| We gladly accept PayPal! | Or mail a check to Democrats.com |
Thank you for participating in Democrats.com, the largest independent community of Democratic Party activists, with over 600,000 members.
Democrats.com is the home of the Aggressive Progressives and we led the fight against George W. Bush after he stole the White House in 2000. We now support President Obama's agenda of change.
We rely on the generous contributions of members like you to fight for progressive change over the opposition of right-wing Republicans and the Corporate Media. We gratefully accept contributions of any amount!
We invite you to sign our most recent petitions:
We also encourage you to use our simple Web forms to tell your Senators and Representative how you feel on these questions:
Finally, we encourage you to get involved in one of our important organizing efforts below.
You can make a difference right this minute! Here are links to sites that help you take action immediately.
To receive invitations to future BlogCalls, please submit your credentials here.
12/14/07 BlogCall11 with a Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee who wrote an op-ed calling for immediate impeachment hearings for Vice President Dick Cheney - but none of the nation's leading newspapers would publish it.
10/13/05 BlogCall10 with David Swanson of AfterDowningStreet.org discussing the netroots-funded poll that found a virtual majority of Americans - 50% to 44% - want Congress to consider impeaching President Bush if he lied about the war in Iraq.
8/10/05 BlogCall9 with Cindy Sheehan of Gold Star Families for Peace, who is protesting outside George Bush's "ranch" in Crawford Texas so she can meet with Bush to ask him: "Why did my son die?" and "What was the noble cause that he died for?"
4/19/05 BlogCall8 with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com, exposing the American Center for Voting Rights (ACVR) as a Republican front group with close ties to James Baker, the architect of Stolen Election 2000 and the Republican-controlled Baker-Carter Commission on Election Reform.
4/12/05 Blogcall7 with Andy Stephenson, Education Director of Vote Trust USA.
4/5/05 Blogcall6 with David Swanson of DebtSlavery.org exposing the credit card industry's corrupt campaign to push its atrocious Bankruptcy Bill through the House of Representatives this week - and the grassroots campaign by bloggers and activists to stop it.
3/29/05 BlogCall5 with David Donnelly of The Daily Delay and WithoutDeLay.org exposing the backlash against Tom DeLay arising from his exploitation of Terri Schiavo.
3/22/05 BlogCall4 with Greg Palast of GregPalast.com on the battle within the Bush administration between neoconservatives and the oil giants over who would profit from Iraq's oil. After the deaths of over 1,500 U.S. soldiers and over 100,000 Iraqi civilians, BlogCall4 will ask: "Was it all about oil?"
3/15/05 Blogcall3 with John Byrne and Larisa Alexandrovna of RawStory.com about how Tom Delay's extravagant overseas trips were illegally funded by a "charity" called NCPPR
3/8/05 BlogCall2 with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com and Clint Curtis on the Tom Feeney / Yang Enterprises / Touchscreen Vote-Rigging Scandal.
2/24/05 BlogCall1 with John Aravosis of AmericaBlog.com on the Jeff Gannon/Jim Guckert scandal.
Q. What is BlogCall?
BlogCall is a conference call hosted by progressive and Democratic "bloggers" to discuss exposes of Republican and rightwing crimes and scandals that deserve national media attention. We invite mainstream journalists to participate fully in each BlogCall.
Each BlogCall features a progressive or Democratic "blogger" who has broken a major expose. The format is a virtual press conference, in which the featured "blogger" will present his/her story for 15 minutes, followed by 30 minutes of Q&A about the story.
Q. Why was BlogCall created?
Because progressive "bloggers" (including investigative reporters) cannot get their important exposes covered in the mass media - unlike rightwing bloggers, who get their lies and smears covered immediately on the DrudgeReport, Rush Limbaugh, FOX News, Joe Scarborough, and the rest of the Rightwing Media.
Q. What are the specific objectives of BlogCall?
Q. How do we define "bloggers"?
BlogCall is for progressive "bloggers" who do investigative research and reporting. We also include traditional investigative reporters, editors, producers, talk show hosts, and media activists who share the ideals of blogging:
Q. How does BlogCall work?
Q. What happens after a BlogCall?
Q. How often will BlogCalls occur?
Q. What exposes will BlogCalls cover?
Here is a list of topics under consideration.
Q. Who can participate in BlogCalls?
BlogCalls are open to Working Members, Honorary Members, and Guests.
Working Members form the core of BlogCall. They are selected by the Administrative Committee from the best progressive bloggers (for example, Koufax Award winners). They are encouraged to join one of the standing committees:
Honorary Members have a standing invitation to participate in every BlogCall:
Guests: mainstream journalists who are actively covering the particular BlogCall topic. Guests must contact us (please specify "BlogCall" as your reason) and provide links to your current work.
Q. Can others join BlogCall?
At the outset we are using FreeConference.com, which has a limit of 100 participants.
If a large number of bloggers and activists would like to participate, we will consider paid conference call systems, but we would have to charge participants roughly $5 per call to cover the costs.
Q. How do BlogCall participants find out about each BlogCall?
When your participation is approved, we will add you to the FreeConference system.
A day or two before each BlogCall, you will receive an e-mail from the FreeConference system with the phone number and PIN. The "From" address will be "Democrats Com" <reservation-#####@conferencemgr.com>, where #### will change each time. If you have a spam filtering program, try to whitelist "@conferencemgr.com". The phone number will be a local phone number somewhere in the U.S., but will not be toll-free - that's how FreeConference.com can offer its service for free.
Due to the limitations of FreeConference.com (100 participants), participation in BlogCalls will be on a first-come-first-served basis. The RSVP system will accept more than 100 participants, but the phone-in system will not - so dial in early to make sure you get a line!
Q. What was the original idea behind BlogCall?
Read Bob Fertik's Blogging Truth to Power: How Progressive Bloggers Can Break through the MSM Blackout to Get Coverage for our Exposes
Q. Who helped turn this idea into reality?
Karyn Altman, Tom Ball, Jim Bryant, Ben Burch, Noah Diamond, Ralph Dratman, Brad Friedman, Carolyn Kay, Geoff Staples
The following topics and bloggers are under consideration:
| U.S. military torture | Lawrence Velvel |
| U.S. military attacks on journalists | Danny Schechter |
| Bush doctrine of global domination | Tom Engelhardt |
| White House propaganda | Susan G |
| Rightwing propaganda and tax exemption abuse | Nashua Advocate |
| Social Security bill | Josh Marshall |
| Bankruptcy bill | Elizabeth Warren |
| John Bolton nomination to UN ambassador | Dave Meyer |
| Robert Nelson, the NASA scientist who proved Bush was wired for the 2004 debates | Dave Lindorff |
| 2004 Exit Polls / Steve Freeman | Kathy Dopp |
| 2004 Ohio | Bob Fitrakis |
| Janet Linke, the widow of the Texas Air National Guard pilot who replaced George W. Bush in 1972 after he was grounded for being "unfit to fly" | Russ Baker |
| CBS 60 Minutes "Rathergate" and Mary Mapes | Joe Hagan |
| 9/11 - Sibel Edmonds | Kyle Hence / Dave Kubiak |
| American Center for Voting Rights | Brad Friedman |
| Project 21 | Faye Anderson |
| Closeted Republican Gaybashers | Mike Rogers |
| Media plagiarism at Talon News | Ron Brynaert |
Blogging Truth to Power:
How Progressive Bloggers Can Break through the MSM Blackout to Get Coverage for our Exposes
Bob Fertik
Last Update: 2/15/05
Most of the mainstream media (MSM) is now firmly under the control of the Bush administration and the Republican Party.
The few outlets that are not entirely under GOP control are afraid to challenge the GOP because right-wing media activists are so vicious.
Right-wing bloggers can get instant national attention for their "exposes" - no matter how bogus - through their allies on cable TV, especially Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Joe Scarborough, and Pat Buchanan. Their successes include:
By contrast, progressive bloggers have no allies on TV, so our exposes - no matter how important - usually get blacked out.
Despite the general blackout, progressive bloggers have had a few breakthroughs.
Still, progressive bloggers need a more effective way to get serious coverage for major exposes.
(I am defining "bloggers" broadly as civic-minded investigators who do original research to expose wrongdoing by corrupt government and corporate officials - and share their exposes with the public in order to inspire grassroots activism and change. This broad definition embraces traditional investigative reporters and serious talk show hosts. We invite such reporters and hosts to join this effort as long as they are willing to operate their own blog, so they can benefit from the further discoveries - and occasional corrections - of their audience.)
Since God helps those who help themselves, I propose that progressive bloggers hold regular conference calls to share important exposes.
Our goals would be:
Of course, large conference calls are a challenge. I propose the following structure:
The content of these calls would be fact-focused, not opinion-focused. All of us can rant brilliantly (of course!), but we should do that on our blogs, not on these calls.
Criteria for selection would include:
Possible topics would include:
The effort would be sustained by three ongoing committees:
1. Program Committee
2. Credentials Committee
3. Publicity Committee
To cover the costs of this effort, we will set a monthly user subscription fee. We are requesting competitive bids from large conference call services to keep costs as low as possible.
Why should Democrats put their money into big banks that want to kill union jobs at Chrysler and kill union organizing by blocking EFCA?
Why don't we create our own bank - BlueBank?
| Services | Analysis |
| Nationwide charter | Our members are scattered across the country. |
| Competitive deposit rates | A well-run bank should offer competitive rates. |
| Minimal fees and charges | Banks should make money by lending to credit-worthy customers, not by ripping off its customers. |
| Honest credit cards | Ditto. |
| Honest mortgages | Ditto. |
| Low-fee accounts for Democratic candidates | There are 10,000 elected offices and at least one Democratic candidate for each. We can help those candidates by making it easy to open an account and keeping fees low. |
| Loans to socially responsible businesses: unionized, green, minority- and women- owned | SRB's are good credit risks because the owners and employees are devoted to their success. |
The dream is simple, but turning it into reality is not. Here are some key issues:
1. Credit Union or Bank?
| Issue | Credit Union | Bank |
| Ownership | Would Democrats.com qualify as an "Association"? Here are the rules. It appears that an "Association" must be a non-profit. Democrats.com is an LLC, so we would have to incorporate a new non-profit and establish a formal governance structure. | Democrats.com could raise private capital from progressive investors to buy an existing bank. |
| Membership |
Chapter 2 Part III: To qualify as an "Association" NCUA will consider the totality of the circumstances, which includes: • Whether members pay dues; • Whether members participate in the furtherance of the goals of the association; • Whether the members have voting rights. To meet this requirement, members need not vote directly for an officer, but may vote for a delegate who in turn represents the members’ interests; • Whether the association maintains a membership list; • Whether the association sponsors other activities; • The association's membership eligibility requirements; and • The frequency of meetings. A support group whose members are continually changing or whose duration is temporary may not meet the single associational common bond criteria. Each class of member will be evaluated based on the totality of the circumstances. Individuals or honorary members who only make donations to the association are not eligible to join the credit union. Homeowner associations, tenant groups, consumer groups, and other groups of persons having an “interest in” a particular cause and certain consumer cooperatives may also qualify as an association. |
No formal membership, just individual customers who are willing to move their deposits from a big bank to BlueBank. |
Fellow Progressives,
Drinking Liberally started in Manhattan in May 2003 as a support group for down-and-out liberals and spread like wildfire across the country. Chapters meet every week at a local bar to share drinks and make new friends.
But what if we did more than drink and chat? What if we discussed concrete changes that we can bring about in our communities - and beyond?
That's the idea behind Changing Liberally. And with your help, we hope to turn this idea into reality.
To start a chapter, pick a convenient bar with a gathering space on a night when it's quiet. Invite local activists and leaders you already know, along with their significant others.
First order drinks. Then introduce yourselves and talk briefly about one issue you're working on and/or care strongly about. After that, talk about what you can do together.
There are many ways we can bring about change. We can start listservs or blogs. We can help existing groups or start new ones. We can meet with elected or appointed officials or candidates. If we want to reach out to our friends and neighbors, we can hold larger community events at local schools or churches.
If the group grows, move to a larger space, and perhaps expand from drinks to buffet meals.
Barack Obama promised change if Americans from all backgrounds came together to work for change. President Obama is fulfilling his promise in Washington DC. What can we do in our communities?
Let's have a drink and find out!
From: DocGonzo
Here's a list of the exact contact info for each of the House Judiciary Democrats, not just a generic page that leaves you somewhere without being able to just send them a message. Some of them are behind a House Web form (there are different variants) that requires their "ZIP+4" ZIPcode, which I have listed after their DC office phone#. So you should have all you need to contact them RIGHT NOW.
John Conyers (Chair/MI-14) (202) 225-5126 John.Conyers@mail.house.gov
Howard Berman (CA-28) (202)225-4695 91411-4102
Rick Boucher (VA-9) 24210-2839 (202)225-3861
Jerrold Nadler (NY-8) 11224-4561 (202)225-5635
Robert Scott (VA-3) 23607-4333 (202)225-8351
Melvin Watt (NC-12) (202)225-1510 28208-5214
Zoe Lofgren (CA-16) (202)225-3072 95112-5162
Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18) (202)225-3816 77002-8028
William Delahunt (MA-10) (202)225-3111 02601-3128 William.Delahunt@mail.house.gov
Robert Wexler (FL-19) (202)225-3001 33431-6344
Linda Sanchez (CA-39) (202)225-6676 90703-2694
Steve Cohen (TN-9) (202)225-3265 38103-1816
*Hank Johnson (GA-4) (202)225-1605 30058-4104
*Luis Gutierrez (IL-4) (202)225-8203 60647-4841
*Brad Sherman (CA-28) (202)225-5911 91403-1791
**Anthony Weiner (NY-9) (202)225-6616 11415-3605 Weiner@mail.house.gov
Adam Schiff (CA-29) (202)225-4176 91103-3966
Artur Davis (AL-7) (202)225-2665 35203-4014
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20) (202)225-7931 33026-6037
Tammy Baldwin (WI-2) (202)225-2906 53703-5103
Keith Ellison (MN-5) (202)225-4755 55411-3675
Maxine Waters (CA-35) (202) 225-2201 90003-4597
Betty Sutton (OH-13) (202) 225-3401 44313
(The names with an *asterisk are those Reps whose contact page makes it easy to contact them. The rest should be reprimanded into making it easy. Weiner was the most accessible)
Chairman Conyers Howard Berman Jerrold Nadler Rick Boucher

Bobby Scott Tammy Baldwin Mel Watt Maxine Waters

Sheila Jackson Lee Robert Wexler Zoe Lofgren Adam Schiff

Keith Ellison Linda Sánchez Anthony Weiner Luis Gutierrez

Hank Johnson Brad Sherman Artur Davis William Delahunt
Steve Cohen Betty Sutton Debbie Wasserman Schultz
House phone numbers as of 5/27/08. If you find an error, please contact us.
(Note: the local phone is for the primary district office. A House member can also have several satellite offices.)
| District | Last | First | Phone-DC | Phone-local |
| AK00 | Young | Don | 202-225-5765 | 907-456-0210 |
| AL01 | Bonner | Jo | 202-225-4931 | 251-943-2073 |
| AL02 | Everett | Terry | 202-225-2901 | 334-277-9113 |
| AL03 | Rogers | Mike | 202-225-3261 | 256-236-5655 |
| AL04 | Aderholt | Robert | 202-225-4876 | 256-546-0201 |
| AL05 | Cramer | Bud | 202-225-4801 | 256-381-3450 |
| AL06 | Bachus | Spencer | 202-225-4921 | 205-280-0704 |
| AL07 | Davis | Artur | 202-225-2665 | 205-752-5380 |
| AR01 | Berry | Marion | 202-225-4076 | 501-843-3043 |
| AR02 | Snyder | Vic | 202-225-2506 | 501-324-5941 |
| AR03 | Boozman | John | 202-225-4301 | 479-782-7787 |
| AR04 | Ross | Mike | 202-225-3772 | 870-536-3376 |
| AS00 | Faleomavaega | Eni | 202-225-8577 | 684-633-1372 |
| AZ01 | Renzi | Rick | 202-225-2315 | 928-587-3417 |
| AZ02 | Franks | Trent | 202-225-4576 | 623-776-7911 |
| AZ03 | Shadegg | John | 202-225-3361 | 602-263-5300 |
| AZ04 | Pastor | Ed | 202-225-4065 | 602-256-0551 |
| AZ05 | Mitchell | Harry | 202-225-2190 | 480-946-2411 |
| AZ06 | Flake | Jeff | 202-225-2635 | 480-833-0092 |
| AZ07 | Grijalva | Raul | 202-225-2435 | 520-622-6788 |
| AZ08 | Giffords | Gabrielle | 202-225-2542 | 520-881-3588 |
| CA01 | Thompson | Mike | 202-225-3311 | 707-269-9595 |
| CA02 | Herger | Wally | 202-225-3076 | 530-223-5898 |
| CA03 | Lungren | Daniel | 202-225-5716 | 916-859-9906 |
| CA04 | Doolittle | John | 202-225-2511 | 800-232-1336 |
| CA05 | Matsui | Doris | 202-225-7163 | 916-498-5600 |
| CA06 | Woolsey | Lynn | 202-225-5161 | 415-507-9554 |
| CA07 | Miller | George | 202-225-2095 | 707-645-1888 |
| CA08 | Pelosi | Nancy | 202-225-4965 | 415-556-4862 |
| CA09 | Lee | Barbara | 202-225-2661 | 510-763-0370 |
| CA10 | Tauscher | Ellen | 202-225-1880 | 707-428-7792 |
| CA11 | McNerney | Jerry | 202-225-1947 | 925-737-0727 |
| CA12 | Speier | Jackie | 202-225-3531 | 650-342-0300 |
| CA13 | Stark | Pete | 202-225-5065 | 510-494-1388 |
| CA14 | Eshoo | Anna | 202-225-8104 | 650-323-2984 |
| CA15 | Honda | Michael | 202-225-2631 | 408-558-8085 |
| CA16 | Lofgren | Zoe | 202-225-3072 | 408-271-8700 |
| CA17 | Farr | Sam | 202-225-2861 | 831-429-1976 |
| CA18 | Cardoza | Dennis | 202-225-6131 | 209-527-1914 |
| CA19 | Radanovich | George | 202-225-4540 | 209-579-5458 |
| CA20 | Costa | Jim | 202-225-3341 | 559-495-1620 |
| CA21 | Nunes | Devin | 202-225-2523 | 559-733-3861 |
| CA22 | McCarthy | Kevin | 202-225-2915 | 661-327-3611 |
| CA23 | Capps | Lois | 202-225-3601 | 805-546-8348 |
| CA24 | Gallegly | Elton | 202-225-5811 | 805-686-2525 |
| CA25 | McKeon | Buck | 202-225-1956 | 661-274-9688 |
| CA26 | Dreier | David | 202-225-2305 | 909-575-6226 |
| CA27 | Sherman | Brad | 202-225-5911 | 818-501-9200 |
| CA28 | Berman | Howard | 202-225-4695 | 818-994-7200 |
| CA29 | Schiff | Adam | 202-225-4176 | 626-304-2727 |
| CA30 | Waxman | Henry | 202-225-3976 | 323-651-1040 |
| CA31 | Becerra | Xavier | 202-225-6235 | 213-483-1425 |
| CA32 | Solis | Hilda | 202-225-5464 | 323-307-9904 |
| CA33 | Watson | Diane | 202-225-7084 | 323-965-1422 |
| CA34 | Roybal-Allard | Lucille | 202-225-1766 | 213-628-9230 |
| CA35 | Waters | Maxine | 202-225-2201 | 310-642-4610 |
| CA36 | Harman | Jane | 202-225-8220 | 310-549-8282 |
| CA37 | Richardson | Laura | 202-225-7924 | 310-538-1190 |
| CA38 | Napolitano | Grace | 202-225-5256 | 562-801-2134 |
| CA39 | Sánchez | Linda | 202-225-6676 | 562-860-5050 |
| CA40 | Royce | Edward | 202-225-4111 | 714-992-8081 |
| CA41 | Lewis | Jerry | 202-225-5861 | 800-233-1700 |
| CA42 | Miller | Gary | 202-225-3201 | 714-257-1142 |
| CA43 | Baca | Joe | 202-225-6161 | 909-885-2222 |
| CA44 | Calvert | Ken | 202-225-1986 | 951-784-4300 |
| CA45 | Bono | Mary | 202-225-5330 | 760-320-1076 |
| CA46 | Rohrabacher | Dana | 202-225-2415 | 714-960-6483 |
| CA47 | Sanchez | Loretta | 202-225-2965 | 714-621-0102 |
| CA48 | Campbell | John | 202-225-5611 | 949-756-2244 |
| CA49 | Issa | Darrell | 202-225-3906 | 760-599-5000 |
| CA50 | Bilbray | Brian | 202-225-0508 | 760-737-8438 |
| CA51 | Filner | Bob | 202-225-8045 | 619-422-5963 |
| CA52 | Hunter | Duncan | 202-225-5672 | 619-448-5201 |
| CA53 | Davis | Susan | 202-225-2040 | 619-280-5353 |
| CO01 | DeGette | Diana | 202-225-4431 | 303-844-4988 |
| CO02 | Udall | Mark | 202-225-2161 | 303-650-7820 |
| CO03 | Salazar | John | 202-225-4761 | 719-587-5105 |
| CO04 | Musgrave | Marilyn | 202-225-4676 | 720-494-4336 |
| CO05 | Lamborn | Doug | 202-225-4422 | 719-520-0055 |
| CO06 | Tancredo | Thomas | 202-225-7882 | 720-283-9772 |
| CO07 | Perlmutter | Ed | 202-225-2645 | 303-274-7944 |
| CT01 | Larson | John | 202-225-2265 | 860-278-8888 |
| CT02 | Courtney | Joe | 202-225-2076 | 860-886-0139 |
| CT03 | DeLauro | Rosa | 202-225-3661 | 203-562-3718 |
| CT04 | Shays | Christopher | 202-225-5541 | 203-357-8277 |
| CT05 | Murphy | Christopher | 202-225-4476 | 860-223-8412 |
| DC00 | Norton | Eleanor Holmes | 202-225-8050 | 202-783-5065 |
