right away.

On that score, McCain admitted he had fouled up. He said he should have reimbursed Keating immediately, not waited several years. His staff said it was an oversight, but it looked bad, McCain jetting around with Keating, then going to bat for him with the federal regulators.

"I was in a hell of a mess," McCain later would write...

Among the Keating Five, McCain took the most direct contributions from Keating. But the [ Senate Ethics Committee ] investigation found that he was the least culpable, along with Glenn. McCain attended the meetings but did nothing afterward to stop Lincoln's death spiral...

McCain owns up to his mistake this way:

"I was judged eventually, after three years, of using, quote, poor judgment, and I agree with that assessment."

2. Rick Renzi

Rep. Rick Renzi (AZ01) has been in the news for a land deal scandal since 2005, when he introduced a land swap bill in Congress that made his business partner and major campaign donor James Sandlin rich.

After the FBI investigation into Renzi was first reported in October 2006, McCain vouched for Renzi’s “integrity” in a robo-call to Arizona voters:

This is Senator John McCain. I’m calling to urge you to support my friend, Representative Rick Renzi for Congress. Rick has represented the first district of Arizona with tenacity, honesty and integrity beyond reproach.

McCain honored Renzi by putting him on the National Campaign Committee for his Presidential campaign and making him a co-chair of his Arizona Leadership Team.

In February 2008, Renzi was indicted on 35 counts of extortion, wire fraud, money laundering and other crimes, but McCain refused to remove him from his campaign committee, saying "it doesn't matter" because Renzi is presumed innocent (video).

McCain Sex

John McCain has voted against abortion rights throughout his career. Is that based on principle or politics, namely abjectg pandering to the religious right? Where does McCain stand on sexuality issues like birth control, sex education, STD's and AIDS? Don't expect to find an answer to this question on the Straight Talk Express.

3/16/07

[S]omeone asked about public funding for contraception in Africa to prevent the spread of AIDS. "I'm sure I've taken a position on it in the past," he stammered as he looked to his communications director. "I'm sure I'm opposed to government funding."

Sensing a vulnerable moment, reporters kept the questions coming. What about sex education in the schools? Should it mention contraceptives? Or only abstinence, like President Bush wants? "I think I support the president's present policy," he said, tentatively.

More questions: Do condoms stop sexually transmitted disease? A long pause. A stern look. "I've never gotten into these issues or thought much about them," he said, almost crying uncle. "Obviously, we all want to stop the spread of AIDS. Everybody wants to do that. What's the most viable way of doing that?"

…In a last ditch attempt to rescue himself, McCain told an aide to go get a briefing paper prepared by Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, a doctor, who he said has been advising him on "these issues." But the aide couldn't find the briefing paper. "We've lost it," McCain mumbled.

"Whether I support government funding for them or not, I don't know," McCain said about contraceptives. He then said he'd look into it for the reporters, who finally let him off the hook and moved onto other subjects again.

.

McCain Social Security

McCain supports privatization, according to his economic advisor Carly Fiorina on 4/16/08:

Well, I know that he has been very favorably inclined to the report that came out a little bit ago, the Republican party made a number of suggestions which he embraced. He has on other occasions said that he supports private accounts as one of the ways to reform the system. But I think he, and I think he will continue to be supportive of those.

 

McCain Staff

Michael Goldfarb, Deputy Communications Director

  • 4/11/07: [George] Mitchell’s less than persuasive answer [to whether withdrawal timetables “somehow infringe on the president’s powers as commander in chief?”]: “Congress is a coequal branch of government…the framers did not want to have one branch in charge of the government.” True enough, but they sought an energetic executive with near dictatorial power in pursuing foreign policy and war. So no, the Constitution does not put Congress on an equal footing with the executive in matters of national security.

McCain Supporters

Here's a list of McCain's key supporters. A few things jump out:

  • The top 3 supporters are Texans. After 8 years of Bush/Cheney/DeLay, haven't we had enough rightwing Texans?
  • Some of these folks are really unpopular like S&L scandal architect Phil Gramm, Nixon anti-semite Fred Malek, and Vietnam/Cambodia/Indonesia/Iraq war criminal Henry Kissinger.
  • There are 4 women out of 75. Don't women make up half the country?
  • Is there a black on the list?
  • Are there any hispanics besides Cuban rightwingers Lincoln & Mario Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen?
  • Why did McCain "disappear" his hundreds of lobbyist friends?

National Campaign Chairman
The Honorable Robert Mosbacher, Texas

National Campaign General Co-Chairs
Former U.S. Senator Phil Gramm, Texas > Key architect of S&L deregulatory scandal
Former U.S. Representative Thomas G. Loeffler, Texas

National Campaign Co-Chairs
Mr. John Chambers, California
Governor Jon Huntsman, Utah
Governor Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota
Former Governor Tom Ridge, Pennsylvania
Former U.S. Senator Warren Rudman, New Hampshire
Mr. Frederick W. Smith, Tennessee

National Finance Committee Co-Chairs
The Honorable George Argyros, California
Mr. Michael Ashner, New York
Mr. Brian Ballard, Florida
Mr. Lawrence E. Bathgate II, New Jersey
Mr. Wayne Berman, Washington, D.C.
Mr. Donald L. Bren, California
Mr. John Chambers, California
The Honorable James A. Courter, New Jersey
Mr. Donald R. Diamond, Arizona
Mr. Ray Dalio, Connecticut
Mr. Lewis M. Eisenberg, New Jersey
Mr. Jon Hammes, Wisconsin
Mr. James B. Lee, Jr., New York
The Honorable Frederic V. Malek, Virginia
Mr. John A. Moran, Florida
Mr. Carter Pate, Virginia
Mr. A. Jerrold Perenchio, California
Mr. Fred Smith, Tennesse
Mr. J. Gary Shansby, California
Mr. John A. Thain, New York
The Honorable Ronald Weiser, Michigan

National Campaign Committee Members and Supporters

U.S. Representative Spencer Bachus, Alabama
U.S. Senator Sam Brownback, Kansas
U.S. Senator Richard Burr, North Carolina
U.S. Representative Mike Castle, Delaware
Former Governor William P. Clements, Jr., Texas
U.S. Senator Susan Collins, Maine
Governor Mitch Daniels, Indiana
Former U.S. Senator Mike DeWine, Ohio > 06 Crushed by Sherrod Brown
U.S. Representative Lincoln Diaz-Balart, Florida
U.S. Representative Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida
The Honorable Lawrence Eagleburger
U.S. Representative Jeff Flake, Arizona
Former U.S. Representative Greg Ganske, Iowa
U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, South Carolina
Former U.S. Senator Slade Gorton, Washington
The Honorable Alexander Haig
Former Governor Frank Keating, Oklahoma
U.S. Representative Ric Keller, Florida
U.S. Representative Mark Kirk, Illinois
The Honorable Henry Kissinger > War criminal
U.S. Senator Jon Kyl, Arizona
U.S. Representative Ray Lahood, Illinois
U.S. Representative Steven LaTourette, Ohio
U.S. Senator Trent Lott, Mississippi 
U.S. Representative Dan Lungren, California
Former Governor Jim Martin, North Carolina
The Honorable Robert "Bud" McFarlane > Key figure in Iran-contra scandal
Former Governor John R. McKernan, Jr., Maine
U.S. Representative Chip Pickering, Mississippi
U.S. Representative Todd Platts, Pennsylvania
U.S. Representative Rick Renzi, Arizona > 2/08 Indicted on 35 counts
Former Governor Buddy Roemer, Louisiana
U.S. Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Florida
The Honorable James Schlesinger > Key supporter of Iraq catastrophe
U.S. Representative John Shadegg, Arizona > 1/08 FEC complaint for money laundering
U.S. Representative Chris Shays, Connecticut
U.S. Representative John Shimkus, Illinois
The Honorable George Shultz
U.S. Senator Gordon Smith, Oregon
U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe, Maine
Former Governor Jane Swift, Massachusetts
U.S. Senator John Thune, South Dakota
U.S. Representative Fred Upton, Michigan
U.S. Senator John Warner, Virginia > Key supporter of Iraq catastrophe
The Honorable R. James Woolsey > Key supporter of Iraq catastrophe

Listing as of August 2, 2007

McCain Taxes

On 4/15/08, McCain outlined his taxing and spending plans:

McCain's proposal, outlined April 15, would extend President George W. Bush's tax cuts, reduce the top corporate rate, repeal the alternative minimum tax and double exemptions for dependents. Price: $3.3 trillion by the end of a President McCain's second term in 2017, according to figures from his campaign and the Treasury.

The Arizona senator said that would be offset by eliminating pork-barrel spending, freezing a portion of the budget, and saving from Medicare spending. He could cut the budget by $100 billion a year "in a New York minute," he said in a Bloomberg Television interview yesterday.

Robert Bixby, executive director of the Washington-based Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan group that advocates budget restraint, said "the huge imbalance'' in McCain's plan "is that the tax cuts are specific and large and the spending cuts are small and vague.''

Once, McCain was a deficit hawk, Bixby said, but "strange things happen when people run for president.''

Economist Paul Krugman summarizes McCain's tax plan:

First, Mr. McCain proposes making almost all of the Bush tax cuts, which are currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2010, permanent. (He proposes reinstating the inheritance tax, albeit at a very low rate.)

Second, he wants to eliminate the alternative minimum tax, which was originally created to prevent the wealthy from exploiting tax loopholes, but has begun to hit the upper middle class.

Third, he wants to sharply reduce tax rates on corporate profits.

According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, the overall effect of the McCain tax plan would be to reduce federal revenue by more than $5 trillion over 10 years. That’s a lot of revenue loss — enough to pose big problems for the government’s solvency...

If truth be told, the McCain tax plan doesn’t seem to embody any coherent policy agenda. Instead, it looks like a giant exercise in pandering — an attempt to mollify the G.O.P.’s right wing, and never mind if it makes any sense. 

McCain's Medicare plan includes a

quiet bombshell proposal to make Medicare beneficiaries with higher incomes pay more for their prescription drug benefits, a notion that furthers the privatization (and in the eyes of many health care advocates, the diminution and eventual death) of Medicare...

many health care advocates see McCain’s proposal is just another opening to privatize Medicare and destroy it as a social insurance program, under which everyone who has paid into the system is entitled to equal benefits as a matter of right. A provision that was tucked into the recent law that gave seniors the drug benefit (Part D) already requires wealthier beneficiaries to pay more for the Medicare premiums that cover doctor visits and outpatient services (Part B). If drug benefits, too, are based on income, critics fear that support for the program will eventually erode as those with more choices and more money will opt out of the program and buy coverage from private insurers.

The New York Times mentioned it in a front page piece, noting that the proposal would affect not just billionaires but couples earning more than $164,000 and single people with incomes of $82,000. But it didn’t go beyond that...

McCain adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin revealed the most when he said in the Post story: “You could make this as aggressive as you want to get more savings.” In other words, if the government saves $2 billion by making couples with incomes greater than $164,000 pay higher premiums, it could save $6 billion by moving down the income ladder to, say, $100,000 or even less.

Here's an analysis of McCain's plan by the Center for American Progress Action Fund

McCain Technology

Reed Hundt on telecom issues:

McCain opposed the goal of connecting all Americans to telephone service, doesn't support having a national broadband policy that provides any way for rural or lower income people to get Internet access, didn't vote for the competition-providing Telecommunications Act of 1996, opposed putting the Internet into every classroom, and never seemed to care about monopoly or duopoly in any communications market. He said he wanted to auction spectrum but didn't vote for the legislation that authorized the FCC to do that. He often said he didn't like broadcasters, but he failed to stop them from postponing the end of analog television (and delaying the follow-on spectrum auction) when he was chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee.

Reed Hundt on alternative energy technology:

the essential government role in promoting solar, wind, geothermal and other non-carbon innovations at least includes (1) tax and spending efforts that help overcome very high early-stage costs in a reliable and significant way coupled with (2) precise and efficient regulatory intervention that provides adequate access to the national electric grid for green technologies. Right now the Senate won't vote for permanent tax credits (or even another temporary renewal) for investment in green technologies, and one wonders why that recalcitrance doesn't draw McCain's wrath, since an investment tax credit is a form of funding the 1,000 flowers.

 

McCain Temper

Those who know John McCain best know he is short-tempered and flies into fits of rage. Is that the person we want to have his finger on the nuclear button? 

To Cindy McCain, in front of a group of Arizona reporters,

  • "At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you c*nt."

Sen. Bob Smith (R-NH)

  • "His temper would place this country at risk in international affairs, and the world perhaps in danger. In my mind, it should disqualify him."

Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS)

  • "The thought of (McCain) being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me."

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) 

  • 5/18/07: Things got really heated when Cornyn accused McCain of being too busy campaigning for president to take part in the negotiations, which have gone on for months behind closed doors. “Wait a second here,” Cornyn said to McCain. “I’ve been sitting in here for all of these negotiations and you just parachute in here on the last day. You’re out of line.”
    “F**k you! I know more about this than anyone else in the room,” shouted McCain at Cornyn.

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV)

  • 8/27/08 "I've served with the man 26 years. Do I have the ability to speak with experience about someone who has abused everyone he's dealt with? Someone who does not have the temperament to be president..."

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA)

  • 9/7/08 "There have been times when he's just exploded. Look, around here, people lose their tempers once in a while. But it doesn't happen very often, and it usually happens in some contextual framework. A lot of times there's just not much of a contextual framework for his blowing up."

McClatchy 9/7/08:

  • At age 2, McCain's tantrums were so intense that he'd hold his breath for a few minutes and pass out. His parents would dunk him in cold water to "cure" him, he wrote in his memoir, "Faith of My Fathers."
  • "I have spent much of my life choosing my own attitude, often carelessly, often for no better reason than to indulge a conceit," he wrote. He conceded that some of his actions have been embarrassing, and "others I deeply regret."
  • On election night 1986, then-Arizona Republican Party executive director Jon Hinz recalled, McCain was unhappy, even angry, even though he'd just won a U.S. Senate seat and his party had just made a virtually unprecedented sweep of state offices. McCain had hoped that night would help launch him as a national figure. Instead, when the 5-foot-9 senator-elect spoke at the Phoenix victory party, the podium was too tall. "You couldn't see his mouth," Hinz said. A furious McCain sought out Robert Wexler, the Young Republican head in charge of arrangements. "McCain kept pointing his finger in Wexler's chest, berating him," Hinz recalled. The 6-foot-6 Hinz stepped between them and told McCain to cut it out. "I told him I'll make sure there's an egg crate around next time," he said. McCain walked away angrily.
  • About a year later [late 1987], McCain reportedly erupted again, this time at a meeting with Arizona's then-Gov. Evan Mecham, who was about to be impeached after being indicted on felony charges. Karen Johnson, then Mecham's secretary and now an Arizona state senator, recalled how McCain told Mecham that he was "causing the party a lot of problems" and was an embarrassment to the party. "Sen. McCain got very angry," Johnson recalled, "and I said, 'Why are you talking to the governor like this? You're causing problems yourself. You're an embarrassment.'" Johnson would go on to work at three different jobs over the next five years, and she said that each time, McCain would contact her boss and try to get her removed.
  • Stories abound on Capitol Hill: how McCain told Senate Budget Committee Chairman Pete Domenici, R-N.M., how "only an a-hole" would craft a budget like he did.
  • Or the time in 1989 when he confronted Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, then a Democrat and now a Republican, because Shelby had promised to vote for McCain friend John Tower as secretary of defense, and then Shelby voted against Tower. McCain later wrote how, after the vote, he approached Shelby "to bring my nose within an inch of his as I screamed out my intense displeasure over his deceit ... the incident is one of the occasions when my temper lived up to its exaggerated legend."
  • Cochran recalled earlier this summer that he saw McCain manhandle a Sandinista official during a 1987 diplomatic mission in Nicaragua. Cochran told the Biloxi Sun Herald that McCain was talking, and, "I saw some kind of quick movement at the bottom of the table and I looked down there and John had reached over and grabbed this guy by the shirt collar and had snatched him up like he was throwing him up out of the chair to tell him what he thought about him or whatever." McCain said the incident never took place. "I must say, I did not admire the Sandinistas much," he told a news conference. "But there was never anything of that nature. It just didn't happen."
  • In 1992, McCain sparred with Dolores Alfond, the chairwoman of the National Alliance of Families for the Return of America's Missing Servicemen and Women, at a Senate hearing. McCain's prosecutorlike questioning of Alfond - available on YouTube - left her in tears.
  • Four years later [1996], at her group's Washington conference, about 25 members went to a Senate office building, hoping to meet with McCain. As they stood in the hall, McCain and an aide walked by. Six people present have written statements describing what they saw. According to the accounts, McCain waved his hand to shoo away Jeannette Jenkins, whose cousin was last seen in South Vietnam in 1970, causing her to hit a wall.
  • As McCain continued walking, Jane Duke Gaylor, the mother of another missing serviceman, approached the senator. Gaylor, in a wheelchair equipped with portable oxygen, stretched her arms toward McCain. "McCain stopped, glared at her, raised his left arm ready to strike her, composed himself and pushed the wheelchair away from him," according to Eleanor Apodaca, the sister of an Air Force captain missing since 1967.

McCain Thief

During the 2008 Presidential campaign, John McCain has stolen the intellectual property of numerous musicians and other artists:

  • John Mellencamp made McCain stop playing his songs at campaign events
  • Mike Myers made McCain pull a Wayne's World clip from his TV ads
  • Jackson Browne filed a lawsuit to stop Ohio Republicans from playing "Running on Empty"
  • McCain also stole from Frankie Valli, ABBA, Orleans (that's Democratic Rep. John Hall's band), and Chuck Berry

McCain Veterans

On 5/25/08, McCain declared, "I received the highest award from literally every veteran’s organization in America."

But McCain's opposition to Jim Webb’s (D-VA) 21st Century GI Bill

puts him in opposition to the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, the American Legion, and the national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

The recognition McCain has received from veterans groups is not “high awards” but failing grades:

— Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave McCain a grade of D for his record of voting against veterans. (By contrast, Obama got a B+.)

– Disabled Veterans of America noted McCain’s dismal 20 percent voting record on veterans’ issues. (Obama had an 80 percent.)

– In a list of “Key Votes,” Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) notes McCain “Voted Against Us” 15 times and “Voted For Us” only 8. (Obama voted for VVA 12 times, and against only once.)

 

McCain Votes

McCain has been in Congress since 1983 and has a long and detailed voting record.

  • Environment: In 2007, McCain skipped every crucial vote on the environment and ranked dead last among all 535 Members of Congress according to the League of Conservation Voters:
    “Out of 535 Members of Congress, John McCain is the only one who chose to miss every single key environmental vote scored by the League of Conservation Voters last year. When it came time to stand up and vote for the environment, John McCain was nowhere to be found,” said Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club. “Every other Member who received a zero from LCV last year at least had the temerity to show up and vote against the environment and clean energy time after time. And unlike John McCain, I doubt any of them would claim to be environmental leaders or champions on global warming.”
  • Big Oil Giveaways: In December 2007, a bill to redirect oil company tax breaks to renewable energy failed by one vote - and John McCain didn't vote.

McCain Wiretapping

NY Times 6/6/08

A top adviser to Senator John McCain says Mr. McCain believes that President Bush’s program of wiretapping without warrants was lawful, a position that appears to bring him into closer alignment with the sweeping theories of executive authority pushed by the Bush administration legal team.

In a letter posted online by National Review this week, the adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, said Mr. McCain believed that the Constitution gave Mr. Bush the power to authorize the National Security Agency to monitor Americans’ international phone calls and e-mail without warrants, despite a 1978 federal statute that required court oversight of surveillance.

Why does McCain support illegal, warrantless wiretapping? Could it simply be the money?

John McCain has condemned the influence of "special interest lobbyists," yet dozens of lobbyists have political and financial ties to his presidential campaign — particularly from telecommunications companies, an industry he helps oversee in the Senate.

Of the 66 current or former lobbyists working for the Arizona senator or raising money for his presidential campaign, 23 have lobbied for telecommunications companies in the past decade, Senate lobbying disclosures show.

Or is McCain trying to prevent George Bush and Dick Cheney from being charged with breaking the law and violating the rights of millions of Americans?

McCain Women

McCain has dedicated his entire career to opposing women's rights.

On 4/23/08, McCain supported the Republican filibuster against equal pay for women.

In 1992, McCain called his wife Cindy a "cunt" in front of 3 reporters:

Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain's intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain's hair and said, "You're getting a little thin up there." McCain's face reddened, and he responded, "At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt." McCain's excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days.

2009 Campaigns

Congress: Special Elections

Senate        
         
House        
IL05       Tom Geogheghan
         

Issues

Issue Democrats.com plan Congress Groups Media Blogs
Torture Lobby Holder for Special Prosecutor House: Conyers letter
Senate: Feingold copy?
Ratner: CSP Olbermann/Turley
Maddow
Pardon-Scorecard
Single payer Support Congressional lobbying Conyers PDA    
Wiretap Watch private lawsuits   ACLU Olbermann emptywheel
Afghanistan health care not warfare   UFPJ   getafghanistanright
State Secrets   S.417
H.R.984
ACLU Greenwald ACLU

2010 Campaigns

BA: BlueAmerica 

Congress

Senate        
         
House        
FL12 Doug Tudor Adam Putnam BA 08: 43%
         

Election Activism

Blogs and News

Groups Fighting Election Fraud

Groups Mobilizing Democratic and Progressive Voters

Do-It-Yourself Strategies

Reports

Books 

Articles

Films

Forums

  • 8/13/06 Seattle: Radio Hosts on Elections with Rachel Maddow, Thom Hartmann, Stephanie Miller, Laura Flanders and Mike Malloy

Lawsuits

News Coverage

.

Ohio Protest

Count Every Vote in Ohio!

George Bush declared himself the winner of Ohio's 20 crucial Electoral College votes with an election night margin of only 136,483.

We are organizing a protest to demand the counting of every vote in Ohio, including

  • 155,000 provisional ballots, which cannot be counted without the approval of Republican election officials in every county
  • 92,000 overvotes, undervotes, and "counting errors"
  • full disclosure of all secret computer codes for electronic systems

Election Reform

We support:

1) Automatic registration based on Social Security records

The voluntary voter registration process is hugely inefficient, expensive, and subject to fraud. A far superior system would use the Social Security database, allowing each voter to maintain one "voting address" either through direct Internet access or through the mail. Boards of election would use their geographic portion of that list as their master voter file.

2) Electronic voting reforms

  • All votes must be cast on paper ballots; touchscreens (DRE's) must be decertified
  • Electronic vote scanners must use certified open source software that cannot be accessed remotely; all software revisions must be certified
  • truly random post-election handcounts must match scanners or all votes must be counted by hand

3)  A Constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to vote for President

4) Abolish the Electoral College

5) An end to partisan oversight of the electoral process by Secretaries of State who actively support partisan candidates 

6) Unified federal standards for national elections, including equal protection of voting rights by such means as equal voting systems, equal numbers of machines, and equal time to vote

7) Extended voting periods to allow all voters a meaningful opportunity to vote

8) Instant Run-off Voting, Proportional Representation and Fusion

9) Publicly financed elections for federal offices

10) Vote-by-Mail should be encouraged

Oregon conducts its elections entirely by mail - there are no precincts to vote in. (Oregon is adding 2 touchscreen machines per county for disabled voters.) According to Secretary of State Bill Bradbury, the system produced "record turnout and little strife." 87% of registered voters voted - compared with 60%-70% in the rest of the country.

11) Abolish gerrymandering and mid-decade redistricting

All Congressional district lines should be drawn by non-partisan boards. Redistricting should take place only in the year following the Census every decade.

We also support:

Dems Should Forget Ethics "Reform" - It's Time for a Second American Revolution!

Clueless Democrats - both in Congress and even in the progressive blogosphere - are about to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once again. How? By letting Republicans turn the Scandal of the Century into an inside-the-beltway battle over "ethics reform."

Republicans in Congress and the White House have created the most corrupt government in American history. Tends of billions of dollars have disappeared from the Treasury, no one knows where they have gone - and most shockingly, no one is even investigation grand theft on an unimaginable scale - because Republicans control everything.

Lord Acton was exactly right: all power corrupts, and absolutely power corrupts absolutely.

Republican corruption is not on the margins, limited to a few "bad apples" - it is at the very heart of how they govern. The whole political machine created by Karl Rove, Tom DeLay, Grover Norquist, Ralph Reed, and Jack Abramoff is based on corruption: raising money illegally and spending it illegally, all for the sole purpose of seizing power, stealing as much as they can get their hands on, and manipulating elections to stay in power forever.

You don't have to look far to see massive GOP corruption. Wherever GOP-controlled Washington is spending large sums of money, it is being spent corruptly. Look at Iraq... the Gulf Coast... Medicare... Homeland Security... the NSA... etc. etc. etc.

Now the very same Republicans who corrupted everything in Washington are promising to "reform" it. As Harry Reid said, the idea of Republicans reforming themselves "is like asking John Gotti to clean up organized crime."

Of course the substance of the Republican plan is a farce. As the Pentagon Post reports,

According to lobbyists and ethics experts, even if Hastert's proposal is enacted, members of Congress and their staffs could still travel the world on an interest group's expense and eat steak on a lobbyist's account at the priciest restaurants in Washington.

The only requirement would be that whenever a lobbyist pays the bill, he or she must also hand the lawmaker a campaign contribution. Then the transaction would be perfectly okay.

John Aravosis cuts right through the bushit:

The pigs feeding at the trough aren't going to give up all the freebies. They'll just have the lobbyists feed them and take them on trips through their campaigns.

It's classic GOP bait and switch. They're just going to say that they're doing reform -- but not do it. That fits their pattern. Lobby reform doesn't reform anything, like "Clear Skies" doesn't clean the skies and like "No Child Left Behind" leaves kids behind.

But even though the GOP plan is a farce, the mere fact that they have a document they call a "reform plan" is enough to put them ahead of the corruption scandal for the majority of Americans who get their news from TV. Why? Because Karl Rove controls everything we see on TV.

Haven't Democrats learned that yet??????

I'll be blunt: If Congressional Democrats operate within the framework of "reform," they will not change anything important - and they will not beat Republicans and win a majority in November.

"Reform" used to be a nice liberal word. But since Newt Gingrich began his own version of "reform", the word has become meaningless - or worse. Remember "welfare reform"? That simply meant throwing millions of women and children deeper into poverty. Remember "buget reform"? That simply let the the GOP turn the Clinton-Gore projected surplus of $6 trillion into $3 trillion of debt in just 5 years. (And no, 9/11 did not cause $9 trillion in damage to the U.S. economy - or even $100 billion.) Remember "Social Security reform"? That would have destroyed Social Security, were it not for Josh Marshall's heroic blogging at TalkingPointsMemo.com.

Americans aren't stupid - they know "reform" is meaningless. Congress isn't corrupt because politicians take $50 meals from lobbyists. Changing a few little things won't change anything important. Americans don't want "ethics reform" - they want a political revolution.

So if Democrats want to win back Congress, they must declare - and lead - a Second American Revolution that will end corruption in Washington.

What should that revolution consist of? Here are the main elements:

  • Get money out of politics - all of it. Politicians should be prohibited from taking money from anyone for anything. All Congressional races should be publicly funded. Candidates should be given enough to run a decent campaign - say $1 million for House races, and $500,000 per CD for Senate races. That would mean $26.5 million for California, $14.5 million for New York, and $2.5 million for Iowa. (For 1 CD states like Wyoming, I would adjust the Senate amount to $1 million so they get the same amount as a House candidate.) Such a system isn't perfect; if a candidate is personally wealthy (like Mike Bloomberg or Arnold Schwarzenegger), the Supreme Court will allow him or her to spend as much as (s)he wants. But we can live with that exception for the sake of eliminating corruption.
  • Fix the legislative process. Special interest "earmarks" must be banned. Bills should be published on the Internet so Members - and citizens - have time to read them. All bills should require public hearings, followed by a week before floor votes. Budgets should be adopted on time, or Members should not get paid. Congressional raises should be prohibited unless the government runs a surplus.
  • Require real campaign debates. As a condition of receiving public funds, candidates must agree to four public debates in October - one per week. The debates should be unmoderated to keep journalists from pontificating and promoting their own pet issues - and to force candidates to address each other's arguments. The debates should be carried free and live on local TV channels as a condition of their license.
  • Eliminate election fraud. We must ban electronic voting and count votes for Federal elections by hand in public - just as they do in Canada and around the world. Every American citizen should be automatically registered based on the Social Security system (a plan I proposed last September), so officials cannot play games with disenfranchising voters. Election offices at every level (including Secretary of State) should be bi-partisan.
  • End gerrrymandering. Create a single national formula for drawing Congressional District lines. Eliminate all election-rigging parameters like party, race, and income. Prohibit mid-decade redistricting.
  • Be fair to third parties. A rigid, permanent two-party system is a prescription for corruption and incompetence; third parties need to rise up when the system breaks down. We need reasonable nation-wide criteria for third-party candidacies. We must include third-party candidates in debates. We must use instant runoff voting so voters can choose a third-party candidate without "wasting" their vote.
  • Abolish the Electoral College. The President should not be chosen by a handful of voters of one state, whether Florida (2000) or Ohio (2004). Votes in all 50 states and 5 territories should count equally.

This is an ambitious agenda, and it will take work - including Constitutional Amendments - to make it real. But it's exactly what the American people want - and it's long overdue.

Wake up Democrats!! Don't get into a losing battle for meaningless "reform" - demand a Second American Revolution instead!!!!

INN World Reports Event: May 11, 2006

INN World Reports presents:

[Title]

Thursday May 11th 7-9:30 pm

New York Society for Ethical Culture
2 West 64th St.

The event is the launch of a nationally televised weekly voting news series which promotes paper ballot solutions.

This series will appear within the INN World Report, the evening news on Freespeech TV 9415 dish network.

Keynote: Most likely will be John Conyers, we are awaiting confirmation.

Panel:

  • Bob Fritrakis,
  • Mark Crispin Miller
  • Steve Freeman
  • Howard Dean (invited)
  • Donna Brazile (invited)

The focus of the event is two fold:

1. Ohio was stolen and now we have the proof. Although voter supression was a major tactic, there is now convincing evidence that more people actually voted for John Kerry complete with county tallies that now show why the exit polls gave the state to Kerry after voting finished and before they were "weighted" in after-midnight re-spins.

2. The idea is to expose this with the new proof to high up Dems who cannot ignore this if they are present and are asked to participate. Bob Fitrakis and Mark Crispin Miller's public outings have been very successful in showing the techniques used to "steal" elections. There are boatloads of horror stories to tell. This is not just about DRE's and their malfunctions but a myriad of software and cyber manipulations that include software controlled tabulators that are just as vunerable.

This factual nuts and bolts revealing of how it was done will segue into the second section where participants and audience get to offer solutions through a Q&A dialogue.

Co-sponsors:

  • Harpers Magazine
  • Democrats.com
  • True Majority
  • MoveOn (invited)

Make Voter Registration AUTOMATIC with Social Security Numbers

The Carter-Baker Commission Report entitled Building Confidence in U.S. Elections was published on 9/19/05. The most controversial proposal would require photo ID's for all voters, which Democrats denounced as a "poll tax." 

The inevitable result of the photo ID requirement will be "Katrina Democracy" - people with cars (and therefore photo ID's) will get to vote, while people without cars (and photo ID's) will be "left behind" to suffer without political power and drown in their powerlessness, just like the poor citizens of New Orleans. For this reason, Rep. John Conyers declared it "dead on arrival."

"I am shocked that this Commission has decided to take us several giant steps back in the march for voting rights by recommending a national ID requirement for voters. This would inevitably disenfranchise minority voters and the most vulnerable among us -- those who live in poverty and the elderly. While I continue to believe that the 2004 elections showed our desperate need for election reforms, this misguided and highly controversial recommendation makes this Commission's entire report -- regardless of the merits of other recommendations -- dead on arrival from a civil rights and voting rights perspective.  As a result, I am unalterably opposed to these discriminatory new requirements and will encourage my colleagues in the House and Senate to join with me in doing so.

Moreover, a photo ID requirement for voting would help create a de facto "National Identity Card," something liberals and conservatives have long opposed because it reverses the basis of our Constitution from "government by the consent of the people" to "people by the consent of the government." In other words, if you don't produce your "papers" you can be denied the ordinary rights of citizenship that we take for granted, like being able to walk down the street without being stopped and searched by a cop. (Conservatives used to be particularly vehement in their opposition to this and all other forms of "big government," but that all changed with Ronald Reagan and the New Right.) As Conyers declared:

A national voter ID card system would significantly diminish freedom and privacy in the US because once put in place, it is unlikely that such a system would be restricted to its original purpose. A national voter ID system would threaten the privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and will gradually increase the control that government and business wields over everyday citizens.

In reality, there is no significant need for any form of voter ID. It is already a felony to vote more than once, or to vote in someone else's name. Since the cost of getting caught (a felony conviction that will ruin your life) so greatly outweighs the benefit of doing it (casting one extra vote that has an infinitesimal chance of changing the outcome), no rational person would commit this crime.

When voter fraud occurs, it is practically never done in person at polling places. You must sign in, and your signature could betray you (unless you are an expert at handwriting fraud). Your face could betray you too, if the inspector knew the real voter's face. That is why it is almost impossible to find documented cases of in-person voter fraud - which is the only form of fraud that would theoretically be reduced by photo ID's.

In reality, most voter fraud is done through absentee ballots, where someone can slowly copy a signature with minimal risk of getting caught. There are many cases of absentee fraud, including the infamous 1997 Miami Mayor's race that was overturned by a judge. The photo ID requirement would do nothing to stop absentee fraud - unless such votes had to be notarized, which is tellingly not part of Baker's proposal. (Why is it perfectly ok to inconvenience poor Americans in a major way, but unacceptable to inconvenience more affluent Americans in the slightest?)

Still, Republicans have convinced themselves that in-person voting fraud is possible because voter registration files include non-existent, ineligible, and duplicate voters. When files are inaccurate, it creates a theoretical possibility that voters could vote more than once, or vote when they are not eligible. This principle applies even more to absentee voting than to in-person voting.

Either way (in-person or absentee), the solution to inaccurate files is creating accurate voter files - not imposing a voter ID requirement. So let me offer a much simpler solution that guarantees an accurate voter file and saves county governments billions of dollars!!

Let's use the Social Security file as the national voter registration file.

Everyone in America has a unique Social Security record (which is designated by a unique number, but is technically independent of the number that is initially assigned). Virtually every newborn gets one (to qualify for health coverage and/or a tax deduction) and every teen or adult must have one in order to work. You keep your account throughout your life, even if you need to change the original number because of identity theft or domestic abuse. So why don't we just make that record (without the Social Security number) the authoritative voter record of every citizen? (1)

This would have huge advantages over the current system:

1. It would make voter registration automatic. You would never have to fill out a registration form to vote - which is a major obstacle to voting for many citizens.

2. County governments would not have to laboriously maintain complete voter files. Instead, they would simply download the Social Security file (name, address, and citizenship status) for their county right before each election, merge in signature samples (and party codes for restricted primaries), and print out sign-in sheets for each precinct. This would save county governments billions of dollars each year in staff, postage, printing, and storage space.

3. The number of errors in the system would be reduced to a tiny fraction of the current system, so there would be practically no need for provisional ballots and all the hassles that go with them.

4. The tiny problem of voter fraud would be made even tinier. Duplicate registrations (which typically occur when someone moves and re-registers without cancelling the old registration) would become impossible, because a Social Security account has a single address. Dead voters would be removed as soon as Social Security is notified, which is pretty quick (because they have to stop the checks).

5. The Social Security file would get "cleaner" over time, if voters discovered the file had an out-of-date surname or address and provided a new one. (Such voters would cast a provisional ballot until the Social Security file was updated.) This would make life better for the Social Security Administration, as well as beneficiaries and Members of Congress who have to struggle with inaccurate files.

Are there any downsides? None that I can see.

1. Would Social Security Numbers be used and exposed to identity theft? Absolutely not because there's no need for the Social Security Administration to deliver any Social Security Numbers to the Boards of Election. They would only deliver unique, accurate voter lists with name, address, and possibly citizenship status. You would never be asked for your Social Security Number when you vote. All that matters is whether your name is on the sign-in sheet - just the way it works now. Your identity would be verified by matching your sign-in signature with your stored signature sample - just the way it works now.

2. Would non-citizens be able to vote if prohibited by state laws? No, because Social Security checks the citizenship of all applicants (2), and presumably stores that information in each record. (And presumably this information is more accurate than any information now stored by county election boards, which rely on voters' signed oaths that they are citizens, but have no resources to check birth certificates.) At election time, Social Security could download all records including the citizenship flag so counties could apply their state and local laws. (If sharing that detail violates immigration laws, Social Security could simply exclude non-citizens from the downloaded lists.)

3. Would felons be able to vote even if prohibited by state laws? This problem could be solved by having counties match the Social Security file against their felon file to remove felons before delivering voter files to each county. But this would have to be done according to strictly accurate matching procedures (possibly including Social Security numbers), not the deliberately inaccurate matches used by Florida in 2000. And there would have to be provisional ballot procedures if eligible voters were wrongly told they were ineligible to vote - just as there are now.