| DE00 | Castle | Michael | 202-225-4165 | 302-428-1902 |
| FL01 | Miller | Jeff | 202-225-4136 | 850-479-1183 |
| FL02 | Boyd | Allen | 202-225-5235 | 850-561-3979 |
| FL03 | Brown | Corrine | 202-225-0123 | 407-872-0656 |
| FL04 | Crenshaw | Ander | 202-225-2501 | 904-598-0481 |
| FL05 | Brown-Waite | Ginny | 202-225-1002 | 352-567-6707 |
| FL06 | Stearns | Cliff | 202-225-5744 | 904-269-3203 |
| FL07 | Mica | John | 202-225-4035 | 386-860-1499 |
| FL08 | Keller | Ric | 202-225-2176 | 888-642-1211 |
| FL09 | Bilirakis | Gus | 202-225-5755 | 813-985-8541 |
| FL10 | Young | Bill | 202-225-5961 | 727-391-6030 |
| FL11 | Castor | Kathy | 202-225-3376 | 813-871-2817 |
| FL12 | Putnam | Adam | 202-225-1252 | 863-534-3530 |
| FL13 | Buchanan | Vern | 202-225-5015 | 941-951-6643 |
| FL14 | Mack | Connie | 202-225-2536 | 239-252-6225 |
| FL15 | Weldon | Dave | 202-225-3671 | 800-939-3515 |
| FL16 | Mahoney | Tim | 202-225-5792 | 772-878-3181 |
| FL17 | Meek | Kendrick | 202-225-4506 | 954-450-6767 |
| FL18 | Ros-Lehtinen | Ileana | 202-225-3931 | 305-220-3281 |
| FL19 | Wexler | Robert | 202-225-3001 | 561-988-6302 |
| FL20 | Wasserman Schultz | Debbie | 202-225-7931 | 954-437-3936 |
| FL21 | Diaz-Balart | Lincoln | 202-225-4211 | 305-470-8555 |
| FL22 | Klein | Ron | 202-225-3026 | 866-713-7303 |
| FL23 | Hastings | Alcee | 202-225-1313 | 561-684-0565 |
| FL24 | Feeney | Tom | 202-225-2706 | 321-264-6113 |
| FL25 | Diaz-Balart | Mario | 202-225-2778 | 305-225-6866 |
| GA01 | Kingston | Jack | 202-225-5831 | 912-265-9010 |
| GA02 | Bishop | Sanford | 202-225-3631 | 706-320-9477 |
| GA03 | Westmoreland | Lynn | 202-225-5901 | 770-683-2033 |
| GA04 | Johnson | Hank | 202-225-1605 | 770-987-2291 |
| GA05 | Lewis | John | 202-225-3801 | 404-659-0116 |
| GA06 | Price | Tom | 202-225-4501 | 770-565-4990 |
| GA07 | Linder | John | 202-225-4272 | 770-232-3005 |
| GA08 | Marshall | Jim | 202-225-6531 | 877-464-0255 |
| GA09 | Deal | Nathan | 202-225-5211 | 706-638-7042 |
| GA10 | Broun | Paul | 202-225-4101 | 706-886-2776 |
| GA11 | Gingrey | Phil | 202-225-2931 | 770-836-8130 |
| GA12 | Barrow | John | 202-225-2823 | 706-613-3232 |
| GA13 | Scott | David | 202-225-2939 | 770-432-5405 |
| GU00 | Bordallo | Madeleine | 202-225-1188 | 671-477-4272 |
| HI01 | Abercrombie | Neil | 202-225-2726 | 808-541-2570 |
| HI02 | Hirono | Mazie | 202-225-4906 | 808-541-1986 |
| IA01 | Braley | Bruce | 202-225-2911 | 319-287-3233 |
| IA02 | Loebsack | David | 202-225-6576 | 319-351-0789 |
| IA03 | Boswell | Leonard | 202-225-3806 | 888-432-1984 |
| IA04 | Latham | Tom | 202-225-5476 | 641-357-5225 |
| IA05 | King | Steve | 202-225-4426 | 712-732-4197 |
| ID01 | Sali | Bill | 202-225-6611 | 208-454-5602 |
| ID02 | Simpson | Michael | 202-225-5531 | 208-523-6701 |
| IL01 | Rush | Bobby | 202-225-4372 | 773-224-6500 |
| IL02 | Jackson | Jesse | 202-225-0773 | 708-798-6000 |
| IL03 | Lipinski | Daniel | 202-225-5701 | 312-886-0481 |
| IL04 | Gutierrez | Luis | 202-225-8203 | 312-666-3882 |
| IL05 | Emanuel | Rahm | 202-225-4061 | 773-267-5926 |
| IL06 | Roskam | Peter | 202-225-4561 | 630-893-9670 |
| IL07 | Davis | Danny | 202-225-5006 | 773-533-7520 |
| IL08 | Bean | Melissa | 202-225-3711 | 847-358-9160 |
| IL09 | Schakowsky | Janice | 202-225-2111 | 847-298-2128 |
| IL10 | Kirk | Mark | 202-225-4835 | 847-940-0202 |
| IL11 | Weller | Jerry | 202-225-3635 | 815-740-2028 |
| IL12 | Costello | Jerry | 202-225-5661 | 618-397-8833 |
| IL13 | Biggert | Judy | 202-225-3515 | 630-655-2052 |
| IL14 | Foster | Bill | 202-225-2976 | 815-288-0680 |
| IL15 | Johnson | Timothy | 202-225-2371 | 217-403-4690 |
| IL16 | Manzullo | Donald | 202-225-5676 | 815-394-1231 |
| IL17 | Hare | Phil | 202-225-5905 | 217-422-9150 |
| IL18 | LaHood | Ray | 202-225-6201 | 217-793-0808 |
| IL19 | Shimkus | John | 202-225-5271 | 618-252-8271 |
| IN01 | Visclosky | Peter | 202-225-2461 | 219-795-1844 |
| IN02 | Donnelly | Joe | 202-225-3915 | 574-288-2780 |
| IN03 | Souder | Mark | 202-225-4436 | 800-959-3041 |
| IN04 | Buyer | Steve | 202-225-5037 | 317-838-0404 |
| IN05 | Burton | Dan | 202-225-2276 | 800-382-6020 |
| IN06 | Pence | Mike | 202-225-3021 | 765-640-2919 |
| IN07 | Carson | Andre | 202-225-4011 | 317-283-6516 |
| IN08 | Ellsworth | Brad | 202-225-4636 | 812-465-6484 |
| IN09 | Hill | Baron | 202-225-5315 | 812-288-3999 |
| KS01 | Moran | Jerry | 202-225-2715 | 785-309-0572 |
| KS02 | Boyda | Nancy | 202-225-6601 | 785-234-8111 |
| KS03 | Moore | Dennis | 202-225-2865 | 913-621-0832 |
| KS04 | Tiahrt | Todd | 202-225-6216 | 316-262-8992 |
| KY01 | Whitfield | Ed | 202-225-3115 | 270-826-4180 |
| KY02 | Lewis | Ron | 202-225-3501 | 270-688-8858 |
| KY03 | Yarmuth | John | 202-225-5401 | 502-582-5129 |
| KY04 | Davis | Geoff | 202-225-3465 | 859-824-3320 |
| KY05 | Rogers | Harold | 202-225-4601 | 606-886-0844 |
| KY06 | Chandler | Ben | 202-225-4706 | 859-219-1366 |
| LA01 | Scalise | Steve | 202-225-3015 | 985-340-2185 |
| LA02 | Jefferson | William | 202-225-6636 | 504-589-2274 |
| LA03 | Melancon | Charlie | 202-225-4031 | 985-876-3033 |
| LA04 | McCrery | Jim | 202-225-2777 | 318-798-2254 |
| LA05 | Alexander | Rodney | 202-225-8490 | 318-322-3500 |
| LA06 | Cazayoux | Don | 202-225-3901 | 800-892-1253 |
| LA07 | Boustany | Charles | 202-225-2031 | 337-235-6322 |
| MA01 | Olver | John | 202-225-5335 | 978-342-8722 |
| MA02 | Neal | Richard | 202-225-5601 | 508-634-8198 |
| MA03 | McGovern | James | 202-225-6101 | 508-431-8025 |
| MA04 | Frank | Barney | 202-225-5931 | 617-332-3920 |
| MA05 | Tsongas | Nikki | 202-225-3411 | 978-521-1845 |
| MA06 | Tierney | John | 202-225-8020 | 978-531-1669 |
| MA07 | Markey | Edward | 202-225-2836 | 508-875-2900 |
| MA08 | Capuano | Michael | 202-225-5111 | 617-621-6208 |
| MA09 | Lynch | Stephen | 202-225-8273 | 508-586-5555 |
| MA10 | Delahunt | William | 202-225-3111 | 800-870-2626 |
| MD01 | Gilchrest | Wayne | 202-225-5311 | 410-838-2517 |
| MD02 | Ruppersberger | Dutch | 202-225-3061 | 410-628-2701 |
| MD03 | Sarbanes | John | 202-225-4016 | 410-832-8890 |
| MD04 | Wynn | Al | 202-225-8699 | 301-987-2054 |
| MD05 | Hoyer | Steny | 202-225-4131 | 301-843-1577 |
| MD06 | Bartlett | Roscoe | 202-225-2721 | 301-724-3105 |
| MD07 | Cummings | Elijah | 202-225-4741 | 410-685-9199 |
| MD08 | Van Hollen | Chris | 202-225-5341 | 301-891-6982 |
| ME01 | Allen | Thomas | 202-225-6116 | 207-283-8054 |
| ME02 | Michaud | Michael | 202-225-6306 | 207-942-6935 |
| MI01 | Stupak | Bart | 202-225-4735 | 906-228-3700 |
| MI02 | Hoekstra | Peter | 202-225-4401 | 616-395-0030 |
| MI03 | Ehlers | Vernon | 202-225-3831 | 616-451-8383 |
| MI04 | Camp | Dave | 202-225-3561 | 989-631-2552 |
| MI05 | Kildee | Dale | 202-225-3611 | 810-239-1437 |
| MI06 | Upton | Fred | 202-225-3761 | 269-982-1986 |
| MI07 | Walberg | Timothy | 202-225-6276 | 877-846-6407 |
| MI08 | Rogers | Mike | 202-225-4872 | 877-333-6453 |
| MI09 | Knollenberg | Joe | 202-225-5802 | 248-851-1366 |
| MI10 | Miller | Candice | 202-225-2106 | 586-997-5010 |
| MI11 | McCotter | Thaddeus | 202-225-8171 | 734-632-0314 |
| MI12 | Levin | Sander | 202-225-4961 | 586-498-7122 |
| MI13 | Kilpatrick | Carolyn | 202-225-2261 | 734-246-0780 |
| MI14 | Conyers | John | 202-225-5126 | 313-961-5670 |
| MI15 | Dingell | John | 202-225-4071 | 313-278-2936 |
| MN01 | Walz | Timothy | 202-225-2472 | 507-206-0643 |
| MN02 | Kline | John | 202-225-2271 | 952-808-1213 |
| MN03 | Ramstad | Jim | 202-225-2871 | 952-738-8200 |
| MN04 | McCollum | Betty | 202-225-6631 | 651-224-9191 |
| MN05 | Ellison | Keith | 202-225-4755 | 612-522-1212 |
| MN06 | Bachmann | Michele | 202-225-2331 | 651-731-5400 |
| MN07 | Peterson | Collin | 202-225-2165 | 218-253-4356 |
| MN08 | Oberstar | James | 202-225-6211 | 218-828-4400 |
| MO01 | Clay | Lacy | 202-225-2406 | 314-383-5240 |
| MO02 | Akin | Todd | 202-225-2561 | 314-590-0029 |
| MO03 | Carnahan | Russ | 202-225-2671 | 314-962-1523 |
| MO04 | Skelton | Ike | 202-225-2876 | 573-635-3499 |
| MO05 | Cleaver | Emanuel | 202-225-4535 | 816-842-4545 |
| MO06 | Graves | Sam | 202-225-7041 | 816-233-9818 |
| MO07 | Blunt | Roy | 202-225-6536 | 417-781-1041 |
| MO08 | Emerson | JoAnn | 202-225-4404 | 573-756-9755 |
| MO09 | Hulshof | Kenny | 202-225-2956 | 573-221-1200 |
| MS01 | Childers | Travis | 202-225-4306 | 662-342-3942 |
| MS02 | Thompson | Bennie | 202-225-5876 | 662-326-9003 |
| MS03 | Pickering | Chip | 202-225-5031 | 601-442-2515 |
| MS04 | Taylor | Gene | 202-225-5772 | 228-864-7670 |
| MT00 | Rehberg | Dennis | 202-225-3211 | 406-256-1019 |
| NC01 | Butterfield | G.K. | 202-225-3101 | 252-789-4939 |
| NC02 | Etheridge | Bob | 202-225-4531 | 888-262-6202 |
| NC03 | Jones | Walter | 202-225-3415 | 800-351-1697 |
| NC04 | Price | David | 202-225-1784 | 919-967-7924 |
| NC05 | Foxx | Virginia | 202-225-2071 | 336-778-0211 |
| NC06 | Coble | Howard | 202-225-3065 | 336-886-5106 |
| NC07 | McIntyre | Mike | 202-225-2731 | 910-735-0610 |
| NC08 | Hayes | Robin | 202-225-3715 | 910-997-2070 |
| NC09 | Myrick | Sue | 202-225-1976 | 704-362-1060 |
| NC10 | McHenry | Patrick | 202-225-2576 | 828-327-6100 |
| NC11 | Shuler | Heath | 202-225-6401 | 828-252-1651 |
| NC12 | Watt | Melvin | 202-225-1510 | 336-275-9950 |
| NC13 | Miller | Brad | 202-225-3032 | 336-574-2909 |
| ND00 | Pomeroy | Earl | 202-225-2611 | 701-235-9760 |
| NE01 | Fortenberry | Jeff | 202-225-4806 | 402-379-2064 |
| NE02 | Terry | Lee | 202-225-4155 | 402-397-9944 |
| NE03 | Smith | Adrian | 202-225-6435 | 308-384-3900 |
| NH01 | Shea-Porter | Carol | 202-225-5456 | 603-743-4813 |
| NH02 | Hodes | Paul | 202-225-5206 | 603-223-9814 |
| NJ01 | Andrews | Robert | 202-225-6501 | 856-848-3900 |
| NJ02 | LoBiondo | Frank | 202-225-6572 | 800-471-4450 |
| NJ03 | Saxton | Jim | 202-225-4765 | 609-261-5800 |
| NJ04 | Smith | Christopher | 202-225-3765 | 732-350-2300 |
| NJ05 | Garrett | Scott | 202-225-4465 | 201-712-0330 |
| NJ06 | Pallone | Frank | 202-225-4671 | 732-249-8892 |
| NJ07 | Ferguson | Mike | 202-225-5361 | 908-757-7835 |
| NJ08 | Pascrell | Bill | 202-225-5751 | 973-523-5152 |
| NJ09 | Rothman | Steven | 202-225-5061 | 201-646-0808 |
| NJ10 | Payne | Donald | 202-225-3436 | 973-645-3213 |
| NJ11 | Frelinghuysen | Rodney | 202-225-5034 | 973-984-0711 |
| NJ12 | Holt | Rush | 202-225-5801 | 609-750-9365 |
| NJ13 | Sires | Albio | 202-225-7919 | 201-558-0800 |
| NM01 | Wilson | Heather | 202-225-6316 | 505-346-6781 |
| NM02 | Pearce | Stevan | 202-225-2365 | 505-622-0055 |
| NM03 | Udall | Tom | 202-225-6190 | 505-763-7616 |
| NV01 | Berkley | Shelley | 202-225-5965 | 702-220-9823 |
| NV02 | Heller | Dean | 202-225-6155 | 775-686-5760 |
| NV03 | Porter | Jon | 202-225-3252 | 702-387-4941 |
| NY01 | Bishop | Timothy | 202-225-3826 | 631-259-8450 |
| NY02 | Israel | Steve | 202-225-3335 | 631-951-2210 |
| NY03 | King | Peter | 202-225-7896 | 516-541-4225 |
| NY04 | McCarthy | Carolyn | 202-225-5516 | 516-739-3008 |
| NY05 | Ackerman | Gary | 202-225-2601 | 718-423-2154 |
| NY06 | Meeks | Gregory | 202-225-3461 | 718-738-4200 |
| NY07 | Crowley | Joseph | 202-225-3965 | 718-320-2314 |
| NY08 | Nadler | Jerrold | 202-225-5635 | 718-373-3198 |
| NY09 | Weiner | Anthony | 202-225-6616 | 718-520-9001 |
| NY10 | Towns | Edolphus | 202-225-5936 | 718-855-8018 |
| NY11 | Clarke | Yvette | 202-225-6231 | 718-287-1142 |
| NY12 | Velázquez | Nydia | 202-225-2361 | 718-599-3658 |
| NY13 | Fossella | Vito | 202-225-3371 | 718-356-8400 |
| NY14 | Maloney | Carolyn | 202-225-7944 | 718-932-1804 |
| NY15 | Rangel | Charles | 202-225-4365 | 212-663-3900 |
| NY16 | Serrano | Jose | 202-225-4361 | 718-620-0084 |
| NY17 | Engel | Eliot | 202-225-2464 | 845-735-1000 |
| NY18 | Lowey | Nita | 202-225-6506 | 914-428-1707 |
| NY19 | Hall | John | 202-225-5441 | 845-291-4100 |
| NY20 | Gillibrand | Kirsten | 202-225-5614 | 518-828-3109 |
| NY21 | McNulty | Michael | 202-225-5076 | 518-762-3568 |
| NY22 | Hinchey | Maurice | 202-225-6335 | 845-791-7116 |
| NY23 | McHugh | John | 202-225-4611 | 518-661-6486 |
| NY24 | Arcuri | Michael | 202-225-3665 | 315-252-2777 |
| NY25 | Walsh | James | 202-225-3701 | 315-423-5657 |
| NY26 | Reynolds | Thomas | 202-225-5265 | 716-634-2324 |
| NY27 | Higgins | Brian | 202-225-3306 | 716-484-0729 |
| NY28 | Slaughter | Louise | 202-225-3615 | 716-282-1274 |
| NY29 | Kuhl | Randy | 202-225-3161 | 607-776-9142 |
| OH01 | Chabot | Steve | 202-225-2216 | 513-684-2723 |
| OH02 | Schmidt | Jean | 202-225-3164 | 800-784-6366 |
| OH03 | Turner | Michael | 202-225-6465 | 937-383-8931 |
| OH04 | Jordan | Jim | 202-225-2676 | 419-999-6455 |
| OH05 | Latta | Bob | 202-225-6405 | 419-448-9016 |
| OH06 | Wilson | Charles | 202-225-5705 | 330-532-3740 |
| OH07 | Hobson | David | 202-225-4324 | 937-325-0474 |
| OH08 | Boehner | John | 202-225-6205 | 513-779-5400 |
| OH09 | Kaptur | Marcy | 202-225-4146 | 419-259-7500 |
| OH10 | Kucinich | Dennis | 202-225-5871 | 440-845-2707 |
| OH11 | Jones | Stephanie | 202-225-7032 | 216-522-4900 |
| OH12 | Tiberi | Patrick | 202-225-5355 | 614-523-2555 |
| OH13 | Sutton | Betty | 202-225-3401 | 440-245-5350 |
| OH14 | LaTourette | Steven | 202-225-5731 | 800-447-0529 |
| OH15 | Pryce | Deborah | 202-225-2015 | 614-469-5614 |
| OH16 | Regula | Ralph | 202-225-3876 | 330-722-3793 |
| OH17 | Ryan | Tim | 202-225-5261 | 330-373-0074 |
| OH18 | Space | Zachary | 202-225-6265 | 740-779-1636 |
| OK01 | Sullivan | John | 202-225-2211 | 918-749-0014 |
| OK02 | Boren | Dan | 202-225-2701 | 918-423-5951 |
| OK03 | Lucas | Frank | 202-225-5565 | 580-256-5752 |
| OK04 | Cole | Tom | 202-225-6165 | 580-436-5375 |
| OK05 | Fallin | Mary | 202-225-2132 | 405-234-9900 |
| OR01 | Wu | David | 202-225-0855 | 800-422-4003 |
| OR02 | Walden | Greg | 202-225-6730 | 541-389-4408 |
| OR03 | Blumenauer | Earl | 202-225-4811 | 503-231-2300 |
| OR04 | DeFazio | Peter | 202-225-6416 | 541-269-2609 |
| OR05 | Hooley | Darlene | 202-225-5711 | 503-557-1324 |
| PA01 | Brady | Robert | 202-225-4731 | 215-426-4616 |
| PA02 | Fattah | Chaka | 202-225-4001 | 215-848-9386 |
| PA03 | English | Phil | 202-225-5406 | 814-723-7282 |
| PA04 | Altmire | Jason | 202-225-2565 | 724-378-0928 |
| PA05 | Peterson | John | 202-225-5121 | 814-238-1776 |
| PA06 | Gerlach | Jim | 202-225-4315 | 610-594-1415 |
| PA07 | Sestak | Joe | 202-225-2011 | 610-892-8623 |
| PA08 | Murphy | Patrick | 202-225-4276 | 215-348-1194 |
| PA09 | Shuster | Bill | 202-225-2431 | 717-264-8308 |
| PA10 | Carney | Christopher | 202-225-3731 | 570-327-1902 |
| PA11 | Kanjorski | Paul | 202-225-6511 | 570-496-1011 |
| PA12 | Murtha | John | 202-225-2065 | 724-349-3195 |
| PA13 | Schwartz | Allyson | 202-225-6111 | 215-335-3355 |
| PA14 | Doyle | Michael | 202-225-2135 | 412-664-4049 |
| PA15 | Dent | Charles | 202-225-6411 | 215-541-4106 |
| PA16 | Pitts | Joseph | 202-225-2411 | 610-374-3637 |
| PA17 | Holden | Tim | 202-225-5546 | 717-234-5904 |
| PA18 | Murphy | Tim | 202-225-2301 | 724-850-7312 |
| PA19 | Platts | Todd | 202-225-5836 | 717-600-1919 |
| PR00 | Fortuno | Luis | 202-225-2615 | 787-723-6333 |
| RI01 | Kennedy | Patrick | 202-225-4911 | 401-729-5600 |
| RI02 | Langevin | James | 202-225-2735 | 401-732-9400 |
| SC01 | Brown | Henry | 202-225-3176 | 843-747-4175 |
| SC02 | Wilson | Joe | 202-225-2452 | 803-939-0041 |
| SC03 | Barrett | Gresham | 202-225-5301 | 803-649-5571 |
| SC04 | Inglis | Bob | 202-225-6030 | 864-582-6422 |
| SC05 | Spratt | John | 202-225-5501 | 843-393-3998 |
| SC06 | Clyburn | James | 202-225-3315 | 843-662-1212 |
| SD00 | Herseth Sandlin | Stephanie | 202-225-2801 | 605-394-5280 |
| TN01 | Davis | David | 202-225-6356 | 423-247-8161 |
| TN02 | Duncan | John | 202-225-5435 | 423-745-4671 |
| TN03 | Wamp | Zach | 202-225-3271 | 423-756-2342 |
| TN04 | Davis | Lincoln | 202-225-6831 | 865-354-3323 |
| TN05 | Cooper | Jim | 202-225-4311 | 615-736-5295 |
| TN06 | Gordon | Bart | 202-225-4231 | 615-896-1986 |
| TN07 | Blackburn | Marsha | 202-225-2811 | 901-382-5811 |
| TN08 | Tanner | John | 202-225-4714 | 731-423-4848 |
| TN09 | Cohen | Steve | 202-225-3265 | 901-544-4131 |
| TX01 | Gohmert | Louie | 202-225-3035 | 866-535-6302 |
| TX02 | Poe | Ted | 202-225-6565 | 866-447-0242 |
| TX03 | Johnson | Sam | 202-225-4201 | 972-470-0892 |
| TX04 | Hall | Ralph | 202-225-6673 | 214-726-9949 |
| TX05 | Hensarling | Jeb | 202-225-3484 | 214-349-9996 |
| TX06 | Barton | Joe | 202-225-2002 | 817-543-1000 |
| TX07 | Culberson | John | 202-225-2571 | 713-682-8828 |
| TX08 | Brady | Kevin | 202-225-4901 | 936-439-9542 |
| TX09 | Green | Al | 202-225-7508 | 713-383-9234 |
| TX10 | McCaul | Michael | 202-225-2401 | 979-830-8497 |
| TX11 | Conaway | Michael | 202-225-3605 | 432-331-9667 |
| TX12 | Granger | Kay | 202-225-5071 | 817-338-0909 |
| TX13 | Thornberry | Mac | 202-225-3706 | 806-371-8844 |
| TX14 | Paul | Ron | 202-225-2831 | 361-576-1231 |
| TX15 | Hinojosa | Rubén | 202-225-2531 | 956-682-5545 |
| TX16 | Reyes | Silvestre | 202-225-4831 | 915-534-4400 |
| TX17 | Edwards | Chet | 202-225-6105 | 817-645-4743 |
| TX18 | Jackson-Lee | Sheila | 202-225-3816 | 713-861-4070 |
| TX19 | Neugebauer | Randy | 202-225-4005 | 806-763-1611 |
| TX20 | Gonzalez | Charles | 202-225-3236 | 210-472-6195 |
| TX21 | Smith | Lamar | 202-225-4236 | 210-821-5024 |
| TX22 | Lampson | Nick | 202-225-5951 | 281-461-6300 |
| TX23 | Rodriguez | Ciro | 202-225-4511 | 432-336-3975 |
| TX24 | Marchant | Kenny | 202-225-6605 | 866-213-3803 |
| TX25 | Doggett | Lloyd | 202-225-4865 | 512-916-5921 |
| TX26 | Burgess | Michael | 202-225-7772 | 972-434-9700 |
| TX27 | Ortiz | Solomon | 202-225-7742 | 361-883-5868 |
| TX28 | Cuellar | Henry | 202-225-1640 | 956-631-4826 |
| TX29 | Green | Gene | 202-225-1688 | 281-999-5879 |
| TX30 | Johnson | Eddie | 202-225-8885 | 214-922-8885 |
| TX31 | Carter | John | 202-225-3864 | 512-246-1600 |
| TX32 | Sessions | Pete | 202-225-2231 | 972-392-0505 |
| UT01 | Bishop | Rob | 202-225-0453 | 801-625-0107 |
| UT02 | Matheson | Jim | 202-225-3011 | 435-627-0880 |
| UT03 | Cannon | Chris | 202-225-7751 | 801-569-5125 |
| VA01 | Wittman | Robert | 202-225-4261 | 804-443-0668 |
| VA02 | Drake | Thelma | 202-225-4215 | 757-787-7836 |
| VA03 | Scott | Bobby | 202-225-8351 | 804-644-4845 |
| VA04 | Forbes | J. | 202-225-6365 | 804-526-4969 |
| VA05 | Goode | Virgil | 202-225-4711 | 434-392-8331 |
| VA06 | Goodlatte | Bob | 202-225-5431 | 540-432-2391 |
| VA07 | Cantor | Eric | 202-225-2815 | 804-747-4073 |
| VA08 | Moran | James | 202-225-4376 | 703-971-4700 |
| VA09 | Boucher | Rick | 202-225-3861 | 276-523-5450 |
| VA10 | Wolf | Frank | 202-225-5136 | 800-850-3463 |
| VA11 | Davis | Tom | 202-225-1492 | 703-590-4599 |
| VI00 | Christensen | Donna | 202-225-1790 | 340-778 5900 |
| VT00 | Welch | Peter | 202-225-4115 | 888-605-7270 |
| WA01 | Inslee | Jay | 202-225-6311 | 206-361-0233 |
| WA02 | Larsen | Rick | 202-225-2605 | 360-733-4500 |
| WA03 | Baird | Brian | 202-225-3536 | 360-695-6292 |
| WA04 | Hastings | Doc | 202-225-5816 | 509-452-3243 |
| WA05 | Rodgers | Cathy McMorris | 202-225-2006 | 509-353-2374 |
| WA06 | Dicks | Norman | 202-225-5916 | 360-479-4011 |
| WA07 | McDermott | Jim | 202-225-3106 | 206-553-7170 |
| WA08 | Reichert | David | 202-225-7761 | 206-275-3438 |
| WA09 | Smith | Adam | 202-225-8901 | 253-896-3775 |
| WI01 | Ryan | Paul | 202-225-3031 | 608-752-4050 |
| WI02 | Baldwin | Tammy | 202-225-2906 | 608-258-9800 |
| WI03 | Kind | Ron | 202-225-5506 | 715-831-9214 |
| WI04 | Moore | Gwen | 202-225-4572 | 414-297-1140 |
| WI05 | Sensenbrenner | James | 202-225-5101 | 262-784-1111 |
| WI06 | Petri | Thomas | 202-225-2476 | 920-231-6333 |
| WI07 | Obey | David | 202-225-3365 | 715-842-5606 |
| WI08 | Kagen | Steve | 202-225-5665 | 920-437-1954 |
| WV01 | Mollohan | Alan | 202-225-4172 | 304-292-3019 |
| WV02 | Capito | Shelley | 202-225-2711 | 304-925-5964 |
| WV03 | Rahall | Nick | 202-225-3452 | 304-325-6222 |
| WY00 | Cubin | Barbara | 202-225-2311 | 307-261-6595 |
Democratic and Progressive Wikis
Archive of past Democrats.com events.
Daytime
Evening
Torture and Lies: Who Is Accountable?
From Abu Ghraib to the Downing Street Minutes
New York City Town Hall Meeting
Saturday July 23, 2005 2-4 p.m.
New York Society for Ethical Culture 2 W. 64th St.
Free admission, donations suggested
Seating is limited, no reservations
Sponsored by The Nation and Democrats.com
Speakers:
Moderator: Bob Fertik
Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), who has represented a conservative district in upstate New York since 1993, has spoken passionately about the significance of the Downing Street Minutes and the need to hold the President accountable for taking the nation to war on the basis of lies.
http://www.democrats.com/hinchey-newpaltz
Hon. Liz Holtzman, a former Congresswoman from New York, served on the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment of President Nixon. She later served as District Attorney of Brooklyn and currently serves on the Nazi and Japanese Imperial War Criminal Records Interagency Working Group. She just published "Torture and Accountability," an extraordinary article in The Nation:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050718&s=holtzman
Randi Rhodes hosts The Randi Rhodes Show, the hugely popular afternoon show on Air America Radio. Bob Fertik is the President of Democrats.com and a co-founder of AfterDowningStreet.org, a broad national coalition formed on May 26 to end the U.S. media blackout of the Downing Street Minutes, which exposed the Bush administration's pre-war declarations as deliberate lies.
http://therandirhodesshow.com/live/
July 23 is the 3rd anniversary of the Downing Street Minutes. Town Hall Meetings are being held all across the country, organized by Rep. John Conyers and AfterDowningStreet.org.