4. Could an ineligible voter cast a vote under someone else's name? Sure - just as they can now. But as I describe above, this almost never happens because it's a crime whose cost infinitely exceeds its benefit. If Republicans can prove that this happens frequently enough to come up with a "big government" bureaucratic solution, there are two obvious "small government" solutions that would solve 99.9% of all problems:

  • to prevent duplicate voting: dip voters' thumbs in purple ink, just as we celebrated in Iraq
  • to prevent impersonation: allow any common form of ID - student cards, Medicare/Medicaid cards, electric bills, etc.

This plan could be implemented starting immediately and completed by the 2006 election (if it was a national priority) or otherwise by 2008.

1. The Social Security Administration would have to create a secure system to download county files to authorized county officials. (This could be done in 3 months if SSA has a decent computer system.)

2. County election boards would have to acquire the capability to download their county file and then match the street addresses against the precinct table so they can print sign-in sheets for each precinct. (Most counties have that capability already; if not, a specialized vendor could provide it easily.)

3. Counties would also have to scan and store all current voter signature samples, and add this image to the voter's record. (Many counties have that capability already; if not, a specialized vendor could also provide it easily.) This voter/signature file would have to be matched against the downloaded Social Security voter file. (As an alternative, the Social Security Administration could add signatures nationally from state driver's license files.)

4. In states that restrict primary voting to registered party members, counties would have to match their voter/party files against the downloaded Social Security voter file.  (As an alternative, the Social Security Administration could permanently store the party code for each voter, subject to strict privacy rules. But some voters would never "trust" SSA with this information, so this approach should be set aside until this legitimate concern is resolved, if it ever is.)

So that's my simple plan. Jimmy Carter and James Baker, are you listening?

Footnotes:

(1) The Social Security Administration only maintains primary address records for current Social Security recipients. (Social Security recipients can update their address at http://www.socialsecurity.gov/coa/) For everyone else, SSA gets your current address from the IRS every year to send your annual statement. (The IRS lets you change your address using Form 8822, but relies primarily on the Postal Service's automated NCOA system to maintain current addresses, which in turn relies on citizens to submit address changes to USPS via the web, by phone (800-ASK-USPS) or using a paper form at a Post Office.)

(2) There are millions of noncitizens in the U.S., and many have Social Security Numbers - but they are identified as noncitizens in the Social Security file and are ineligible to vote. In order to get a Social Security Number, noncitizens must submit a SS-5 form, which distinguishes U.S. Citizens, Legal Aliens Allowed to Work, Legal Aliens Not Allowed to Work, and Other. To prove citizenship (and thus be eligible to vote), an applicant must provide a U.S. consular report of birth, a U.S. passport, a Certificate of Citizenship, or a Certificate of Naturalization. These documents are verified by the Social Security Administration, so they are much more reliable than the records kept by county election boards, which rely primarily on the citizenship checkbox on the voter registration form.

Social Security Numbers for Voter Registration

On 9/19/05, The Brennan Center critiqued the Carter-Baker report at length. Chapter II objected to the use of Social Security numbers in an interstate (interoperable) voter file. I agree completely with this privacy concern and therefore my proposal does not use Social Security numbers at all - just the name and address (and possibly citizenship status).

The Brennan Center also raises concerns about the accuracy of the Social Security file. While there are inevitably accuracy problems in a file of over 200 million individuals, I am certain it is more accurate than poorly-maintained county-maintained voter files. For Social Security recipients, file accuracy is enforced by recipients who monitor monthly delivery of their checks. For pre-retirees, file accuracy depends on the IRS, which gets regular updates from taxpayers, employers, and the USPS. (See footnote 1 in my proposal.)

Chapter II 
THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT FULL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS BE  USED IN VOTER DATABASES (SECTION 2.2) AND ON ID CARDS (SECTION 2.5) POSE SERIOUS PRIVACY AND SECURITY PROBLEMS
 

With regard to the Report's interoperability recommendations, it is unquestionably beneficial to account for voters who move across state lines. Nonetheless, the Report fails to consider the serious efficacy, privacy, and security concerns raised by a nationally distributed database of the magnitude it contemplates. These problems are exacerbated by the Report's recommendation that an individual's Social Security number be used as the broadly disseminated unique voting identifier.

The Report's recommendation creates substantial privacy and security hazards. Social Security numbers unlock a vast array of information regarding private financial, employment, and medical data – and, as a result, must be kept with ironclad security. Unfortunately, existing legal limitations on and protections for Social Security numbers have been consistently whittled away over time and frequently disregarded in practice. The media regularly reports on breaches of security concerning public and private data files containing Social Security numbers.

Hackers, however, are not the only concern. Social Security numbers are also disclosed by officials entrusted with their safekeeping, despite criminal penalties against distribution. (96) For example, in 1997, Georgia's Secretary of State contracted with a credit reporting corporation in an effort to "capture" the Social Security numbers of some 400,000 registered voters without such a number on file. In due course, Georgia's entire voter registration list – records for more than four million citizens, and the associated Social Security numbers of those who had provided their number upon registration – was disclosed to the corporation, with no restrictions on the corporation's use of those numbers. (97)

The Report's recommendation to use the Social Security number as the unique identifier for tracking voters across state lines would only increase the general circulation of this financial keystone – and there is no reason to believe that new legal protections would be any more effective than their existing counterparts. The potential for improper use and disclosure will only increase.

Moreover, the Report recommends not only that the Social Security number be used as a unique interstate identifier, but also that it be placed physically on the voting ID card. (98) A misplaced or stolen card would contain, readily available on the face of the card, all information necessary to perpetrate identity theft with ease: name, signature, date of birth, current address, and Social Security number. Similarly, such personal information would be contained on photocopies of drivers licenses maintained for other purposes: for example, copies held (and potentially misplaced) by clerks at car rental agencies or volunteer poll workers. Such a card would become a treasure chest for wrongdoers, and would expose countless Americans to privacy violations, identity theft, and variety of other crimes.

In addition to the substantial privacy concerns, the Social Security number is a flawed key for tracking (and potentially purging) voters across states. The Social Security Administration was not established to construct a system of national identification, and its database contains substantial errors. For example, the SSA's Director of Information Exchange and Computer Matching has admitted that at least ten percent of the information obtained when attempting to match identifying information in the SSA database with identifying data collected in other systems by other government entities may be inaccurate. (99) The SSA's systems may be adequate for disbursing funds, but they were never intended to track individuals from one state to another for voting purposes. (100)

Finally, the Report recommends – without any discussion – that the information used as an individual's unique fingerprint to track a voter across state lines include not merely the date of birth, but also the person's "place of birth." (101) As with the Social Security number, this information is often used as a key to private information wholly unrelated to voting, and as such, disclosure presents a substantial security hazard. Moreover, this information seems particularly susceptible to use in harassing legitimate voters, particularly naturalized citizens. The reasons to protect against broad disclosure of a voter's place of birth are at least as serious as those confronting the widespread distribution of a voter's full Social Security number. Yet, as with many other issues, the Report wholly fails to consider these important concerns.

96 42 U.S.C. §§ 408(a)(8), 405(c)(2)(C)(vii)(I).
97 See Schwier v. Cox, No. 1:00-cv-2820-JEC (N.D. Ga. Jan. 31, 2005), slip op. at 5, 21 & n.9, available at
http://www.acluga.org/briefs/ssn/SSNotoVoteOrder.pdf.
98 Report at 21.
99 Remarks of Pete Monaghan, Director of Information Exchange and Computer Matching of the Social Security
Administration, at the February 2004 meeting of the National Association of Secretaries of State.
100 Hearing, supra note 72.
101 Report at 12.

Ohio Election Reform Plan

Ohio Election Reform Plan
Bob Fertik
January 13, 2005

On January 12, 2005 Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell announced a plan to replace all of Ohio's voting systems with optical scan (optiscan) systems. Voters fill in circles on a pre-printed ballot like an SAT test, and the ballots are read by an optical scanner.

While optical scan systems are generally the most reliable (1) and cost-effective automated voting systems (2), Secretary Blackwell made a crucial mistake when he selected two vendors - Diebold and ES&S - with strong conservative Republican ties.

Democratic voters have absolutely no reason to blindly trust a system operated by Diebold and ES&S under the supervision of Ken Blackwell. Blackwell was outrageously partisan before the election, when he rejected voter registrations from newspaper forms and rejected provisional ballots cast at the wrong table or precinct. He was outrageously partisan after the election when he  refused to testify under oath in Moss v. Bush or to respond to Rep. John Conyers' 102-page report on Ohio election problems.

If Ohio wants to switch to optical scan systems, there are other vendors to choose from. But before Ohio selects any vendors, it must adopt a set of standards to ensure honest and transparent elections. It must then evaluate each vendor and product against those standards.

Moreover, Ohio needs to adopt a set of procedures for handling optical scanners before, during, and after each election.

The following is a suggested set of standards. A complete set of standards should be produced by experts in election systems.

Machine standards:

  • Open source software
  • No external ports or plug-in cards (so software and results cannot be altered)
  • No clock (so the machine cannot behave differently on Election Day)
  • Blind programming of each election (so the machine does not know which candidates are Republicans or Democrats)
  • No vendor participation required for election or recount
  • Software access secure and logged
  • Secure box protects scanner from tampering
  • Scanned ballots are stored in secure box with scanner

Vendor standards:

  • Background checks on all staff
  • Ban on convicted criminals (see the Diebold rap sheet: http://blog.democrats.com/Diebold) - perhaps must pass test for Notary Public
  • Prohibition on owner, management, or staff engagement in politics
  • Requirement to maintain and publish reports of all problems (like drug companies and aircraft manufacturers) and to fix them

Election Board procedures:

  • Secure storage of all machines in locked rooms with motion detector alarms; all violations must be reported to the Secretary of State
  • Public notice of all technical maintenance, with full public supervision and written description of work to be done (in advance) and work performed (afterwards) with sworn signature of technician
  • No vendor participation permitted for election or recount; routine maintenance by bi-partisan staff only
  • At election time, representatives of all parties witness secure retrieval and storage of machines
  • Pre-election machine accuracy tests in public with layperson's explanation
  • All problems should be reported to the vendor and the Secretary of State
  • Staff must be certified in all procedures by the Secretary of State and not reliant on vendors

Election Certification procedures:

  • Total ballots counted must be compared to total voters
  • Post-election machine accuracy tests in public with layperson's explanation
  • Manual recount of the top-line (or perhaps closest) campaign in a few precincts chosen (a) at random plus (b) by all parties
  • If any discrepancy is found, another group of precincts should be chosen for manual count
  • If a second discrepancy is found, then a county-wide manual recount would be required
  • Certification must be signed by county election supervisors certifying compliance with all procedures under penalty of law

Recount procedures:

  • Scanners and ballots should be stored in secure room with motion detectors
  • Recount parties should have supervised access to maintenance logs, security logs, ballots, and voter sign-ins
  • Sample precincts should be chosen through a combination of both truly random and party-selected
  • Strict rules for going from sample recount to full recount
  • Strict schedule must comply with Electoral College schedule
  • Court-appointed Special Master must supervise and certify recount

(1) Optical scan systems with precinct tabulators have the lowest error rates (overvotes and undervotes), compared with touchscreen, punchcard, or lever systems. That's because the tabulators can check the ballots for overvotes (which would invalidate the ballot), and give the voter the opportunity to fix the mistake. Optical scan systems with county tabulators have among the highest error rates.

(2) There is a strong case for non-automated voting systems, i.e. paper ballots. Much of the plan described above is focused on making the scanners tamper-proof; all of those elements are unnecessary with paper ballots. The principal objection to paper ballots is the time and tedium of counting them, especially when there are a large number of races to be counted. However, a typical precinct handles under 1,000 votes, so a team of volunteers can conduct the count fairly quickly. Everyone is too tired on Election Night to conduct a tedious count; but if elections were held on Saturdays, the counting could be done on Sundays. And if we built bi-partisan volunteer counts into our election system, we might change the whole "red-blue" adversarial climate into a "purple" climate of civic cooperation.

Reject Ohio's Fraudulent Electors on January 6

On January 6 2001, Congress will decide whether to accept Ohio's 20 fraudulent Electors for Bush.

Members of the House of Representatives are expected to protest these Electors. For a formal Congressional challenge, we need Just One Senator to join them. We need your help!

At 9 a.m., protest at the FBI to demand an intensive investigation of vote rigging and vote suppression in Ohio, Florida and other states.

At 10 a.m., Rev. Jesse Jackson, David Cobb, and Others Lead D.C. Rally for Investigation into Vote Suppression in Lafayette Park, across from the White House (16th & H St., NW)

At noon, ReDefeatBush.com is planning a big protest in the Upper Senate Park.

Let's emulate the heroic Ukrainian people and turn out en masse to reject another stolen election!

Just One Senator!

Just One Senator!

On January 6 2001, 14 Representatives led by the Congressional Black Caucus filed written motions (prepared by Democrats.com) challenging Florida's Bush Electors, a scene made famous at the beginning of Fahrenheit 9-11. But no Senators were willing to join them, so there was no debate.

Activists must begin lobbying their Senators now to support a challenge to Bush's Ohio Electors on January 6. Click here to eFAX 20 targeted Senators.

You can also write your own letter, using these sample letters.

Below is a list of likely Senators, along with the groups who are lobbying them and any statements they have made. Democratic Underground, the Coalition Against Election Fraud, No Stolen Elections/United Progressives for Democracy, thedeanpeople, and Progressive Democrats of America are also organizing a state-by-state lobbying effort.

AZ: John McCain (R)

AR: Blanche Lincoln (D) - hiding behind GAO investigation bull****

From: Correspondence_Reply@lincoln.senate.gov
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004

As you know, a request was recently made by several members of the U.S. House of Representatives for the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to undertake an investigation of the efficacy of voting machines and new technologies used in the 2004 election. Furthermore, it requested an inquiry into how election officials responded to difficulties they encountered as well as what we can do in the future to improve our election systems and administration.

I am concerned by many of the reports included in the request which cited numerous problems with electronic voting machines, lost votes, and excessively long lines at polling places. In this modern, computerized age, there is absolutely no excuse for database errors, lack of polling-place education and training, and equipment malfunctions that resulted in throwing out tens of thousands of legally-cast ballots around the country.

The right to vote freely is the foundation of democracy and we must do all we can to ensure every vote is counted and recorded accurately. That is why I recently helped introduce the Restore Elector Confidence in Our Representative Democracy (RECORD) Act, S. 2313. This Act contains a provision to strengthen security measures for electronic voting devices to prevent outside tampering and requires a paper printout of votes cast at electronic voting machines. This printout will permit a voter to verify the accuracy of his or her ballot before it is cast and would require the voting system to preserve the paper printout of the voter's ballot as the individual permanent paper record. This printout would be preserved at the polling site for use in any audits and recounts.

Like you, I believe voters must have faith in the electoral process for our democracy to succeed. You can be certain that I will monitor the GAO investigation and will continue to support efforts to ensure faith and integrity in our voting systems.

AR: Mark Pryor (D)

CA: Barbara Boxer (D) - Contest The Vote

1/3/05 UPI

A spokesman for Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., meanwhile, said the office had received a number of petitions Monday but would not comment on how Boxer intended to vote on the certification.

CO: Ken Salazar (D)

CT: Chris Dodd (D)

CT: Joe Lieberman (D)

DE: Joe Biden (D)

DE: Tom Carper (D)

FL: Bill Nelson (D)

1/03 BlueLemur

Nelson’s press office, however, says the senator has decided against joining a congressional challenge absent conclusive evidence “to warrant overturning the results.”

“Senator Nelson believes valid concerns have been raised about the conduct of the election, but that no conclusive evidence has been presented to warrant overturning the results,” Nelson press office spokesperson Nicole Berckes told RAW STORY in an email. “Absent such evidence, Senator Nelson doesn’t at this time feel he can support a congressional challenge.”

“Meantime, he’s awaiting the findings by several government agencies that are investigating allegations of voter irregularities,” she added. “And in the upcoming session of Congress, he intends to file legislation to further improve our election process.”

HI: Dan Akaka (D)

HI: Daniel Inouye (D)

IA: Charles Grassley (R)

IA: Tom Harkin (D)

IL: Richard Durbin (D)

1/3/05 UPI

In response to an e-mail message from a friend involved in the recount movement, Durbin thanked him for his interest but wrote that with the Ohio vote certified, "It is clear that Sen. Kerry was correct in announcing his concession on November 3rd."

"The basic test hasn't been met," said spokesman Joe Shomaker. "There is no compelling evidence of massive voter fraud." He added that Durbin is a strong proponent of electoral reform and supports abolishing the Electoral College but said that "tilting at the windmills" about November's outcome would not help his credibility on the issue.

No amount of petitions, faxes or phone calls would likely change Durbin's stance, he said.

IL: Barack Obama (D)

1/5 Washington Times

Mr. Obama said his staff is reviewing the Ohio resolution, but said he has not decided whether he will sign it. "The election is over and President Bush won fair and square, so I don't think we need to challenge the election, but we continue to have chronic problems in our voting system," he said. "Some of the practices in Ohio were clearly illegal and disenfranchised voters and, let's be real about this, some Republicans were denied their rights to vote as well."

IN: Evan Bayh (D)

IN: Richard Lugar (R)

LA: Mary Landrieu (D)

MA: Ted Kennedy (D)

MA: John Kerry (D) - Coalition Against Election Fraud - MIA

1/4/05 Kerry's two-week overseas trip, which includes stops in war-ravaged Iraq, conveniently allows the defeated Democrat nominee to avoid a potentially awkward moment on the House floor as congressmen vote to certify election results.

``(Kerry) wants to personally thank our troops for their service, focus on the steps that must be taken to achieve success in Iraq and hear from experts in the region,'' Kerry spokeswoman April Boyd said.

``While he conceded the election on Nov. 3, he is still very passionate about having every vote count,'' Boyd said.

MD: Barbara Mikulski (D)

MD: Paul Sarbanes (D)

ME: Susan Collins (R)

ME: Olympia Snowe (R)

MI: Carl Levin (D)

1/5 Oakland Press: Levin representative Vicki Selva said she could not speak for the senator's position on the issue, but said he is familiar with information about irregularities "and is open to any information or accounts or evidence." She said Levin and other senators face legal and other parameters in opposing the certification of electoral votes.

MI: Debbie Stabenow (D)

MN: Mark Dayton (D)

11/9 The election is over, and the voters have spoken. President Bush won a second term conclusively, albeit by a narrow margin of 51% to 48%.

While at Yale, Dayton was a fraternity brother of Bush at Delta Kappa Epsilon, where Bush was President.

MT: Max Baucus (D)

ND: Kent Conrad (D)

ND: Byron Dorgan (D)

NE: Chuck Hagel (R)

NE: Ben Nelson (D)

NJ: Jon Corzine (D) - thedeanpeople - met with staff on Dec. 23

NJ: Frank Lautenberg (D) - thedeanpeople - met with staff on Dec. 23

NM: Jeff Bingaman (D) - no

1/5 ABQJournal: "Sen. Kerry conceded the election on Nov. 3 and does not support Rep. Conyers' effort. I will follow his lead," Bingaman said. "But I do believe it is imperative to thoroughly review election practices in all 50 states to determine how to improve election laws and ensure that all eligible voters are able to cast ballots and that every vote is counted."

NV: Harry Reid (D)

NY: Hillary Clinton (D)

NY: Chuck Schumer (D)

OR: Ron Wyden (D) - Oregon Clean Vote - met with staff

RI: Lincoln Chafee (R)

RI: Jack Reed (D)

SD: Tim Johnson (D)

VT: Jim Jeffords (I) - Vermonters for Voting Integrity - no

1/4/05 I am deeply concerned about reported irregularities and flaws in the 2004 election, and I fully support efforts to find out what went wrong and make it right. A challenge to the Ohio Electors will not fix the problems at hand. We know that such a challenge will not affect the outcome of the election, and I fear it will only further polarize our political landscape. John Kerry has conceded this election, and we must now move forward in a constructive way. I believe the investigation by the non-partisan Goverment Accountability Office will provide needed answers.

In Congress, I will work to reform and clarify existing law, and push for the creation of a paper trail for electronic voting and a national standard for provisional ballots. These reforms are needed to assure that these problems are not repeated in future elections. People must have the utmost confidence that their votes will be counted.

VT: Pat Leahy (D) - Vermonters for Voting Integrity - no

1/05 Letter to constituents:

While I share in the disappointment of many with the results of this election, I was pleased to see such a high number of Americans turn out to vote. Since Senator John Kerry has conceded, I have no intention of contesting the results of the election. That being said, the U.S. Government Accountability Office is conducting a thorough investigation of all allegations concerning voter rolls and registrations, fraud, and election concerns, and I will certainly continue to pay close attention to this important issue.

Many Vermonters, after seeing Michael Moore's movie,  "Fahrenheit 9/11," contacted me raising questions and concerns  about the 12 members of the Congressional Black Caucus who  voiced their opposition to Florida's electors at the Joint Session of Congress convened for the ceremonial reading of the electoral votes. Several key events preceded the January 6, 2001 Joint Session of Congress, including: (1) the U.S. Supreme Court had ended the vote-counting in Florida with its decision in the case of Bush v. Gore, (2) the Electoral College had cast its votes, and (3) the Democratic candidate, Al Gore, had conceded. For an objection to be heard during this process, federal law states that the objection must be in writing and must be signed by at least one Senator and one Representative. Then-Vice President Gore met with the Congressional Black Caucus before January 6 and asked that they not object, telling its members that, had the objection been accepted, it merely would have opened the floor for debate and would not have altered the outcome. Problems with the election had already been debated for months and the decision had already been made, meaning that additional debate would not have changed the outcome of the election.

WA: Maria Cantwell (D)

WA: Patty Murray (D)

WI: Russ Feingold (D)

WI: Herb Kohl (D)

WV: Robert Byrd (D)

WV: Jay Rockefeller (D)

Sample letters

Dear Senator X,

The ideal of one person, one vote and that everyone’s vote is counted has been deeply cherished in the United States of America since the Anti-Slavery Movement, the Women’s Suffrage Movement, the Civil Rights Movement and the expansion of voting to young people.  The 2000 and 2004 presidential elections have made it clear that this precious cornerstone of American democracy has been destroyed. 

We the undersigned, respectfully request that you take action as a Senator to recognize that the November 2, 2004 presidential election was fraught with voting violations, misconduct of some highly placed election officials, tampering, voter suppression, interference targeted at communities of people of color, students, and low-income people – all of which has raised suspicions in many minds that this was not a free, fair and honest election.

Given the widespread use of electronic voting machines, which are especially liable to malfunction and fraud and leave no trace of how they work nor what data they receive, it is not possible to perform recounts in many states.  Hundreds of stories on malfunctions of electronic voting machines and central tabulation machines are appearing in regional news media. 

Papers and sworn testimonies by experts state that the chances of the exit polls giving such  divergent results from the official tallies are almost a statistical impossibility. Nor is it statistically conceivable that practically all the reported malfunctions and errors would give the advantage to the same candidate.  Furthermore, statistical analysis reveals that even the popular vote victory may turn out to be false.

To preserve democracy in the United States of America, we ask that you be open to the concerns of large numbers of Americans.  Almost 57,000 complaints have thus far been filed about this election process.  Recounts are being demanded in several states. In the critical states of Ohio and Florida, hard evidence of improprieties is accumulating daily, almost always in the same direction and substantial enough to be outcome-determinative.

In Ohio, Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, who is avowedly partisan as the Co-Chair for the Bush/Cheney campaign, has used his official powers illegally to hinder the recount process in Ohio in many ways.  He has also refused to cooperate with the Democratic Party members of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee in its hearing headed by Representative Conyers. One example of many equally egregious problems in the Ohio election was a severe shortage of voting machines in precincts of people of color and students at colleges, leading to waits of up to 10 hours for voters to cast their ballot.

We call on you to review the evidence. We are asking you to be our voice.  We think this is crucial for the future of democracy and this country and we hope you will respond to our plea. 

We are keenly aware that no Senator was willing to stand with the Representatives of the Congressional Black Caucus in their challenge to the presidential election of 2000.  In 2004 the evidence of fraud is systemic, stronger, more widespread and believed by millions of Americans.  We urge you to be courageous by taking leadership and refusing to certify the results of the presidential election of 2004.  We also urge you to voice open support for any formal objections from the House of Representatives and to sign with them if any House members challenge the 2004 presidential election.