Co-sponsors:
For updates visit:
http://democrats.com/july23
To volunteer visit:
http://democrats.com/contact
Torture, Lies and Treason: Who Is Accountable?
From Abu Ghraib to the Downing Street Minutes to Valerie Plame
New York City Town Hall Meeting
Saturday July 23, 2005 2-4 p.m.
New York Society for Ethical Culture 2 W. 64th St.
Sponsored by The Nation and Democrats.com
Speakers:
Rep. Maurice Hinchey
Hon. Liz Holtzman
Randi Rhodes
Moderator: Bob Fertik
On behalf of The Nation magazine and Democrats.com, thank you all for coming to this important Town Hall Meeting on this hot Saturday afternoon.
My name is Bob Fertik and I am the President of Democrats.com and a co-founder of the AfterDowningStreet Coalition.
I'd like to thank the New York Society for Ethical Culture for renting us their wonderful building. I hope each of you will make a donation to help the Society and also get involved in its important community work.
I'd also like to thank our wonderful co-sponsors: Air America Radio, Billionaires for Bush, The Blame Show, Dave Pollak, Democracy for NYC, INN World Report, The Iraq Project, MediaChannel.org, New Democratic Majority, NYC Downing Street Coalition, NYS Senators Liz Krueger and Eric Schneiderman, openDemocracy.net, PoliticalStrategy.us, Progressive Democrats of America, SmirkingChimp.com, United for Peace and Justice, Veterans for Peace, and VoterMarch.org.
I want to thank the contributors to Democrats.com and AfterDowningStreet.org who made today's events possible.
And I'd like to thank the reporters and bloggers who came to hear what we have to say.
Today's forum in New York City is one of over 300 events around the country, organized by Rep. John Conyers and AfterDowningStreet.org. Eight of these events feature Members of Congress, including John Conyers in Detroit, Jim McDermott in Seattle, Barbara Lee in Oakland, Maxine Waters in Los Angeles, and Maurice Hinchey here today. Rep. Charlie Rangel of Harlem held an online town hall yesterday.
Today's events follow a hearing by John Conyers on June 16 that was attended by 36 House Democrats - including Maurice Hinchey - even though Republicans forced the hearings into a small basement room and scheduled 11 roll call votes to keep Members away. Right after the hearing, AfterDowningStreet.org led a spirited protest at the White House to force staff members to accept a letter from John Conyers to George Bush that was signed by over 100 House Members and over 500,000 citizens, including many of you.
This level of mobilization is remarkable, especially since AfterDowningStreet.org was started just two months ago. And this will be just the beginning of our efforts, if you will help us. We'll get to your role after our speakers.
So why are we here today?
First, we are here to mark the 3rd anniversary of the Downing Street Minutes, the smoking gun which proves the Bush administration deliberately lied to Congress, the American people, and the world, to justify their long-planned invasion of Iraq.
Here's what Sir Richard Dearlove, head of British intelligence, told Tony Blair's inner cabinet three years ago today - four months before Congress authorized military action in Iraq, six weeks before Bush's first speech on Iraq here at the United Nations.
"Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."
The publication of this document on May 1 caused a firestorm in the British media, but the U.S. media refused to cover it. It was only because of bloggers and activists that most Americans ever learned of this document. And even today, the mainstream media continues its blackout of this historic story.
But more broadly, we are here to discuss the highest crimes imaginable in our democracy: Torture, Lies, and possibly even Treason.
In the past three years, these crimes were committed at the highest levels of our government - and in our names.
These crimes were committed by people who believe they are above the law.
And they will be right - if we, the American people, fail to hold them accountable.
Our speakers are experts on the crimes of the Bush administration.
But they also believe passionately in holding this administration accountable for its crimes.
We all know that Presidents are held accountable through impeachment.
But you probably don't know the word "impeachment" is strictly taboo in Washington today.
The mainstream media - which demanded Bill Clinton's impeachment for lying about sex - refuses to even ask whether George Bush should be impeached for lying about war.
For obvious reasons, conservatives vehemently oppose any discussion of impeachment.
But no progressives have been willing to talk about it either.
Until today.
Today, we are going to break that taboo.
Today, we are going to ask whether George Bush should be impeached for torture, lies, and possibly even treason.
According to a recent Zogby poll, an astonishing 42% of Americans believe George Bush should be impeached if he lied about Iraq.
By comparison, only 26% of Americans thought Bill Clinton should be impeached after the Lewinsky scandal broke.
This 42% figure is astounding. It represents nearly 100 million Americans.
Yet the mainstream media refuse to report it, because - as I said - the word impeachment is strictly taboo.
I know there are a few reporters - and lots of bloggers - here today. So let's give them some news to report.
How many of you believe George Bush should be impeached for lying about Iraq? Please raise your hands, and keep them raised.
Reporters and bloggers, please look around.
The American people are speaking.
They deserve to be heard. And whether or not the media listen today, ultimately we will be heard.
Because Democracy is on the march - right here at home.
Now it's time for our speakers to be heard.
Our first speaker is Liz Holtzman, who knows a thing or two about impeachment. Born in Brooklyn, Holtzman went from Abraham Lincoln High School to Radcliffe College and Harvard Law School. She was elected to Congress in 1972 at the age of 31, and is still the youngest woman ever elected. Holtzman was put on the House Judiciary Committee just in time to investigate the Watergate break-in. That investigation, led by the late Peter Rodino of Newark, uncovered widespread criminality in the Nixon administration, and led to the introduction of Articles of Impeachment, supported by both Democrats and Republicans. On August 8, 1974, Richard Nixon decided to resign rather than be impeached. Liz also knows a lot about prosecuting criminals, through her eight years as District Attorney in Brooklyn. And finally, Liz knows a lot about war crimes, through her current work on the Nazi and Japanese Imperial War Criminal Records Interagency Working Group. Liz recently applied her tremendous knowledge to the question of torture in Iraq, in a brilliant article in The Nation that everyone should read. I'm delighted to welcome a New York treasure, Liz Holtzman.
Maurice Hinchey was born on the Lower West Side and grew up in Saugerties. After serving two years in the Navy, he worked as a laborer in a cement plant and worked his way through college collecting tolls on the Thruway. He rebuilt the local Democratic Party and was elected to the State Assembly in 1974, becoming the first Democrat from Ulster County in 62 years. He served there for 18 years, gaining statewide fame as an environmental champion, preserving Sterling Forest, passing the first acid rain law, and investigating mafia control of the solid waste industry. He was elected to Congress in 1992 in a conservative upstate district running from Poughkeepsie west to the Finger Lakes. Hinchey has been an outspoken critic of the Iraq War - both before and after - and has brought audiences to their feet from New Paltz to St. Louis with his denunciations of the lies that took us to war.
Randi Rhodes was born in Brooklyn. Her father, who served in World War II, was a mechanical engineer; her mom worked in a dress shop. For financial reasons - like most soldiers today - Randi enlisted in the Air Force in 1977 and excelled as a mechanic, reaching the rank of sergeant. Her radio career began in Seminole, Texas where she was a waitress in a Mexican restaurant to support her radio habit. She made it to New York, Dallas, and Milwaukee before settling in South Florida. I first got to know her during the Florida recount in 2000, when Randi was about the only journalist in Florida protesting the theft of the Presidency. She gained national fame with the 2004 launch of Air America Radio, where she hosts the afternoon show from 3 to 7 each day. Randi has a huge and devoted audience here in New York City, where she is heard on 1190AM.
...
Let's give our wonderful speakers a warm round of applause for giving up their Saturday afternoons to discuss these historic topics with us.
Now let's talk about what you can do.
On your way in the door, you should have received a flyer about Representative Barbara Lee's Resolution of Inquiry, H. Res 375.
This resolution was introduced on Thursday and has 26 co-sponsors.
It is a simple request. It asks the White House and State Department for all "communication with officials with officials of the United Kingdom between January 1, 2002 and October 16, 2002, relating to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq."
In other words, we want to know whether the information contained in the Downing Street Minutes is true.
A Resolution of Inquiry is a special kind of bill. Under House rules, the committee to which it is assigned - probably International Relations - must vote yes or no within 14 Congressional working days.
AfterDowningStreet.org is trying to get every Member of Congress to support this Resolution. Our handout lists every Member in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut.
We would like to form committees of activists in as many of these districts as we can. So that's where you can help.
If you have to leave now, please take this flyer home and email your Representative using the link on the flyer - democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/50
If you can stay for another 10 minutes, I have asked a few people to lead brief caucus meetings here in this auditorium.
If you look around, you'll see people holding up signs for various parts of the region. In Manhattan, the West Side is represented by Jerry Nadler. The East Side is Carolyn Maloney. Harlem is Charlie Rangel. The Bronx is Jose Serrano, Eliot Engel and Joe Crowley. Queens is Joe Crowley, Greg Meeks, Gary Ackerman, and Nydia Velazquez. Brooklyn is Velazquez, Major Owens, Ed Towns, Anthony Weiner, Jerry Nadler, and Vito Fossella. Staten Island is Fossella. New Jersey has 13 Representatives, Upstate New York has 12, Nassau/Suffolk has 4, Connecticut has 5.
When you find your area caucus, find the people who have the same Representative. Then exchange e-mail addresses so you can work together after this meeting. And choose one person as the coordinator. Our immediate goal is to schedule a meeting in each district in August, when Congress is in recess and Members are at home. The coordinator should schedule the meeting, with the goal of persuading your Representative to support Barbara Lee's Resolution of Inquiry. The coordinator should e-mail me, bob@democrats.com, so we can work together to make our efforts a success.
That's all we ask for now. It's an easy way to get started and to get to know your Representative. Remember, Congress works for us, and it is their Constitutional duty to hold the White House accountable for its crimes. So let's work together, and make our Democracy work!
While Democrats control the House of Representatives by 231-202, they cannot pass progressive bills on health care, the environment, jobs, justice, and impeachment - or even stop horrendous Republican bills on Iraq, torture, and warrantless wiretapping - because a few dozen "Bush Democrats" usually vote with George Bush.
One solution is to elect more Democrats to increase our majority so "Bush Democrats" matter less, and many netroots groups like Moveon.org, DailyKos.com, and Blue America are doing this brilliantly.
The other solution is to support progressive Democrats in primaries against "Bush Democrats," and that's why we launched this effort, drawing heavily on the excellent advice of Blue America's Howie Klein.
The main reason progressives have avoided primaries against Democratic incumbents is the fear that a divisive primary might help turn a "Bush Democratic" seat into a Republican seat. Realistically, there may be a few "Bush Democrats" who are uniquely able to win in Republican districts and therefore should not be challenged in a Democratic primary. But those are the exceptions, not the rule - especially in an election like 2008 where Democrats have a large lead due to widespread disgust with Bush and the entire Republican Party. We will not target incumbents who are truly exceptional.
While we focus on replacing incumbent Bush Democrats, there are two other situations in which progressive Democrats face Bush Democrats:
You can help all of our progressive Democratic candidates through our Actblue page:
http://www.actblue.com/page/bushdemocrats
1. Incumbent Bush Democrats who deserve primary challenges
Below is a list of Democrats who voted wrong on one or more crucial votes. Some are hard-core "Bush Democrats" while others simply join them from time to time.
| Steny Hoyer |
By publishing this list, we hope to accomplish several goals:
This list began after 59 Bush Democrats voted against the McGovern Amendment on 5/10/2007 on the first key vote to end the war. Those 59 Bush Democrats voted for an endless occupation of Iraq despite overwhelming opposition from Democrats, Independents, and even many Republicans. The list has been modified since then to take account of other key votes since the original Iraq War vote on 10/10/02.
Key to Column Headings:
"B/R" ranks each district on a "Blue/Red" scale where 1=Strong Blue, 2=Leans Blue, 3=Tossup, 4=Leans Red, 5=Solid Red. In theory there is less "risk" in challenging an incumbent in a Blue district than a Red one, because the seat should stay Democratic regardless of who wins the primary. But each district and each race is unique, so that general theory may or may not apply.
"Incumbent" links to a page for each incumbent where you can discuss progressive Democrats who could challenge them in a primary, and other topics related to local political organizing.
"B/N" identifies Members who join the "Bluedog" (B) or "New Democrat/DLC" (N) caucuses. "Bluedogs" claim to support "fiscal responsibility," but these Bluedogs support a war that has already wasted an incredible $434 billion and driven budget deficits to record levels. "New Democrats/DLC" claim to support "national security" but the Iraq War has severely damaged our armed forces, undermined military recruitment, increased global terrorism, and alienated our allies. Those who play a leadership role with either group earn an asterisk (*).
"BDI" is the "Bush Democrat Index" which ranks all Democrats on their overall voting support for George Bush and the Republicans. It is the reverse of the Progressive Punch Index.
"Votes" identifies key votes where these Members voted wrong:
"Primary Nominees" lists people whose names have been mentioned. If they are running and have a web site we link to their site. If we consider them priority candidates (whether or not they are running) we make them bold.
| Dist | B/R | Incumbent | B/N | BDI | Votes | Primary Nominees |
| AL05 | 4 | Bud Cramer | B | 2 | ABMIRWCPQF | retiring in 08 |
| AL07 | Artur Davis | MWBPKQF | ||||
| AR01 | Marion Berry | B | ABCKQF | |||
| AR02 | 1 | Vic Snyder | N | 49 | IXWQF | |
| AR04 | 1 | Mike Ross | B* | 26 | ABMIWCPQF | |
| AZ05 | 4 | Harry Mitchell | b | 59 | ?IRWQF | |
| AZ08 | 3 | Gabrielle Giffords | B | 79 | ?IQF | Jeff Latas |
| CA18 | 3 | Dennis Cardoza | B | 46 | ?BIF | |
| CA20 | 2 | Jim Costa | B | 50 | ?BIWCQF | |
| CA28 | 1 | Howard Berman | 117 | AIQF | Rep. Cindy Montanez Rep. Lloyd Levine Mike Stettler |
|
| CO02 | 1 | 109 | IQF | running for US Senate | ||
| CO03 | 4 | John Salazar | B | 56 | ?BMIRWQF | |
| FL02 | 4 | Allen Boyd | B* | 6 | ABMIRWCPQF | Rep. Al Lawson |
| FL03 | Corrine Brown | KQF | ||||
| FL16 | 4 | Tim Mahoney | B | 63 | ?IRQF | |
| GA02 | 1 | Sanford Bishop | B | 27 | ABMIRQF | |
| GA08 | 5 | Jim Marshall | B | 9 | ?MIRXWQF | Robert Nowak Jack Ellis George Carswell |
| GA012 | 1 | John Barrow | BN | 12 | ?MIRXWPQF | Regina Thomas 7/15 |
| GA013 | 1 | David Scott | BN | 52 | ?BMIRQF | |
| IA03 | 3 | B | 20 | ABMIWPF | [Likely to retire after IA loses seat in 2010] |
|
| IL03 | 1 | Daniel Lipinski | 76 | IWQF | ||
| IL05 | Rahm Emanuel | * | KQF | |||
| IL08 | 4 | Melissa Bean | BN | 37 | ?BMIRWPQF | |
| IN02 | 3 | Joe Donnelly | B | 29 | ?IRWQF | |
| IN08 | 4 | Brad Ellsworth | B | 30 | ?IXWPQF | |
| IN09 | 4 | Baron Hill | B | 32 | A?IWQ | Gretchen Clearwater 5/6 |
| KS02 | 4 | Nancy Boyda | b | 88 | ?IQF | |
| KS03 | 3 | Dennis Moore | BN* | 47 | ABMICPQF | |
| KY06 | 3 | Ben Chandler | BN | 55 | ?BMIWQF | Sen. Ernesto Scorsone |
| LA03 | 3 | Charlie Melancon | BN | 15 | ?BMIRWPQF | |
| LA06 | Don Cazayoux | ?QF | ||||
| MD02 | 1 | Dutch Ruppersberger | 68 | ?BIQF | ||
| MD04 | 1 | 94 | AB | Donna Edwards | ||
| MD05 | 1 | Steny Hoyer | * | 83 | ABIQF | Paul Pinsky |
| MN07 | 4 | Collin Peterson | B | 3 | ABMIWQF | |
| MO04 | 5 | Ike Skelton | 5 | ABIQF | ||
| MS01 | Travis Childers | ?QF | ||||
| MS04 | 5 | Gene Taylor | B | 1 | ABMIXWCQF | |
| NC02 | 2 | Bob Etheridge | N | 48 | ABMIWQF | |
| NC07 | 3 | Mike McIntyre | BN | 7 | ABMIWQF | |
| NC011 | 3 | Heath Shuler | B | 23 | ?IRWPQF | Sen. Martin Luther Nesbitt Rep. Susan C Fisher Rep. Ray Rapp |
| ND00 | 4 | Earl Pomeroy | B | 33 | ABMIWPQF | |
| NV01 | 1 | Shelley Berkley | N | 67 | AIRQF | |
| NY20 | Kirsten Gillibrand | B | ?QF | |||
| OH06 | 3 | Charles Wilson | B | 140 | ?IWQF | |
| OH18 | 4 | Zack Space | B | 57 | ?IRWPQF | |
| OK02 | 4 | Dan Boren | B | 4 | ?BMIRXWCPQF | |
| PA04 | 3 | Jason Altmire | 25 | ?IRWQF | ||
| PA07 | Joe Sestak | ?KQF | ||||
| PA10 | 5 | Chris Carney | B | 43 | ?IRXWPQF | |
| PA11 | Paul Kanjorski | AQF | ||||
| PA12 | John Murtha | AHRBKQF | ||||
| PA13 | 1 | Allyson Schwartz | N | 145 | ?BIRQ | Chuck Pennacchio |
| PA17 | 5 | Tim Holden | B | 11 | ABMIRXPQF | Sen. Michael O'Pake |
| SC05 | John Spratt | AMBPKQF | ||||
| SC06 | Jim Clyburn | * | KQF | |||
| SD00 | 4 | Stephanie Herseth Sandlin | BN* | 36 | ?BMIRWCQF | |
| TN04 | 3 | Lincoln Davis | B | 13 | ?BMIWCPQF | |
| TN05 | 1 | Jim Cooper | B | 24 | ?BIWPQF | |
| TN06 | 4 | Bart Gordon | B | 18 | ABMIWQF | |
| TN08 | 1 | John Tanner | B | 8 | ABMIRWCPQF | |
| TX09 | 1 | Al Green | 167 | ?BIF | Rep. Alma Allen Rep. Hubert Vo |
|
| TX15 | Ruben Hinojosa | KQF | ||||
| TX16 | Silvestre Reyes | KQF | ||||
| TX17 | 5 | Chet Edwards | 17 | ABMIWQF | ||
| TX22 | 5 | Nick Lampson | B | 34 | A?IRWCQF | |
| TX23 | 3 | Ciro Rodriguez | 75 | ?IWQF | ||
| TX27 | 2 | Solomon Ortiz | 14 | BIQF | Juan Garcia | |
| TX28 | 1 | Henry Cuellar | bN | 19 | ?BMIRWQF | |
| TX29 | 1 | Gene Green | 43 | AIQF | Sen. Mario V. Gallegos | |
| UT02 | 5 | Jim Matheson | B | 10 | ABMIXWCPQF | Mayor Rocky Anderson |
| VA09 | 5 | Rick Boucher | 38 | ABIQF | ||
| WA03 | Brian Baird | CKQF | Cheryl Crist | |||
| WA06 | Norm Dicks | AQF | Paul Richmond | |||
| WI03 | 2 | Ron Kind | N* | 66 | ABIQF |
2. Republican districts and open seats where progressive Democrats are running against Bush Democrats
3. Progressive Democratic incumbents who are being challenged by Bush Democrats
| Dist | B/R | Progressive | Bush Democrat | Notes |
| TN-09 | 1 | Steve Cohen | Nikki Tinker | Cohen is an outstanding progressive Freshman who won Harold Ford Jr.'s open seat in 2006 by beating cousin Joe Ford Jr. in the Democratic primary and brother Jake Ford in the general election. Religious right ministers want to defeat Cohen because he supported the Hate Crimes Bill H.R. 1592 and they are likely to support Nikki Tinker, Harold Ford Jr.'s former campaign manager, who came in 2nd to Cohen in the 2006 Democratic primary. |
In Washington, conservative Democrats call themselves "New Democrats" - which only means they will betray the Democratic base - unions, women, minorities, gays - whenever Corporate America tells them to.
Here at Democrats.com, we call them Corporate Sellouts.
Groups
Democratic Leadership Council (DLC)
Senate New Democratic Coalition
Max Baucus, U.S. Senator, MT
Evan Bayh, U.S. Senator, IN
Maria Cantwell, U.S. Senator, WA
Tom Carper, U.S. Senator, DE
Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator, NY
Kent Conrad, U.S. Senator, ND
Christopher Dodd, U.S. Senator, CT
Byron Dorgan, U.S. Senator, ND
Dianne Feinstein, U.S. Senator, CA
Tim Johnson, U.S. Senator, SD
John Kerry, U.S. Senator, MA
Herb Kohl, U.S. Senator, WI
Mary Landrieu, U.S. Senator, LA
Joe Lieberman, U.S. Senator, CT
Blanche Lincoln, U.S. Senator, AR
Bill Nelson, U.S. Senator, FL
Ben Nelson, U.S. Senator, NE
Mark Pryor, U.S. Senator, AR
Debbie Stabenow, U.S. Senator, MI
House New Democratic Coalition
Brian Baird, U.S. Representative, WA
Shelley Berkley, U.S. Representative, NV
Lois Capps, U.S. Representative, CA
Russ Carnahan, U.S. Representative, MO
Ed Case, U.S. Representative, HI
Ben Chandler, U.S. Representative, KY
Joseph Crowley, U.S. Representative, NY
Jim Davis, U.S. Representative, FL
Susan Davis, U.S. Representative, CA
Artur Davis, U.S. Representative, AL
Rahm Emanuel, U.S. Representative, IL
Eliot Engel, U.S. Representative, NY
Bob Etheridge, U.S. Representative, NC
Harold Ford, Jr. , U.S. Representative, TN
Jane Harman, U.S. Representative, CA
Stephanie Herseth, U.S. Representative, SD
Brian Higgins, U.S. Representative, NY
Rush Holt, U.S. Representative, NJ
Darlene Hooley, U.S. Representative, OR
Jay Inslee, U.S. Representative, WA
Steve Israel, U.S. Representative, NY
Ron Kind, U.S. Representative, WI
Rick Larsen, U.S. Representative, WA
John Larson, U.S. Representative, CT
Carolyn McCarthy, U.S. Representative, NY
Mike McIntyre, U.S. Representative, NC
Gregory Meeks, U.S. Representative, NY
Juanita Millender-McDonald, U.S. Representative, CA
Dennis Moore, U.S. Representative, KS
Jim Moran, U.S. Representative, VA
David Price, U.S. Representative, NC
Loretta Sanchez, U.S. Representative, CA
Adam B. Schiff, U.S. Representative, CA
Allyson Schwartz, U.S. Representative, PA
David Scott, U.S. Representative, GA
Adam Smith, U.S. Representative, WA
Ellen Tauscher, U.S. Representative, CA
Tom Udall, U.S. Representative, NM
David Wu, U.S. Representative, OR

Democrats.com encourages every progressive activist to run for political office - at whatever level appeals to you.
As a company, we are prohibited by law from contributing money or services to candidates. However, we can offer free advice - and we are happy to do so!
The Internet is the greatest campaign tool ever invented. If you master the Internet, you can run a kick-ass Democratic campaign. Here are some suggestions on how to use the Internet to win. For best results, complete each step in sequence.
1. Create a web site
a. Think of a domain name that's really easy to spell and remember. Buy it at a low-cost registrar/hosting site like GoDaddy.com or Namesecure.com.
b. Create a free campaign contribution page at ActBlue.com and encourage your friends to make a contribution to show support.
c. Buy a turn-key Web site from one of these excellent vendors. If you can't afford a turn-key site, you can build a workable site for practically nothing using these do-it-yourself tools (no programming or server management skills necessary). Be sure to include an email signup form.
d. Have a good photographer take a vivid smiling closeup picture of you, as well as candid shots of you talking to voters.
e. Find a videographer with a studio to record you making a 2-minute persuasive statement about your candidacy, looking directly into the camera. Upload that statement to Youtube and embed the Youtube object in your web site.
f. Blog about the issues you care about most, the issues voters are bringing up as you campaign, news and blog coverage, etc. Write in a natural thoughtful voice. Respond to worthwhile comments. Enlist your strongest supporters (and clearest writers) as occasional bloggers.
g. Create a page with endorsements and enlist respected people from all walks of life, especially politics (including local party officers). Include their titles with their permission.
2. Promote your web site
a. Tell your friends to visit your blog, post comments, and help you spread the word. Respond to thoughtful comments whenever you can - build a friendly and welcoming community!
b. Reach out to Democrats.com members and other progressive activists in your Congressional District:
c. Print business cards. You can buy fancy but inexpensive cards with your color logo from iPrint.com.
d. Hit the campaign trail. Speak to local organizations, especially progressive activist groups like Moveon.org, DemocracyForAmerica.org (Howard Dean's group), Progressive Democrats of America, and Democrats.com. Join their e-mail lists to keep up with their activities and find out when they are meeting locally.
e. Social Networking. Create a campaign page on MySpace.com, Facebook.com, and YouTube.com - the largest social network sites. Recruit one or more volunteers who are regular users of these sites to update your campaign page and make "friends."
f. Make friends with progressive reporters, talk show hosts, and bloggers who cover your district - invite them to lunch or dinner so they get to know you. Encourage them to write/talk about your campaign. Make sure they mention your web site.
g. When your blog starts cooking with genuine local support, introduce your campaign on the national and state blogs. Each blog has its own format and personality, so spend a little time getting familiar with each one before you post. You only get one chance to make a first impression, so don't blow it!
Here is the straight dope from the King of Democratic Blogging, Markos Moulitsas a.k.a. Kos of DailyKos.com.
All of the campaigns that have grabbed notice in the past couple of years were launched by regular people, and I simply lent my support. I think it's important for people to realize that this is a new model of activism. The press and politicians still think it's a traditional model -- from top to bottom. So they come to me and think that by "reaching out" to me they can reach my audience. That's complete crap. It needs to be the exact opposite, they need to reach out to my audience. And if my audience decides its an endeavor worthy of support, then I'll get involved.
Here are some excellent tips for engaging bloggers from Chris Bowers and Matthew Stoller, authors of Emergence of the Progressive Blogosphere: A New Force in American Politics:
• Hire a "Netroots Coordinator" and be prepared to work with him or her on money, messaging and organizing. Most organizations hire one and relegate them to a position where they are asked simply to raise money. If you follow this model it is not worth engaging the blogs. A good Netroots Coordinator can deliver messaging, media, and money.
• Put up a link on your web site that says "Got a blog?" Ask for bloggers to give you their name, email, IM, and blog address. This list is valuable – it is the list of bloggers who are interested in your issue.
• Take your list of bloggers and add them to your press release list. Call through to introduce yourself, and invite them to cover events, and if possible give them press passes and access.
• Read the blogs who sign up. If you use an "aggregator" such as www.bloglines.com, you can read many more blogs much more quickly. Get a sense of who is on your side and who is not. Go into the comment section of various blogs and add comments when relevant.
• Hold conference calls with your strategists/candidate. Treat bloggers like friends and allies, but also realize you are on the record.
• Periodically do a "blog round-up" where you email interesting blog posts on your issue to all the bloggers as well as internally.
Link to interesting blog posts from your web site/blog; make sure you link to a few posts that disagree with you. This will lend your online presence more credibility.• Listen and respond to criticism. These are your friends and often not that experienced in politics – treat them like they are here to learn, not like they are cynical, hard-boiled reporters.
3. Become a Netroots Hero
Every campaign cycle, a handful of campaigns gain the attention of the largest national blogs. They do so through a combination of timing, creativity, know-how, and luck.
The most important factors are:
Candidate qualifications for "aggressive progressive" candidates
Researching your opponent: Progressive Punch is an incredible database of Congressional votes that awards every Member of Congress a "progressive score" based on their votes. You can click on the Member's name to learn more about each vote.
Legal requirements
Fundraising
Internet organizing
Training for candidates, staff, and volunteers (see also PACs)
How to Email Democrats.com Activists in your CD
Example #1: Impeachment Committees
My name is ? and I am a fellow member of Democrats.com.
I am organizing an Impeachment Committee to persuade Representative ? to support impeachment.
We will collect impeachment petitions in a busy location, write letters to the editor, and meet with Representative ? to persuade him/her to support impeachment.
Can you help us?
If so, please reply and tell me which of the activities above you can help with, and include your phone number if it's ok for me to call.
Thank you!!
[Your name]
Example #2: Iraq Town Hall
My name is ? and I am a fellow member of Democrats.com.
I am organizing a Town Hall Meeting on Iraq to persuade Representative ? to vote NO on Bush's demand for another $102 billion.
The Town Hall will be on April ? at the ? Church on ? Ave.
Can you come? And can you help me organize this event?
Please reply to this email if you can.
And please forward this email to everyone you know in Representative ?'s district.
Thank you!!
[Your name]
Democrats.com has built a unique email networking tool to help local activists who are authorized senders reach out to fellow Democrats.com members in their:
The purpose of this tool is to help activists accomplish political tasks, such as:
How it works:
Opting out:
Authorized senders:
Authorized senders can be chosen in several ways:
Content restrictions:
Everyone receives too much email, and we do not want this system to become a nuisance or a burden. We strictly prohibit:
Technical development:
a. If you know a good PHP programmer or Linux server administrator, download and install a free copy of CivicSpace. Otherwise, buy a basic hosting package from your domain registrar (like GoDaddy.com or Namesecure.com) that includes a few pages for basic information. Pick one of the pre-packaged designs, or find a talented graphic designer to create a snazzy logo and a simple site design, including a style sheet (body text and headlines).
b. Build your most important pages in this order: Home, Biography, Issues, News, Endorsements, and Photos. Do a first draft, sleep on it, and do a second draft. Show it to your most savvy friends and ask for their feedback. Keep revising it until it is unique, important, and persuasive.
c. Add a blog. You can get a free blog at Blogger.com. Tell your story in your blog - who you are, why you're running, and how you plan to beat your opponent. Update your blog frequently with items about yourself, your opponent, your district, and the issues of the day - local, state, national, and international.
d. Add a contribution form. You can get one from ActBlue.com.
e. Add a mailing list. You can get a free one from Yahoogroups.
These are the best turn-key Web sites for progressive candidates.
| Cost/US House |
Content Mgmt |
Blog |
Email List |
Volun teer |
Donate |
FEC File |
Canvass Mgmt |
| Blue State Digital | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
||
| Blue Utopia | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
| Bryght | + | + | |||||
| Campaign Advantage | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
||
| Campaign Office | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
||
| Campaign Window | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| CompleteCampaigns.com | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| DCS | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
||
| ElectionMall | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Mandate Media | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| Media Mezcla | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
||
| NGP Campaign Office | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
| Orchid for Change | + | + | + |
+ |
+ |
||
| WebPolitechs | + | + | + | + | + |
Mailing List Managers
If you have a web site but need a service to manage your mailing list, you can choose between free and paid services. Free services (Yahoo Groups (http://groups.google.com/),%20%20and%20Topica’s%20free%20service%20(http://lists.topica.com/).%20have">http://groups.yahoo.com/),%20Google%20Groups%20(http://groups.google.com/),%20%20and%20Topica’s%20free%20service%20(http://lists.topica.com/).%20have these limitations:
Hosted email tools typically allow you to manage your list, create emails, and view reports through a web-based interface. Most will allow you to send formatted emails; some provide tools to let you easily format them. You can generally integrate them into your website so that you can take subscriptions online, and the tools will automatically manage unsubscribe requests and delete email addresses that are no longer valid. Reports allow you to see how many opened a particular eNewsletter and how many clicked on a link.
These tools minimize the possibility of being blacklisted as a spammer. In addition, many of the vendors proactively manage relationships with ISPs to prevent spam filter problems.
Canvassing systems:
These systems allow you to upload a voter file and then manage canvass operations like phone banks and door-to-door by printing contact sheets and keypunching canvass results.
Paid Advertising to progressive activists:
Email append: buy email addresses for Democratic voters in your district (typically 15% match rates)
Free Internet outreach tips:
Progressive Democratic PACs
Democratic Leadership PACs
Bi-partisan Progressive PACs
Veterans/Iraq PACs
On August 2, 2005, Paul Hackett shocked the political world by getting 48% in a special election in Ohio's 2nd Congressional District - a conservative district that previously elected Republicans with over 70% of the vote.
What was the secret of Hackett's success? Hackett didn't let Republicans frame the debate, and he didn't mince words.
Here is Paul Hackett in his own words.
Gay Marriage:
Democrats.com believes in Democracy as expressed in the Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...
Unfortunately George Bush and the Republican Party do not believe in winning fair elections - they believe in stealing elections.
Democrats.com led the fight against the Stolen Elections of 2000 and 2004 - and we will continue to fight them through our voter empowerment web site MyDem.com
Here are resources to help us in our fight.
Are YOU registered to vote? Are you SURE??
You may THINK you're registered and go to the polls on Election Day - and be shocked to discover your name is not on the eligible voter list.
Why? Because Republicans are trying to disenfranchise Democratic voters through an ever-increasing number of despicable laws, regulations, and practices - even criminal activities.
Make sure they haven't removed YOU - "Google" your voter registration!
Step 1. Create a user account at Democrats.com so we can protect the privacy of your voter registration data. We need lastname, firstname, address, zip, and birthdate for an accurate match. (You can change or delete your data after you finish your search.)
Step 2. Search the Democrats.com National Voter List.
Step 3. Register to vote!
If you find this service useful, we welcome your contributions. We also encourage you to tell your friends to visit http://democrats.com/register
Count every vote - no more stolen elections!
(1) Because we are using copies of county election files, we cannot guarantee the results of our search - our service is for your convenience only. The only definitive way to find out if you are registered is to receive a mailing addressed to you from your County Election Office. Otherwise you can call your County Election Office (also here) and ask a county employee to look up your current voter record in their file. If you have any questions or comments, please drop us a note.
Here are some of the candidates and races we are following...
There are some of the "aggressive progressive" Democratic challengers we're watching. More at AfterDowningStreet.org. Special props to those who attended Netroots Nation in July 2008.
Progressive Democratic PACs (Other Progressive and Democratic PACs)
- BA: BlueAmerica
- BD: BushDemocrats (Democrats.com)
- DFA: Democracy For America
- DWT: Down With Tyranny
- ESC: Eschaton/Atrios
- JSt: JStreet
- MyD: MyDD
- NOW: NOW
- Olbd: OpenLeft Better Democrats
- OtB: Orange to Blue (DailyKos.com - criteria)
- PDA: Progressive Democrats of America
- PEN: People's Email Network
- SNA: SNAPPac/Students for a New American Politics
Progressive Endorsements
- ADS: AfterDowningStreet
- DWT: DownWithTyranny
| Challenger | Incumb | Gen eral |
Prim ary |
Pac | Out of Iraq | Wiretap | Other | ||
| S | AK | Mark Begich | Stevens (R) | BA DWT |
"gradual withdrawal" | No | |||
| S | ID | Larry LaRocco | open (R) | within 12-14 months | No | ||||
| S | KY | Greg Fischer | McConnell (R) | lost |
BA | Responsible Plan |
|||
| S | KY | Bruce Lunsford | No | ||||||
| S | ME | Tom Allen | Collins (R) | BA DWT ESC SNA |
No | ||||
| S | MN | Al Franken | Coleman (R) | OtB SNA |
|||||
| S | NC | Jim Neal | Dole (R) | lost |
BA | ASAP | vs. Primary opponent Kay Hagan: opposed Mukasey opposes telecom immunity supports S-CHIP opposes tax cuts for the rich |
||
| S | NE | Scott Kleeb | Johans (R) | ESC | |||||
| S | NH | Jeanne Shaheen | Sununu (R) | NOW SNA |
|||||
| S | NM | Tom Udall | DWT ESC |
No | |||||
| S | OK | Andrew Rice | Inhofe (R) | BA DWT OtB |
ASAP but orderly | No | pro-choice, pro-gun, civil unions, mandatory health insurance | ||
| S | OR | Jeff Merkley | Smith (R) |
5/20 won! |
BA DWT Olbd |
now | No | universal health care, stop global warming, restore the Constitution, voter verifiable paper trail | |
| S | OR | Steve Novick | Smith (R) |
lost |
|||||
| S | TX | Rick Noriega | Cornyn (R) | BA DFA DWT OtB |
No | ||||
| H | AL02 | Bobby Bright | Everett (R) | won | |||||
| H | AL03 | Josh Segall | Rogers (R) | lost | ePluribus Radio | ||||
| H | AL05 | Parker Griffith | (open-D) | won | |||||
| H | AK00 | Diane Benson | Young (R) | lost | DWT NOW |
||||
| H | AK00 | Ethan Berkowitz | Young (R) | ||||||
| H | AZ01 | Howard Shanker | (open) | lost | BA DWT |
No | primary v. Ann Kirkpatrick, endorsed by DCCC | ||
| H | AZ01 | Ann Kirkpatrick | (open) | won | |||||
| H | AZ03 | Bob Lord | Shadegg (R) | lost | DWT OtB |
||||
| H | CA03 | Bill Durston | Lungren (R) | PDA | |||||
| H | CA04 | Charlie Brown | (open) | BA DFA DWT OtB |
No | ||||
| H | CA08 | Shirley Golub | Nancy Pelosi (D) | lost |
PEN | Impeach | |||
| H | CA16 | Cynthia Papermaster | Zoe Lofgren (D) | lost |
Impeach | ||||
| H | CA24 | Mary Pallant | Gallegly (R) | lost |
ADS MyD PDA |
||||
| H | CA26 | Russ Warner | Dreier (R) | lost | BA DWT |
No | |||
| H | CA42 | Ron Shepston | Miller (R) | lost |
BA | ||||
| H | CA45 | Julie Bornstein | lost | BA | |||||
| H | CA46 | Debbie Cook | Rohrabacher (R) | lost | BA DWT |
Responsible Plan | No | ||
| H | CA48 | Steve Young | Campbell (R) | PDA | phased withdrawal | ||||
| H | CA50 | Cheryl Ede | Bilbray (R) | lost |
PDA | ||||
| H | CA50 | Nick Leibham | Bilbray (R) | lost | No | ||||
| H | CA52 | Vickie Butcher | (open) | lost |
PDA | phased withdrawal | |||
| H | CA53 | Mike Copass | Susan Davis (D) | lost |
PDA | Out-of-Iraq Pledge! | Defend the U.S. Constitution Separation of Corporation and State Repeal NAFTA |
||
| H | CO02 | Joan Fitz-Gerald | (open) | 8/12 | PDA NOW |
||||
| H | CO02 | Jared Polis | (open) | 8/12 | Responsible Plan | ||||
| H | CO04 | Betsy Markey | Musgrave (R) | won | NOW | No | |||
| H | CO05 | Hal Bidlack | Lamborn (R) | Responsible Plan | 25 years as an officer in the United States Air Force, retiring in September, 2006, as a Lt. Colonel. | ||||
| H | CT04 | Jim Himes | Shays (R) | WON | BA DWT ESC SNA |
No | |||
| H | FL08 | Corbett Kroehler | Keller (R) | PDA | |||||
| H | FL08 | Alan Grayson | Keller (R) | WON | BA DWT |
No | |||
| H | FL10 | Samm Simpson | Young (R) | PDA | |||||
| H | FL12 | Doug Tudor | Putnam (R) | lost | DFA DWT |
Responsible Plan | No | just retired from the Navy as a chief petty officer and his wife is still on active duty (and deployable) | |
| H | FL15 | Bob Bowman | Weldon (R) | ||||||
| H | FL21 | Raul Martinez | Diaz- | lost | |||||
| H | FL18 | Annette Taddeo | Ros-Lehtinen (R) | lost | BA DFA DWT |
Responsible Plan |
FL-18 is the most Democratic leaning (R +4) of the three Miami cuban districts and Annette's campaign is both well-organized and well-funded. Blog 7/23/08 |
||
| H | FL24 | Clint Curtis | Feeney (R) | lost | PDA | No | |||
| H | FL24 | Suzanne Kosmas | Feeney (R) | won | |||||
| H | FL25 | Joe Garcia | Diaz-Balart (R) | lost | BA DFA DWT OtB |
No | |||
| H | GA08 | Bob Nowak | Jim Marshall (D) | No | |||||
| H | GA10 | Bobby Saxon | Broun (R) | veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan | |||||
| H | GA12 | Regina Thomas | John Barrow (D) | 7/15 | BA Olbd |
"adamantly opposed to the occupation" | No | Barrow voted with Bush on HR 976 SCHIP; S 1927 FISA; HR 2956 Redeploy troops in 120 days; HR 2206 Iraq funding without withdrawal deadlines; HR 1591 Iraq benchmarks and withdrawal deadlines; HR 6 Repeal tax cuts for oil companies. District is 45% African-American and African-Americans are 70% of the voters in Democratic primaries. |
|
| H | GA13 | Donzella James | David Scott (D) | 7/15 | ADS | "would vote No on funding occupation" |
"supports impeachment" 2006 primary lost 67%-31% |
||
| H | IA03 | Ed Fallon | Leonard Boswell (D) | lost |
DFA PDA |
As in his seven previous campaigns in the Iowa Legislature, all of which he won, Fallon is running a grassroots campaign that focuses on contacting voters through door-to-door canvassing and phone banking, as well as creative use of YouTube. Recent productions include a mockumentary “Campaigns of the Rich and Powerful” and a rap video on fiscal responsibility and tax reform. | |||
| H | ID01 | Walt Minnick | Bill Sali (R) | won | |||||
| H | IL03 | Mark Pera | Dan Lipinski (D) | lost |
BA BD |
||||
| H | IL08 | Randi Scheuer | Melissa Bean (D) | lost |
BD PDA |
||||
| H | IL10 | Dan Seals | Kirk (R) | lost | OtB SNA NOW |
No | |||
| H | IL11 | Debbie Halvorson | (open) | won | JSt | ||||
| H | IL14 | John Laesch | open (R) | lost |
BA PDA |
||||
| H | IN06 | Barry Welsh | Pence (R) | lost | BA | No | |||
| H | IN09 | Gretchen Clearwater | Baron Hill (D) | lost |
BA | Out-of-Iraq Pledge! | Civil liberties, equal rights and justice for all; Single payer universal healthcare; jobs @ living wage | ||
| H | KY01 | Heather Ryan | Whitfield (R) | No | |||||
| H | LA06 | Michael Jackson | Don Cazayoux (D) | 9/6 | asap | No | Cazayoux was elected in a special election in 2008 and immediately became one of the strongest Bush Democrats. | ||
| H | MD01 | Frank Kratovil | open (R) | won | |||||
| H | MD04 | Donna Edwards | Al Wynn (D) | 2/12 won! |
BA BD JSt Olbd PDA |
||||
| H | ME01 | Mark Lawrence | open (D) | lost |
pro-impeachment | ||||
| H | ME01 | Chellie Pingree | open (D) | NOW | No | ||||
| H | MI07 | Mark Schauer | Walberg (R) | WON | BA DWT |
No | |||
| H | MI09 | Gary Peters | Knollenberger (R) | WON | BA DWT NOW |
No | "I believe in civil rights and equality for all people and to me gay marriage is a basic human rights issue, one I feel very strongly about. When I take a position based on core principles, I'm not going to waiver from it" | ||
| H | MN03 | Ashwin Madia | open (R) | lost | DWT | No | |||
| H | MO02 | Byron DeLear | Akin (R) | pro-impeachment | |||||
| H | NC08 | Larry Kissell | Hayes (R) | WON | BA DWT |
No | |||
| H | NC09 | Harry Taylor | Myrick (R) | PDA NOW |
known for his courageous—and courteous—confrontation of President Bush in Charlotte in April 2006. | ||||
| H | NJ01 | Mahdi Ibn-Ziyad | Rob Andrews (D) | lost |
PDA | ||||
| H | NJ05 | Camille Abate | Garrett (R) | lost |
now | local Moveon leader, pro-impeachment | |||
| H | NJ05 | Dennis Shulman | Garrett (R) | lost | 6/3 won! |
BA DWT JSt |
Responsible Plan | No | blind rabbi |
| H | NJ07 | Linda Stender | open (R) | lost | NOW | No | |||
| H | NM01 | Martin Heinrich | (open) | WON | 6/3 won! |
BA DWT |
No | ||
| H | NM02 | Bill McCamley | (open) | lost |
|||||
| H | NM02 | Harry Teague | (open) | won | multimillionaire oilman | ||||
| H | NY08 | Adam Sullivan | Jerrold Nadler (D) | BD | Impeach | ||||
| H | NY10 | Kevin Powell | Ed Towns (D) | 9/9 | |||||
| H | NY13 | Steve Harrison | Fossella (R) | lost | DWT NOW PDA |
now | |||
| H | NY13 | Michael McMahon | open (R) | won | |||||
| H | NY21 | Darius Shahinfar | open (D) | 9/9 | No | ||||
| H | NY21 | Tracey Brooks | open (D) | 9/9 | NOW | ||||
| H | NY25 | Dan Maffei | (open) | WON | BA DWT OtB |
No | |||
| H | NY26 | Jon Powers | Jack Davis (D) | lost | BA DWT OtB |
No | |||
| H | NY29 | Eric Massa | Kuhl (R) | WON | DFA DWT PDA Olbd OtB |
No | |||
| H | OH02 | Victoria Wulsin | Schmidt (R) | BA DWT NOW SNA |
No | ||||
| H | OH03 | Jane Mitakides | Turner (R) | lost | NOW | ||||
| H | OH15 | Mary Jo Kilroy | (open) | lost | JSt NOW SNA |
||||
| H | OR01 | Mark Welyczko | David Wu (D) | lost |
PEN | Impeach | |||
| H | OR03 | Joe Walsh | Blumenauer (D) | lost |
PEN | Impeach | |||
| H | OR05 | Nancy Moran | (open) | lost |
PEN | Impeach | |||
| H | PA15 | Sam Bennett | Dent (R) | lost | BA DWT NOW Olbd |
No | |||
| H | TN09 | Steve Cohen | won | BA DWT JSt |
primary by Harold Ford Jr. supporter | ||||
| H | TX10 | Larry Joe Doherty | McCaul (R) | lost | BA DWT |
No | |||
| H | VA02 | Glenn Nye | Drake (R) | won | |||||
| H | VA04 | Andrea Miller | Forbes (R) | DWT | No | progressive social activist pro-impeachment former MoveOn.org Regional Coordinator and Dennis Kucinich Regional Coordinator |
|||
| H | VA05 | Tom Perriello | Goode (R) | ADS BA DWT Olbd SNA |
No | ||||
| H | VA06 | Sam Rasoul | Goodlatte (R) | ||||||
| H | VA10 | Judy Feder | Wolf (R) | BA DWT NOW |
No | Dean of Georgetown University's Public Policy Institute (1999-2007) nationally recognized expert in health care policy |
|||
| H | VA11 | Leslie Byrne | (open) | lost |
BA NOW |
She opposed the war in Iraq from the start, will fight to make health care more affordable and more accessible, and has always supported a woman's right to choose. | |||
| H | VA11 | Gerry Connolly | open (R) | won | developer/contractor | ||||
| H | WA03 | Cheryl Crist | Brian Baird (D) | 8/19 lost |
Impeach | ||||
| H | WA04 | George Fearing | Hastings (R) | ||||||
| H | WA06 | Paul Richmond | Norm Dicks (D) | 8/19 lost |
Impeach | ||||
| H | WA08 | Darcy Burner | Reichert (R) | BA DFA DWT ESC Jst NOW Olbd OtB SNA |
No | ||||
| H | WI01 | Marge Krupp | Ryan (R) | NOW | |||||
| H | WY00 | Gary Trauner | (open) | lost | OtB | No |
I urge all Democrats to take the unequivocal Out-of-Iraq Pledge:
I solemnly pledge to vote against any additional funds for the occupation of Iraq, except what is absolutely required to bring all our troops home. I recognize that I will be under tremendous pressure from Democratic leaders and the Corporate Media to fund various missions like "fighting terrorism" or "training Iraqi forces" or "protecting Iraqi democracy," but I will not waver. We have already spent far too much of our blood and treasure for a war and occupation based on never-ending lies, and I will not sacrifice one more American soldier's life or one more taxpayer's dollar for those lies.
From: Democrats.com
Subject: Democratic Presidential Survey

Democrats.com is the oldest and largest online community of Democratic Party activists with over 330,000 subscribers, and we are conducting the first Presidential survey of Democrats via email.
The results will be published on Democrats.com and will get wide coverage in the media, so we hope you will participate!
If the Presidential vote were held today, which Democratic candidate would you vote for? (Vote by clicking one link below).
Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton
Chris Dodd
John Edwards
Mike Gravel
Dennis Kucinich
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
If you cast a vote we will send you an email when the results are published. We will also forward your email to the candidate of your choice so they can invite you to events with your candidate and help you vote absentee or at the polls on Election Day.
Thank you for your participation and onwards to victory in 2008!
Bob Fertik, President
Democrats.com
These are the results of our survey of Democrats
| IA | NH | NV | SC | |
| Joe Biden | ||||
| Hillary Clinton | ||||
| Chris Dodd | ||||
| John Edwards | ||||
| Mike Gravel | ||||
| Dennis Kucinich | ||||
| Barack Obama | ||||
| Bill Richardson |
These are the key post-election decisions by Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi:
| Week | Progressives | BlueDogs | Republicans |
| 11/3 | Rahm Emanuel named Chief of Staff |
To: Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, and Barack Obama
The Democratic nomination was not decided in Iowa or New Hampshire, so voters in many other states will have a voice in choosing our nominee.
The central theme for all Democratic candidates is change. But there's an enormous difference between talking about change a year from now - and acting for change NOW.
In the coming weeks, Congress has three major opportunities to ACT for change. As Democratic primary voters, we want to know: Will you just talk about change, or will you act for change NOW?
1. Will you actively support Senator Dodd's filibuster of telecom immunity for warrantless wiretapping, including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Senators?
2. Will you actively oppose and endorse the filibuster of any bills to further fund the occupation of Iraq, including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Senators and Representatives?
3. Will you actively support Rep. Robert Wexler's efforts to persuade House Judiciary Committee Chair John Conyers to hold hearings on Impeachment for Vice President Cheney, including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Representatives?
4. Will you actively support Rep. John Conyers' single-payer non-profit health care plan (H.R. 676), including making speeches and emailing your supporters urging them to contact their Senators and Representatives?
We look forward to your prompt response so we can share your answers with millions of progressive primary voters who want change NOW.
Sincerely,
Change Now Coalition
Democrats.com
Progressive Democrats of America
Etc.
Display this full page for our collections of important facts about Barack Obama.
For ongoing stories in the news, check our blog:
http://democrats.com/barack-obama
Internet rumors & lies:
The 2008 campaign has begun, and the Democratic presidential candidates are competing for the support of the anti-war majority - that's us, folks!
It's extremely rare for progressives to be courted by Democratic leaders, so let's make them really compete for our votes by making our position clear:
1. Deny all funds for Bush's escalation
2. Use the Supplemental Appropriations to restrict all funds to safe withdrawal of our troops (Lee Amendment) attach a withdrawal timeline, even if Bush vetoes the bill
3. Support legislation for immediate redeployment of U.S. troops, to be completed by the end of 2007 using the funds already appropriated
4. Oppose continued U.S. occupation of Iraq beyond 2007
We will track the candidates' positions below. Please help us by contacting the campaigns (click on their names for the contact form). Ask them to state their position on the 4 issues above - simply copy/paste into their contact form after this introduction: "As a member of Democrats.com, I support these positions on Iraq. Do you?"
The Kucinich Plan (H.R. 1234): How do the other candidates compare?
| Biden | Clinton | Dodd | Edwards | Gravel | Obama | Richardson | |
| 1. The US announces it will end the occupation, close military bases and withdraw. | Yes | ||||||
| 2. US announces that it will use existing funds to bring the troops and necessary equipment home. | |||||||
| 3. Order a simultaneous return of all US contractors to the United States and turn over all contracting work to the Iraqi government. | |||||||
| 4. Convene a regional conference for the purpose of developing a security and stabilization force for Iraq. | Yes | Yes | |||||
| 5. Prepare an international security and peacekeeping force to move in, replacing US troops who then return home. | |||||||
| 6. Develop and fund a process of national reconciliation. | Yes | ||||||
| 7. Reconstruction and Jobs. | Yes | ||||||
| 8. Reparations. | |||||||
| 9. Political Sovereignty. | |||||||
| 10. Iraq Economy. | |||||||
| 11. Economic Sovereignty. | |||||||
| 12. International Truth and Reconciliation. | |||||||
.
Display this full page for our collections of important facts about John McCain.