Sheila Parks

Dear Senator X,

The most important stories are being ignored by the mainstream media and the silence is, frankly, deafening. A good place to start is http://www.truthinvoting.org/Articles.htm and also our home page links (left margin) at http://www.truthinvoting.org.
We feel that Senator Wyden and staff should at least be aware of the following before the January 6th session:

1. Exit polls in the U.S. showed Kerry winning the election-- we in the U.S. have just as much reason to contest the Nov 2nd election as the Ukranians had to contest their election. See http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/112204MargieBurns.shtml and http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm

2. The chance that the exit polls randomly diverging from reported results in PA, FL and OH is only 1 in 250 million (see Dr. Freeman article in left margin of http://www.truthinvoting.org under "Exit Poll Research"). The actual causes, which are almost certainly non-random, are most likely vote fraud and/or election rigging-- an immediate investigation is definitely warranted. One of Oregon's own scholars, Richard Hayes Phillips offers his analysis/testimony at : http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/WO0412/S00167.htm

3. Triad systems appears to have rigged the Ohio recount with "cheat sheets". http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121604Z.shtml "The Triad Systems representative suggested that since the hand count had to match the machine count exactly, and since it would be hard to memorize the several numbers which would be needed to get the count to come out exactly right, that they should post this series of numbers on the wall where they would not be noticed by observers. He suggested making them look like employee information or something similar. The people doing the hand count could then just report these numbers no matter what the actual count of the ballots revealed. This would then "match" the tabulator report for this precinct exactly. The numbers were apparently the final certified counts for the selected precinct. "

4. The widespread suppression of the black vote in Cleveland and other predominantly black areas in Ohio was criminal and should not be allowed to stand. It seems clear that the imbalanced misallocation of voting machines between Republican and Democratic precincts was designed to suppress black voting. This racist policy must be exposed and corrected immediately, not two years or four years or six years hence.

5. The affidavit of Clinton Curtis, a programmer in Florida, provides shocking indications that electronic vote machine rigging may have been going on since 2000. Congressman Feeney (Jeb Bush's running mate from the 90's) is implicated. This story deserves far, far more attention than it's been getting. From Feeney's hometown paper: http://www.seminolechronicle.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/12/16/41c2fdb042ea1

All of this and more suggests that there are overwhelming problems with the 2004 election and that it's not at all unreasonable to suppose that Kerry may have been the real winner, just as Al Gore was in the 2000 election. We do not wish to wait another 4 years to get another chance at a fair election. We request that the 2004 election be repaired or repeated immediately. We, in the U.S., deserve fair elections just as much as the people of the Ukraine.

Sincerely,

[TruthInVoting]

Dear Senator X,

On January 6, 2005 a joint session of Congress will be held in which you will be called upon to vote to certify the 2004 Presidential Election.

Please, please, do NOT vote to certify that election. It was stolen from the American people. The evidence of electoral fraud is overwhelming, specific, and widespread. It is not a scheme cooked up by "sore losers" or the feverish imaginings of paranoid "conspiracy theorists." The vote rigging, voter suppression, and discriminatory, predatory chicanery was very real, and it almost certainly did turn the election in favor of Bush and Cheney, and most likely worked in favor also of dozens of other Republican candidates whose chances of winning in a fair election would have been slim.

The case for election-turning fraud is best established in Ohio, where it has been set on a sound legal footing by an impressive team of pro bono lawyers, Cliff Arnebeck and Susan Truitt among them, wholehearted grassroots progressives, fighting for Ohioans, civil rights, and genuine American interests. The case Moss v. Bush was filed in Federal Court on Dec. 13. The widespread evidence for fraud has been gathered by the courageous and inspiring efforts of everyday Ohioans, and volunteers from other states, for the last six weeks. They have struggled to find justice for the outrages they have suffered before, on, and after election day. Some of them have suffered violence and intimidation (like being run off the road in the dark of night, and having their tires slashed) because they have tried to see a legitimately called statewide recount through to completion.

But the fraud was not limited to Ohio. In all likelihood it spread across the country, wherever local party members involved in elections at precinct or county levels, acting either independently, or in small or larger groups of knowing participants, were willing to cooperate with election systems technicians who had both party and profit motives to rig machines to favor Republican candidates, and principally George Bush.

It is a fact that 80% of the votes cast on 11/2/04 were counted by machines from the two largest vendors, ES&S and Diebold, both of which have very deep and publically documented connections with the the GOP. 80%! Now that is FAR in excess of the margin of difference in nearly every race in this country. Can we really be expected to trust the results of such election?

I am asking you, as one of many thousands, perhaps millions, of Americans, DO NOT trust this election. Please make this courageous and patriotic stand on behalf of democracy and transparent government in the nation. Vote AGAINST certifying the presidential election results on January 6, 2005.

Then, when the uproar settles and the Senate convenes to regroup around this new political reality, a true setback to the rutting, rampaging elephant that is set to stampede through the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Social Security, the US tax code, and public legal protections (so-called "tort reform"), then you can hold your head high, march straight down those Capitol steps, and stand at the microphone before the crowd that has promised to be there on that day.

Tell them that you just bravely stood up for free and fair elections in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Tell them that you for one won't stand by any longer as Americans of color, as young Americans, as lower and middle class Americans of all ethnicities and backgrounds, get their basic civil rights and even international treaty rights for a fair election trampled on by partisan hacks and corrupt politicians.

Tell them that you for one, even if your party will not, are standing up and speaking out in defense of American democracy, of the principle that America is governed by the people, not by corrupt "leaders" usurping power through sham legal decisions (Florida 2000) and through outright fraud and election theft (Ohio 2004).

Then tell them that you will lead the charge to take back elections from the private corporations. That our citizenship will not be outsourced and digitized in the name of convenience and ease of counting, and so that corporations can profit from our electoral system while they jerryrig their systems to install candidates in office who will support their anti-social and destructive policies of world pillage and private greed.

Tell the Senate NO, you will not certify this sham "election" for George W. Bush, and tell the people YES, you will stand up for democracy in 2005.

Your country needs you. Will you accept the call?

An optimistic fellow American,
Matthew Fox, Ph.D.
Princeton, NJ

Dear Senator X,

Honorable Senators and Representatives of Congress,

History will judge you by your actions, or lack of action on January 6th, 2005...

On that fateful day, I and millions of other patriotic Americans urge you to stand up and do the right thing.

Stand up for Democracy for all parties and for all voters, each of us citizens of this great country. It is our Constitutional Right to Vote, and to have our vote count. And it became your sworn duty to uphold and insure that right, when you took your oath of office:

"I, [name], do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

You know as well as I do that there were numerous and unprecedented voting irregularities on November 2, and since then during the recounts. (If you didn't know, visit http://miamedia.com/votergate to read what the media is saying and the research has unearthed.)

Millions of tax-paying, loyal, voting Americans are counting on you to do the right thing, and thoroughly investigate the Nov 2 vote, so we will have in our voting system, and our elected officials. And I do mean you.

We call on you and beseech you to do your sworn duty to the American People:

  • Ferret out every voting irregularity, failure, mistake, inconsistency that made the Nov 2 election the most notorious one in recent history.
  • Find and prosecute any illegal acts, no matter where that may lead.
  • If you are not certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that the official vote tallies for President and for others on November 2 were accurate, then you must challenge the Electoral Tally on January 6, 2005 and call for a full investigation.
  • Then, work to fix the problems in our election system that led to the Nov 2 voting fiasco.

The famous words that Thomas Paine uttered 200 years ago still ring true:

"The right of voting for representatives is the primary right by which all other rights are protected. To take away this right is to reduce a man to slavery. . ."

Will you kowtow to what expediency would have you do, or will you prove to yourself, your family, and your grand children that you are a person of backbone and character like Thomas Paine? Will you go down in history as a Statesman who is admired because you did the right thing when your country called on you, when the people who elected you to office depended on you?

Follow your heart and your conscience.

Stand up for Democracy on January 6, 2005. Challenge and investigate the Nov 2 vote.

Yours sincerely,
Glenn Sanders
December 31, 2004
The Votergate Resource Center
http://miamedia.com/news/2004-12-31.open.letter.congress.html

Press Conference Wednesday, Jan. 5th 2:00 P.M.

Press Conference Wednesday, Jan. 5th 2:00 P.M.
National Press Club, Washington, D.C.

Ilene PRoctor
International Public Relations
Press Contact:
Ilene Proctor (310) 271 5857 or (310) 721-2336
Kat L’Estrange (541) 510-5646

BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, BUSH DID NOT WIN THE OHIO OR NATIONAL VOTE.
HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL CHALLENGE.
PRESS CONFERENCE, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, WASHINGTON, D.C.
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 5TH AT 2:00 PM

WHO:
Lead plaintiff, Moss v. Bush, Rev. Bill Moss
Lead trial counsel, Peter Peckarsky
Professor and statistical expert, Ron Baiman, Ph.D.
Publisher and lawyer, Bob Fitrakis
Lawyer, Susan Truitt
Exit polling expert, Jonathan Simon, JD
Senior editor, freepress.org. Harvey Wasserman
Legal statistician, Richard Hayes-Phillips, Ph.D
Director, Progressive Democrats of America, Tim Carpenter
NAACP, National Voter Fund, Greg Moore
Author Warren Linney, MA (The Patriot Test)

WHAT:  
• Exit polls did not match the reported vote in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and 7 of 8 other  key battleground states
• Voting machines with secret software owned by private, partisan companies subject to  manipulation and which deprived citizens of their right to fair and transparent elections
• Uncounted and provisional ballots negatively and disproportionately affected African American voters 
• Inexplicable vote disparities
• Voting Rights Act Violations
• Recount did not recount all the votes
• Challenge at January 6 Joint Session of Congress

WHY: 
TO PROVIDE FULL BACKGROUND ON KEY ASSERTIONS PRIOR TO THE HISTORIC CONGRESSIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE 2004 VOTE

PARTIAL LIST OF EVIDENCE:
There is clear and compelling evidence that the election was stolen. By examining a very wide range of sworn testimonies from voters, polling officials and others close to the administration of the Nov. 2 election; by statistical analysis of the certified vote by mathematicians, election experts and independent research teams who have conducted detailed studies of the results in Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, and elsewhere; from experts who studied the voting machines, tabulators and other electronic equipment on which a fair vote count has depended; and from a team of attorneys and others who have challenged the Ohio results; the freepress.org investigative team has compiled a portrait  of an election whose true outcome must be investigated further by the Congress, the media and all Americans -- because it was almost certainly not an honest victory for George W. Bush.

Crucial flaws in the national vote count, most importantly in the national popular vote, and in Ohio and Florida indicate John Kerry was the actual winner on November 2, as reported in national exit polls. At the very least, the widespread tampering with how the election was conducted, and how Ohio's votes were counted and re-counted, has compromised this nation's historic commitment to free and fair elections.

George W. Bush's ‘victory' appears to have resulted from multiple frauds – a GOP ‘do-whatever it takes'  strategy to win the state that swung the election.

The questionable votes far exceed Bush's margin of victory in Ohio.

The Bush-Cheney ‘do what ever it takes" strategy in Ohio covered a very wide range of tactics, from disenfranchisement of minority voters to discarding of ballots to tampered tabulators and much more. Taken as a whole, this compendium of error, fraud, cover-up and contempt indicates that this was not a legitimate election, and is not worthy of being certified by the Congress of the United States.

Thirty disenfranchised voters on the Freedom Winter bus ride from Columbus, Ohio to Washington, D.C. will be present to share their voting horror stories with the media.

WHERE:
National Press Club
Zenger Room
529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor
Washington, DC 20045
202.662.7500

SPONSORED BY: Free Press, _www.freepress.org_ (http://www.freepress.org/) Citizens Alliance for Secure Elections, _www.caseohio.org_ (http://www.caseohio.org/) Progressive Democrats of America, _www.pdamerica.org_ (http://www.pdamerica.org/) We Do Not Concede _www.donotconcede.com_ (http://www.donotconcede.com/)

Republican Dirty Tricks

Republicans don't win elections - they steal them. Sometimes they even admit it!

Rush Limbaugh 9/19/06:

you take a look at the average Democrat voter registration drive, you can take for every hundred thousand voters they register, the cumulative IQ would probably be less than a pencil eraser. So when it comes time for the election, half of them can be fooled in saying, "No, it’s not Election Day. It’s tomorrow, Wednesday." And they show up on Wednesday to vote when the polls are closed, and the Democrats claim a trick has been played on them. That’s how stupid some of their voters are...

You think I’m lying? That happened. Republicans did a dirty trick and sent a flier out a week early and said due to unfortunate circumstances, certain precincts, Election Day will be held on Wednesday, blah, blah, blah, blah. Democrats heard about it, this is such a dirty trick. They were worried because they knew it would work, because half their voters are stupid idiots! They have to be when you look at the way they vote.

.

Voter Registration Scams

* In 2000, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris purged 57,700 eligible voters through fraudulent use of "felon" lists - enough to steal the Presidency for George W. Bush.

* In 2004, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell refused to process voter registration forms printed in major newspapers because the paper was too thin. At least 308,000 voters were purged in Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Toledo alone.

* In 2004, a Republican firm called Sproul & Associates paid canvassers to register new voters - and illegally threw away the Democratic forms. (In 2006, a Republican firm called California Grassroots Mobilization was caught filing fraudulent Republican voter registrations.)