For ongoing stories in the news, check our blog:
http://democrats.com/john-mccain
during a forum shown on MSNBC, host Chris Matthews asked McCain if he would "sit down with the Democratic nominee . . . and agree to them that there will be no outside sleazeball attacks by either side, that you will tell your people you will condemn any attack, like a swift-boating, and you will both agree to do that upfront, right after you get the nomination?"
"I would love to do that," McCain replied. "During the primary, there was a 527 that sprang up. And I asked them to stop."
.
John McCain is as much of an anti-abortion zealot as anyone in Congress.
John McCain was born on 8/29/36. If elected, he will be 72 when he is sworn in in 2009 - the oldest start of any Presidency. He would be 76 at the end of his first term, and if re-elected in 2012, would be president until age 80.
McCain's age is already an issue, due to his many jokes and "senior moments."
McCain is a cancer survivor
McCain's family history is risky
Is McCain's mind failing?
McCain's many "senior moments" are listed here. Does he have a medical problem?
Gerontologists and retirement planners have learned that aging brains compensate for cognitive decline by relying on templates of familiar knowledge more than problem solving. That’s usually a good thing, but neuroscientists have also found that memory loss can lead people to substitute incorrect information. This phenomenon, called confabulation, rather than being random, often takes the form of untrue “facts” that make them feel better — giving them what scientists have called “the pleasantness of false beliefs.” So are McCain’s stumbles simply misstatements, or evidence of a mind filling in blanks with wish fulfillment? Well, we really have no idea. But neither does McCain: His aides told reporters in May that he has had no mental evaluations in the past eight years.
During his first presidential run, eight years ago, McCain disclosed hundreds of pages of records to reporters as he sought then to counter what aides called a "whisper campaign" questioning his mental fitness. In those records, medical personnel concluded that his years in prison, including solitary confinement, left him with no psychological wounds. Aides said McCain has had no mental evaluations in the past eight years and none was included in the documents.
McCain's memory could also be affected by prescription drugs:
Could McCain's mind get worse?
13% of Americans over 65 have Alzheimers. 22% of Americans over 70 are affected by mild cognitive impairment, a decline in brain function that causes memory loss and can lead to dementia. (Each year, 3.5% of healthy 70-79 year olds develop mild cognitive impairment, with men twice as likely as women to get it.) Further, 35-40% of older adults have neural deficits that lead to poor decision making.
Ronald Reagan turned 70 two weeks after his inauguration in 1981 and many questioned whether he was too old. He was formally diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 1994 at age 83, but early symptoms were apparent during his re-election campaign in 1984, which he dismissed with a famous prepared joke: "I'm not going to hold my opponent's youth and inexperience against him."
McCain's brain has endursed physical, chemical, and physiological abuse:
Does McCain have PTSD and its consequential psychiatric problems?
According to Dr. Kirk James Murphy, a V.A. physician who has long experience treating veterans with PTSD:
Sen McCain's life history indicates that his brain is at greater than average risk of dysfunction and impairment in the following areas:
- capacity to learn, recall, and reason with complex new information
- judgement and impulse control
- capacity to devote sustained attention.
Sen McCain - like all victims of trauma and torture - is entitled to absolute privacy regardiing his personal medical history. We as American citizens, however, are entitled to all possible information about the men and women who choose to ask act us to select them as president.
At the very least, Sen McCain's history raises many questions about the presence of objectively determinable disruption in neuropsychiatric function. He and his camapign have been forthcoming with his medical records in the past; his brain history strongly suggests that obtaining and releasing the results of current neuropsychiatric testing, imaging studies (perhaps including functional MRI and or auditory evoked potential findings) and other relevant assessments would be required in order to conclude that Sen McCain would bring to the Oval Office a brain functioning sufficiently well to serve as the second President of the 21st Century.
.
Is John McCain eligible to be President?
Under the Constitution, the President must be a "natural born Citizen" of the United States.
But McCain was not born in the United States. He was born in the Panama Canal Zone on Aug 29, 1936 at the Coco Solo Naval Hospital; at the time of McCain's birth was NOT located within the Canal Zone. (It was later added to the Zone by Franklin Roosevelt through EXECUTIVE ORDER 8981 on Dec 17, 1941, when McCain was 5 years old.)
Therefore John McCain is not a citizen "by birth" or a "natural born Citizen."
Instead, McCain is a citizen "by law" because his parents were both American citizens.
The Supreme Court has never decided whether a citizen "by law" is eligible to be President, because no citizen "by law" has ever won a Presidential election.
Several federal lawsuits have been filed that challenge McCain's eligibility:
More info:
John McCain has kissed George Bush's ass ever since Bush beat him in the vicious 2000 GOP primary in South Carolina, when Bush's dirty tricksters used "push polls" to spread lies about McCain's "black babies."
McCain's devotion to Bush has been especially ardent on Iraq.
But with Bush's approval rating down to 19%, McCain suddenly wants to keep Bush as far away as possible, according to the NY Times.
John McCain has a history of melanoma (skin cancer):
McCain called Cindy a "cunt" in front of 3 reporters in 1992:
Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain's intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain's hair and said, "You're getting a little thin up there." McCain's face reddened, and he responded, "At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt." McCain's excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days.
Cindy's fortune comes from her father's beer distributorship, which had many ties to the mob.
Which may be why McCain refused to release Cindy's 2006 and 2007 tax returns.
Back in 2004, then-Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie excoriated John Kerry in the media as a result of the presumptive Democratic nominee's similar decision not to publicly release information on his wife's substantial assets -- so we can assume that he will hit McCain for doing the same thing this year, right? I'm not holding my breath. In fact, Heinz Kerry did release a portion of her 2003 returns during the 2004 campaign.)
The partial release of Cindy's tax returns could be hiding something very important:
These media reports, therefore, have advanced the McCain campaign's comparison between Cindy McCain's limited release of financial information and Heinz Kerry's, and in doing so, ignored a key distinction in the information they released: Unlike Heinz Kerry, Cindy McCain did not release sufficient information for the public to determine the extent to which she benefited from the tax cuts her husband supports extending.
Slate writes:
Aside from a Wachovia checking account, in which he keeps between $15,000 and $50,000 (wouldn't some of that money earn more interest in a certificate of deposit?), all of the couple's assets are in Cindy's name. John McCain's tax return is so anemic, so marginal to the couple's actual financial situation, that he doesn't even take a deduction for interest on his home mortgage. Presumably Cindy does, since disclosure forms indicate that she has several mortgages.
We don't know for certain whether she does, because the campaign has declined to release Cindy McCain's tax returns. This data gap sets McCain apart from his Democratic opponents, who have released jointly filed tax records going back a minimum of seven years. Thanks to McCain's lack of genuine opposition in recent months, there has been very little clamor to release Cindy McCain's returns, even from those Republicans who loudly insisted that Hillary and Bill Clinton were hiding something in theirs.
Cindy says she will never release her tax returns, even if she becomes First Lady!
John McCain claims to be a brave war hero. So why is he afraid to even talk to Iran? As Jonathan Singer writes,
The Obama campaign is completely right to invoke Presidents Kennedy and Reagan in talking about the importance of speaking with both friend and foe. They might have even invoked Teddy Roosevelt, who McCain claims to model his career after but who in fact McCain seems to know and understand little about, a President who won a nobel peace prize while in the White House specifically because of his willingness to engage with the world.
But I'd go even a step further and ask why John McCain is afraid to speak with Iran. What is it about Iran that scares McCain so much? Or is it that McCain believes Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Khamenei are so crafty that they would trick an American President into inadvertently ceding the state of Maine or American Samoa to Iran? Or alternatively, is it that McCain simply does not know how to act in a manner different from his true political role model, George W. Bush?
Here's a simpler possibility: John McCain is simply a coward, just like all the macho war criminals in the Bush Administration.
Republican critics of John McCain
Ron Paul
Frank Schaefer, author of "AWOL-The Unexcused Absence of America's Upper Classes From Military Service, And How It Hurts Our Country."
John McCain's "talk" is a lot more crooked than straight.
Watch these Youtubes:
Jon Perr writes,
Four days after Arianna Huffington first reported it, John McCain’s 2000 VoteGate has become the election issue du jour. The New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times have all run stories confirming Huffington’s account that in 2000 a still steaming McCain did not vote for George W. Bush, the man who savaged him and his family during the Republican primaries.
Of course McCain tried to lie about it to Bill O'Reilly - but his tongue slipped and he accidentally told the truth!
O'REILLY: Did you vote for President Bush?
MCCAIN: Of course not.
Beyond McCain's guilty conscience, and all the witnesses at the Hollywood dinner party, there is more evidence McCain voted against Bush in 2000. In the spring of 2001, McCain seriously considered leaving the Republican Party and caucusing with Senate Democrats!
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was close to leaving the Republican Party in 2001, weeks before then-Sen. Jim Jeffords (Vt.) famously announced his decision to become an Independent, according to former Democratic lawmakers who say they were involved in the discussions.
In interviews with The Hill this month, former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and ex-Rep. Tom Downey (D-N.Y.) said there were nearly two months of talks with the maverick lawmaker following an approach by John Weaver, McCain’s chief political strategist...
Daschle said that throughout April and May of 2001, he and McCain “had meetings and conversations on the floor and in his office, I think in mine as well, about how we would do it, what the conditions would be. We talked about committees and his seniority … [A lot of issues] were on the table.”
Absolutely not so, according to McCain. In a statement released by his campaign, McCain said, “As I said in 2001, I never considered leaving the Republican Party, period.”
So who are you going to believe, McCain or a half-dozen Democrats who participated in these discussions?
Other senators who played major roles in the intense recruiting effort, according to Democrats, were then-Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) as well as Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Harry Reid (D-Nev.).
All of McCain's semi-Democratic friends know it's true, but now they're either lying or covering it up. The liar is John Weaver, McCain’s chief political strategist, who actually started the conversation with Tom Downey. The coverup is by Marshall Wittman
a McCain loyalist and strategist six years ago, put the odds of McCain leaving the Republican Party at “50-50.” Wittman, who now works for Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), declined to comment for this article.
Two other obvious witnesses were not interviewed: Jim Jeffords, who actually left the Republican Party to caucus with Democrats that spring, and Lincoln Chafee, who got close but chickened out.
In May, McCain was forced to fire two key staffers because of their lobbying work for the brutal dictators of Myanmar (Burma).
But that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to McCain's ties to brutal dictators.
Charlie Black, campaign chairman (Hilzoy)
More at FireTheLobbyists.com.
Back when John McCain was a "straight talker," he said this about economics:
Here's McCain's economic plan in a nutshell, based on his statements and writing:
It Takes Real Chutzpah for a Guy Who Owns Eight Houses (McCain) to Call Barack Obama an "Elitist"
The McCain campaign is managed by a cadre of Washington-insider special interest lobbyists. He and his current wife are estimated to be worth about $100 million. He reportedly owns eight houses. His let-them-eat-cake economic policies are based on George Bush's failed radical conservative "you're on your own buddy" philosophy. One after another he supported trade agreements that protect the rights of corporations, but ignore the rights of labor, and have devastated one Pennsylvania community after another. He gets most of his campaign cash from the wealthiest corporate interests around. And he has the gall to call Barack Obama an "elitist"?
In May, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) launched a Spanish-language campaign website, greeting voters with, “Bienvenido! Estamos Unidos con McCain” (Welcome! We are united with McCain):

This new website comes despite the fact that McCain voted in 2006 for Sen. James Inhofe’s (R-OK) amendment to “declare English as the national language of the United States and to promote the patriotic integration of prospective US citizens.” In March, McCain skipped a vote on an amendment by Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), aimed at “blocking lawsuits by employees challenging English-only workplace rules.” Both Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-IL) voted against the measure, but McCain left Washington to attend a fundraiser.
Republicans and the Corporate Media spent months attack Barack Obama over his ties to his crazy pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. But what about John McCain's ties to crazy rightwing pastors and other extremists?
Rev. John Hagee
McCain said he was "very honored by Pastor John Hagee's endorsement." Reverend Parsley calls McCain a "strong, true, consistent conservative."
G. Gordon Libby
Rev. Rod Parsley
McCain calls Parsley "a spiritual adviser."
Just as George Bush did in 2004, John McCain's 2008 campaign is centered on fearmongering.
Torture: McCain was against it, before he was for it.
Public Funding of Elections: McCain was for it, before he was against it.
Immigration: McCain was for it, before he was against it. It's impossible to keep track of McCain's immigration flip-flops without a scorecard, but luckily Steve Benen is keeping one. Here are some of the major flips:
Iraq:
Global Warming: He was against it before he was for it.
McCain wants to replace the United Nations with a "League of Democracies."
McCain also wants to throw Russia out of the G8 and exclude China while adding India and Brazil
Gay Marriage
McCain wants to businesses to stop offering health care to their employees, and to force everyone to buy insurance individually. The Des Moines Register writes,
The proposal [by McCain] should scare the heck out of the millions of Americans who rely on employer-based coverage... Buying individual policies means having your health history reviewed. It means not having the bargaining power and protections that come with being part of a plan offered by an employer. And it's expensive...
The senator is correct that the employer-based system of health insurance in this country isn't working. Businesses are saddled with the high costs of coverage, putting them at a competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace. Insurance shouldn't be tied to jobs.
But the more reasonable solution is to offer everyone what Medicare already offers: health coverage financed by a combination of tax dollars and participant contributions, thus allowing the huge bargaining power of millions of Americans to leverage down costs.
That idea is nowhere near as radical as forcing millions of Americans to shop for their own coverage in a profit-driven, private-insurance sector.
McCain is lying about the Democratic plans to make private insurance affordable to the 47 million uninsured Americans, claiming Democrats want a "massive government takeover"
"There are those that want a massive government takeover of the health care system in America," Mr. McCain warned Thursday in Des Moines, as he made the case for his more market-based approach...
"But before you decide to sign on to that kind of a program, go to Canada, or go to European countries that have government-run health care systems," he continued. "My friends, they don’t work, they’re inefficient, and they end up in a two-tiered system where the wealthiest can afford to pay for their own health care and those with low income sometimes wait six or eight months for a routine kind of treatment. And that’s what I’m not going to let happen to the United States of America."
From the beginning, John McCain has been the strongest Senate supporter of invading Iraq to replace Saddam Hussein with the famously corrupt and double-crossing Ahmed Chalabi.
When the invasion of Iraq turned into a disastrous occupation, McCain became its strongest defender. Now McCain claims to be the strongest critic of Bush's mismanagement of the Iraq War.
Timeline:
John McCain admits he knows little about economics. But what little he knows is enough to kill good American jobs.
3/08: Boeing lost a $35 billion contract for Air Force tankers to the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. (EADS), which cost 44,000 good U.S. jobs.
John McCain pretends to be civil and charming, but his ugly sense of humor gives him away as a nasty and vindictive SOB.
In New Orleans on 4/24/08, McCain said: “I would’ve landed my airplane at the nearest Air Force base and come over personally.” But as Newsweek notes, on Aug. 29, 2005, when Katrina had just hit New Orleans, McCain was posing with President Bush for his 69th birthday.
McCain aggressively sought the endorsement of conservative evaneglical leader John Hagee, who said repeatedly repeated that Hurricane Katrina was punishment to New Orleans.
McCain told reporters he was not sure if he would rebuild the lower 9th ward as president. "That is why we need to go back is to have a conversation about what to do -rebuild it, tear it down, you know, whatever it is," he said. Transplanted Texan writes,
I guess it's no surprise. McCain has opposed the creation of an independent 9/11-style commission to investigate the failure of the levees, voted against a 2006 bill that included $28 billion in hurricane relief, and opposed Medicaid and unemployment benefits for Katrina victims.
Lies About Obama
Obama wants to teach kindergartners about sex before they can read
9/9/08 “Education” Ad (TV :30)
ANNCR: Education Week says Obama “hasn’t made a significant mark on education”.
That he’s “elusive” on accountability.
A “staunch defender of the existing public school monopoly”.
Obama’s one accomplishment?
Legislation to teach “comprehensive sex education” to kindergartners.
Learning about sex before learning to read?
Barack Obama.
Wrong on education. Wrong for your family.
Truth:
Campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs told CBS News the legislation Obama supported provided information to children on what to watch for when with an adult they don't know, such as inappropriate advances or touching.
“It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls – a position that his friend Mitt Romney also holds. Last week, John McCain told Time magazine he couldn’t define what honor was. Now we know why,” says Obama spokesman Bill Burton in an emailed statement.
Obama would increase capital gains taxes on 100 million Americans
Lies About Himself
McCain crowd estimates
McCain created the DoNotCall list:
McCain co-authored the CAN-SPAM Act:
Lobbying for Lowell Paxson
John McCain brags that he's friends with lots and lots of lobbyists:
I have many friends who represent various interests ranging from the firemen, to the police to senior citizens to various interests particularly before my committee and I had meetings with hundreds of them and that was my job to do to get their input. Obviously, people who represent interests are fine, that's their constitutional right, the question is do they have access or unwarranted influence and certainly no one ever has in the conduct of my public life and my legislative agenda.
At least 59 lobbyists have helped McCain raise nearly $50 million. Below are some of the most powerful corporate lobbyists who have the most influence over McCain - and always put their clients' interests ahead of the interests of the American people. (Also watch "Friends" - a great video by Brave New Films.
People:
| Phil Gramm, National Campaign General Co-Chair |
Vice Chairman of Swiss bank UBS, and their U.S. lobbyist until April 2008. According to Newsweek, UBS is the focus of congressional and Justice Department investigations into schemes that enabled wealthy Americans to evade income taxes by stashing their money in overseas havens. Gramm's former congressional aide, John Savercool, is still registered to lobby for UBS on numerous issues, including a bill cosponsored by Sen. Barack Obama that would crack down on foreign tax havens. |
|
Rick Davis |
Rightsfield.com: Founded Davis, Manafort & Freedman, Inc., through which he served clients ranging from Nigerian dictator Gen. Sani Abacha to “mafia-like” Argentine legislator Alberto Pierri. Davis has had a long association with McCain — one tangled up in webs of special influence. In 1999, while Davis was working for McCain, two of his firm’s clients, COMSAT and SBC, “had major (and controversial) mergers pending before the Federal Communications Commission in 1999, and both mergers were approved.” The FCC was under the legislative oversight authority of McCain’s Commerce Committee, yet McCain refused to recuse himself from the proceedings. Davis was also a central figure in McCain’s Reform Institute scandal, an under-reported affair in which the “Maverick” Senator used a nonprofit, tax-exempt “reform” organization to trade political favors for corporate cash." ### WaPo: In August 2006, Davis was present again at a social gathering that was also attended by McCain and Deripaska, this time in Montenegro, another Eastern European country in which Davis's firm was working. The three were among a few dozen people dining at a restaurant during an official Senate trip. Davis was a paid consultant to the governing party in Montenegro and had advised it on a just-ratified independence referendum, Salter said. That was why he was at the dinner, he added. Afterward, a group from the dinner took boats out to a nearby yacht moored in the Adriatic Sea, where champagne and pastries were served, partly in honor of McCain's 70th birthday. |
|
Charlie Black |
Charles R. Black Jr. is chair of BKSH, a powerful DC lobbying firm that has earned $57,426,252 in lobbying fees since 1998 from hundreds of corporations, led by Philip Morris, AT&T, JP Morgan, and GE. a seasoned Republican operative whose client roster dates back to such paragons as the late Filipino President Ferdinand Marcos and several African dictators, and more recently has featured Erik Prince, the mercenary entrepreneur who founded Blackwater. |
|
Vicki Iseman |
Vicki Iseman has represented Paxson since 1998, longer than any of her other clients. The Washington Post reports that Iseman’s clients have given nearly $85,000 to McCain campaigns since 2000. McCain initially supported legislation that would have forced Paxson and handful of broadcasters — but not the great bulk of television stations — off the air by December 31, 2006. Bud Paxson himself personally testified about this bill with “fear and trepidation” at a hearing on September 8, 2004. Two weeks later, McCain had reversed himself. He now supported legislation that would grant two-year reprieve for Paxson — and instead force all broadcasters to stop transmitting analog television by December 31, 2008. Paxson and his lobbyists, including Iseman, were working at this time for just such a change. |
|
|
Washington Post 2/23/08: The second letter [from McCain to the FCC on behalf of Paxson] came on Dec. 10, a day after the company's jet ferried McCain to a Florida fundraiser aboard a yacht in West Palm Beach. The fundraiser was arranged by Hector Alcalde of Alcalde & Fay and was hosted by a cruise line that Alcalde had represented, Paxson said. Paxson said he attended the fundraiser. Emptywheel 2/23/08: Paxson flew McCain to a fundraiser in FL, organized by Iseman's boss, and probably hosted at the house of the owner of Carnival Cruise lines. Paxson, Iseman, McCain, Alcalde--they all were there. In other words, this was Alcalde and Fay as a company sponsoring McCain's campaign, not just individual clients of Iseman's who had businses with McCain. |
| Kirk Blalock | Kirk Blalock, of the lobbying firm Fierce, Isakowitz & Blalock, leads Mr. McCain’s young professional group and has raised over $250,000 for him; his clients include Sprint Nextel and Viacom. |
| Kyle McSlarrow | Kyle McSlarrow, chief of the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, the lobbying arm for the cable industry, has raised over $100,000 for Mr. McCain. He and others in the cable industry recently butted heads with Mr. McCain over a proposal that would allow customers to pick and choose which channels they received. |
| Wayne Berman |
Wayne Berman, who is deputy finance chairman of the McCain campaign and a veteran lobbyist whose clients include Verizon and Verizon Wireless, dismissed the notion that some lobbyists might be raising money for Mr. McCain to curry influence The NYTimes could also say "Wayne Berman, of the McCain campaign and lobbyist for ChevronTexaco, and chairman of Federalist Lobbying as well as an insurance broker." Or "friend of Tom DeLay?" Or how about "AmeriQuest lobbyist Wayne Berman, whose client had interests before the Commerce Committee of which McCain was chairman." Wouldn't that be informative for the public to dig further into at some point before November? |
She was the woman McCain dreamed of during his long incarceration and torture in Vietnam’s infamous ‘Hanoi Hilton’ prison and the woman who faithfully stayed at home looking after the children and waiting anxiously for news.
But when McCain returned to America in 1973 to a fanfare of publicity and a handshake from Richard Nixon, he discovered his wife had been disfigured in a terrible car crash three years earlier. Her car had skidded on icy roads into a telegraph pole on Christmas Eve, 1969. Her pelvis and one arm were shattered by the impact and she suffered massive internal injuries...
For nearly 30 years, Carol has maintained a dignified silence about the accident, McCain and their divorce. But last week at the bungalow where she now lives at Virginia Beach, a faded seaside resort 200 miles south of Washington, she told The Mail on Sunday how McCain divorced her in 1980 and married Cindy, 18 years his junior and the heir to an Arizona brewing fortune, just one month later.
Carol insists she remains on good terms with her ex-husband, who agreed as part of their divorce settlement to pay her medical costs for life. ‘I have no bitterness,’ she says. ‘My accident is well recorded. I had 23 operations, I am five inches shorter than I used to be and I was in hospital for six months. It was just awful, but it wasn’t the reason for my divorce.
‘My marriage ended because John McCain didn’t want to be 40, he wanted to be 25. You know that happens...it just does.’
Some of McCain’s acquaintances are less forgiving, however. They portray the politician as a self-centred womaniser who effectively abandoned his crippled wife to ‘play the field’. They accuse him of finally settling on Cindy, a former rodeo beauty queen, for financial reasons.
McCain was then earning little more than £25,000 a year as a naval officer, while his new father-in-law, Jim Hensley, was a multi-millionaire who had impeccable political connections...
In 1979 – while still married to Carol – he met Cindy at a cocktail party in Hawaii. Over the next six months he pursued her, flying around the country to see her. Then he began to push to end his marriage.
Carol and her children were devastated. ‘It was a complete surprise,’ says Nancy Reynolds, a former Reagan aide.
‘They never displayed any difficulties between themselves. I know the Reagans were quite shocked because they loved and respected both Carol and John.’
Another friend added: ‘Carol didn’t fight him. She felt her infirmity made her an impediment to him. She justified his actions because of all he had gone through. She used to say, “He just wants to make up for lost time.”’
Indeed, to many in their circle the saddest part of the break-up was Carol’s decision to resign herself to losing a man she says she still adores.
Friends confirm she has remained friends with McCain and backed him in all his campaigns. ‘He was very generous to her in the divorce but of course he could afford to be, since he was marrying Cindy,’ one observed...
despite his popularity as a politician, there are those who won’t forget his treatment of his first wife.
Ted Sampley, who fought with US Special Forces in Vietnam and is now a leading campaigner for veterans’ rights, said: ‘I have been following John McCain’s career for nearly 20 years. I know him personally. There is something wrong with this guy and let me tell you what it is – deceit.
‘When he came home and saw that Carol was not the beauty he left behind, he started running around on her almost right away. Everybody around him knew it.
‘Eventually he met Cindy and she was young and beautiful and very wealthy. At that point McCain just dumped Carol for something he thought was better.
‘This is a guy who makes such a big deal about his character. He has no character. He is a fake. If there was any character in that first marriage, it all belonged to Carol.’...
Ross Perot, who paid her medical bills all those years ago, now believes that both Carol McCain and the American people have been taken in by a man who is unusually slick and cruel – even by the standards of modern politics.
‘McCain is the classic opportunist. He’s always reaching for attention and glory,’ he said.
‘After he came home, Carol walked with a limp. So he threw her over for a poster girl with big money from Arizona. And the rest is history.’
Matthew Yglesias on VickiGate:
Obviously, I don’t know whether or not McCain had sex with Iseman. I suppose by “what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” standards, he didn’t even deny having had sex with Iseman. Certainly it’d be a bit rich of McCain to get outraged that anyone would even suggest that he might engage in sexual improprieties. After all, it’s well known that he repeatedly cheated on his first wife Carol, of a number of years, with a variety of women, before eventually dumping her for a much-younger heiress whose family fortune was able to help finance his political career. That’s well known, I should say, except to the electorate, who would probably find that this sort of behavior detracts from McCain’s “character” appeal.
For the past 20 years, John McCain has received more glowing media coverage than any other politician. There's a whole book about it.
Columnist Joel Connelly writes,
McCain is allowed to dominate any and every issue on which he chooses to cross the aisle in Congress. He is omnipresent on Sunday talk shows.
Between 1997 and 2006, McCain had 135 appearances as a guest on “Meet the Press,” “This Week” and “Face the Nation,” far more than runner-up Joe Biden with 91. McCain was usually able to hold forth alone rather than sharing the stage.
Like many older Americans, McCain's memory is playing tricks with him. For example, he forgets key facts.
Like how many homes he owns:
"I think — I'll have my staff get to you," McCain told Politico in Las Cruces, N.M. "It's condominiums where — I'll have them get to you."
Like the $1M lawsuit he filed in 1990:
"You can be sure that I talked to and got the permission of any client who is listed as a plaintiff," said attorney Barbara P. Beach.
Like the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003:
In the 21st century, nations don't invade other nations.
Like Election Day is in November:
“If we do everything right — and we can and we will — I will win in January,”
He also has a tendency to say one thing... and then forget he ever said it. Here are some great examples, courtesy of georgia10. Is McCain simply lying, or suffering from "senior moments"? We report, you decide.
Yesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) told CNN that that President Bush’s escalation in Iraq is going so well, "General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in an unarmed humvee." On Monday, he told radio host Bill Bennett that there "are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods, today."
This morning, during an interview with McCain, CNN’s John Roberts rebutted McCain’s assertions, stating, "I checked with General Petraeus’s people overnight and they said he never goes out in anything less than an up-armored humvee." He added that a new report by retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey "said no Iraqi government official, coalition soldier, diplomat reporter could walk the streets of Baghdad without heavily armed protection."
Faced with overwhelming evidence that he was wrong, McCain denied he’d ever said it: "Well, I’m not saying they could go without protection. The President goes around America with protection. So, certainly I didn’t say that."
On the possibility of tearing down the Ninth Ward:
McCain said he didn’t know what his plans would be. "That’s why we need to go back," he said, "to have a conversation about what to do about it. Rebuild it? Tear it down? Ya know, whatever it is."
From North Carolina, Clinton seized the opportunity to attack. "Sen. McCain said he might want to tear down the Ninth Ward instead of rebuilding it," she said. "But I went to the Ninth Ward after Katrina and met with people there and saw the destruction and I saw the resilience in their eyes and they deserve our help to rebuild and regain their lives and their homes."
Steve Schmidt, a senior McCain aide, said Clinton’s attack was "inaccurate." "Sen. McCain has said the levees must be strengthened on time so people can make a decision on whether to return based on safety," he said, adding that he would like to see a "safe, vibrant community emerge" after the appropriate flood plan.
Even before Clinton made her comments, McCain had been asked to clarify. "I don’t remember ever saying it," he said Thursday afternoon on his way from Xavier University to the New Orleans airport.
RUSSERT: Senator McCain, you have said repeatedly, "I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated." Is it a problem for your campaign that the economy is now the most important issue, one that, by your own acknowledgement, you're not well-versed on?
McCAIN: Actually, I don't know where you got that quote from. I'm very well-versed in economics.
ROUND 1: Do you think Saddam is a threat?
"I believe that Saddam Hussein presents clear and present danger to the United States of America with his continued pursuit of...to acquire weapons of mass destruction." [CNN Late Edition, 3/3/02]
"I never said that it was a, quote, clear and present danger because of weapons of mass destruction." [Hardball, 9/17/03]
As John McCain neared his momentous primary election victory in Florida after a ferocious campaign questioning his conservative credentials, right-wingers buzzed over word that he had privately suggested that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was too conservative. In response, McCain said he recalled saying no such thing and added that Alito was a "magnificent" choice. In fact, multiple sources confirm that the senator made negative comments about Alito nine months ago [...]
In a conference call with bloggers that day, McCain said, "I don't recall a conversation where I would have said that." He was "astonished" by the Alito quote, he said, and he repeatedly says at town meetings, "We're going to have justices like Roberts and Alito."
On the Gitmo lawsuit, Boumediene v. Bush:
McCain had previously derided that decision as “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country,” but today stepped back from that comment:
ISAACSON: But you called that the worst decision in history?
MCCAIN: No I didn’t. No, no
.
"Everybody says that they’re against the special interests. I’m the only one the special interests don’t give any money to." - John McCain, New Hampshire Town Hall, November 2007
Steven Betts (5/8/08)
Donald Diamond (4/22/08)
Sinclair Broadcasting / Glencairn Broadcasting (2/23/08)
FEC Violations
FEC Violation #2
When called out for a factual error in something so trivial, yet memorable as using dominant pro football teams of an era to patronize he uses the POW card.
He uses the POW Card to push his Cuba policy.
He uses the POW Card to get a forty year old dig in at hippies.
He has used the POW card to say he isn't a racist, evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
He has used the POW card to excuse years of voting against issues supporting veterans.
He just used the POW experience again to apparently plagiarize Solzhenitsyn (classy, the guy just died). But then again, how dare I accuse John McCain of this, he was a war hero.
And the most shallow of McCain surrogatoes on cable (and is there any other kind?) even excuse cheating on your wife through the POW experience.
1. Keating Five: John McCain's most infamous scandal was being one of the "Keating Five" Senators who helped S&L profiteer Charles Keating.
On Oct. 8, 1989, The Arizona Republic revealed that McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators.
The paper also reported that the McCains, sometimes accompanied by their daughter and baby-sitter, had made at least nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard the American Continental jet. Three of the trips were made during vacations to Keating's opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay.
McCain also did not pay Keating for some of the trips until years after they were taken, after he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln. Total cost: $13,433...
McCain also had to explain his trips with Keating and why he didn't pay Keating back right away.
On that score, McCain admitted he had fouled up. He said he should have reimbursed Keating immediately, not waited several years. His staff said it was an oversight, but it looked bad, McCain jetting around with Keating, then going to bat for him with the federal regulators.
"I was in a hell of a mess," McCain later would write...
Among the Keating Five, McCain took the most direct contributions from Keating. But the [ Senate Ethics Committee ] investigation found that he was the least culpable, along with Glenn. McCain attended the meetings but did nothing afterward to stop Lincoln's death spiral...
McCain owns up to his mistake this way:
"I was judged eventually, after three years, of using, quote, poor judgment, and I agree with that assessment."
2. Rick Renzi
Rep. Rick Renzi (AZ01) has been in the news for a land deal scandal since 2005, when he introduced a land swap bill in Congress that made his business partner and major campaign donor James Sandlin rich.
After the FBI investigation into Renzi was first reported in October 2006, McCain vouched for Renzi’s “integrity” in a robo-call to Arizona voters:
This is Senator John McCain. I’m calling to urge you to support my friend, Representative Rick Renzi for Congress. Rick has represented the first district of Arizona with tenacity, honesty and integrity beyond reproach.
McCain honored Renzi by putting him on the National Campaign Committee for his Presidential campaign and making him a co-chair of his Arizona Leadership Team.
In February 2008, Renzi was indicted on 35 counts of extortion, wire fraud, money laundering and other crimes, but McCain refused to remove him from his campaign committee, saying "it doesn't matter" because Renzi is presumed innocent (video).
John McCain has voted against abortion rights throughout his career. Is that based on principle or politics, namely abjectg pandering to the religious right? Where does McCain stand on sexuality issues like birth control, sex education, STD's and AIDS? Don't expect to find an answer to this question on the Straight Talk Express.
[S]omeone asked about public funding for contraception in Africa to prevent the spread of AIDS. "I'm sure I've taken a position on it in the past," he stammered as he looked to his communications director. "I'm sure I'm opposed to government funding."
Sensing a vulnerable moment, reporters kept the questions coming. What about sex education in the schools? Should it mention contraceptives? Or only abstinence, like President Bush wants? "I think I support the president's present policy," he said, tentatively.
More questions: Do condoms stop sexually transmitted disease? A long pause. A stern look. "I've never gotten into these issues or thought much about them," he said, almost crying uncle. "Obviously, we all want to stop the spread of AIDS. Everybody wants to do that. What's the most viable way of doing that?"
…In a last ditch attempt to rescue himself, McCain told an aide to go get a briefing paper prepared by Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, a doctor, who he said has been advising him on "these issues." But the aide couldn't find the briefing paper. "We've lost it," McCain mumbled.
"Whether I support government funding for them or not, I don't know," McCain said about contraceptives. He then said he'd look into it for the reporters, who finally let him off the hook and moved onto other subjects again.
.
McCain supports privatization, according to his economic advisor Carly Fiorina on 4/16/08:
Well, I know that he has been very favorably inclined to the report that came out a little bit ago, the Republican party made a number of suggestions which he embraced. He has on other occasions said that he supports private accounts as one of the ways to reform the system. But I think he, and I think he will continue to be supportive of those.
Michael Goldfarb, Deputy Communications Director
Here's a list of McCain's key supporters. A few things jump out:
National Campaign Chairman
The Honorable Robert Mosbacher, Texas
National Campaign General Co-Chairs
Former U.S. Senator Phil Gramm, Texas > Key architect of S&L deregulatory scandal
Former U.S. Representative Thomas G. Loeffler, Texas
National Campaign Co-Chairs
Mr. John Chambers, California
Governor Jon Huntsman, Utah
Governor Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota
Former Governor Tom Ridge, Pennsylvania
Former U.S. Senator Warren Rudman, New Hampshire
Mr. Frederick W. Smith, Tennessee
National Finance Committee Co-Chairs
The Honorable George Argyros, California
Mr. Michael Ashner, New York
Mr. Brian Ballard, Florida
Mr. Lawrence E. Bathgate II, New Jersey
Mr. Wayne Berman, Washington, D.C.
Mr. Donald L. Bren, California
Mr. John Chambers, California
The Honorable James A. Courter, New Jersey
Mr. Donald R. Diamond, Arizona
Mr. Ray Dalio, Connecticut
Mr. Lewis M. Eisenberg, New Jersey
Mr. Jon Hammes, Wisconsin
Mr. James B. Lee, Jr., New York
The Honorable Frederic V. Malek, Virginia
Mr. John A. Moran, Florida
Mr. Carter Pate, Virginia
Mr. A. Jerrold Perenchio, California
Mr. Fred Smith, Tennesse
Mr. J. Gary Shansby, California
Mr. John A. Thain, New York
The Honorable Ronald Weiser, Michigan
National Campaign Committee Members and Supporters
U.S. Representative Spencer Bachus, Alabama
U.S. Senator Sam Brownback, Kansas
U.S. Senator Richard Burr, North Carolina
U.S. Representative Mike Castle, Delaware
Former Governor William P. Clements, Jr., Texas
U.S. Senator Susan Collins, Maine
Governor Mitch Daniels, Indiana
Former U.S. Senator Mike DeWine, Ohio > 06 Crushed by Sherrod Brown
U.S. Representative Lincoln Diaz-Balart, Florida
U.S. Representative Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida
The Honorable Lawrence Eagleburger
U.S. Representative Jeff Flake, Arizona
Former U.S. Representative Greg Ganske, Iowa
U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, South Carolina
Former U.S. Senator Slade Gorton, Washington
The Honorable Alexander Haig
Former Governor Frank Keating, Oklahoma
U.S. Representative Ric Keller, Florida
U.S. Representative Mark Kirk, Illinois
The Honorable Henry Kissinger > War criminal
U.S. Senator Jon Kyl, Arizona
U.S. Representative Ray Lahood, Illinois
U.S. Representative Steven LaTourette, Ohio
U.S. Senator Trent Lott, Mississippi
U.S. Representative Dan Lungren, California
Former Governor Jim Martin, North Carolina
The Honorable Robert "Bud" McFarlane > Key figure in Iran-contra scandal
Former Governor John R. McKernan, Jr., Maine
U.S. Representative Chip Pickering, Mississippi
U.S. Representative Todd Platts, Pennsylvania
U.S. Representative Rick Renzi, Arizona > 2/08 Indicted on 35 counts
Former Governor Buddy Roemer, Louisiana
U.S. Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Florida
The Honorable James Schlesinger > Key supporter of Iraq catastrophe
U.S. Representative John Shadegg, Arizona > 1/08 FEC complaint for money laundering
U.S. Representative Chris Shays, Connecticut
U.S. Representative John Shimkus, Illinois
The Honorable George Shultz
U.S. Senator Gordon Smith, Oregon
U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe, Maine
Former Governor Jane Swift, Massachusetts
U.S. Senator John Thune, South Dakota
U.S. Representative Fred Upton, Michigan
U.S. Senator John Warner, Virginia > Key supporter of Iraq catastrophe
The Honorable R. James Woolsey > Key supporter of Iraq catastrophe
Listing as of August 2, 2007
On 4/15/08, McCain outlined his taxing and spending plans:
McCain's proposal, outlined April 15, would extend President George W. Bush's tax cuts, reduce the top corporate rate, repeal the alternative minimum tax and double exemptions for dependents. Price: $3.3 trillion by the end of a President McCain's second term in 2017, according to figures from his campaign and the Treasury.
The Arizona senator said that would be offset by eliminating pork-barrel spending, freezing a portion of the budget, and saving from Medicare spending. He could cut the budget by $100 billion a year "in a New York minute," he said in a Bloomberg Television interview yesterday.
Robert Bixby, executive director of the Washington-based Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan group that advocates budget restraint, said "the huge imbalance'' in McCain's plan "is that the tax cuts are specific and large and the spending cuts are small and vague.''
Once, McCain was a deficit hawk, Bixby said, but "strange things happen when people run for president.''
Economist Paul Krugman summarizes McCain's tax plan:
First, Mr. McCain proposes making almost all of the Bush tax cuts, which are currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2010, permanent. (He proposes reinstating the inheritance tax, albeit at a very low rate.)
Second, he wants to eliminate the alternative minimum tax, which was originally created to prevent the wealthy from exploiting tax loopholes, but has begun to hit the upper middle class.
Third, he wants to sharply reduce tax rates on corporate profits.
According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, the overall effect of the McCain tax plan would be to reduce federal revenue by more than $5 trillion over 10 years. That’s a lot of revenue loss — enough to pose big problems for the government’s solvency...
If truth be told, the McCain tax plan doesn’t seem to embody any coherent policy agenda. Instead, it looks like a giant exercise in pandering — an attempt to mollify the G.O.P.’s right wing, and never mind if it makes any sense.
McCain's Medicare plan includes a
quiet bombshell proposal to make Medicare beneficiaries with higher incomes pay more for their prescription drug benefits, a notion that furthers the privatization (and in the eyes of many health care advocates, the diminution and eventual death) of Medicare...
many health care advocates see McCain’s proposal is just another opening to privatize Medicare and destroy it as a social insurance program, under which everyone who has paid into the system is entitled to equal benefits as a matter of right. A provision that was tucked into the recent law that gave seniors the drug benefit (Part D) already requires wealthier beneficiaries to pay more for the Medicare premiums that cover doctor visits and outpatient services (Part B). If drug benefits, too, are based on income, critics fear that support for the program will eventually erode as those with more choices and more money will opt out of the program and buy coverage from private insurers.
The New York Times mentioned it in a front page piece, noting that the proposal would affect not just billionaires but couples earning more than $164,000 and single people with incomes of $82,000. But it didn’t go beyond that...
McCain adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin revealed the most when he said in the Post story: “You could make this as aggressive as you want to get more savings.” In other words, if the government saves $2 billion by making couples with incomes greater than $164,000 pay higher premiums, it could save $6 billion by moving down the income ladder to, say, $100,000 or even less.
Here's an analysis of McCain's plan by the Center for American Progress Action Fund
Reed Hundt on telecom issues:
McCain opposed the goal of connecting all Americans to telephone service, doesn't support having a national broadband policy that provides any way for rural or lower income people to get Internet access, didn't vote for the competition-providing Telecommunications Act of 1996, opposed putting the Internet into every classroom, and never seemed to care about monopoly or duopoly in any communications market. He said he wanted to auction spectrum but didn't vote for the legislation that authorized the FCC to do that. He often said he didn't like broadcasters, but he failed to stop them from postponing the end of analog television (and delaying the follow-on spectrum auction) when he was chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee.
Reed Hundt on alternative energy technology:
the essential government role in promoting solar, wind, geothermal and other non-carbon innovations at least includes (1) tax and spending efforts that help overcome very high early-stage costs in a reliable and significant way coupled with (2) precise and efficient regulatory intervention that provides adequate access to the national electric grid for green technologies. Right now the Senate won't vote for permanent tax credits (or even another temporary renewal) for investment in green technologies, and one wonders why that recalcitrance doesn't draw McCain's wrath, since an investment tax credit is a form of funding the 1,000 flowers.
Those who know John McCain best know he is short-tempered and flies into fits of rage. Is that the person we want to have his finger on the nuclear button?
To Cindy McCain, in front of a group of Arizona reporters,
Sen. Bob Smith (R-NH)
Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS)
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)
Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV)
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA)
McClatchy 9/7/08:
During the 2008 Presidential campaign, John McCain has stolen the intellectual property of numerous musicians and other artists:
On 5/25/08, McCain declared, "I received the highest award from literally every veteran’s organization in America."
But McCain's opposition to Jim Webb’s (D-VA) 21st Century GI Bill
puts him in opposition to the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, the American Legion, and the national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars.
The recognition McCain has received from veterans groups is not “high awards” but failing grades:
— Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave McCain a grade of D for his record of voting against veterans. (By contrast, Obama got a B+.)
– Disabled Veterans of America noted McCain’s dismal 20 percent voting record on veterans’ issues. (Obama had an 80 percent.)
– In a list of “Key Votes,” Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) notes McCain “Voted Against Us” 15 times and “Voted For Us” only 8. (Obama voted for VVA 12 times, and against only once.)
McCain has been in Congress since 1983 and has a long and detailed voting record.
NY Times 6/6/08
A top adviser to Senator John McCain says Mr. McCain believes that President Bush’s program of wiretapping without warrants was lawful, a position that appears to bring him into closer alignment with the sweeping theories of executive authority pushed by the Bush administration legal team.
In a letter posted online by National Review this week, the adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, said Mr. McCain believed that the Constitution gave Mr. Bush the power to authorize the National Security Agency to monitor Americans’ international phone calls and e-mail without warrants, despite a 1978 federal statute that required court oversight of surveillance.
Why does McCain support illegal, warrantless wiretapping? Could it simply be the money?
John McCain has condemned the influence of "special interest lobbyists," yet dozens of lobbyists have political and financial ties to his presidential campaign — particularly from telecommunications companies, an industry he helps oversee in the Senate.
Of the 66 current or former lobbyists working for the Arizona senator or raising money for his presidential campaign, 23 have lobbied for telecommunications companies in the past decade, Senate lobbying disclosures show.
Or is McCain trying to prevent George Bush and Dick Cheney from being charged with breaking the law and violating the rights of millions of Americans?
McCain has dedicated his entire career to opposing women's rights.
On 4/23/08, McCain supported the Republican filibuster against equal pay for women.
In 1992, McCain called his wife Cindy a "cunt" in front of 3 reporters:
Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain's intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain's hair and said, "You're getting a little thin up there." McCain's face reddened, and he responded, "At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt." McCain's excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days.
Congress: Special Elections
| Senate | ||||
| House | ||||
| IL05 | Tom Geogheghan | |||
Issues
| Issue | Democrats.com plan | Congress | Groups | Media | Blogs |
| Torture | Lobby Holder for Special Prosecutor | House: Conyers letter Senate: Feingold copy? |
Ratner: CSP | Olbermann/Turley Maddow |
Pardon-Scorecard |
| Single payer | Support Congressional lobbying | Conyers | PDA | ||
| Wiretap | Watch private lawsuits | ACLU | Olbermann | emptywheel | |
| Afghanistan | health care not warfare | UFPJ | getafghanistanright | ||
| State Secrets | S.417 H.R.984 |
ACLU | Greenwald | ACLU |
BA: BlueAmerica
Congress
| Senate | ||||
| House | ||||
| FL12 | Doug Tudor | Adam Putnam | BA | 08: 43% |
Blogs and News
Groups Fighting Election Fraud
Groups Mobilizing Democratic and Progressive Voters
Do-It-Yourself Strategies
Reports
Books
Articles
Films
Forums
Lawsuits
News Coverage
.
Count Every Vote in Ohio!
George Bush declared himself the winner of Ohio's 20 crucial Electoral College votes with an election night margin of only 136,483.
We are organizing a protest to demand the counting of every vote in Ohio, including
We support:
1) Automatic registration based on Social Security records
The voluntary voter registration process is hugely inefficient, expensive, and subject to fraud. A far superior system would use the Social Security database, allowing each voter to maintain one "voting address" either through direct Internet access or through the mail. Boards of election would use their geographic portion of that list as their master voter file.
2) Electronic voting reforms
3) A Constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to vote for President
4) Abolish the Electoral College
5) An end to partisan oversight of the electoral process by Secretaries of State who actively support partisan candidates
6) Unified federal standards for national elections, including equal protection of voting rights by such means as equal voting systems, equal numbers of machines, and equal time to vote
7) Extended voting periods to allow all voters a meaningful opportunity to vote
8) Instant Run-off Voting, Proportional Representation and Fusion
9) Publicly financed elections for federal offices
10) Vote-by-Mail should be encouraged
Oregon conducts its elections entirely by mail - there are no precincts to vote in. (Oregon is adding 2 touchscreen machines per county for disabled voters.) According to Secretary of State Bill Bradbury, the system produced "record turnout and little strife." 87% of registered voters voted - compared with 60%-70% in the rest of the country.
11) Abolish gerrymandering and mid-decade redistricting
All Congressional district lines should be drawn by non-partisan boards. Redistricting should take place only in the year following the Census every decade.
We also support:
Clueless Democrats - both in Congress and even in the progressive blogosphere - are about to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once again. How? By letting Republicans turn the Scandal of the Century into an inside-the-beltway battle over "ethics reform."
Republicans in Congress and the White House have created the most corrupt government in American history. Tends of billions of dollars have disappeared from the Treasury, no one knows where they have gone - and most shockingly, no one is even investigation grand theft on an unimaginable scale - because Republicans control everything.
Lord Acton was exactly right: all power corrupts, and absolutely power corrupts absolutely.
Republican corruption is not on the margins, limited to a few "bad apples" - it is at the very heart of how they govern. The whole political machine created by Karl Rove, Tom DeLay, Grover Norquist, Ralph Reed, and Jack Abramoff is based on corruption: raising money illegally and spending it illegally, all for the sole purpose of seizing power, stealing as much as they can get their hands on, and manipulating elections to stay in power forever.
You don't have to look far to see massive GOP corruption. Wherever GOP-controlled Washington is spending large sums of money, it is being spent corruptly. Look at Iraq... the Gulf Coast... Medicare... Homeland Security... the NSA... etc. etc. etc.
Now the very same Republicans who corrupted everything in Washington are promising to "reform" it. As Harry Reid said, the idea of Republicans reforming themselves "is like asking John Gotti to clean up organized crime."
Of course the substance of the Republican plan is a farce. As the Pentagon Post reports,
According to lobbyists and ethics experts, even if Hastert's proposal is enacted, members of Congress and their staffs could still travel the world on an interest group's expense and eat steak on a lobbyist's account at the priciest restaurants in Washington.
The only requirement would be that whenever a lobbyist pays the bill, he or she must also hand the lawmaker a campaign contribution. Then the transaction would be perfectly okay.
John Aravosis cuts right through the bushit:
The pigs feeding at the trough aren't going to give up all the freebies. They'll just have the lobbyists feed them and take them on trips through their campaigns.
It's classic GOP bait and switch. They're just going to say that they're doing reform -- but not do it. That fits their pattern. Lobby reform doesn't reform anything, like "Clear Skies" doesn't clean the skies and like "No Child Left Behind" leaves kids behind.
But even though the GOP plan is a farce, the mere fact that they have a document they call a "reform plan" is enough to put them ahead of the corruption scandal for the majority of Americans who get their news from TV. Why? Because Karl Rove controls everything we see on TV.
Haven't Democrats learned that yet??????
I'll be blunt: If Congressional Democrats operate within the framework of "reform," they will not change anything important - and they will not beat Republicans and win a majority in November.
"Reform" used to be a nice liberal word. But since Newt Gingrich began his own version of "reform", the word has become meaningless - or worse. Remember "welfare reform"? That simply meant throwing millions of women and children deeper into poverty. Remember "buget reform"? That simply let the the GOP turn the Clinton-Gore projected surplus of $6 trillion into $3 trillion of debt in just 5 years. (And no, 9/11 did not cause $9 trillion in damage to the U.S. economy - or even $100 billion.) Remember "Social Security reform"? That would have destroyed Social Security, were it not for Josh Marshall's heroic blogging at TalkingPointsMemo.com.
Americans aren't stupid - they know "reform" is meaningless. Congress isn't corrupt because politicians take $50 meals from lobbyists. Changing a few little things won't change anything important. Americans don't want "ethics reform" - they want a political revolution.
So if Democrats want to win back Congress, they must declare - and lead - a Second American Revolution that will end corruption in Washington.
What should that revolution consist of? Here are the main elements:
This is an ambitious agenda, and it will take work - including Constitutional Amendments - to make it real. But it's exactly what the American people want - and it's long overdue.
Wake up Democrats!! Don't get into a losing battle for meaningless "reform" - demand a Second American Revolution instead!!!!
INN World Reports presents:
[Title]
Thursday May 11th 7-9:30 pm
New York Society for Ethical Culture
2 West 64th St.
The event is the launch of a nationally televised weekly voting news series which promotes paper ballot solutions.
This series will appear within the INN World Report, the evening news on Freespeech TV 9415 dish network.
Keynote: Most likely will be John Conyers, we are awaiting confirmation.
Panel:
The focus of the event is two fold:
1. Ohio was stolen and now we have the proof. Although voter supression was a major tactic, there is now convincing evidence that more people actually voted for John Kerry complete with county tallies that now show why the exit polls gave the state to Kerry after voting finished and before they were "weighted" in after-midnight re-spins.
2. The idea is to expose this with the new proof to high up Dems who cannot ignore this if they are present and are asked to participate. Bob Fitrakis and Mark Crispin Miller's public outings have been very successful in showing the techniques used to "steal" elections. There are boatloads of horror stories to tell. This is not just about DRE's and their malfunctions but a myriad of software and cyber manipulations that include software controlled tabulators that are just as vunerable.
This factual nuts and bolts revealing of how it was done will segue into the second section where participants and audience get to offer solutions through a Q&A dialogue.
Co-sponsors:
The Carter-Baker Commission Report entitled Building Confidence in U.S. Elections was published on 9/19/05. The most controversial proposal would require photo ID's for all voters, which Democrats denounced as a "poll tax."
The inevitable result of the photo ID requirement will be "Katrina Democracy" - people with cars (and therefore photo ID's) will get to vote, while people without cars (and photo ID's) will be "left behind" to suffer without political power and drown in their powerlessness, just like the poor citizens of New Orleans. For this reason, Rep. John Conyers declared it "dead on arrival."