* In early 2006, Los Angeles County threw out 43% of voter registration applications because of computer glitches, slight discrepancies in spelling, or missing ID numbers.

Because of Republican efforts to erect barriers to voting, all states now require an ID number on each new registration, such as a drivers license or social security number. If you write that number incorrectly, or if the name on your voter registration form does not match your ID exactly, your registration will be rejected.

More and more voters are going to the polls on Election Day only to discover that their names were removed from the voter lists and they cannot vote.

Voting Machines

Diebold

Diebold employed 5 convicted felons as senior managers and developers to help write the central compiler computer code
that counted 50% of the votes in 30 states. http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,61640,00.html

Jeff Dean, Diebold's Senior Vice-President and senior programmer on Diebold's central compiler code, was convicted of 23 counts of felony theft in the first degree. http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

Diebold Senior Vice-President Jeff Dean was convicted of planting back doors in his software and using a "high degree of
sophistication" to evade detection over a period of 2 years. http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

During the Ohio recount in 2004, Catherine Buchanan says she was told Diebold reprogrammed voting machines while present at her local Board of Elections. "They told us that Diebolt [sic] was coming to reprogram the computer, which doesn't make any sense. I mean, if you're going to calibrate a machine, you calibrate it before you're going to do testing to make sure it's going to be okay," Buchanan asserts.

ES&S

Tom Eschenberger, vice president of ES&S, was fingered by charges of bribery and kickbacks.

Sequoia

Phil Foster and Pasquale Ricci of Sequoia were indicted for paying a large bribe to the Louisiana Commissioner of Elections.

The owner of this same company once tried to bribe a sitting Supreme Court justice.

Sequoia has even been linked to one member of the Gambino crime family.

Fight the Media

Democrats.com MediaWatch
Challenge Pro-Republican Media Bias!

The corporate media favor Bush and the right wing, and work against liberals and Democrats. Endless unfair media attacks against the Clintons, President Elect Gore and now Sen. Kerry bias the political process. We don't have to take it any more, but media bias won't fix itself. We must fight back. You can help.

Join the media watchdog team at one of three levels:

1. Rapid Responder - Demand fair(er) media coverage. Even if you don't have a lot of time to spare, join the Rapid Response team. We'll send you Action Items describing media bias with contact information so you can call, fax, and email to demand fair(er) coverage.

2. Media Watch Dog - Help expose and oppose media bias. If you have a few free hours a week join the Media Watch Group(s) for the outlets you know best (see below). Then submit Action Items to your group(s) for distribution to the rapid responder team.

3. Media Watch Leader - Take Charge at the highest level of Media Watch. If you have a free hour every other day you can apply to join the Leadership Team. Tell us why you want to help lead our efforts against media bias, your experience and other relevant information. We'll consider your application promptly. If accepted, you'll become a leader in the fight against media bias by moderating the groups, formulating and distributing Action Items, and more!

MediaWatch is focused like a laser-beam on one task: leading "rapid response" efforts exposing and opposing media bias against Democrats. We have immediate and significant impact holding the media accountable through specific actions, not discussions. We maintain high standards for quality and accuracy as we expose and document right wing media bias, act directly against media bias, and maintain pressure to end anti-Democratic bias.

Join the Rapid Response team to start. Help out more by joining the Media Watch Main organizational group and the group(s) monitoring your primary news source(s), the ones you know best. Apply to join the Leadership Team and help moderate the groups, direct our organization and more. Sign up for the Media Bias MeetUp. Fight media bias.

Sign Up for Media Watch Group(s)ABC Broadcast
AOL / Time not CNN
Associated Press Service
CBS Broadcast
Cable News Network
CSPAN - I II III radio etc.
ClearChannel Radio
Dallas Morn. News / Belo
FOX Broadcast / Cable
Gannett / USA Today
Hearst / SF Chronicle
Hollinger News Empire
Knight Ridder Service
Los Angeles TimesLocal and Weekly Papers
Local TV Broadcast / Cable
MSNBC, CNBC & MSN online
Moon's UPI, Wash. Times etc.
Murdoch's NY Post etc.
NBC Broadcast
NY Times / Boston Globe
Newsweek Magazine
Public Broadcasting & NPR
The Washington Post
US News & World Report
Wall Street Journal

Organizational Group
Discussion Group

Who Owns the Media?
Adbusters | LiberalSlant | MediaChannel | The Nation

Contact Information: Print and Television

ABC - News | Good Morning America | World News Tonight
Nightline | 20/20 | 20/20 Downtown | Primetime
World News Now | Weekend News | This Week
Other | Website | Individual Contacts
Main Phone: (212) 456-1000 | Fax: (212) 456-5962
D.C. Bureau phone: 202-222-7777
ABC World News Tonight phone: 212-456-4040
Nightline phone: 202-222-7000
147 Columbus Ave New York, NY 10023
47 W. 66 St., New York, NY 10023

Associated Press - Phone: 212-621-1500 | Fax: 212-621-7523
D.C. Bureau phone: 202-776-9400
50 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020

Arizona Republic - Web Form | E-mail | Website | Individual Contacts
Phone: (602) 444-8000 | Fax: (602) 444-8933
200 E Van Buren St Phoenix, AZ 85004-2238
Atlanta Journal-Const. - Web Form | E-mail | Website | Individual Contacts
Phone: (404) 526-5151 | Fax: (404) 526-5610
72 Marietta St NW Atlanta, GA 30303
Baltimore Sun - Web Form | Email | Website | Individual Contacts
Phone: (410) 332-6000 | Fax: (410) 752-6049
501 N Calvert St Baltimore, MD 21202-3604
Boston Globe - Web Form | Email | Website | Individual Contacts
Ombudsman: Christine Chinlund Phone: 617-929-3020 / 3022
Phone: (617) 929-2000 | Fax: (617) 929-2098
135 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125

Boston Herald - Web Form | Email | Website | Individual Contacts
Phone: (617) 426-3000 | Fax: (617) 619-6450
300 Harrison Ave Boston, MA 02118

C-SPAN - (202) 737-3220 | Viewer Services: (765) 464-3080
Washington Journal: Democrats (202) 585-3881
Email Washington Journal: Guest | Producers
booktv@c-span.org | booknotes@c-span.org
C-Span radio | General: viewer@c-span.org

CBS - CBS Evening News | The Early Show | 60 Minutes II
48 Hours | Face The Nation |
CBS News Phone: 212-975-4321 | Fax: 212-975-1893
D.C. Bureau phone: 202-457-4385
CBS Evening News with Dan Rather:
Phone: 212-975-3691 or 202-457-4385 | Fax: 212-975-1893
The Early Show: Phone: 212-975-2824
Fax: 212-975-7133 or 212-975-2033
60 Minutes: Phone: 212-975-2006 | Fax: 212-757-6975
555 W. 57th St., New York, NY 10019-2985
60 Minutes II: Phone: 212-975-6200
524 W. 57 St., New York, NY 10019
Chicago Sun Times - letters@suntimes.com
Chicago Tribune - ctc-TribLetter@Tribune.com
Cleveland Plain Dealer - Dealerletters@plaind.com
CNBC - General Information
Phone: (201) 585-2622 | Fax: (201) 583-5453
2200 Fletcher Ave. Fort Lee, NJ 07024
CNN - General Feedback
Phone: 404-827-1500 | Fax: 404-827-1906
One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
CNN Washington Bureau
820 First St. N.E., Washington, DC 20002
Phone: 202-898-7900 | Fax: 202-898-7923
Crossfire Phone: 202-898-7655 | Fax: 202-898-7611
Larry King Live Phone: 202-898-7690 | Fax: 202-898-7686
Dallas Morning News - letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com
Detroit Free Press - letters@freepress.com
FOX News - Comments | Special Report with Brit Hume
FOX Report with Shepard Smith | O'Reilly Factor
Hannity & Colmes | On the Record with Greta
Phone: (212) 301-3000 | Fax: (212) 301-4229
Email: comments@foxnews.com
1211 Ave. of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
Houston Chronicle - viewpoints@chron.com
Los Angeles Times - letters@latimes.com
Phone: 800-528-4637 or 213-237-5000 | Fax: 213-237-4712
202 West First Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Miami Herald - HeraldEd@herald.com
MSNBC - World | Hardball with Chris Matthews | MSNBC Reports
Phone: (201) 583-5000 | Fax: (201) 583-5453
Email: world@msnbc.com
One MSNBC Plaza, Secaucus, NJ 07094
National Public Radio
All Things Considered | Morning Edition
Ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin | Talk Of The Nation
Phone: 202-513-2000 | Fax: 202-513-3329
635 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20001-3753
NBC - Nightly News with Tom Brokaw | NBC News' Today | Dateline NBC
Phone: 212-664-4444 | Fax: 212-664-4426
30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112
Washington Bureau Phone: 202-885-4200 | Fax: 202-362-2009
4001 Nebraska Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20016
NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw:
Phone: 212-664-4971 or 202-885-4259 | Fax: 202-362-2009
NBC News' Today: Phone: 212-664-4602 / 202-885-4231 | Fax: 212-664-4426
Dateline NBC: Phone: 212-664-7501 | Fax: 212-664-7864
New York Daily News - voicers@edit.nydailynews.com
New York Times - letters@nytimes.com
Phone: 212-556-1234 | Fax: 212-556-3690
D.C. Bureau phone: 202-862-0300
229 W. 43rd St., New York, NY 10036
Newark Star Ledger - http://penn.nj.com
Newsday - letters@newsday.com
Newsweek - Letters to the Editor
Phone: 212-445-4000 | Fax: 212-445-5068
251 W 57th Street, New York, NY 10019
PBS - Phone: 703-739-5000 | Fax: 703-739-8458
1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314
The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer: Phone: 703-998-2150
3620 South 27th St., Arlington, VA 22206
All Things Considered: Phone: 202-513-2110
Morning Edition: Phone: 202-513-2150 | Fax: 202-513-3329
Philadelphia Inquirer - editor@phillynews.com
San Diego Union-Tribune - letters@uniontrib.com
San Francisco Chronicle - letters@sfchronicle.com
San Jose Mercury - letters@sjmercury.com
Seattle Post-Intelligencer - editpage@seattlepi.com
Seattle Times - opinion@seattletimes.com
St. Louis Post-Dispatch - letters@post-dispatch.com
Time Magazine - Letters to the Editor
Phone: 212-522-1212 | Fax: 212-522-0323
Time & Life Bldg., Rockefeller Center, New York, NY 10020
U.S. News & World Report - Letters to the Editor
Phone: 202-955-2000 | Fax: 202-955-2049
1050 Thomas Jefferson St., Washington, DC 20007
USA Today - editor@usatoday.com
Phone: 800-872-0001 or 703-276-3651 | Fax: 703-247-3108
1000 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22229

Washington Post - letters@washpost.com | Ombudsman
Letter writing guidelines and individual writers' email
Phone: 202-334-6000 | Fax: 202-334-5269
1150 15th St., NW, Washington, DC 20071

More: CSPAN's List | NewsLink's List | CapWiz Look Up

Cable News

  CNN MSNBC FOX
6a John Roberts
Kiran Chetry
Joe Scarborough
Mika Brz
Dufuses
9a   Mika Brz  
4p Wolf Blitzer   Laura Ingraham
5p Wolf Blitzer    
6p     Brit Hume
7p      
8p Mrs. Dan Senor Keith Olbermann Bill O'Reilly
9p Larry King Dan Abrams Sean Hannity
Alan Colmes
10p Anderson Cooper    

Fox Advertisers

A. These customer-respecting advertisers stopped supporting Glenn Beck's hate speech.

Binder & Binder

  • 8/28/09 I fully agree with you concerning Glen Beck’s comments, and I have asked Fox News to remove our commercials from his program. Glen Beck’s comments have been so far off the wall, that it’s hard to think that anyone with any common sense would take them seriously. In fact, I wonder if he’s been drinking again. Here’s our problem. Our commercial buy on Fox News is contracted under a system called ROS – that’s run of schedule. What that means is we buy a certain number of commercials, and the network schedules them where they see fit. The big buck guys can afford to buy specific shows. We can’t. So, Fox may or may not honor my request to remove our spots from any particular program. If they don’t, I can of course, not renew at the end of our broadcast contract…but not before. As with any contract, one party can’t simply decide not to fulfill its obligations to the other. 