"I am shocked that this Commission has decided to take us several giant steps back in the march for voting rights by recommending a national ID requirement for voters. This would inevitably disenfranchise minority voters and the most vulnerable among us -- those who live in poverty and the elderly. While I continue to believe that the 2004 elections showed our desperate need for election reforms, this misguided and highly controversial recommendation makes this Commission's entire report -- regardless of the merits of other recommendations -- dead on arrival from a civil rights and voting rights perspective. As a result, I am unalterably opposed to these discriminatory new requirements and will encourage my colleagues in the House and Senate to join with me in doing so.
Moreover, a photo ID requirement for voting would help create a de facto "National Identity Card," something liberals and conservatives have long opposed because it reverses the basis of our Constitution from "government by the consent of the people" to "people by the consent of the government." In other words, if you don't produce your "papers" you can be denied the ordinary rights of citizenship that we take for granted, like being able to walk down the street without being stopped and searched by a cop. (Conservatives used to be particularly vehement in their opposition to this and all other forms of "big government," but that all changed with Ronald Reagan and the New Right.) As Conyers declared:
A national voter ID card system would significantly diminish freedom and privacy in the US because once put in place, it is unlikely that such a system would be restricted to its original purpose. A national voter ID system would threaten the privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and will gradually increase the control that government and business wields over everyday citizens.
In reality, there is no significant need for any form of voter ID. It is already a felony to vote more than once, or to vote in someone else's name. Since the cost of getting caught (a felony conviction that will ruin your life) so greatly outweighs the benefit of doing it (casting one extra vote that has an infinitesimal chance of changing the outcome), no rational person would commit this crime.
When voter fraud occurs, it is practically never done in person at polling places. You must sign in, and your signature could betray you (unless you are an expert at handwriting fraud). Your face could betray you too, if the inspector knew the real voter's face. That is why it is almost impossible to find documented cases of in-person voter fraud - which is the only form of fraud that would theoretically be reduced by photo ID's.
In reality, most voter fraud is done through absentee ballots, where someone can slowly copy a signature with minimal risk of getting caught. There are many cases of absentee fraud, including the infamous 1997 Miami Mayor's race that was overturned by a judge. The photo ID requirement would do nothing to stop absentee fraud - unless such votes had to be notarized, which is tellingly not part of Baker's proposal. (Why is it perfectly ok to inconvenience poor Americans in a major way, but unacceptable to inconvenience more affluent Americans in the slightest?)
Still, Republicans have convinced themselves that in-person voting fraud is possible because voter registration files include non-existent, ineligible, and duplicate voters. When files are inaccurate, it creates a theoretical possibility that voters could vote more than once, or vote when they are not eligible. This principle applies even more to absentee voting than to in-person voting.
Either way (in-person or absentee), the solution to inaccurate files is creating accurate voter files - not imposing a voter ID requirement. So let me offer a much simpler solution that guarantees an accurate voter file and saves county governments billions of dollars!!
Let's use the Social Security file as the national voter registration file.
Everyone in America has a unique Social Security record (which is designated by a unique number, but is technically independent of the number that is initially assigned). Virtually every newborn gets one (to qualify for health coverage and/or a tax deduction) and every teen or adult must have one in order to work. You keep your account throughout your life, even if you need to change the original number because of identity theft or domestic abuse. So why don't we just make that record (without the Social Security number) the authoritative voter record of every citizen? (1)
This would have huge advantages over the current system:
1. It would make voter registration automatic. You would never have to fill out a registration form to vote - which is a major obstacle to voting for many citizens.
2. County governments would not have to laboriously maintain complete voter files. Instead, they would simply download the Social Security file (name, address, and citizenship status) for their county right before each election, merge in signature samples (and party codes for restricted primaries), and print out sign-in sheets for each precinct. This would save county governments billions of dollars each year in staff, postage, printing, and storage space.
3. The number of errors in the system would be reduced to a tiny fraction of the current system, so there would be practically no need for provisional ballots and all the hassles that go with them.
4. The tiny problem of voter fraud would be made even tinier. Duplicate registrations (which typically occur when someone moves and re-registers without cancelling the old registration) would become impossible, because a Social Security account has a single address. Dead voters would be removed as soon as Social Security is notified, which is pretty quick (because they have to stop the checks).
5. The Social Security file would get "cleaner" over time, if voters discovered the file had an out-of-date surname or address and provided a new one. (Such voters would cast a provisional ballot until the Social Security file was updated.) This would make life better for the Social Security Administration, as well as beneficiaries and Members of Congress who have to struggle with inaccurate files.
Are there any downsides? None that I can see.
1. Would Social Security Numbers be used and exposed to identity theft? Absolutely not because there's no need for the Social Security Administration to deliver any Social Security Numbers to the Boards of Election. They would only deliver unique, accurate voter lists with name, address, and possibly citizenship status. You would never be asked for your Social Security Number when you vote. All that matters is whether your name is on the sign-in sheet - just the way it works now. Your identity would be verified by matching your sign-in signature with your stored signature sample - just the way it works now.
2. Would non-citizens be able to vote if prohibited by state laws? No, because Social Security checks the citizenship of all applicants (2), and presumably stores that information in each record. (And presumably this information is more accurate than any information now stored by county election boards, which rely on voters' signed oaths that they are citizens, but have no resources to check birth certificates.) At election time, Social Security could download all records including the citizenship flag so counties could apply their state and local laws. (If sharing that detail violates immigration laws, Social Security could simply exclude non-citizens from the downloaded lists.)
3. Would felons be able to vote even if prohibited by state laws? This problem could be solved by having counties match the Social Security file against their felon file to remove felons before delivering voter files to each county. But this would have to be done according to strictly accurate matching procedures (possibly including Social Security numbers), not the deliberately inaccurate matches used by Florida in 2000. And there would have to be provisional ballot procedures if eligible voters were wrongly told they were ineligible to vote - just as there are now.
4. Could an ineligible voter cast a vote under someone else's name? Sure - just as they can now. But as I describe above, this almost never happens because it's a crime whose cost infinitely exceeds its benefit. If Republicans can prove that this happens frequently enough to come up with a "big government" bureaucratic solution, there are two obvious "small government" solutions that would solve 99.9% of all problems:
This plan could be implemented starting immediately and completed by the 2006 election (if it was a national priority) or otherwise by 2008.
1. The Social Security Administration would have to create a secure system to download county files to authorized county officials. (This could be done in 3 months if SSA has a decent computer system.)
2. County election boards would have to acquire the capability to download their county file and then match the street addresses against the precinct table so they can print sign-in sheets for each precinct. (Most counties have that capability already; if not, a specialized vendor could provide it easily.)
3. Counties would also have to scan and store all current voter signature samples, and add this image to the voter's record. (Many counties have that capability already; if not, a specialized vendor could also provide it easily.) This voter/signature file would have to be matched against the downloaded Social Security voter file. (As an alternative, the Social Security Administration could add signatures nationally from state driver's license files.)
4. In states that restrict primary voting to registered party members, counties would have to match their voter/party files against the downloaded Social Security voter file. (As an alternative, the Social Security Administration could permanently store the party code for each voter, subject to strict privacy rules. But some voters would never "trust" SSA with this information, so this approach should be set aside until this legitimate concern is resolved, if it ever is.)
So that's my simple plan. Jimmy Carter and James Baker, are you listening?
Footnotes:
(1) The Social Security Administration only maintains primary address records for current Social Security recipients. (Social Security recipients can update their address at http://www.socialsecurity.gov/coa/) For everyone else, SSA gets your current address from the IRS every year to send your annual statement. (The IRS lets you change your address using Form 8822, but relies primarily on the Postal Service's automated NCOA system to maintain current addresses, which in turn relies on citizens to submit address changes to USPS via the web, by phone (800-ASK-USPS) or using a paper form at a Post Office.)
(2) There are millions of noncitizens in the U.S., and many have Social Security Numbers - but they are identified as noncitizens in the Social Security file and are ineligible to vote. In order to get a Social Security Number, noncitizens must submit a SS-5 form, which distinguishes U.S. Citizens, Legal Aliens Allowed to Work, Legal Aliens Not Allowed to Work, and Other. To prove citizenship (and thus be eligible to vote), an applicant must provide a U.S. consular report of birth, a U.S. passport, a Certificate of Citizenship, or a Certificate of Naturalization. These documents are verified by the Social Security Administration, so they are much more reliable than the records kept by county election boards, which rely primarily on the citizenship checkbox on the voter registration form.
On 9/19/05, The Brennan Center critiqued the Carter-Baker report at length. Chapter II objected to the use of Social Security numbers in an interstate (interoperable) voter file. I agree completely with this privacy concern and therefore my proposal does not use Social Security numbers at all - just the name and address (and possibly citizenship status).
The Brennan Center also raises concerns about the accuracy of the Social Security file. While there are inevitably accuracy problems in a file of over 200 million individuals, I am certain it is more accurate than poorly-maintained county-maintained voter files. For Social Security recipients, file accuracy is enforced by recipients who monitor monthly delivery of their checks. For pre-retirees, file accuracy depends on the IRS, which gets regular updates from taxpayers, employers, and the USPS. (See footnote 1 in my proposal.)
Chapter II
THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT FULL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS BE USED IN VOTER DATABASES (SECTION 2.2) AND ON ID CARDS (SECTION 2.5) POSE SERIOUS PRIVACY AND SECURITY PROBLEMS
With regard to the Report's interoperability recommendations, it is unquestionably beneficial to account for voters who move across state lines. Nonetheless, the Report fails to consider the serious efficacy, privacy, and security concerns raised by a nationally distributed database of the magnitude it contemplates. These problems are exacerbated by the Report's recommendation that an individual's Social Security number be used as the broadly disseminated unique voting identifier.
The Report's recommendation creates substantial privacy and security hazards. Social Security numbers unlock a vast array of information regarding private financial, employment, and medical data – and, as a result, must be kept with ironclad security. Unfortunately, existing legal limitations on and protections for Social Security numbers have been consistently whittled away over time and frequently disregarded in practice. The media regularly reports on breaches of security concerning public and private data files containing Social Security numbers.
Hackers, however, are not the only concern. Social Security numbers are also disclosed by officials entrusted with their safekeeping, despite criminal penalties against distribution. (96) For example, in 1997, Georgia's Secretary of State contracted with a credit reporting corporation in an effort to "capture" the Social Security numbers of some 400,000 registered voters without such a number on file. In due course, Georgia's entire voter registration list – records for more than four million citizens, and the associated Social Security numbers of those who had provided their number upon registration – was disclosed to the corporation, with no restrictions on the corporation's use of those numbers. (97)
The Report's recommendation to use the Social Security number as the unique identifier for tracking voters across state lines would only increase the general circulation of this financial keystone – and there is no reason to believe that new legal protections would be any more effective than their existing counterparts. The potential for improper use and disclosure will only increase.
Moreover, the Report recommends not only that the Social Security number be used as a unique interstate identifier, but also that it be placed physically on the voting ID card. (98) A misplaced or stolen card would contain, readily available on the face of the card, all information necessary to perpetrate identity theft with ease: name, signature, date of birth, current address, and Social Security number. Similarly, such personal information would be contained on photocopies of drivers licenses maintained for other purposes: for example, copies held (and potentially misplaced) by clerks at car rental agencies or volunteer poll workers. Such a card would become a treasure chest for wrongdoers, and would expose countless Americans to privacy violations, identity theft, and variety of other crimes.
In addition to the substantial privacy concerns, the Social Security number is a flawed key for tracking (and potentially purging) voters across states. The Social Security Administration was not established to construct a system of national identification, and its database contains substantial errors. For example, the SSA's Director of Information Exchange and Computer Matching has admitted that at least ten percent of the information obtained when attempting to match identifying information in the SSA database with identifying data collected in other systems by other government entities may be inaccurate. (99) The SSA's systems may be adequate for disbursing funds, but they were never intended to track individuals from one state to another for voting purposes. (100)
Finally, the Report recommends – without any discussion – that the information used as an individual's unique fingerprint to track a voter across state lines include not merely the date of birth, but also the person's "place of birth." (101) As with the Social Security number, this information is often used as a key to private information wholly unrelated to voting, and as such, disclosure presents a substantial security hazard. Moreover, this information seems particularly susceptible to use in harassing legitimate voters, particularly naturalized citizens. The reasons to protect against broad disclosure of a voter's place of birth are at least as serious as those confronting the widespread distribution of a voter's full Social Security number. Yet, as with many other issues, the Report wholly fails to consider these important concerns.
96 42 U.S.C. §§ 408(a)(8), 405(c)(2)(C)(vii)(I).
97 See Schwier v. Cox, No. 1:00-cv-2820-JEC (N.D. Ga. Jan. 31, 2005), slip op. at 5, 21 & n.9, available at
http://www.acluga.org/briefs/ssn/SSNotoVoteOrder.pdf.
98 Report at 21.
99 Remarks of Pete Monaghan, Director of Information Exchange and Computer Matching of the Social Security
Administration, at the February 2004 meeting of the National Association of Secretaries of State.
100 Hearing, supra note 72.
101 Report at 12.
Ohio Election Reform Plan
Bob Fertik
January 13, 2005
On January 12, 2005 Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell announced a plan to replace all of Ohio's voting systems with optical scan (optiscan) systems. Voters fill in circles on a pre-printed ballot like an SAT test, and the ballots are read by an optical scanner.
While optical scan systems are generally the most reliable (1) and cost-effective automated voting systems (2), Secretary Blackwell made a crucial mistake when he selected two vendors - Diebold and ES&S - with strong conservative Republican ties.
Democratic voters have absolutely no reason to blindly trust a system operated by Diebold and ES&S under the supervision of Ken Blackwell. Blackwell was outrageously partisan before the election, when he rejected voter registrations from newspaper forms and rejected provisional ballots cast at the wrong table or precinct. He was outrageously partisan after the election when he refused to testify under oath in Moss v. Bush or to respond to Rep. John Conyers' 102-page report on Ohio election problems.
If Ohio wants to switch to optical scan systems, there are other vendors to choose from. But before Ohio selects any vendors, it must adopt a set of standards to ensure honest and transparent elections. It must then evaluate each vendor and product against those standards.
Moreover, Ohio needs to adopt a set of procedures for handling optical scanners before, during, and after each election.
The following is a suggested set of standards. A complete set of standards should be produced by experts in election systems.
Machine standards:
Vendor standards:
Election Board procedures:
Election Certification procedures:
Recount procedures:
(1) Optical scan systems with precinct tabulators have the lowest error rates (overvotes and undervotes), compared with touchscreen, punchcard, or lever systems. That's because the tabulators can check the ballots for overvotes (which would invalidate the ballot), and give the voter the opportunity to fix the mistake. Optical scan systems with county tabulators have among the highest error rates.
(2) There is a strong case for non-automated voting systems, i.e. paper ballots. Much of the plan described above is focused on making the scanners tamper-proof; all of those elements are unnecessary with paper ballots. The principal objection to paper ballots is the time and tedium of counting them, especially when there are a large number of races to be counted. However, a typical precinct handles under 1,000 votes, so a team of volunteers can conduct the count fairly quickly. Everyone is too tired on Election Night to conduct a tedious count; but if elections were held on Saturdays, the counting could be done on Sundays. And if we built bi-partisan volunteer counts into our election system, we might change the whole "red-blue" adversarial climate into a "purple" climate of civic cooperation.
On January 6 2001, Congress will decide whether to accept Ohio's 20 fraudulent Electors for Bush.
Members of the House of Representatives are expected to protest these Electors. For a formal Congressional challenge, we need Just One Senator to join them. We need your help!
At 9 a.m., protest at the FBI to demand an intensive investigation of vote rigging and vote suppression in Ohio, Florida and other states.
At 10 a.m., Rev. Jesse Jackson, David Cobb, and Others Lead D.C. Rally for Investigation into Vote Suppression in Lafayette Park, across from the White House (16th & H St., NW)
At noon, ReDefeatBush.com is planning a big protest in the Upper Senate Park.
Let's emulate the heroic Ukrainian people and turn out en masse to reject another stolen election!
Just One Senator!
On January 6 2001, 14 Representatives led by the Congressional Black Caucus filed written motions (prepared by Democrats.com) challenging Florida's Bush Electors, a scene made famous at the beginning of Fahrenheit 9-11. But no Senators were willing to join them, so there was no debate.
Activists must begin lobbying their Senators now to support a challenge to Bush's Ohio Electors on January 6. Click here to eFAX 20 targeted Senators.
You can also write your own letter, using these sample letters.
Below is a list of likely Senators, along with the groups who are lobbying them and any statements they have made. Democratic Underground, the Coalition Against Election Fraud, No Stolen Elections/United Progressives for Democracy, thedeanpeople, and Progressive Democrats of America are also organizing a state-by-state lobbying effort.
AZ: John McCain (R)
AR: Blanche Lincoln (D) - hiding behind GAO investigation bull****
From: Correspondence_Reply@lincoln.senate.gov
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004As you know, a request was recently made by several members of the U.S. House of Representatives for the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to undertake an investigation of the efficacy of voting machines and new technologies used in the 2004 election. Furthermore, it requested an inquiry into how election officials responded to difficulties they encountered as well as what we can do in the future to improve our election systems and administration.
I am concerned by many of the reports included in the request which cited numerous problems with electronic voting machines, lost votes, and excessively long lines at polling places. In this modern, computerized age, there is absolutely no excuse for database errors, lack of polling-place education and training, and equipment malfunctions that resulted in throwing out tens of thousands of legally-cast ballots around the country.
The right to vote freely is the foundation of democracy and we must do all we can to ensure every vote is counted and recorded accurately. That is why I recently helped introduce the Restore Elector Confidence in Our Representative Democracy (RECORD) Act, S. 2313. This Act contains a provision to strengthen security measures for electronic voting devices to prevent outside tampering and requires a paper printout of votes cast at electronic voting machines. This printout will permit a voter to verify the accuracy of his or her ballot before it is cast and would require the voting system to preserve the paper printout of the voter's ballot as the individual permanent paper record. This printout would be preserved at the polling site for use in any audits and recounts.
Like you, I believe voters must have faith in the electoral process for our democracy to succeed. You can be certain that I will monitor the GAO investigation and will continue to support efforts to ensure faith and integrity in our voting systems.
AR: Mark Pryor (D)
CA: Barbara Boxer (D) - Contest The Vote
A spokesman for Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., meanwhile, said the office had received a number of petitions Monday but would not comment on how Boxer intended to vote on the certification.
CO: Ken Salazar (D)
CT: Chris Dodd (D)
CT: Joe Lieberman (D)
DE: Joe Biden (D)
DE: Tom Carper (D)
FL: Bill Nelson (D)
Nelson’s press office, however, says the senator has decided against joining a congressional challenge absent conclusive evidence “to warrant overturning the results.”
“Senator Nelson believes valid concerns have been raised about the conduct of the election, but that no conclusive evidence has been presented to warrant overturning the results,” Nelson press office spokesperson Nicole Berckes told RAW STORY in an email. “Absent such evidence, Senator Nelson doesn’t at this time feel he can support a congressional challenge.”
“Meantime, he’s awaiting the findings by several government agencies that are investigating allegations of voter irregularities,” she added. “And in the upcoming session of Congress, he intends to file legislation to further improve our election process.”
HI: Dan Akaka (D)
HI: Daniel Inouye (D)
IA: Charles Grassley (R)
IA: Tom Harkin (D)
IL: Richard Durbin (D)
In response to an e-mail message from a friend involved in the recount movement, Durbin thanked him for his interest but wrote that with the Ohio vote certified, "It is clear that Sen. Kerry was correct in announcing his concession on November 3rd."
"The basic test hasn't been met," said spokesman Joe Shomaker. "There is no compelling evidence of massive voter fraud." He added that Durbin is a strong proponent of electoral reform and supports abolishing the Electoral College but said that "tilting at the windmills" about November's outcome would not help his credibility on the issue.
No amount of petitions, faxes or phone calls would likely change Durbin's stance, he said.
IL: Barack Obama (D)
Mr. Obama said his staff is reviewing the Ohio resolution, but said he has not decided whether he will sign it. "The election is over and President Bush won fair and square, so I don't think we need to challenge the election, but we continue to have chronic problems in our voting system," he said. "Some of the practices in Ohio were clearly illegal and disenfranchised voters and, let's be real about this, some Republicans were denied their rights to vote as well."
IN: Evan Bayh (D)
IN: Richard Lugar (R)
LA: Mary Landrieu (D)
MA: Ted Kennedy (D)
MA: John Kerry (D) - Coalition Against Election Fraud - MIA
1/4/05 Kerry's two-week overseas trip, which includes stops in war-ravaged Iraq, conveniently allows the defeated Democrat nominee to avoid a potentially awkward moment on the House floor as congressmen vote to certify election results.
``(Kerry) wants to personally thank our troops for their service, focus on the steps that must be taken to achieve success in Iraq and hear from experts in the region,'' Kerry spokeswoman April Boyd said.
``While he conceded the election on Nov. 3, he is still very passionate about having every vote count,'' Boyd said.
MD: Barbara Mikulski (D)
MD: Paul Sarbanes (D)
ME: Susan Collins (R)
ME: Olympia Snowe (R)
MI: Carl Levin (D)
1/5 Oakland Press: Levin representative Vicki Selva said she could not speak for the senator's position on the issue, but said he is familiar with information about irregularities "and is open to any information or accounts or evidence." She said Levin and other senators face legal and other parameters in opposing the certification of electoral votes.
MI: Debbie Stabenow (D)
MN: Mark Dayton (D)
11/9 The election is over, and the voters have spoken. President Bush won a second term conclusively, albeit by a narrow margin of 51% to 48%.
While at Yale, Dayton was a fraternity brother of Bush at Delta Kappa Epsilon, where Bush was President.
MT: Max Baucus (D)
ND: Kent Conrad (D)
ND: Byron Dorgan (D)
NE: Chuck Hagel (R)
NE: Ben Nelson (D)
NJ: Jon Corzine (D) - thedeanpeople - met with staff on Dec. 23
NJ: Frank Lautenberg (D) - thedeanpeople - met with staff on Dec. 23
NM: Jeff Bingaman (D) - no
1/5 ABQJournal: "Sen. Kerry conceded the election on Nov. 3 and does not support Rep. Conyers' effort. I will follow his lead," Bingaman said. "But I do believe it is imperative to thoroughly review election practices in all 50 states to determine how to improve election laws and ensure that all eligible voters are able to cast ballots and that every vote is counted."
NV: Harry Reid (D)
NY: Hillary Clinton (D)
NY: Chuck Schumer (D)
OR: Ron Wyden (D) - Oregon Clean Vote - met with staff
RI: Lincoln Chafee (R)
RI: Jack Reed (D)
SD: Tim Johnson (D)
VT: Jim Jeffords (I) - Vermonters for Voting Integrity - no
1/4/05 I am deeply concerned about reported irregularities and flaws in the 2004 election, and I fully support efforts to find out what went wrong and make it right. A challenge to the Ohio Electors will not fix the problems at hand. We know that such a challenge will not affect the outcome of the election, and I fear it will only further polarize our political landscape. John Kerry has conceded this election, and we must now move forward in a constructive way. I believe the investigation by the non-partisan Goverment Accountability Office will provide needed answers.
In Congress, I will work to reform and clarify existing law, and push for the creation of a paper trail for electronic voting and a national standard for provisional ballots. These reforms are needed to assure that these problems are not repeated in future elections. People must have the utmost confidence that their votes will be counted.
VT: Pat Leahy (D) - Vermonters for Voting Integrity - no
1/05 Letter to constituents:
While I share in the disappointment of many with the results of this election, I was pleased to see such a high number of Americans turn out to vote. Since Senator John Kerry has conceded, I have no intention of contesting the results of the election. That being said, the U.S. Government Accountability Office is conducting a thorough investigation of all allegations concerning voter rolls and registrations, fraud, and election concerns, and I will certainly continue to pay close attention to this important issue.
Many Vermonters, after seeing Michael Moore's movie, "Fahrenheit 9/11," contacted me raising questions and concerns about the 12 members of the Congressional Black Caucus who voiced their opposition to Florida's electors at the Joint Session of Congress convened for the ceremonial reading of the electoral votes. Several key events preceded the January 6, 2001 Joint Session of Congress, including: (1) the U.S. Supreme Court had ended the vote-counting in Florida with its decision in the case of Bush v. Gore, (2) the Electoral College had cast its votes, and (3) the Democratic candidate, Al Gore, had conceded. For an objection to be heard during this process, federal law states that the objection must be in writing and must be signed by at least one Senator and one Representative. Then-Vice President Gore met with the Congressional Black Caucus before January 6 and asked that they not object, telling its members that, had the objection been accepted, it merely would have opened the floor for debate and would not have altered the outcome. Problems with the election had already been debated for months and the decision had already been made, meaning that additional debate would not have changed the outcome of the election.
WA: Maria Cantwell (D)
WA: Patty Murray (D)
WI: Russ Feingold (D)
WI: Herb Kohl (D)
WV: Robert Byrd (D)
WV: Jay Rockefeller (D)
Dear Senator X,
The ideal of one person, one vote and that everyone’s vote is counted has been deeply cherished in the United States of America since the Anti-Slavery Movement, the Women’s Suffrage Movement, the Civil Rights Movement and the expansion of voting to young people. The 2000 and 2004 presidential elections have made it clear that this precious cornerstone of American democracy has been destroyed.
We the undersigned, respectfully request that you take action as a Senator to recognize that the November 2, 2004 presidential election was fraught with voting violations, misconduct of some highly placed election officials, tampering, voter suppression, interference targeted at communities of people of color, students, and low-income people – all of which has raised suspicions in many minds that this was not a free, fair and honest election.
Given the widespread use of electronic voting machines, which are especially liable to malfunction and fraud and leave no trace of how they work nor what data they receive, it is not possible to perform recounts in many states. Hundreds of stories on malfunctions of electronic voting machines and central tabulation machines are appearing in regional news media.
Papers and sworn testimonies by experts state that the chances of the exit polls giving such divergent results from the official tallies are almost a statistical impossibility. Nor is it statistically conceivable that practically all the reported malfunctions and errors would give the advantage to the same candidate. Furthermore, statistical analysis reveals that even the popular vote victory may turn out to be false.
To preserve democracy in the United States of America, we ask that you be open to the concerns of large numbers of Americans. Almost 57,000 complaints have thus far been filed about this election process. Recounts are being demanded in several states. In the critical states of Ohio and Florida, hard evidence of improprieties is accumulating daily, almost always in the same direction and substantial enough to be outcome-determinative.