Clorox

  • 8/24/09 a former Beck advertiser, now says that "we do not want to be associated with inflammatory speech used by either liberal or conservative talk show hosts." The maker of bleach and household cleaners said in a statement that is has decided not to advertise on political talk shows.
  • "The Clorox Company remains committed to quality broadcasting. We pride ourselves in being a responsible advertiser and have established long-standing and strict standards for the selection of television programming. Per our standards, we do not advertise in programs that display exploitive sex or violence; treat ethnic, religious or political groups in a disparaging manner; present facts inaccurately or distort them to blatantly partisan advantage; and treat individuals or groups in a demeaning manner.
    Clorox holds true to our advertising standards and we hold true to our nation's heritage of free expression of political opinions. However, consistent with our standards, we do not want to be associated with inflammatory speech used by either liberal or conservative talk show hosts. After a comprehensive review of political talks shows across the spectrum, at this time we have made a decision not to advertise on political talk shows.
    Today's television programming environment is extremely challenging for responsible advertisers. However, The Clorox Company will continue to exercise special care in all program and station selection. We do not want to support programming that is in conflict with our programming standards."

Closing.com

  • 8/28/09 Our TV commercial on Fox News yesterday was purchased on a “run of schedule” rotation basis, which gives the network sole discretion for scheduling the time and day that the ad appears. We did not make the choice to sponsor any particular program, nor do we condone the views of any program host on any of the cable networks where we have purchased commercial air time. Fox News has agreed to place our advertising elsewhere in their rotation. 

CVS Caremark

  • 8/24/09 said it advertises on Fox but hadn't said anything about Beck. Now it has told its advertising agency to inform Fox that it wanted no commercials on Beck. "We support vigorous debate, especially around policy issues that affect millions of Americans, but we expect it to be informed, inclusive and respectful," said spokeswoman Carolyn Castel

Dannon

  • 8/31/09 I can assure you we share your concerns about the quality and appropriateness of programming. We do all that we can to ensure that it meets Dannon standards.
    As you may know, companies like Dannon typically purchase advertising "rotations" throughout a network's or station's scheduled programming.  And although we work diligently through our advertising agency to avoid inappropriate programming, on occasion our safeguards are inadequate.  For us, that is an indication that we must redouble our efforts in this regard, and we will.
    We are committed to participating in programs that reflect the high quality of our products.  That is our directive to our advertising agency, and it is not negotiable.
    Once again, thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts with us on this important matter.  You can be sure we value your comments and we hope in the future that we can count you as a consumer of Dannon products.
     

Kraft

  • 8/24/09 In recent years, there has been a proliferation of shows with extreme content, including on the political front. These shows often are controversial and do not align with our company or brand values. We do not want to become associated with controversy simply because of the placement of a 30-second spot. That’s why we have made the decision to stop advertising on the more politically extreme programs, including The Glenn Beck Show, on all networks.

UPS Stores

  • 8/24/09 temporarily halted buying ads on Fox News Channel as a whole. UPS' Hallabran said the decision to pull commercials "should not be interpreted as we are permanently withdrawing our advertising from Fox." He said the company wants to reach viewers with a wide spectrum of opinions.

B. These customer-hating advertisers continue to support Glenn Beck's hate speech.

L.L. Bean publicaffairs@llbean.com

  • 8/19/09 Viewers should not assume that L.L.Bean endorses or opposes a specific view expressed by Fox or any other station.

FREE SPEECH: 101

As you may or may not know, I made a documentary film entitled THIS DIVIDED STATE. The film chronicles Michael Moore's controversial visit to Utah Valley State College 2 weeks before the 2004 presidential election. Protests, bribery, and death threats descended upon the school in a fanatical effort to cancel Moore's speech.

One of the key players of the documentary was Joe Vogel. Joe was the Student Body Vice President and was ultimately responsible for inviting Michael Moore. In the end, Joe was forced to resign from his office and lost a scholarship because of his involvement in the Moore fiasco. As facts began to emerge about Joe's resignation, it became clear that it was because of a "tell all" book that Joe was writing that caused many people in the college administration and Utah legislator to get extremely angry at Joe. They asked Joe to "vow on oath of silence" about the book. Joe said "no". They said, "You must resign".

You see, Joe had been present in many secret meetings and had heard first hand the corruption that lied under the surface of the quiet Utah town of Orem. Now, that book, full of explosive facts and extremely frightening accounts is hitting book shelves nationwide. Joe has called it FREE SPEECH 101. And he's naming names and pulling no punches.

Not only does it talk about the Moore controversy, but expounds on the growing trend of colleges and universites becoming corporations owned and controled by those with money, power, and agendas. A very important book...

Check out Joe's BLOG here.

Check out the website for FREE SPEECH 101.

Media Truth

The Problem (9/12/08):

  • Sarah Palin's candidacy is based entirely on bald-faced lies:
    • That she said "thanks but no thanks" to the "Bridge to Nowhere"
    • That she was a leading opponent of earmarks
    • That she is ready to be Commander-in-Chief
    • New lies baked daily!
  • More broadly, the McCain campaign is now based entirely on lies and smears:
    • That Obama wants to raise taxes on the middle class
    • That Obama promoted sex education for pre-schoolers
    • That Obama called Palin a pig
    • New lies and smears baked daily!
  • The McCain-Palin lies are being treated as truths by journalists and pundits who are either stupid or lazy
    • Atrios 9/12/08: Liar
      And the lies will continue until the bobbleheads start repeating over and over again that John McCain is a liar, has a trouble with the truth, doesn't care who he deceives, etc.
    • Josh Marshall 9/12/08: What a Team ...
      We're at a key moment -- where we learn if there is any consequence in this election for serial lying. It's a question that only the major media outlets will be able to answer.

The Opportunity: To expose the lies and brand McCain-Palin as liars 

  • Responsible and honest journalists now understand lying is the heart of the McCain-Palin campaign
  • A growing number of those journalists are willing to call them lies
    • John Cole 
    • Joe Klein 
    • Andrew Sullivan
    • Jake Tapper (9/12 earmarks)
    • Jeff Toobin (9/12 earmarks 6:45 pm ET)
  • Progressive bloggers are paying close attention and documenting some (but not all) of the lies in near real-time
    • Atrios 
    • CrooksAndLiars
    • DailyKos (Hunter)
    • Digbysblog (dday)
    • FireDogLake (Lindsay Beyerstein)
    • HuffingtonPost 
    • MediaMatters
    • MotherJones
    • TalkingPointsMemo
    • TheNation (Ari Melber)
    • ThinkProgress
  • Online organizers are "packaging" anti-lie campaigns and reaching an enormous activist base
    • BraveNewFilms
    • Democrats.com
    • Moveon
    • TrueMajority
  • Progressive TV personalities are challenging the lies on their own
    • Paul Begala 
    • Joy Behar
    • Jack Cafferty
    • Alan Colmes
    • Rachel Maddow 
    • Roland Martin
    • Keith Olbermann
    • Jon Stewart
  • Progressive columnists are challenging the lies on their own
    • E.J. Dionne 
    • Bob Herbert 
    • Paul Krugman
    • Greg Mitchell
    • Frank Rich

The Challenge: To expose the lies and brand McCain-Palin as liars 

  1. Expose McCain-Palin lies in near-real time
    • Blog the lie and link to the truth
  2. Quickly spread the truth throughout the blogosphere
    • Core email list of McCain-Palin truth-bloggers
  3. Get the truth on TV through our allies above (how?)
  4. Enlist more TV allies (how?)
    • Donna Brazile 
    • Campbell Brown
    • Mika Brzinski 
    • James Carville
    • Chris Matthews
    • Andrea Mitchell
    • David Shuster
  5. Get more bloggers, columnists and op-ed contributors to write the truth and go on TV
    • Ari Melber (9/12 TV)
    • David Sirota
  6. Identify mainstream journalists who are buying the lies and get them to stop
    • Examples 
      • Gloria Borger
      • MICHAEL COOPER and JIM RUTENBERG (9/13)
      • Adam Nagourney
    • Strategies
  7. Get the Obama campaign and the Democratic Party to do free and paid media to build the narrative that McCain-Palin and all Republicans are campaigning entirely on lies

 

Fight the Right

FreeRepublic.com

FreeRepublic.com is a borderline criminal organization that tolerates activities that are un-democratic and un-American and should not be tolerated by anyone who believes in freedom.

Death threats - usually barely disguised as "jokes"

Hit lists - designated "enemies" in wartime

"Freeping" - interfering with legitimate communications by overwhelming communications lines

Infiltrating or manipulating liberal groups

Denial of Service Attacks

  • 1/24/04 Hillary.org
  • 11/01 Hillary.org (reported to FBI)

Reagan

Reagan Administration Corruption (source: Liberals Like Christ)

        Conservative Republicans are such paragons of virtue and truth that they claim that Bill Clinton's administration was "the most corrupt administration in American history" despite the fact that history contradicts everything about that statement.
  1. Despite the fact that the President and first lady, and many members of the Clinton administration were charged with crimes, their accusers fell flat on their faces when they had to prove their trumped up charges in court almost every time, because there was no credible evidence or witnesses to justify the charges brought by their Republican enemies and touted by their countless friends in the mainstream media.
  2. Contrast that to the great numbers of the Republican administration of Ronald Reagan who were not just charged, but were found guilty, but which most Americans don't remember because the so-called "Liberal media" rarely, if ever, make any mention of them.  See the actual names & crimes below.
  3. The contenders for the title of "the most corrupt administration in American history" are all Republican administrations.  It may be hard to order them exactly, but the contenders for the first, second, third & fourth "most corrupt administrations in American history" are the Republican administrations of Grant, Harding, Nixon and Reagan.

Ronald Reagan's Criminal Administration:

        "By the end of his term, 138 Reagan administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations.  In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever."

  1. James Watt, Reagan's Secretary of the Interior was indicted on 41 felony counts for using connections at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to help his private clients seek federal funds for housing projects in Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.  Watt conceded that he had received $500,000 from clients who were granted very favorable housing contracts after he had intervened on their behalf.  In testifying before a House committee Watt said: "That's what they offered and it sounded like a lot of money to me, and we settled on it." Watt was eventually sentenced to five years in prison and 500 hours of community service.
  2. Although not convicted, Edwin Meese III, resigned as Reagan's Attorney General after having been the subject of investigations by the United States Office of the Independent Counsel on two occasions (Wedtech and Iran-Contra), during the 3 short years he was in office.
  3. E. Bob Wallach, close friend and law classmate of Attorney General Edwin Meese, was sentenced to six years in prison and fined $250,000 in connection with the Wedtech influence-peddling scandal.
  4. Lyn Nofziger--Convicted on charges of illegal lobbying of White House in Wedtech scandal.
  5. Michael Deaver received three years' probation and was fined one hundred thousand dollars after being convicted for lying to a congressional subcommittee and a federal grand jury about his lobbying activities after leaving the White House.
  6. The Iran-Contra scandal. In June, 1984, at a National Security Council meeting, CIA Director Casey urged President Reagan to seek third-party aid for the Nicaraguan contras.  Secretary of State Schultz warned that it would be an "impeachable offense" if the U.S. government acted as conduit for such secret funding.  But that didn't stop them.  That same day, Oliver North was seeking third-party aid for the contras.  But Reagan, the "teflon President" avoided serious charges or impeachment.
  7. Casper Weinberger was Secretary of Defense during Iran-Contra.  In June 1992 he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of concealing from congressional investigators and prosecutors thousands of pages of his handwritten notes.  The personal memoirs taken during high level meetings, detailed events in 1985 and 1986 involving the Iran-Contra affair.  Weinberger claimed he was being unfairly prosecuted because he would not provide information incriminating Ronald Reagan.  Weinberger was scheduled to go on trial January 5, 1993, where the contents of his notes would have come to light and may have implicated other, unindicted conspirators.  While Weinberger was never directly linked to the covert operations phase of the Iran-Contra affair, he is believed to have been involved in the cover-up of the ensuing scandal. According to Special Prosecutor Lawrence Walsh, Weinberger's notes contain evidence of a conspiracy among the highest ranking Reagan Administration officials to lie to congress and the American public.  Some of the notes are believed to have evidence against then Vice-President George Bush who pardoned Weinberger to keep him from going to trial.
  8. Raymond Donovan, Secretary of Labor indicted for defrauding the New York City Transit Authority of $7.4. million.
    { Republicans will point out that Donovan was acquitted.  And that really matters in Donovan's case, because he was a Republican.  But it didn't matter for Clinton or any of his cabinet, most all of whom were acquitted, because they were Democrats!}
  9. Elliott Abrams was appointed by President Reagan in 1985 to head the State Department's Latin American Bureau.  He was closely linked with ex-White House aide Lt. Col. Oliver North's covert movement to aid the Contras.  Working for North, Abrams coordinated inter-agency support