In Ohio, Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, who is avowedly partisan as the Co-Chair for the Bush/Cheney campaign, has used his official powers illegally to hinder the recount process in Ohio in many ways. He has also refused to cooperate with the Democratic Party members of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee in its hearing headed by Representative Conyers. One example of many equally egregious problems in the Ohio election was a severe shortage of voting machines in precincts of people of color and students at colleges, leading to waits of up to 10 hours for voters to cast their ballot.
We call on you to review the evidence. We are asking you to be our voice. We think this is crucial for the future of democracy and this country and we hope you will respond to our plea.
We are keenly aware that no Senator was willing to stand with the Representatives of the Congressional Black Caucus in their challenge to the presidential election of 2000. In 2004 the evidence of fraud is systemic, stronger, more widespread and believed by millions of Americans. We urge you to be courageous by taking leadership and refusing to certify the results of the presidential election of 2004. We also urge you to voice open support for any formal objections from the House of Representatives and to sign with them if any House members challenge the 2004 presidential election.
Sheila Parks
Dear Senator X,
The most important stories are being ignored by the mainstream media and the silence is, frankly, deafening. A good place to start is http://www.truthinvoting.org/Articles.htm and also our home page links (left margin) at http://www.truthinvoting.org.
We feel that Senator Wyden and staff should at least be aware of the following before the January 6th session:
1. Exit polls in the U.S. showed Kerry winning the election-- we in the U.S. have just as much reason to contest the Nov 2nd election as the Ukranians had to contest their election. See http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/112204MargieBurns.shtml and http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm
2. The chance that the exit polls randomly diverging from reported results in PA, FL and OH is only 1 in 250 million (see Dr. Freeman article in left margin of http://www.truthinvoting.org under "Exit Poll Research"). The actual causes, which are almost certainly non-random, are most likely vote fraud and/or election rigging-- an immediate investigation is definitely warranted. One of Oregon's own scholars, Richard Hayes Phillips offers his analysis/testimony at : http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/WO0412/S00167.htm
3. Triad systems appears to have rigged the Ohio recount with "cheat sheets". http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121604Z.shtml "The Triad Systems representative suggested that since the hand count had to match the machine count exactly, and since it would be hard to memorize the several numbers which would be needed to get the count to come out exactly right, that they should post this series of numbers on the wall where they would not be noticed by observers. He suggested making them look like employee information or something similar. The people doing the hand count could then just report these numbers no matter what the actual count of the ballots revealed. This would then "match" the tabulator report for this precinct exactly. The numbers were apparently the final certified counts for the selected precinct. "
4. The widespread suppression of the black vote in Cleveland and other predominantly black areas in Ohio was criminal and should not be allowed to stand. It seems clear that the imbalanced misallocation of voting machines between Republican and Democratic precincts was designed to suppress black voting. This racist policy must be exposed and corrected immediately, not two years or four years or six years hence.
5. The affidavit of Clinton Curtis, a programmer in Florida, provides shocking indications that electronic vote machine rigging may have been going on since 2000. Congressman Feeney (Jeb Bush's running mate from the 90's) is implicated. This story deserves far, far more attention than it's been getting. From Feeney's hometown paper: http://www.seminolechronicle.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/12/16/41c2fdb042ea1
All of this and more suggests that there are overwhelming problems with the 2004 election and that it's not at all unreasonable to suppose that Kerry may have been the real winner, just as Al Gore was in the 2000 election. We do not wish to wait another 4 years to get another chance at a fair election. We request that the 2004 election be repaired or repeated immediately. We, in the U.S., deserve fair elections just as much as the people of the Ukraine.
Sincerely,
Dear Senator X,
On January 6, 2005 a joint session of Congress will be held in which you will be called upon to vote to certify the 2004 Presidential Election.
Please, please, do NOT vote to certify that election. It was stolen from the American people. The evidence of electoral fraud is overwhelming, specific, and widespread. It is not a scheme cooked up by "sore losers" or the feverish imaginings of paranoid "conspiracy theorists." The vote rigging, voter suppression, and discriminatory, predatory chicanery was very real, and it almost certainly did turn the election in favor of Bush and Cheney, and most likely worked in favor also of dozens of other Republican candidates whose chances of winning in a fair election would have been slim.
The case for election-turning fraud is best established in Ohio, where it has been set on a sound legal footing by an impressive team of pro bono lawyers, Cliff Arnebeck and Susan Truitt among them, wholehearted grassroots progressives, fighting for Ohioans, civil rights, and genuine American interests. The case Moss v. Bush was filed in Federal Court on Dec. 13. The widespread evidence for fraud has been gathered by the courageous and inspiring efforts of everyday Ohioans, and volunteers from other states, for the last six weeks. They have struggled to find justice for the outrages they have suffered before, on, and after election day. Some of them have suffered violence and intimidation (like being run off the road in the dark of night, and having their tires slashed) because they have tried to see a legitimately called statewide recount through to completion.
But the fraud was not limited to Ohio. In all likelihood it spread across the country, wherever local party members involved in elections at precinct or county levels, acting either independently, or in small or larger groups of knowing participants, were willing to cooperate with election systems technicians who had both party and profit motives to rig machines to favor Republican candidates, and principally George Bush.
It is a fact that 80% of the votes cast on 11/2/04 were counted by machines from the two largest vendors, ES&S and Diebold, both of which have very deep and publically documented connections with the the GOP. 80%! Now that is FAR in excess of the margin of difference in nearly every race in this country. Can we really be expected to trust the results of such election?
I am asking you, as one of many thousands, perhaps millions, of Americans, DO NOT trust this election. Please make this courageous and patriotic stand on behalf of democracy and transparent government in the nation. Vote AGAINST certifying the presidential election results on January 6, 2005.
Then, when the uproar settles and the Senate convenes to regroup around this new political reality, a true setback to the rutting, rampaging elephant that is set to stampede through the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Social Security, the US tax code, and public legal protections (so-called "tort reform"), then you can hold your head high, march straight down those Capitol steps, and stand at the microphone before the crowd that has promised to be there on that day.
Tell them that you just bravely stood up for free and fair elections in the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Tell them that you for one won't stand by any longer as Americans of color, as young Americans, as lower and middle class Americans of all ethnicities and backgrounds, get their basic civil rights and even international treaty rights for a fair election trampled on by partisan hacks and corrupt politicians.
Tell them that you for one, even if your party will not, are standing up and speaking out in defense of American democracy, of the principle that America is governed by the people, not by corrupt "leaders" usurping power through sham legal decisions (Florida 2000) and through outright fraud and election theft (Ohio 2004).
Then tell them that you will lead the charge to take back elections from the private corporations. That our citizenship will not be outsourced and digitized in the name of convenience and ease of counting, and so that corporations can profit from our electoral system while they jerryrig their systems to install candidates in office who will support their anti-social and destructive policies of world pillage and private greed.
Tell the Senate NO, you will not certify this sham "election" for George W. Bush, and tell the people YES, you will stand up for democracy in 2005.
Your country needs you. Will you accept the call?
An optimistic fellow American,
Matthew Fox, Ph.D.
Princeton, NJ
Dear Senator X,
Honorable Senators and Representatives of Congress,
History will judge you by your actions, or lack of action on January 6th, 2005...
On that fateful day, I and millions of other patriotic Americans urge you to stand up and do the right thing.
Stand up for Democracy for all parties and for all voters, each of us citizens of this great country. It is our Constitutional Right to Vote, and to have our vote count. And it became your sworn duty to uphold and insure that right, when you took your oath of office:
"I, [name], do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."
You know as well as I do that there were numerous and unprecedented voting irregularities on November 2, and since then during the recounts. (If you didn't know, visit http://miamedia.com/votergate to read what the media is saying and the research has unearthed.)
Millions of tax-paying, loyal, voting Americans are counting on you to do the right thing, and thoroughly investigate the Nov 2 vote, so we will have in our voting system, and our elected officials. And I do mean you.
We call on you and beseech you to do your sworn duty to the American People:
The famous words that Thomas Paine uttered 200 years ago still ring true:
"The right of voting for representatives is the primary right by which all other rights are protected. To take away this right is to reduce a man to slavery. . ."
Will you kowtow to what expediency would have you do, or will you prove to yourself, your family, and your grand children that you are a person of backbone and character like Thomas Paine? Will you go down in history as a Statesman who is admired because you did the right thing when your country called on you, when the people who elected you to office depended on you?
Follow your heart and your conscience.
Stand up for Democracy on January 6, 2005. Challenge and investigate the Nov 2 vote.
Yours sincerely,
Glenn Sanders
December 31, 2004
The Votergate Resource Center
http://miamedia.com/news/2004-12-31.open.letter.congress.html
Press Conference Wednesday, Jan. 5th 2:00 P.M.
National Press Club, Washington, D.C.
Ilene PRoctor
International Public Relations
Press Contact:
Ilene Proctor (310) 271 5857 or (310) 721-2336
Kat L’Estrange (541) 510-5646
BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, BUSH DID NOT WIN THE OHIO OR NATIONAL VOTE.
HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL CHALLENGE.
PRESS CONFERENCE, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, WASHINGTON, D.C.
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 5TH AT 2:00 PM
WHO:
Lead plaintiff, Moss v. Bush, Rev. Bill Moss
Lead trial counsel, Peter Peckarsky
Professor and statistical expert, Ron Baiman, Ph.D.
Publisher and lawyer, Bob Fitrakis
Lawyer, Susan Truitt
Exit polling expert, Jonathan Simon, JD
Senior editor, freepress.org. Harvey Wasserman
Legal statistician, Richard Hayes-Phillips, Ph.D
Director, Progressive Democrats of America, Tim Carpenter
NAACP, National Voter Fund, Greg Moore
Author Warren Linney, MA (The Patriot Test)
WHAT:
• Exit polls did not match the reported vote in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and 7 of 8 other key battleground states
• Voting machines with secret software owned by private, partisan companies subject to manipulation and which deprived citizens of their right to fair and transparent elections
• Uncounted and provisional ballots negatively and disproportionately affected African American voters
• Inexplicable vote disparities
• Voting Rights Act Violations
• Recount did not recount all the votes
• Challenge at January 6 Joint Session of Congress
WHY:
TO PROVIDE FULL BACKGROUND ON KEY ASSERTIONS PRIOR TO THE HISTORIC CONGRESSIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE 2004 VOTE
PARTIAL LIST OF EVIDENCE:
There is clear and compelling evidence that the election was stolen. By examining a very wide range of sworn testimonies from voters, polling officials and others close to the administration of the Nov. 2 election; by statistical analysis of the certified vote by mathematicians, election experts and independent research teams who have conducted detailed studies of the results in Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, and elsewhere; from experts who studied the voting machines, tabulators and other electronic equipment on which a fair vote count has depended; and from a team of attorneys and others who have challenged the Ohio results; the freepress.org investigative team has compiled a portrait of an election whose true outcome must be investigated further by the Congress, the media and all Americans -- because it was almost certainly not an honest victory for George W. Bush.
Crucial flaws in the national vote count, most importantly in the national popular vote, and in Ohio and Florida indicate John Kerry was the actual winner on November 2, as reported in national exit polls. At the very least, the widespread tampering with how the election was conducted, and how Ohio's votes were counted and re-counted, has compromised this nation's historic commitment to free and fair elections.
George W. Bush's ‘victory' appears to have resulted from multiple frauds – a GOP ‘do-whatever it takes' strategy to win the state that swung the election.
The questionable votes far exceed Bush's margin of victory in Ohio.
The Bush-Cheney ‘do what ever it takes" strategy in Ohio covered a very wide range of tactics, from disenfranchisement of minority voters to discarding of ballots to tampered tabulators and much more. Taken as a whole, this compendium of error, fraud, cover-up and contempt indicates that this was not a legitimate election, and is not worthy of being certified by the Congress of the United States.
Thirty disenfranchised voters on the Freedom Winter bus ride from Columbus, Ohio to Washington, D.C. will be present to share their voting horror stories with the media.
WHERE:
National Press Club
Zenger Room
529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor
Washington, DC 20045
202.662.7500
SPONSORED BY: Free Press, _www.freepress.org_ (http://www.freepress.org/) Citizens Alliance for Secure Elections, _www.caseohio.org_ (http://www.caseohio.org/) Progressive Democrats of America, _www.pdamerica.org_ (http://www.pdamerica.org/) We Do Not Concede _www.donotconcede.com_ (http://www.donotconcede.com/)
Republicans don't win elections - they steal them. Sometimes they even admit it!
Rush Limbaugh 9/19/06:
you take a look at the average Democrat voter registration drive, you can take for every hundred thousand voters they register, the cumulative IQ would probably be less than a pencil eraser. So when it comes time for the election, half of them can be fooled in saying, "No, it’s not Election Day. It’s tomorrow, Wednesday." And they show up on Wednesday to vote when the polls are closed, and the Democrats claim a trick has been played on them. That’s how stupid some of their voters are...
You think I’m lying? That happened. Republicans did a dirty trick and sent a flier out a week early and said due to unfortunate circumstances, certain precincts, Election Day will be held on Wednesday, blah, blah, blah, blah. Democrats heard about it, this is such a dirty trick. They were worried because they knew it would work, because half their voters are stupid idiots! They have to be when you look at the way they vote.
.
* In 2000, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris purged 57,700 eligible voters through fraudulent use of "felon" lists - enough to steal the Presidency for George W. Bush.
* In 2004, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell refused to process voter registration forms printed in major newspapers because the paper was too thin. At least 308,000 voters were purged in Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Toledo alone.
* In 2004, a Republican firm called Sproul & Associates paid canvassers to register new voters - and illegally threw away the Democratic forms. (In 2006, a Republican firm called California Grassroots Mobilization was caught filing fraudulent Republican voter registrations.)
* In early 2006, Los Angeles County threw out 43% of voter registration applications because of computer glitches, slight discrepancies in spelling, or missing ID numbers.
Because of Republican efforts to erect barriers to voting, all states now require an ID number on each new registration, such as a drivers license or social security number. If you write that number incorrectly, or if the name on your voter registration form does not match your ID exactly, your registration will be rejected.
More and more voters are going to the polls on Election Day only to discover that their names were removed from the voter lists and they cannot vote.
Diebold
Diebold employed 5 convicted felons as senior managers and developers to help write the central compiler computer code
that counted 50% of the votes in 30 states. http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,61640,00.htmlJeff Dean, Diebold's Senior Vice-President and senior programmer on Diebold's central compiler code, was convicted of 23 counts of felony theft in the first degree. http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf
Diebold Senior Vice-President Jeff Dean was convicted of planting back doors in his software and using a "high degree of
sophistication" to evade detection over a period of 2 years. http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdfDuring the Ohio recount in 2004, Catherine Buchanan says she was told Diebold reprogrammed voting machines while present at her local Board of Elections. "They told us that Diebolt [sic] was coming to reprogram the computer, which doesn't make any sense. I mean, if you're going to calibrate a machine, you calibrate it before you're going to do testing to make sure it's going to be okay," Buchanan asserts.
ES&S
Tom Eschenberger, vice president of ES&S, was fingered by charges of bribery and kickbacks.
Sequoia
Phil Foster and Pasquale Ricci of Sequoia were indicted for paying a large bribe to the Louisiana Commissioner of Elections.
The owner of this same company once tried to bribe a sitting Supreme Court justice.
Sequoia has even been linked to one member of the Gambino crime family.
Democrats.com MediaWatch
Challenge Pro-Republican Media Bias!
The corporate media favor Bush and the right wing, and work against liberals and Democrats. Endless unfair media attacks against the Clintons, President Elect Gore and now Sen. Kerry bias the political process. We don't have to take it any more, but media bias won't fix itself. We must fight back. You can help.
Join the media watchdog team at one of three levels:
1. Rapid Responder - Demand fair(er) media coverage. Even if you don't have a lot of time to spare, join the Rapid Response team. We'll send you Action Items describing media bias with contact information so you can call, fax, and email to demand fair(er) coverage.
2. Media Watch Dog - Help expose and oppose media bias. If you have a few free hours a week join the Media Watch Group(s) for the outlets you know best (see below). Then submit Action Items to your group(s) for distribution to the rapid responder team.
3. Media Watch Leader - Take Charge at the highest level of Media Watch. If you have a free hour every other day you can apply to join the Leadership Team. Tell us why you want to help lead our efforts against media bias, your experience and other relevant information. We'll consider your application promptly. If accepted, you'll become a leader in the fight against media bias by moderating the groups, formulating and distributing Action Items, and more!
MediaWatch is focused like a laser-beam on one task: leading "rapid response" efforts exposing and opposing media bias against Democrats. We have immediate and significant impact holding the media accountable through specific actions, not discussions. We maintain high standards for quality and accuracy as we expose and document right wing media bias, act directly against media bias, and maintain pressure to end anti-Democratic bias.
Join the Rapid Response team to start. Help out more by joining the Media Watch Main organizational group and the group(s) monitoring your primary news source(s), the ones you know best. Apply to join the Leadership Team and help moderate the groups, direct our organization and more. Sign up for the Media Bias MeetUp. Fight media bias.
|
Who Owns the Media? |
|
Contact Information: Print and Television |
| ABC - News | Good Morning America | World News Tonight Nightline | 20/20 | 20/20 Downtown | Primetime World News Now | Weekend News | This Week Other | Website | Individual Contacts Main Phone: (212) 456-1000 | Fax: (212) 456-5962 D.C. Bureau phone: 202-222-7777 ABC World News Tonight phone: 212-456-4040 Nightline phone: 202-222-7000 147 Columbus Ave New York, NY 10023 47 W. 66 St., New York, NY 10023 |
|
Associated Press - Phone: 212-621-1500 | Fax: 212-621-7523 |
| Arizona Republic - Web Form | E-mail | Website | Individual Contacts Phone: (602) 444-8000 | Fax: (602) 444-8933 200 E Van Buren St Phoenix, AZ 85004-2238 |
| Atlanta Journal-Const. - Web Form | E-mail | Website | Individual Contacts Phone: (404) 526-5151 | Fax: (404) 526-5610 72 Marietta St NW Atlanta, GA 30303 |
| Baltimore Sun - Web Form | Email | Website | Individual Contacts Phone: (410) 332-6000 | Fax: (410) 752-6049 501 N Calvert St Baltimore, MD 21202-3604 |
| Boston Globe - Web Form | Email | Website | Individual Contacts Ombudsman: Christine Chinlund Phone: 617-929-3020 / 3022 Phone: (617) 929-2000 | Fax: (617) 929-2098 135 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125 |
|
Boston Herald - Web Form | Email | Website | Individual Contacts |
|
C-SPAN - (202) 737-3220 | Viewer Services: (765) 464-3080 |
| CBS - CBS Evening News | The Early Show | 60 Minutes II 48 Hours | Face The Nation | CBS News Phone: 212-975-4321 | Fax: 212-975-1893 D.C. Bureau phone: 202-457-4385 CBS Evening News with Dan Rather: Phone: 212-975-3691 or 202-457-4385 | Fax: 212-975-1893 The Early Show: Phone: 212-975-2824 Fax: 212-975-7133 or 212-975-2033 60 Minutes: Phone: 212-975-2006 | Fax: 212-757-6975 555 W. 57th St., New York, NY 10019-2985 60 Minutes II: Phone: 212-975-6200 524 W. 57 St., New York, NY 10019 |
| Chicago Sun Times - letters@suntimes.com |
| Chicago Tribune - ctc-TribLetter@Tribune.com |
| Cleveland Plain Dealer - Dealerletters@plaind.com |
| CNBC - General Information Phone: (201) 585-2622 | Fax: (201) 583-5453 2200 Fletcher Ave. Fort Lee, NJ 07024 |
| CNN - General Feedback Phone: 404-827-1500 | Fax: 404-827-1906 One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366 CNN Washington Bureau 820 First St. N.E., Washington, DC 20002 Phone: 202-898-7900 | Fax: 202-898-7923 Crossfire Phone: 202-898-7655 | Fax: 202-898-7611 Larry King Live Phone: 202-898-7690 | Fax: 202-898-7686 |
| Dallas Morning News - letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com |
| Detroit Free Press - letters@freepress.com |
| FOX News - Comments | Special Report with Brit Hume FOX Report with Shepard Smith | O'Reilly Factor Hannity & Colmes | On the Record with Greta Phone: (212) 301-3000 | Fax: (212) 301-4229 Email: comments@foxnews.com 1211 Ave. of the Americas, New York, NY 10036 |
| Houston Chronicle - viewpoints@chron.com |
| Los Angeles Times - letters@latimes.com Phone: 800-528-4637 or 213-237-5000 | Fax: 213-237-4712 202 West First Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 |
| Miami Herald - HeraldEd@herald.com |
| MSNBC - World | Hardball with Chris Matthews | MSNBC Reports Phone: (201) 583-5000 | Fax: (201) 583-5453 Email: world@msnbc.com One MSNBC Plaza, Secaucus, NJ 07094 |
| National Public Radio All Things Considered | Morning Edition Ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin | Talk Of The Nation Phone: 202-513-2000 | Fax: 202-513-3329 635 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20001-3753 |
| NBC - Nightly News with Tom Brokaw | NBC News' Today | Dateline NBC Phone: 212-664-4444 | Fax: 212-664-4426 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112 Washington Bureau Phone: 202-885-4200 | Fax: 202-362-2009 4001 Nebraska Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20016 NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw: Phone: 212-664-4971 or 202-885-4259 | Fax: 202-362-2009 NBC News' Today: Phone: 212-664-4602 / 202-885-4231 | Fax: 212-664-4426 Dateline NBC: Phone: 212-664-7501 | Fax: 212-664-7864 |
| New York Daily News - voicers@edit.nydailynews.com |
| New York Times - letters@nytimes.com Phone: 212-556-1234 | Fax: 212-556-3690 D.C. Bureau phone: 202-862-0300 229 W. 43rd St., New York, NY 10036 |
| Newark Star Ledger - http://penn.nj.com |
| Newsday - letters@newsday.com |
| Newsweek - Letters to the Editor Phone: 212-445-4000 | Fax: 212-445-5068 251 W 57th Street, New York, NY 10019 |
| PBS - Phone: 703-739-5000 | Fax: 703-739-8458 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314 The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer: Phone: 703-998-2150 3620 South 27th St., Arlington, VA 22206 All Things Considered: Phone: 202-513-2110 Morning Edition: Phone: 202-513-2150 | Fax: 202-513-3329 |
| Philadelphia Inquirer - editor@phillynews.com |
| San Diego Union-Tribune - letters@uniontrib.com |
| San Francisco Chronicle - letters@sfchronicle.com |
| San Jose Mercury - letters@sjmercury.com |
| Seattle Post-Intelligencer - editpage@seattlepi.com |
| Seattle Times - opinion@seattletimes.com |
| St. Louis Post-Dispatch - letters@post-dispatch.com |
| Time Magazine - Letters to the Editor Phone: 212-522-1212 | Fax: 212-522-0323 Time & Life Bldg., Rockefeller Center, New York, NY 10020 |
| U.S. News & World Report - Letters to the Editor Phone: 202-955-2000 | Fax: 202-955-2049 1050 Thomas Jefferson St., Washington, DC 20007 |
| USA Today - editor@usatoday.com Phone: 800-872-0001 or 703-276-3651 | Fax: 703-247-3108 1000 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22229 |
|
Washington Post - letters@washpost.com | Ombudsman |
| More: CSPAN's List | NewsLink's List | CapWiz Look Up |
| CNN | MSNBC | FOX | |
| 6a | John Roberts Kiran Chetry |
Joe Scarborough Mika Brz |
Dufuses |
| 9a | Mika Brz | ||
| 4p | Wolf Blitzer | Laura Ingraham | |
| 5p | Wolf Blitzer | ||
| 6p | Brit Hume | ||
| 7p | |||
| 8p | Mrs. Dan Senor | Keith Olbermann | Bill O'Reilly |
| 9p | Larry King | Dan Abrams | Sean Hannity Alan Colmes |
| 10p | Anderson Cooper |
A. These customer-respecting advertisers stopped supporting Glenn Beck's hate speech.
Binder & Binder
Clorox
Closing.com
CVS Caremark
Kraft
UPS Stores
B. These customer-hating advertisers continue to support Glenn Beck's hate speech.
L.L. Bean publicaffairs@llbean.com
As you may or may not know, I made a documentary film entitled THIS DIVIDED STATE. The film chronicles Michael Moore's controversial visit to Utah Valley State College 2 weeks before the 2004 presidential election. Protests, bribery, and death threats descended upon the school in a fanatical effort to cancel Moore's speech.
One of the key players of the documentary was Joe Vogel. Joe was the Student Body Vice President and was ultimately responsible for inviting Michael Moore. In the end, Joe was forced to resign from his office and lost a scholarship because of his involvement in the Moore fiasco. As facts began to emerge about Joe's resignation, it became clear that it was because of a "tell all" book that Joe was writing that caused many people in the college administration and Utah legislator to get extremely angry at Joe. They asked Joe to "vow on oath of silence" about the book. Joe said "no". They said, "You must resign".
You see, Joe had been present in many secret meetings and had heard first hand the corruption that lied under the surface of the quiet Utah town of Orem. Now, that book, full of explosive facts and extremely frightening accounts is hitting book shelves nationwide. Joe has called it FREE SPEECH 101. And he's naming names and pulling no punches.
Not only does it talk about the Moore controversy, but expounds on the growing trend of colleges and universites becoming corporations owned and controled by those with money, power, and agendas. A very important book...
Check out Joe's BLOG here.
Check out the website for FREE SPEECH 101.
Washington Journal journal@c-span.org
ABC’s This Week http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3428174
CBS Face the Nation http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/feedback/fb_news_form.shtml
Chris Matthews http://www.thechrismatthewsshow.com/html/contact.html
CNN Late Edition http://tr_1212764038313/
Fox News Sunday fns@foxnews.com
NBC’s Meet the Press http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6872152/
The Problem (9/12/08):
The Opportunity: To expose the lies and brand McCain-Palin as liars
The Challenge: To expose the lies and brand McCain-Palin as liars
FreeRepublic.com is a borderline criminal organization that tolerates activities that are un-democratic and un-American and should not be tolerated by anyone who believes in freedom.
Death threats - usually barely disguised as "jokes"
Hit lists - designated "enemies" in wartime
"Freeping" - interfering with legitimate communications by overwhelming communications lines
Infiltrating or manipulating liberal groups
Denial of Service Attacks
Reagan Administration Corruption (source: Liberals Like Christ)
Conservative Republicans are such paragons of virtue and truth that they claim that Bill Clinton's administration was "the most corrupt administration in American history" despite the fact that history contradicts everything about that statement.
Ronald Reagan's Criminal Administration: "By the end of his term, 138 Reagan administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever."
|